150 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
0e376f4fe2 feat(whatsapp-call): support BSUID callers for inbound voice calls (#14743)
## Linear Ticket
-
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7276/bsuid-support-to-whatsapp-voice-calling

## Description

Keeps WhatsApp voice calls in the same thread as the chat when a caller
has adopted a **WhatsApp username** and hidden their phone number.
This makes the inbound-call path BSUID-aware, reusing the same
identifier the messaging pipeline keys on so calls land on the existing
`ContactInbox`/conversation.

## Type of change

- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

-  Locally via UI

## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-07-21 16:19:53 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub ae49af354d fix: serialize multimodal Captain session content (#15096)
Captain now saves agent session records when a user message includes an
image. The saved record keeps the image URL and excludes downloaded
image bytes, so image replies no longer report a JSON serialization
error after delivery.

Fixes:
https://chatwoot-p3.sentry.io/issues/7618423184/?alert_rule_id=13673680&alert_type=issue&notification_uuid=d22a7ab9-95d6-4bba-85e0-733a28466775&project=6382945

## Root cause

RubyLLM downloads image attachments and caches the binary bytes inside
`RubyLLM::Content`. `SessionCaptureService` passed the live object to
the `run_context` JSON column. Rails then tried to encode the cached
JPEG bytes as UTF-8 and raised `JSON::GeneratorError`.

The error did not block replies, handoffs, or credit updates because
session capture rescues its own failures. The failed write meant that
Chatwoot lost the agent session record for the response.

## How to reproduce

1. Send an image to a Captain V2 assistant.
2. Let RubyLLM load the image during the model request.
3. Save the resulting conversation history in an agent session.
4. Observe the JSON encoding error when Rails reaches the cached image
bytes.

## What changed

`SessionCaptureService` now converts `RubyLLM::Content` to its JSON safe
hash before saving the current turn. The hash contains the message text
and attachment URL without the cached bytes. Other message content is
unchanged.

The focused service spec covers a cached JPEG byte payload and passes
with 12 examples. RuboCop reports no offenses in the changed service and
spec.
2026-07-21 13:04:12 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 9749a3dc96 feat: capture captain sessions for v2 assistant responses [CW-7485] (#14971)
Records a `Captain::Session` row for every Captain V2 assistant response
delivered in a conversation, so we can show how a response was generated
and report on credit, FAQ, and document usage. Stacked on #14970 (the
`captain_sessions` model).

## What changed

- `FaqLookupTool` now records the retrieved FAQ ids (and their backing
document ids) into the shared run state, accumulated across tool calls.
- `AgentRunnerService` exposes the raw ai-agents run result via
`last_run_result`; the `generate_response` return shape is unchanged, so
the playground path is unaffected.
- New `Captain::Assistant::SessionCaptureService` builds the session:
scenario resolved from the answering agent name, model from
`assistant.agent_model`, token usage plus the trimmed current-turn
conversation history stored in `run_context`.
- `ResponseBuilderJob` captures after delivery: `credits_consumed`
mirrors the actual charge (1.0 for a billed response, 0.0 for handoffs,
where the session points at the customer-facing handoff message).
Capture runs outside the delivery transaction and swallows its own
failures, so a logging bug can never block or roll back a customer
reply.

V1 responses and copilot are out of scope; copilot capture comes next.

## How to test

On an account with `captain_integration_v2` enabled and an inbox
connected to an assistant with approved FAQs, send a customer message on
a pending conversation. After the assistant replies, a
`Captain::Session` row should exist with the conversation as subject,
the reply message as result, the FAQs/documents used, and the run
context for that turn. Asking for a human agent should produce a
zero-credit session pointing at the handoff message.

<img width="2428" height="1058" alt="CleanShot 2026-07-15 at 17 25
40@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d8e44923-c17b-494f-8c33-c8fa4219438c"
/>
2026-07-16 18:20:44 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 6d38b4d39c fix(captain): improve complex migration instructions (#15002)
Improves Captain V1 → V2 migration for complex legacy instructions so
mandatory triggers, workflows, language rules, and escalation behavior
remain active while query-dependent product knowledge is prepared as
pending FAQ candidates.

## What changed

- Added explicit preservation rules for mandatory triggers, verification
steps, escalation conditions, exceptions, and language behavior.
- Added an auditor that checks the draft and fixes any issues before
manual review.
- Kept the existing migration application contract and schema limits
unchanged
- Added focused regression coverage for the complex-prompt classifier
contract.

## How to reproduce

Generate a migration draft for an assistant with dense legacy
instructions containing mandatory handoff triggers, verification rules,
product facts, and multi-step workflows. The resulting draft should keep
actions active, place query-dependent facts in FAQ candidates, and avoid
silently dropping or reversing source requirements.

Focused Captain migration specs and RuboCop checks pass locally.
2026-07-15 14:51:51 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 9c444315a6 feat: add api_and_webhooks feature flag reconciled from billing plan (#14972)
This introduces a new `api_and_webhooks` account feature flag that will
control access to the token-authenticated API and account webhooks. The
flag is part of the Startup plan features, so paid plans — including
trials of paid plans — get it through the billing reconcile, while
accounts on the default (Hacker) plan don't, with
`manually_managed_features` available as a per-account override. The
flag defaults to enabled, and nothing enforces it yet, so this PR is
behavior-neutral — enforcement lands in a follow-up.

## What changed

- Added `api_and_webhooks` to `features.yml` (first flag on the
`feature_flags_ext_1` column, default enabled).
- Added the flag to `STARTUP_PLAN_FEATURES` in
`Enterprise::Billing::ReconcilePlanFeaturesService`, so all paid tiers
get it and the default plan loses it on reconcile.
- Added the flag to the manually manageable features list so it can be
granted per account via Super Admin.

```rb
# Enables the api_and_webhooks feature for all existing accounts and marks it
# as manually managed so cloud billing reconciles never strip it.
#
# NOT committed to source control — run manually on production.
#
# Usage:
#   bundle exec rails runner enable_api_and_webhooks.rb
#   ACCOUNT_ID=123 bundle exec rails runner enable_api_and_webhooks.rb
#
# Idempotent: accounts already grandfathered are skipped; safe to re-run.

probe = Internal::Accounts::InternalAttributesService.new(Account.new)
abort 'api_and_webhooks is not in valid_feature_list — deploy the feature flag PR first.' unless probe.valid_feature_list.include?('api_and_webhooks')

account_id = ENV.fetch('ACCOUNT_ID', nil)
accounts = account_id.present? ? Account.where(id: account_id) : Account.all

abort "Account with ID #{account_id} not found" if account_id.present? && accounts.empty?

total = accounts.count
puts "Grandfathering api_and_webhooks for #{total} account(s)..."
puts "Started at: #{Time.current}"

updated = 0
skipped = 0
errored = 0

accounts.find_each(batch_size: 500) do |account|
  service = Internal::Accounts::InternalAttributesService.new(account)
  features = service.manually_managed_features

  if features.include?('api_and_webhooks') && account.feature_enabled?('api_and_webhooks')
    skipped += 1
  else
    service.manually_managed_features = features + ['api_and_webhooks'] unless features.include?('api_and_webhooks')
    account.enable_features!('api_and_webhooks')
    updated += 1
  end

  processed = updated + skipped + errored
  puts "Processed #{processed}/#{total}..." if (processed % 1000).zero?
rescue StandardError => e
  errored += 1
  puts "Account #{account.id}: FAILED - #{e.message}"
end

puts "Done! Updated: #{updated}, Skipped: #{skipped}, Errored: #{errored}, Total: #{total}"
```
2026-07-13 18:20:36 +05:30
8fc5c7a5c8 feat: add captain general guidelines migration helpers (#14909)
This PR adds internal tooling and planning docs for migrating existing
Captain assistant instructions into the new General Guidelines
structure.


**Summary**

This PR adds a controlled migration path for moving existing Captain V1
assistant instructions into the structured Captain architecture.

It introduces a classifier that reads the current `config.instructions`
and produces reviewed migration drafts with separate sections for:

- assistant description / business context
- response guidelines
- guardrails
- scenario candidates
- conversation messages
- FAQ/document candidates
- needs-review items

The migration is intentionally staged. It only targets V1-style
assistants that still have custom instructions, are connected to
inboxes, and do not already have structured response guidelines,
guardrails, or scenario records.

When applied, the task writes the extracted business context to the
assistant description, response guidelines to `response_guidelines`,
guardrails to `guardrails`, and stores scenario candidates / FAQ
candidates / review notes under `config["assistant_migration"]`.
Scenario candidates are also flattened into response guidelines for now
so customer behavior is preserved before we create real
`Captain::Scenario` records in a later rollout.

The applier stores the original assistant values under migration
metadata so conversation message config can be restored if needed. It
does not create scenario records yet.

**How to generate drafts**

For specific assistant IDs:

```bash
bundle exec rake captain:assistant_migration:generate \
  IDS=546,636,819 \
  LIMIT=0 \
  OUTPUT=tmp/captain_migration_drafts.jsonl
```

For the first 50 eligible assistants:

```bash
bundle exec rake captain:assistant_migration:generate \
  OUTPUT=tmp/captain_migration_drafts.jsonl
```

For all eligible assistants:

```bash
bundle exec rake captain:assistant_migration:generate \
  LIMIT=0 \
  OUTPUT=tmp/captain_migration_drafts.jsonl
```

**How to apply drafts**

Dry run first:

```bash
bundle exec rake captain:assistant_migration:apply \
  INPUT=tmp/captain_migration_drafts.jsonl \
  DRY_RUN=true
```

Apply changes:

```bash
bundle exec rake captain:assistant_migration:apply \
  INPUT=tmp/captain_migration_drafts.jsonl \
  DRY_RUN=false
```

**How to restore conversation messages**

If extracted `welcome_message`, `handoff_message`, or
`resolution_message` need to be reverted to their pre-migration values:

```bash
bundle exec rake captain:assistant_migration:restore_messages \
  IDS=546,636,819 \
  DRY_RUN=true
```

```bash
bundle exec rake captain:assistant_migration:restore_messages \
  IDS=546,636,819 \
  DRY_RUN=false
```

**Notes**

- `LIMIT=0` means no limit.
- `generate` overwrites the output file.
- The apply task skips assistants that are no longer V1 migration
candidates.
- This PR does not create `Captain::Scenario` records; scenario
candidates are staged in assistant config for a future migration.

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: aakashb95 <aakashbakhle@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aakash Bakhle <48802744+aakashb95@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-13 14:56:09 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub d57354c8b5 feat: tighten conversation FAQ generation prompt (#14957)
Tightens the resolved-conversation FAQ generator so it only proposes
durable, reusable FAQ candidates supported by human support-agent
messages. The implementation now sends a conversation-FAQ-specific
transcript to the LLM: customer messages plus real human support-agent
messages only, excluding bot, private, activity, and template messages.

## Closes

-
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7494/tighten-conversation-faq-generation-prompt

## What changed

- Added a human-only transcript builder in `ConversationFaqService`
instead of using the generic `conversation.to_llm_text` output.
- Excluded bot/agent-bot messages before the LLM call, which removes the
main bot-line leakage class deterministically.
- Preserved native-channel human replies where outgoing messages are
stored as `external_echo` without a `User` sender.
- Kept a prompt decision gate requiring each FAQ to be backed by a
complete public human-agent answer.
- Added generic no-FAQ classes for spam, wrong-service conversations,
private account/payment/order/certificate/troubleshooting cases, support
workflow mechanics, and direct-link/file/quote outputs.
- Added a separate `conversation_faq_generation` model route defaulting
to `gpt-5.2`, while keeping `document_faq_generation` on its existing
`gpt-4.1-mini` default. Conversation FAQ generation passes that feature
default ahead of the legacy global `CAPTAIN_OPEN_AI_MODEL` setting
unless an account-level override is configured.
- Kept the prompt domain-neutral so it can still generate reusable
product, service, policy, setup, and process FAQs outside SaaS contexts.

## Sampling notes

- Production Langfuse traces showed `llm.captain.conversation_faq` calls
using `gpt-4.1` in the sampled account set.
- Locally, `Llm::FeatureRouter.resolve(feature:
'conversation_faq_generation')` now resolves to `gpt-5.2`.
- Reviewed recent production `llm.captain.conversation_faq` traces
across 13+ accounts in compact form.
- Replayed 20 full traces across 10 accounts/domains, including
education, hosting, retail/auto, APIs, logistics, tax/fiscal workflows,
and Chatwoot account 1.
- Explicit `gpt-5.2` replay with human-only conversation history
returned no FAQ for 15/20 traces.
- A comparison replay with `gpt-4.1-mini` returned no FAQ for only 7/20
traces, bringing back several private/order/payment/support-workflow
cases.
- Remaining non-empty `gpt-5.2` outputs are now mostly
borderline/possibly useful human-agent-derived FAQs rather than obvious
bot-sourced answers.

## How to test

- Resolve conversations where the answer came only from the bot; no
pending FAQ should be generated.
- Resolve spam, unrelated, wrong-service, or private
payment/order/account conversations; no pending FAQ should be generated.
- Resolve conversations that require account/order/payment/login/private
verification or a human handoff; no pending FAQ should be generated.
- Resolve a conversation where a human agent gives a stable, reusable
help-center answer; the generated pending FAQ should be general and
self-contained.
2026-07-09 17:47:47 +05:30
Sony MathewandGitHub 66cfb26c77 feat: Add unread count filters feature flag (1/6) (#14885)
## Description

Adds the account-level `unread_count_for_filters` feature flag as the
dark-launch gate for filtered sidebar unread counts. This reuses the
deprecated `quoted_email_reply` flag slot, resets the reused bit for
existing accounts, and removes stale defaults so new accounts do not
reference the old flag.

This also adds the feature where we are now calculating the unread counts for built in filters like mentions, participating and unattended along with unread count for saved filters/folders.

Closes
[CW-7262](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7262/unread-counts-for-filters-folders)

## Type of change

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
2026-07-08 23:50:40 +05:30
Sojan JoseandGitHub 0e07a27c74 fix: enforce inbox limits at model level (#14949)
Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7559/inbox-limit-abuse

## Why

The regular inbox API checked limits in the controller, but WhatsApp
embedded signup creates inboxes through a service using `Inbox.create!`.
That let Enterprise account inbox limits be skipped for embedded signup.

## What this change does

- Adds an Inbox create-time validation hook in OSS and implements the
limit check in the Enterprise Inbox module.
- Removes the duplicate controller/helper limit check so the model is
the single enforcement point.
- Preserves the existing `402 Payment Required` API response for account
inbox limit failures.
- Keeps updates to existing inboxes allowed when an account is already
at its inbox limit.

## Validation

- `bundle exec rspec
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/inboxes_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/models/inbox_spec.rb`
2026-07-08 13:18:07 +04:00
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 83dda621c5 feat: default new accounts to captain v2 (#14917)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

defaults new accounts to captain v2

## Type of change

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

locally and specs

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-07-07 16:21:51 +05:30
Tanmay Deep SharmaandGitHub 11deffdd5d feat: billing brl pix new users (#14617)
## Linear ticket
- https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7253/billing-brl-pix-new-users

## Description

New accounts that sign up in Brazilian Portuguese are now billed in BRL
instead of USD. Their Stripe customer is created with a Brazil address
and Portuguese locale (so the Stripe portal offers Real prices and PIX),
and the AI credit top-up flow shows packages priced in the account's
billing currency. Currency support is config-driven, so adding another
currency later is a configuration change rather than a code change.


## Type of change

- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

- https://www.loom.com/share/c8d3d08c1b844ed6b820438d4209491a

## Screenshot
<img width="904" height="440" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6f19fad8-e6af-46ea-b99f-b0265bb9eeec"
/>


## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-07-06 16:35:38 +05:30
6c9efc4e92 fix: assign outbound voice call conversation to the calling agent (#14906)
Outbound voice calls were being auto-assigned to the wrong agent. When
an agent placed an outbound call, the conversation was created without
an assignee, so inboxes with auto-assignment enabled would round-robin
it to a different agent instead of keeping it with the person who
actually made the call. This made it hard to tell which agent was on an
active call.

## What changed

- Set the calling agent as the conversation's assignee when creating an
outbound voice call conversation.
- This prevents the generic auto-assignment handler from treating the
conversation as unassigned and reassigning it.
- Added specs covering the assignment, including a regression case with
inbox auto-assignment enabled.

**Note:** this applies to newly placed calls; it does not retroactively
fix conversations that were already mis-assigned.

---------

Co-authored-by: Tanmay Deep Sharma <tanmaydeepsharma21@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tanmay Deep Sharma <32020192+tds-1@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-02 16:06:11 +05:30
7bf76057c2 fix: SLA handling for blocked contacts (#14861)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Blocked contacts are now excluded from SLA assignment, processing,
reports, and conversation SLA UI while they remain blocked. Existing SLA
records are preserved, and SLA behavior resumes if the contact is
unblocked.

Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7435/sla-should-not-trigger-for-blocked-contacts

## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

- `bundle exec rspec spec/enterprise/models/conversation_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/models/applied_sla_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/enterprise/action_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/sla/evaluate_applied_sla_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/jobs/sla/process_account_applied_slas_job_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/applied_slas_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/conversations_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/controllers/enterprise/api/v1/accounts/conversations_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/presenters/conversations/event_data_presenter_spec.rb` —
78 examples, 0 failures
- `bundle exec rubocop
enterprise/app/controllers/api/v1/accounts/applied_slas_controller.rb
enterprise/app/jobs/sla/process_account_applied_slas_job.rb
enterprise/app/models/applied_sla.rb
enterprise/app/models/enterprise/concerns/conversation.rb
enterprise/app/presenters/enterprise/conversations/event_data_presenter.rb
enterprise/app/services/enterprise/action_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/sla/evaluate_applied_sla_service.rb
lib/tasks/apply_sla.rake
spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/applied_slas_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/conversations_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/controllers/enterprise/api/v1/accounts/conversations_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/jobs/sla/process_account_applied_slas_job_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/models/applied_sla_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/models/conversation_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/presenters/conversations/event_data_presenter_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/enterprise/action_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/sla/evaluate_applied_sla_service_spec.rb` — no
offenses
- `pnpm exec vitest --no-watch --no-cache --no-coverage
app/javascript/dashboard/components/widgets/conversation/specs/ConversationCard.spec.js`
— 2 tests passed
- `pnpm exec eslint
app/javascript/dashboard/components-next/Conversation/ConversationCard/CardMessagePreviewWithMeta.vue
app/javascript/dashboard/components-next/Conversation/ConversationCard/ConversationCardExpanded.vue
app/javascript/dashboard/components/widgets/conversation/ConversationCard.vue
app/javascript/dashboard/components/widgets/conversation/ConversationHeader.vue
app/javascript/dashboard/components/widgets/conversation/specs/ConversationCard.spec.js`
— passed with existing raw-text warnings in `ConversationHeader.vue`
- `git diff --cached --check` — clean

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-07-02 14:16:29 +05:30
Tanmay Deep SharmaandGitHub a3c7f3b204 fix: finalize WhatsApp calls when terminate webhook overtakes connect (#14836)
## Description

Some inbound WhatsApp calls stayed stuck in "ringing" forever. When a
caller hung up within ~1s of dialing, Meta delivered the terminate
webhook before the connect webhook. The terminate arrived with no call
record yet and was dropped, then connect created the call in ringing
with nothing left to close it. These calls now correctly land as missed
(no_answer), and an agent who taps Accept on a call that already ended
gets a clean "call ended" instead of a generic error.

## Type of change

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

- local UI testing

## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-07-02 13:58:36 +05:30
49b0ab0e1f fix: Consider business hours when computing SLA breaches (#13392)
- Fixes SLA breach computation to respect the "Only during business
hours" setting
- Backend now pre-computes SLA deadlines, simplifying frontend logic

## How it works

Before: SLA deadlines were calculated using wall-clock time, ignoring
business hours.

After: When an SLA policy has "Only during business hours" enabled and
the inbox has working hours configured, the deadline is calculated by
adding threshold time only during business hours.


**How you check if a conversation has a SLA hit or miss?**

<img width="474" height="510" alt="Screenshot 2026-01-28 at 7 06 53 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/54ec8581-18b8-45c6-a356-de8c778ea78d"
/>


**Example:**
- Conversation created: Friday 4:30 PM
- FRT threshold: 1 hour
- Business hours: Mon-Fri 9 AM - 5 PM

| | Breach time |
|--|--|
| Before | Friday 5:30 PM |
| After | Monday 9:30 AM |

## Test plan

- [x] Create an SLA policy with "Only during business hours" enabled
- [x] Configure inbox with business hours (e.g., Mon-Fri 9-5)
- [x] Conversation created during business hours
  - Create a conversation on Wednesday 10:00 AM UTC
- Expected: FRT deadline shows Wednesday 12:00 PM UTC (2 business hours
later)
- [x] Conversation created before business hours
  - Create a conversation on Wednesday 7:00 AM UTC
- Expected: FRT deadline shows Wednesday 11:00 AM UTC (counting starts
at 9 AM)
- [x] Conversation created after business hours
  - Create a conversation on Wednesday 6:00 PM UTC
- Expected: FRT deadline shows Thursday 11:00 AM UTC (counting starts
next day 9 AM)
- [x] Conversation created on weekend
  - Create a conversation on Saturday 10:00 AM UTC
  - Expected: FRT deadline shows Monday 11:00 AM UTC (skips weekend)
- [x] Threshold spans weekend
  - Create a conversation on Friday 4:00 PM UTC with 2-hour FRT
- Expected: FRT deadline shows Monday 10:00 AM UTC (1h Friday + 1h
Monday)
- [x] SLA without business hours
  - Create an SLA policy with only_during_business_hours: false
  - Create a conversation on Friday 4:00 PM UTC with 2-hour FRT
  - Expected: FRT deadline shows Friday 6:00 PM UTC (wall-clock time)
- [x] All Day marked as closed_all_day
  - Create a conversation on Tuesday 4:00 PM UTC with 2-hour FRT
  - Expected: FRT deadline shows Thursday 10:00 AM UTC
- [x] All Day marked as open_all_day
  - Create a conversation on Saturday 10:00 AM UTC with 2-hour FRT
  - Expected: FRT deadline shows Saturday 12:00 PM UTC 
- [x] UI displays correct countdown
  - Verify conversation card shows correct SLA timer
  - Verify timer shows flame icon when breached
  - Verify timer shows alarm icon when within threshold
  - Time updates automatically when time passes
- [x] Verify the breach with a different timezone than your local
timezone

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-02 13:33:22 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 926a9d8a69 fix(captain): default temperature to 0.5 and remove UI control (#14879)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

- Default temperature to 0.5 and remove UI control
- No migrations needed for existing accounts, their current settings are
preserved

## Type of change

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

locally and spec

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-06-30 15:14:03 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub ce2e10e89e fix: tighten captain v2 (#14883)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Tightens v2 prompt and config to match v1

## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)


## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
locally

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-06-30 14:20:54 +05:30
7522457740 feat: v2 - generations get trace level attributes (#14878)
# Pull Request Template

~~Note: merge only after https://github.com/chatwoot/ai-agents/pull/74
has been merged~~

## Description

Before:
<img width="436" height="617" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fd5be8dc-abab-4e01-b251-366648b998ea"
/>


After:
<img width="446" height="577" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8d96d2f2-c126-4cca-b3a2-f2a62b204adf"
/>


<img width="441" height="558" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/89da4157-48a5-4fdc-9c67-9bf987e31638"
/>



## Type of change

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

locally and specs

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
2026-06-29 13:50:17 +05:30
Sojan JoseandGitHub d0b1c055e8 chore: Track cloud plan activation conversions (#14834)
## Summary
- track cloud plan activation conversions when an attributed account
moves from the configured default cloud plan to a paid plan
- use the Stripe webhook event time as the activation timestamp so the
30-day signup attribution window reflects the actual upgrade event
- send the Stripe subscription amount and currency for the conversion
value
- mark the account attribution after enqueueing so later plan updates do
not send duplicate activation conversions

## Notes
- Marketing tracker: https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/MAR-113
- Cloud implementation: https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/LEA-34
- Stripe billing stays responsible for subscription state and value
calculation.
- Cloud plan activation conversion tracking is handled by a small
dedicated service that owns the activation rule, duplicate marker, and
conversion enqueue.
- Website attribution cookie capture remains separate in the marketing
attribution service.
- There is no frontend change and no new user-facing configuration.
- Conversion upload still no-ops outside Chatwoot Cloud and when
attribution has no supported click identifier.
2026-06-25 18:41:43 -07:00
Sony MathewandGitHub cf134deb37 fix: Preserve Captain LLM defaults (#14858)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Adjusts the Captain LLM feature defaults after feature routing so the
defaults stay intentional and avoid unintended high-cost model upgrades.
Assistant, copilot, and onboarding content generation now default to
`gpt-4.1`; audio transcription keeps `gpt-4o-mini-transcribe` as the
default while exposing `whisper-1` as an available account override
option.

Related: https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7425/test-new-models

## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

- `ruby -ryaml -e 'yaml = YAML.load_file("config/llm.yml"); features =
yaml.fetch("features"); models = yaml.fetch("models"); features.each {
|name, cfg| missing = Array(cfg["models"]) - models.keys; raise
"#{name}: missing #{missing.join(",")}" if missing.any?; raise "#{name}:
default not in models" unless
Array(cfg["models"]).include?(cfg["default"]) }'`
- `node -e
"JSON.parse(require('fs').readFileSync('app/javascript/dashboard/i18n/locale/en/settings.json',
'utf8'))"`
- `pnpm exec prettier --check
app/javascript/dashboard/i18n/locale/en/settings.json`
- `bundle exec rspec spec/lib/llm/feature_router_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/llm/base_ai_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/models/concerns/agentable_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/messages/audio_transcription_service_spec.rb
spec/models/concerns/captain_featurable_spec.rb
spec/models/account_spec.rb
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/captain/preferences_controller_spec.rb
spec/controllers/super_admin/accounts_controller_spec.rb`
- `bundle exec rspec
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/article_translation_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/messages/audio_transcription_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/llm/base_ai_service_spec.rb`
- `RUBOCOP_CACHE_ROOT=/private/tmp/rubocop_cache bundle exec rubocop
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/article_translation_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/messages/audio_transcription_service.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/article_translation_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/llm/base_ai_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/messages/audio_transcription_service_spec.rb`
- `git diff --check`

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-06-25 21:35:09 +05:30
Sony MathewandGitHub 4e26c5b4bb feat: Route system LLM jobs (4/6) (#14843)
## Description

Routes the remaining system-only and legacy-sensitive LLM jobs through
feature-level model configuration, while preserving system credential
usage and usage-accounting behavior. This adds dedicated defaults for
help center article generation, onboarding content generation, query
translation, transcription, and search embeddings so these flows can be
configured per account without falling back to installation-wide model
settings.

Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7425/test-new-models

## Type of change

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update

## How Has This Been Tested?

Verified the feature routing defaults and account overrides for the
touched Captain/system LLM paths, including the legacy OpenAI
transcription and paginated FAQ services.

- `eval "$(rbenv init -)" && bundle exec rspec
spec/lib/captain/base_task_service_spec.rb spec/lib/llm/models_spec.rb
spec/models/concerns/captain_featurable_spec.rb
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/captain/preferences_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/paginated_faq_generator_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/pdf_processing_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/messages/audio_transcription_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/onboarding/help_center_article_builder_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/onboarding/website_analyzer_service_spec.rb`
- `eval "$(rbenv init -)" && bundle exec rubocop
app/controllers/api/v1/accounts/captain/preferences_controller.rb
app/models/concerns/account_settings_schema.rb
lib/captain/base_task_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/article_translation_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/article_writer_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/embedding_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/help_center_curation_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/paginated_faq_generator_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/translate_query_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/widget_tagline_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/onboarding/website_analyzer_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/messages/audio_transcription_service.rb
spec/enterprise/services/messages/audio_transcription_service_spec.rb
spec/lib/captain/base_task_service_spec.rb`
- `ruby -e "require 'yaml'; config = YAML.load_file('config/llm.yml');
%w[document_faq_generation help_center_article_generation
onboarding_content_generation help_center_query_translation
audio_transcription help_center_search].each { |feature| abort(%(missing
#{feature})) unless config.dig('features', feature) }; abort('wrong
article default') unless config.dig('features',
'help_center_article_generation', 'default') == 'gpt-5.2'; puts 'llm.yml
ok'"`
- `git diff --check`

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-06-25 17:37:45 +05:30
Sony MathewandGitHub 43e0f8a141 feat: Route Enterprise LLM services (3/6) (#14841)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Routes Enterprise assistant, copilot, FAQ, contact memory,
action-classifier, and false-promise detector LLM paths through
feature-specific model resolution. `Llm::BaseAiService` now accepts
feature/account context and uses `Llm::FeatureRouter` when that context
is present, while retaining the installation-model fallback for
unmigrated callers. This also adds a `document_faq_generation` feature
default for generative FAQ/document content.

Linear: https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7425/test-new-models
Depends on #14840

## Type of change

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update

## How Has This Been Tested?

- `bundle exec rspec spec/lib/llm/models_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/llm/base_ai_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/copilot/chat_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/assistant_chat_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/faq_generator_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/conversation_faq_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/assistant_action_classifier_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/assistant_false_promise_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/jobs/captain/conversation/response_builder_job_spec.rb`
passed with 112 examples, 0 failures.
- `bundle exec rspec spec/models/concerns/captain_featurable_spec.rb
spec/models/account_spec.rb
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/captain/preferences_controller_spec.rb
spec/lib/llm/feature_router_spec.rb` passed with 87 examples, 0
failures.
- `bundle exec rubocop enterprise/app/services/llm/base_ai_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/copilot/chat_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/assistant_chat_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/faq_generator_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/conversation_faq_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/contact_notes_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/contact_attributes_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/assistant_action_classifier_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/assistant_false_promise_service.rb
spec/enterprise/services/llm/base_ai_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/copilot/chat_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/assistant_chat_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/faq_generator_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/conversation_faq_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/assistant_action_classifier_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/assistant_false_promise_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/jobs/captain/conversation/response_builder_job_spec.rb`
passed with no offenses.
- `bundle exec ruby -e "require 'yaml'; config =
YAML.load_file('config/llm.yml'); abort('missing
document_faq_generation') unless config.dig('features',
'document_faq_generation'); abort('missing default') unless
config.dig('features', 'document_faq_generation', 'default'); puts
'llm.yml ok'"` passed.
- `git diff --check` passed.

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-06-25 17:03:07 +05:30
Sojan JoseandGitHub 0849d2e070 chore: Track cloud signup conversions (#14852)
## Summary
- enqueue `cloud_signup` conversion tracking after website attribution
is stored on a new cloud account
- keep authenticated add-workspace requests out of
attribution/conversion tracking
- reuse the existing marketing conversion tracking service and config
already available on `develop`

## Notes
- This PR only wires the signup path.
- Billing/plan activation conversion tracking is intentionally left out
for a separate rollout.
- The conversion service still no-ops outside Chatwoot Cloud and when
stored attribution has no supported click identifier.
2026-06-24 20:04:42 -07:00
Sojan JoseandGitHub cd1a214d98 chore: Add marketing conversion tracking foundation (#14851)
## Summary

Adds the minimal foundation for Cloud marketing conversion tracking:

- locked internal installation config for conversion tracking
credentials and event mappings
- generic background job and service for uploading conversion events
from stored attribution
- focused coverage for Cloud gating, click-id selection, payload shape,
and optional conversion value

This PR intentionally does not wire signup or plan activation yet. The
next step is to validate the service from Rails console against existing
attributed accounts, then add the event hooks in a follow-up PR.

## Notes

The config remains locked and is surfaced under the Internal settings
group next to the existing Cloud plan configuration. The service assumes
the locked config is present and valid; config mistakes should surface
instead of being silently ignored.
2026-06-24 18:27:02 -07:00
df79c0bbde feat: exclude stale conversations via assignment policy age threshold (#14766)
## Linear ticket
-
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7137/assignment-v2-backlog-flush-overloads-agents

## Description

Assignment policies now skip stale unassigned conversations
automatically. Each policy carries an age threshold (defaults to 7
days), so auto-assignment only picks up recent backlog instead of
draining very old, forgotten conversations. The threshold is
configurable per policy and can be cleared to assign conversations
regardless of age. Previously this control existed only on Enterprise
capacity policies (`exclude_older_than_hours`); it now lives on the
assignment policy itself, so every V2 inbox benefits without needing a
capacity policy.

## Type of change

- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

- Local UI flows

## Screenshots? 

<img width="645" height="822" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ec58db86-c1fa-4f9e-be87-2e24ff02e077"
/>


## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
2026-06-23 12:22:45 +05:30
647cfc2d83 feat: distinguish agent-declined calls with a rejected status (#14783)
## Linear ticket
-
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7374/agent-declined-voice-calls-miscounted-as-failed

## Description

Agent rejections were stored with status: failed, so call reports lumped
deliberate declines together with real technical failure.

Fix: give declines their own terminal rejected status (Twilio + WhatsApp
paths), keeping end_reason: agent_rejected. Genuine provider/network
failures stay failed. Frontend renders declines exactly as before;
existing rows backfilled via migration.

## Type of change

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

- Tested on UI

## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
2026-06-23 12:22:29 +05:30
Sojan JoseandGitHub dfd656a7d9 feat(account): persist signup attribution (#14761)
This keeps Chatwoot-side attribution persistence intentionally small and
Enterprise-only.

The website owns attribution capture, normalization, and source
classification. Chatwoot Cloud only reads the already-shaped first-party
attribution cookies during the current web signup account creation path
and stores the decoded payload in internal account metadata. Self-hosted
installs remain unchanged in this repo.

## What changed

- Added Enterprise-only attribution persistence to the current Cloud web
signup account creation path.
- Stores attribution only when `ChatwootApp.chatwoot_cloud?` is true.
- Reads the existing first-touch and last-touch attribution cookies.
- Saves only the documented scalar attribution fields under account
internal metadata.
- Preserves raw attribution values and leaves escaping to display
boundaries.
- Bounds stored attribution values to the website field-size limit.
- Keeps OSS controller code unchanged.
- Keeps signup attribution request coverage in Enterprise specs.
- Avoids backend attribution derivation, referrer parsing, or fallback
classification.
- Skips authenticated add-workspace flows so additional workspaces are
not counted as signup attribution.
- Does not hook unused account creation paths or OmniAuth account
creation.

## How to test

- `bundle exec rubocop
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts_controller_spec.rb
enterprise/app/controllers/enterprise/api/v1/accounts_settings.rb
enterprise/app/services/internal/accounts/marketing_attribution_service.rb
spec/enterprise/services/internal/accounts/marketing_attribution_service_spec.rb`
- `bundle exec rspec spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/internal/accounts/marketing_attribution_service_spec.rb`
- On a cloud-like setup, create an account through the current web
signup path with attribution cookies and confirm account internal
metadata is populated.
- On a non-cloud setup or authenticated add-workspace flow, confirm
account-create behavior is unchanged and no attribution is stored.
2026-06-19 11:01:12 -07:00
Vishnu NarayananandGitHub f66b551c7d revert: Sidebar unread counts for filters (CW-7262) (#14769)
## Description

Reverts [#14726](https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/14726)
(\"feat: Add sidebar unread counts for filters (CW-7262)\"), which
shipped in 4.15.0.

After 4.15.0 rolled out to prod the unread-counts-for-filters code path
caused a cascading incident:

- `Counter#ensure_filters_cache!` fires on every `/unread_counts/index`
and `update_last_seen` request.
- On cache miss it calls `Builder#build_filters_for!`, which:
- invokes `store.clear_user_filters!` -> `delete_matching` -> a Redis
`SCAN_each` over a per-user pattern keyspace, and
- runs 4 fresh SQL passes per user (mentions, participating, unattended,
and per-folder `Conversations::FilterService` queries).
- Threads blocked in the SCAN held their DB connections, the connection
pool exhausted, Sidekiq jobs were discarded with
`ActiveJob::DeserializationError: could not obtain a connection from the
pool`, and the enqueued queue blew past 200K.


Related:
[CW-7262](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7262/unread-counts-for-filters-folders)

## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update

## How Has This Been Tested?


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-06-17 14:58:48 +04:00
fe6368b42e feat: Add sidebar unread counts for filters (CW-7262) (#14726)
## Description

Extends the conversation unread-count system so the left sidebar can
show unread badges for Mentions, Participating, Unattended, and saved
conversation folders. Folder badges reuse the existing `custom_filters`
conversation filter semantics, store user-scoped Redis sets lazily, and
skip unsupported folder filters so invalid saved folders continue to
render without a badge. The Unattended badge counts all visible unread
open conversations that match the existing unattended conversation
scope.

Closes
-
[CW-7262](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7262/unread-counts-for-filters-folders)

## What changed

- Added user-scoped unread-count Redis keys and cache builders for
mentions, participating conversations, unattended conversations, and
saved folder filters.
- Reused `Conversations::FilterService` through a relation-returning
path so folder counts match the folder conversation list behavior.
- Invalidated user filter caches from mention, participant,
custom-filter, and relevant conversation update events.
- Extended the unread-count endpoint payload and sidebar Vuex/sidebar
rendering for the new badge counts, including the Unattended sidebar
item.
- Added Ruby, Enterprise, request, listener, and frontend store coverage
for the new unread-count dimensions.

## Type of change

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

- Created local validation folders for `john@acme.inc` and confirmed the
unread-count payload includes open, resolved, and high-priority folder
badges while excluding the invalid unsupported folder.
- Added coverage for the Unattended badge rule: all visible unread open
conversations matching `Conversation.unattended`.
- Ran focused unread-count Ruby specs, including service, listener,
request, and Enterprise counter coverage.
- Ran frontend unread-count store specs.
- Ran RuboCop on the touched Ruby files.
- Ran ESLint through the project script; it completed with warnings in
existing unrelated files and no errors.

<img width="369" height="525" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-13 at 10 51 39 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/36b1d2c4-dac1-4f6f-9c0e-7ef5a6cc2975"
/>

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] Documentation changes are not required for this internal
unread-count behavior
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] No dependent downstream changes are required

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-06-16 23:46:49 +05:30
41a3ab6dfa feat(companies): add contact company selector (#14496)
Adds a company selector to the contact details form so agents can
associate a contact with an existing company directly from the contact
page.

Closes

- None

Why

Contacts already expose company information through the CRM fields, but
the form only accepted free-text company names. As we split company CRM
work into smaller PRs, this keeps the contact page aligned with the
structured company model while preserving the existing company-name
behavior used by automations.

What changed

- Shows a company dropdown in the contact details form when the
Companies feature is enabled.
- Keeps legacy free-text company names editable when a contact has no
structured `company_id`.
- Allows Enterprise contact create/update APIs to accept account-scoped
`company_id`.
- Syncs `additional_attributes.company_name` when a contact is
associated with a company, including the existing email-domain
auto-association path.
- Serializes `company_id` in the contact model payload so the form can
show the current association.

How to test

1. Enable Companies for an account and open a contact details page.
2. In Edit contact details, use the Company field to select an existing
company.
3. Save the contact and refresh the page.
4. Confirm the selected company remains visible and the contact is
associated with that company.
5. Confirm contacts with only a legacy free-text company name still show
the text input instead of an empty selector.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-16 15:29:27 +05:30
Sony MathewandGitHub b1c2db5435 fix: Stabilize help center builder error spec (#14725)
## Description

Stabilizes the enterprise help center article builder source URL
validation spec by asserting the custom exception via its class name and
message text. This keeps the spec focused on the intended behavior while
avoiding brittle custom exception constant identity checks in
CI/reloading environments.

A bunch of builds on different PRs have been failing because of this
error, sample traces are below:
*
https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/chatwoot/chatwoot/114064/workflows/bdb6eca9-3b65-4c38-b8cf-f2f8564476f8/jobs/158777
*
https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/chatwoot/chatwoot/114064/workflows/bdb6eca9-3b65-4c38-b8cf-f2f8564476f8/jobs/158777

Fixes # N/A

## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

- `/Users/sonymathew/.rbenv/shims/bundle exec rspec
spec/enterprise/services/onboarding/help_center_article_builder_spec.rb`
- `/Users/sonymathew/.rbenv/shims/bundle exec rubocop
spec/enterprise/services/onboarding/help_center_article_builder_spec.rb`
- `git diff --check`

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-06-13 19:57:42 +05:30
Tanmay Deep SharmaandGitHub 8d5d02ea97 feat: add per-inbox toggle to disable incoming calls (#14645)
## Description

Adds a per-inbox "Allow incoming calls" toggle for voice-enabled
WhatsApp and Twilio inboxes. When turned off, the setting is persisted
on the channel; actually rejecting inbound calls is handled in a
follow-up PR.

## Type of change

- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## Screenshot
<img width="804" height="384" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-04 at 11 44 07 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/df8bb026-0387-4031-bcba-6d9a56872eb7"
/>


## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-06-11 14:22:44 +05:30
4d3196b02f feat: Show unread count for all conversations (#14627)
## Description

Adds the unread count for All Conversations to the left sidebar. The
unread counts API now returns an `all_count` aggregate based on the same
permission-scoped inbox counts already used for sidebar badges, and the
sidebar renders that backend-provided value on the All Conversations
item.

Fixes
[CW-7240](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7240/unread-count-for-all-conversations)

## Type of change

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update

## How Has This Been Tested?

- `bundle exec rspec
spec/services/conversations/unread_counts/counter_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/conversations/unread_counts/counter_spec.rb
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/conversations_controller_spec.rb`
- `pnpm test
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/specs/conversationUnreadCounts/actions.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/specs/conversationUnreadCounts/getters.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/specs/conversationUnreadCounts/mutations.spec.js`
- `pnpm exec eslint
app/javascript/dashboard/components-next/sidebar/Sidebar.vue
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/conversationUnreadCounts.js
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/specs/conversationUnreadCounts/actions.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/specs/conversationUnreadCounts/getters.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/specs/conversationUnreadCounts/mutations.spec.js`
- `bundle exec rubocop
app/services/conversations/unread_counts/counter.rb
spec/services/conversations/unread_counts/counter_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/conversations/unread_counts/counter_spec.rb
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/conversations_controller_spec.rb`

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-06-11 13:05:52 +05:30
cd9192f7d1 chore(captain): update Firecrawl to use the v2 API (#14624)
## Description

Migrates Firecrawl from the v1 to the v2 API.
`Captain::Tools::FirecrawlService` now targets `api.firecrawl.dev/v2`,
with the request body updated to match the v2 schema.

> Disclosure: I work at Firecrawl.

Fixes # (n/a)

## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Updated
`spec/enterprise/services/captain/tools/firecrawl_service_spec.rb` to
assert the v2 endpoint and request body.

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

---------

Co-authored-by: Aakash Bakhle <48802744+aakashb95@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-03 23:47:49 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub eaffad12e7 feat(langfuse): propagate observation metadata for evals (#14634)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

We need to pass on trace level attributes down to the spans inside them
like tool calls, observations, etc.
This way, we can filter observations based on trace level attributes.


## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

Attributes added to observation metadata for easy filtering
<img width="1327" height="708" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8f1d1bf8-cde4-481d-a2c2-7920ad2fc52e"
/>

added a `generation_stage` to differentiate llm_calls that call tools vs
those that generate a `final_response`
<img width="1806" height="968" alt="CleanShot 2026-06-03 at 15 11 09@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/db1fa8e0-7f2d-404b-a719-27a16d400442"
/>


propagated attributes to tool calls for future use
<img width="903" height="517" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/edc61ce8-93db-465c-a66e-043138e2dc15"
/>



## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-06-03 16:45:19 +05:30
Tanmay Deep SharmaandGitHub 68e358d732 feat: voice-call UX fixes (#14579)
## Linear ticket
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7187/voice-calls-followup-tasks

## Description

Improvements to the WhatsApp voice-calling experience plus a cheaper,
more accurate audio-transcription model.
- First-time callers now get a real name. An inbound WhatsApp call
creates the contact from the caller's WhatsApp profile name instead of
the bare phone number.
- Clear, consistent call attribution. Call bubbles show a unified
"Handled by {agent}"
- Cleaner call widget. The dismiss (✕) button is shown only for incoming
calls
- WhatsApp calling for manual inboxes. voice_calling_supported? now
covers any whatsapp_cloud inbox
- Transcription: whisper-1 → gpt-4o-mini-transcribe.

## Type of change

- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)


## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-05-27 16:16:16 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 3d20a7b049 feat: generate Help Center for Onboarding (#14370)
## Manually triggering help center generation

Open a Rails console (`bundle exec rails console`):

```ruby
account = Account.find(<ACCOUNT_ID>)
user    = account.users.first

# Optional: refresh brand info from the customer's website
domain = 'example.com'
result = WebsiteBrandingService.new("noreply@#{domain}").perform
account.update!(
  name: result[:title].presence || account.name,
  custom_attributes: account.custom_attributes.merge('website' => domain, 'brand_info' => result)
)

# Optional: wipe existing portals so a fresh one is created
account.portals.destroy_all

Onboarding::HelpCenterCreationService.new(account, user).perform
```

Sidekiq must be running — articles are written by
`Onboarding::HelpCenterArticleGenerationJob`. Avoid running on
production; generation calls the LLM provider.


### Generation flow (Happy Path) 

```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
    autonumber

    participant Kickoff as HelpCenterCreationService
    participant DB as DB
    participant GenJob as HelpCenterArticleGenerationJob
    participant Curator as HelpCenterCurator
    participant Firecrawl as Firecrawl
    participant CuratorLLM as Curation LLM
    participant Redis as Redis Progress
    participant WriterJob as HelpCenterArticleWriterJob
    participant Builder as HelpCenterArticleBuilder
    participant WriterLLM as Writer LLM
    participant Cable as ActionCable

    Kickoff->>DB: Create portal for account<br/>homepage_link=https://chatwoot.com
    Kickoff->>DB: Attach brand logo if available
    Kickoff->>GenJob: Enqueue generation job<br/>account_id, portal_id, user_id, generation_id

    GenJob->>Curator: Curate help center plan
    Curator->>Firecrawl: map https://chatwoot.com<br/>search: docs help support faq
    Firecrawl-->>Curator: Return discovered links
    Curator->>CuratorLLM: Select categories + article plans<br/>from discovered links only
    CuratorLLM-->>Curator: Return categories, articles, allowed_urls

    GenJob->>DB: Create portal categories
    GenJob->>GenJob: Stamp articles with category_id
    GenJob->>GenJob: Filter article URLs against allowed_urls
    GenJob->>GenJob: Drop articles with no category<br/>or no approved source URLs

    GenJob->>Redis: Start progress<br/>status=generating, total=N, finished=0

    loop For each approved article
      GenJob->>WriterJob: Enqueue writer job<br/>title, category_id, approved URLs
    end

    par Writer jobs run independently
      WriterJob->>Builder: Build article from approved URLs
      Builder->>Firecrawl: batch_scrape approved URLs
      Firecrawl-->>Builder: Return Markdown source pages
      Builder->>WriterLLM: Rewrite sources into one article
      WriterLLM-->>Builder: Return title, description, Markdown content
      Builder->>DB: Create draft portal article<br/>meta.source_urls
      WriterJob->>Redis: Increment finished count
      WriterJob->>Cable: Broadcast help_center.article_generated
    end

    WriterJob->>Redis: If finished >= total<br/>mark status=completed
    WriterJob->>Cable: Broadcast help_center.generation_completed
```

### Redis State Management

```mermaid
 stateDiagram-v2
    [*] --> active_pointer_set
    active_pointer_set --> generating: generation job creates valid plan
    active_pointer_set --> skipped: curation skipped/failed

    generating --> generating: each writer job increments finished
    generating --> completed: finished == total
    generating --> ignored_completion: generation_id superseded

    skipped --> [*]
    completed --> [*]
    ignored_completion --> [*]
```
2026-05-21 16:25:01 +05:30
3fae800936 feat: base layer for unread counts (store, counter and builder) (1/3)[CW-6851] (#14368)
## Description

This is the first PR in a series of PRs for Introducing unread counts in
the sidebar for inboxes and labels.

In this PR:

* Added the unread store, counter and builder modules
* Added redis keys for unread count management
* Added specs for all 3 modules, some specs are for testing enterprise
only feature like specific roles and permissions which are added in the
respective enterprise folder itself.

**Note**
None of this changes affect anything else and nothing is wired to
existing modules.

Issue:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6851/support-unread-conversation-counts

## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2026-05-20 14:26:21 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 05bda5f742 feat: don't let onboarding write domain (#14442)
Stop the onboarding flow from writing the user's company website into
`accounts.domain`. That column is reserved for the inbound email domain
used to construct reply-to addresses (`reply+<uuid>@<domain>`), and
silently overloading it from onboarding was breaking email continuity
for accounts whose domain MX didn't point at Chatwoot's inbound —
customer replies were going to an unreachable address.

The website value now lives in `custom_attributes.website`, which is
what the rest of the app already treats as the "company website" field.
2026-05-13 20:09:48 +05:30
58fdd20625 test(voice): WhatsApp Cloud Calling specs [5] (#14357)
Backend test coverage for the WhatsApp Cloud Calling pipeline introduced
in #14356. Stacked on top of that PR so the controller and service under
test exist when CI runs.

## Closes
- Replaces #14348 (which was based on the abandoned \`feature/pla-150\`)

## What's covered

-
\`spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/whatsapp_calls_controller_spec.rb\`
(new, ~210 lines)
- \`show / accept / reject / terminate / initiate / upload_recording\`
happy paths
- 422 paths: missing sdp_offer, missing recording, calling_disabled
inbox, missing contact phone, ringing-state guards, AlreadyAccepted,
NotRinging, CallFailed
- 138006 (no permission) → throttled opt-in template send under
conversation lock; idempotency on retry
  - \`upload_recording\` idempotency guard (\`already_uploaded\`)

- \`spec/enterprise/services/whatsapp/call_service_spec.rb\` (new, ~135
lines)
- State machine: ringing → in_progress → completed; ringing → failed
(reject); ringing → no_answer (terminate)
- Lock contention: concurrent terminate during accept doesn't corrupt
the message/conversation broadcast
- Provider failure paths surface as \`Voice::CallErrors::CallFailed\`
(transport and business)

- \`spec/models/channel/whatsapp_spec.rb\` — extends existing file with
\`voice_enabled?\` matrix (provider × source × calling_enabled)

## Verification

- 77/77 examples pass locally on this branch (controller + service +
channel + incoming-call + permission-reply + open-ai message builder)
- RuboCop clean

## Stack

- Backend: #14356 (\`feat/whatsapp-call-meta-bridge\` — base of this PR)
- FE: #14346 (\`feat/whatsapp-call-ui\`)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 12:40:13 +05:30
de696a55cb feat(voice): add WhatsApp inbound call webhook pipeline [3] (#14315)
Adds the server-side flow that turns Meta WhatsApp Cloud Calling
webhooks into Chatwoot Calls, conversations, voice_call message bubbles,
and ActionCable broadcasts. Stacked on top of #14312 (PR-2 — provider
methods); intentionally does not include the HTTP controller, routes, or
frontend (those land in PR-4 and PR-9).

## Closes
- Part of the WhatsApp Cloud Calling rollout. Linear: TBD

## What changed

**Webhook routing**
- `app/jobs/webhooks/whatsapp_events_job.rb` — append
`prepend_mod_with('Webhooks::WhatsappEventsJob')` so EE can extend it
without forking.
- `enterprise/app/jobs/enterprise/webhooks/whatsapp_events_job.rb` (new)
— overlay that prepends `handle_message_events` to intercept `field:
'calls'` payloads (route to `Whatsapp::IncomingCallService`) and
`interactive.call_permission_reply` messages (route to
`Whatsapp::CallPermissionReplyService`); falls through with `super` for
regular messages.

**Services**
- `enterprise/app/services/whatsapp/incoming_call_service.rb` (new) —
gated on `provider_config['calling_enabled']`; processes `connect`
(creates inbound call via `Voice::InboundCallBuilder` or transitions an
existing outbound call to `in_progress`) and `terminate` events; updates
conversation `additional_attributes` and broadcasts
`voice_call.incoming`/`voice_call.outbound_connected`/`voice_call.ended`.
- `enterprise/app/services/whatsapp/call_permission_reply_service.rb`
(new) — handles WhatsApp interactive `call_permission_reply` replies;
clears the conversation's `call_permission_requested_at` flag and
broadcasts `voice_call.permission_granted` so the agent UI can re-enable
the call button.

**Builder/model adjustments**
- `enterprise/app/services/voice/inbound_call_builder.rb` —
provider-agnostic; accepts `provider:` and `extra_meta:` kwargs, drops
`account:` (now derived from `inbox.account` to keep the param count
under rubocop's ceiling without disabling cops), uses digits-only
`source_id` for WhatsApp ContactInbox (validation requires
`^\d{1,15}\z`), skips Twilio-only `conference_sid` for non-Twilio
providers.
- `enterprise/app/services/voice/call_message_builder.rb` — adds
`create!`/`update_status!` API and `CALL_TO_VOICE_STATUS` map; uses
direct `Message.create!` (bypasses `Messages::MessageBuilder`'s
incoming-on-non-Api-inbox guard, which would otherwise reject the system
bubble); content is `'WhatsApp Call'` for WhatsApp and `'Voice Call'`
for Twilio. Backwards-compatible `perform!` retained for the existing
Twilio call sites.
- `enterprise/app/models/call.rb` — adds `default_ice_servers` (driven
by `VOICE_CALL_STUN_URLS` env), `direction_label` alias for the
`inbound`/`outbound` strings the FE expects, and
`ringing?`/`in_progress?`/`terminal?` predicates used throughout the
pipeline.

**Outgoing-channel guard**
- `app/services/base/send_on_channel_service.rb` — extends
`invalid_message?` to skip messages with `content_type == 'voice_call'`.
Without this, agent-initiated outbound calls (PR-4) would deliver
\"WhatsApp Call\" as a text message to the contact every time.

**Twilio call-site update**
- `enterprise/app/controllers/twilio/voice_controller.rb` — drops the
now-redundant `account: current_account` kwarg from the
`Voice::InboundCallBuilder.perform!` call.

**Tests**
- New: `spec/enterprise/services/whatsapp/incoming_call_service_spec.rb`
(5 examples — calling-disabled, inbound connect, outbound connect,
terminate completed, terminate no-answer, unknown event).
- New:
`spec/enterprise/services/whatsapp/call_permission_reply_service_spec.rb`
(3 examples — accept, reject, calling-disabled).
- Updated: `spec/enterprise/services/voice/inbound_call_builder_spec.rb`
and `spec/enterprise/controllers/twilio/voice_controller_spec.rb` to
drop the `account:` kwarg from call expectations.

## How to test

In `rails console` against an account with a WhatsApp inbox where
`provider_config['calling_enabled']` is true:

```ruby
inbox = Inbox.find(<id>)
params = { calls: [{ id: 'wacid_test', from: '15550001111', event: 'connect',
                     session: { sdp: 'v=0...', sdp_type: 'offer' } }] }
Whatsapp::IncomingCallService.new(inbox: inbox, params: params).perform
# => Conversation + Call (status: 'ringing', provider: 'whatsapp') + voice_call message bubble
# => ActionCable broadcasts `voice_call.incoming` to the assignee or account-wide

# Then terminate it:
Whatsapp::IncomingCallService.new(inbox: inbox,
  params: { calls: [{ id: 'wacid_test', event: 'terminate', duration: 0, terminate_reason: 'no_answer' }] }
).perform
# => Call status flips to 'no_answer', message bubble updates, `voice_call.ended` broadcast fires
```

End-to-end browser flow (Meta → cable → UI) requires the controller from
PR-4 and the frontend from PR-9.

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 11:23:57 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 3489298726 feat: add WidgetCreationService for onboarding web widget setup (#14314)
When a new account finishes onboarding we want to land them on a
dashboard with a working web widget already configured, branded, named,
and assigned to them, instead of an empty inbox list. This PR adds the
services that produce that widget. **No user-visible change yet:** the
services are dormant until the trigger and background job are wired up
in the follow-up PR.

## Context

Milestone 1 added `Account::BrandingEnrichmentJob`, which calls
context.dev during signup and stores brand data on
`account.custom_attributes['brand_info']`, plus the new onboarding form
that captures `domain`, `name`, `industry`, etc. Milestone 2 starts
using that data, and the first thing we want is a web widget
materialized automatically. Splitting the service layer from the
orchestration plumbing (Redis key, `onboarding_step` extension,
controller wiring, ActionCable) keeps this diff focused and lets the
LLM/widget logic merge independently.

## How to test

Run against an existing account that already has `brand_info` populated.

```ruby
account = Account.find(<account_id>)
user    = account.administrators.first
inbox   = WidgetCreationService.new(account, user).perform

inbox.channel.widget_color     # color from brand_info, or '#1f93ff'
inbox.channel.welcome_title    # brand_info[:title], or account.name
inbox.channel.welcome_tagline  # LLM tagline (Enterprise + system key set),
                               # else brand_info[:slogan]/[:description]/nil
inbox.inbox_members.pluck(:user_id)
```

Toggle `InstallationConfig['CAPTAIN_OPEN_AI_API_KEY']` to flip between
LLM and brand-text tagline paths. To verify failure isolation, raise
inside `Captain::Llm::WidgetTaglineService#perform` and confirm widget
creation still succeeds with the fallback tagline.
2026-05-11 16:10:48 +05:30
Tanmay Deep SharmaandGitHub e6b8f48b3b fix: settle captain credits on subscription cancellation (#14089)
## Linear Ticket
-
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6875/captain-credits-3-bugs-in-stripe-subscription-lifecycle-cancel-ratchet

## Description

Fixes Captain credit settlement on subscription cancellation. Previously
`limits['captain_responses']` and `captain_responses_usage` were left in
their pre-cancellation state, which caused incorrect credit totals when
a customer re-subscribed. Cancellation now settles the monthly allotment
(preserving any remaining topup) and resets the usage counter.

## Type of change

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

1. Set up an account subscribed to a paid plan (e.g. Startups) so
`limits['captain_responses']` reflects the plan allotment.
2. Fire `customer.subscription.deleted` for that account's Stripe
customer. Confirm the limits.
3. Fire `customer.subscription.updated` re-subscribing to the paid plan.
Confirm the limits.
4. Repeat cancel → re-subscribe several times;


## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-05-08 12:18:53 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 70f799ab35 fix(captain): add v1 handoff classifier [AI-137] (#14337)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Captain (v1) makes false promises by saying it will handoff but doesn't.
This happens due to an exact string match comparison and the prompt
gives the model a lot of responsibilities:
- identity
- what to respond
- obey custom instructions
- decide on tool calls

This PR decouples responsibility, the core prompt responds, and an
additional llm call evaluates if handoff was needed or not after that
message.

## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

Locally


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-05-05 14:34:31 +05:30
Tanmay Deep SharmaandGitHub 21c0f4dc52 fix(transcription): guard Whisper 25MB limit and zero temperature for stable output (#14335)
Two production-grade fixes to the existing audio transcription service.
**Independent of the WhatsApp Calling work** — these affect every audio
attachment that goes through Whisper (voice notes, call recordings,
voicemails, etc.).

## Closes
- [PLA-151 — PR-5: Recording Upload + Transcription
Pipeline](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-151/pr-5-recording-upload-transcription-pipeline)

## Why this is needed

### 1. Whisper rejects payloads larger than 25 MB

OpenAI's [Whisper
API](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/speech-to-text) hard-caps
file uploads at 25 MB. Long audio recordings — voice notes from chatty
contacts, ~70+ min Opus call recordings — currently hit OpenAI with the
full payload and 413 (\`Payload Too Large\`). The job retries via the
existing \`Faraday::BadRequestError\` discard path, but the agent still
sees a transcription failure for an attachment we knew was too big up
front.

This PR adds a pre-flight \`audio_too_large?\` check via the blob's
\`byte_size\` and returns a controlled error without hitting OpenAI. The
audio attachment is preserved (agents can still listen), only the
transcription is skipped.

### 2. Whisper hallucinates on silence at non-zero temperature

At \`temperature: 0.4\` (the previous value), Whisper produces
well-documented hallucinated repeats on silence and near-silent segments
— e.g. \`Oh, dear. Oh, dear. Oh, dear.\` filling the transcript. This
shows up in real recordings whenever there's a hold or quiet moment.
\`temperature: 0.0\` matches OpenAI's recommended default for
transcription and eliminates the spirals.

Reference:
[openai/whisper#928](https://github.com/openai/whisper/discussions/928),
[openai-python#1010](https://github.com/openai/openai-python/issues/1010).

## Are WhatsApp call recordings already handled?

Yes — by the existing pipeline, **before this PR**:

\`\`\`
Browser MediaRecorder → upload_recording (PR-4)
  → @call.message.attachments.create!(file_type: :audio, ...)
→ Enterprise::Concerns::Attachment#enqueue_audio_transcription
(after_create_commit hook)
      → Messages::AudioTranscriptionJob.perform_later(attachment.id)
        → Messages::AudioTranscriptionService → Whisper
\`\`\`

The \`after_create_commit\` hook already fires for every audio
attachment regardless of source. PR-4's \`upload_recording\` endpoint
creates the attachment; the existing job/service take it from there. No
new wiring needed.

This PR just makes the existing service more robust:
- Calls longer than ~70 min (Opus 48 kbps) no longer 413 against OpenAI
- Quiet recordings no longer produce hallucinated transcripts

## How to test

\`\`\`ruby
# In rails console with a real audio attachment:
service = Messages::AudioTranscriptionService.new(Attachment.audio.last)

# Normal-sized audio: unchanged behaviour
service.perform # => { success: true, transcriptions: ... }

# Large audio: new guard returns error instead of 413-ing OpenAI
allow(attachment.file.blob).to
receive(:byte_size).and_return(30.megabytes)
service.perform # => { error: 'Audio too large for Whisper' }
\`\`\`

Existing transcription specs cover the happy path; one new spec
exercises the byte-limit guard.

## Risk

Low. Both changes are pre-flight guards or parameter values — they
reduce the surface of OpenAI calls that can fail. Failure to transcribe
is already non-fatal (the audio attachment is preserved either way).
2026-05-05 11:49:28 +07:00
0bd0cab868 feat(voice): Attach call recordings + show call duration on the bubble (#14344)
When an inbound voice call ends, the conversation bubble now (1) renders
an inline audio player as soon as Twilio finishes the recording and (2)
shows the call duration alongside "Call ended" so the agent gets the
at-a-glance summary without opening the recording.

Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-118/feat-recordings-on-calls-should-be-attached-on-the-conversation
and
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-119/duration-of-the-call-is-not-visible-on-the-chat-bubble

## How to test

1. Set up a Twilio voice inbox and trigger an inbound call.
2. Answer the call from an agent, talk for a few seconds, then hang up.
3. As soon as the call ends, the bubble should read **"Call ended —
0:NN"** (where NN is the call duration in seconds).
4. Wait a few seconds for Twilio to finish processing the recording
(usually <30s after hangup).
5. The same bubble should now show an inline audio player below the
duration. Press play; the recording should be audible.
6. Refresh the page — both the duration and the player should still be
there.
7. End a second call on the same conversation — its bubble should get
its own duration + player, independent of the first.

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-04 17:14:01 +04:00
Tanmay Deep SharmaandGitHub 28ec1794f4 feat(voice): add WhatsApp Cloud Calling provider methods (#14312)
Adds the Meta WhatsApp Cloud API surface needed for browser-based
calling. This is the second slice of the WhatsApp calling feature,
sitting on top of `feat/voice-call-model-wiring` and consumed by later
PRs (incoming-webhook pipeline, call service, frontend).

This PR ships only the provider-level HTTP wrapper and one error class.
It is feature-flag-free and does not change any user-visible behaviour
on its own — without later PRs, no caller invokes these methods.

## Linear
-
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-148/pr-2-meta-cloud-api-provider-methods

## What changed
- Add `Whatsapp::Providers::WhatsappCloudCallMethods`
(`enterprise/app/services/whatsapp/providers/whatsapp_cloud_call_methods.rb`)
wrapping six Meta endpoints:
- `pre_accept_call`, `accept_call`, `reject_call`, `terminate_call` —
`POST /{phone_id}/calls` with the relevant action payload.
- `send_call_permission_request` — `POST /{phone_id}/messages`
interactive `call_permission_request`.
- `initiate_call` — `POST /{phone_id}/calls` with `audio`/`offer`
session.
- Prepend the module into `Whatsapp::Providers::WhatsappCloudService`
only if defined, so OSS continues to work without the enterprise
overlay.
- Add `Voice::CallErrors::NoCallPermission`
(`enterprise/lib/voice/call_errors.rb`) — raised when Meta returns error
code `138006` from `initiate_call`. The remaining call-service errors
(`NotRinging`, `AlreadyAccepted`, `CallFailed`) will land with PR-4.

## How to test
There is no UI in this PR. Smoke-test from a Rails console with a
WhatsApp inbox configured for calling:

```ruby
inbox = Inbox.find(<id>)
svc = inbox.channel.provider_service
svc.respond_to?(:initiate_call)            # => true
svc.respond_to?(:send_call_permission_request) # => true

# Optional live calls (require a real phone + Meta call-permission opt-in):
svc.send_call_permission_request('15551234567')
svc.initiate_call('15551234567', '<sdp_offer>')
```

Failure path: `initiate_call` against a contact who has not granted call
permission should raise `Voice::CallErrors::NoCallPermission` with
Meta's user-facing message.
2026-05-04 12:44:19 +07:00
1124c1b4c2 feat(voice): Wire Twilio voice flow through unified call model (#14091)
Twilio voice now uses first-class `Call` records as the source of truth
for call state, instead of storing it on
`conversation.additional_attributes` and `conversation.identifier`. Each
call gets its own record, its own `voice_call` bubble matched by
`call_sid`, and its own conference name keyed off `Call.id`. Multiple
calls on the same conversation (for `lock_to_single_conversation`
inboxes) now work correctly, and the conversation card stays in sync
with the real latest message.
Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-121/lock-to-single-thread

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-04-30 11:25:39 +04:00
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 568aae875b feat: wire up auto-sync job backend [AI-150] (#14117)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

- Wires up Controllers to auto-sync job
- adds plan based sync schedule
- a scheduler that runs every hour to check syncable documents
- guards the whole feature behind feature flag by reclaiming
`twilio_content_templates`
- Adds a global and account level cap on how many documents to enqueue
to prevent sudden burst at first run
- some refactor to simplify code
- specs

Fixes # (issue)

## Type of change

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

specs and locally

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-04-29 14:47:14 +05:30
0e122188e9 feat: Add voice calling as a capability on Twilio SMS channel(Enterprise) (#13963)
Voice calling is now a capability on the existing TwilioSms rather than
a separate Voice model. A single Twilio phone number handles both SMS
and voice calls through one inbox.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6683/add-voice-calling-as-a-capability-on-twilio-sms-channel
and https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-120/add-the-support-for-sms

**What changed**
- Replaced Channel::Voice with voice_enabled flag on Channel::TwilioSms
- Added voice_enabled, twiml_app_sid, api_key_secret columns to
channel_twilio_sms table
  - Dropped channel_voice table (no production data)
- All voice logic lives in Enterprise layer via
prepend_mod_with('Channel::TwilioSms')
- Added Voice settings tab on Twilio SMS inbox settings to
enable/disable voice
  - Validates Twilio number voice capability before provisioning
- Teardown service cleans up TwiML app and credentials when voice is
disabled
- Frontend voice detection uses isVoiceCallEnabled() /
getVoiceCallProvider() helpers — extensible to future providers
  - Gated by channel_voice feature flag

**How to test**

1. Enable feature flag:
Account.find(<id>).enable_features('channel_voice')
2. Create voice inbox: Inboxes → Voice tile → enter Twilio credentials →
verify incoming/outgoing calls and SMS work
3. Enable voice on existing SMS inbox: Inboxes → select Twilio SMS inbox
→ Voice tab → toggle on → provide API key credentials → verify calls
work
4. Disable voice: Voice tab → toggle off → verify TwiML app is deleted,
credentials cleared, SMS still works
5. Re-enable voice: Toggle on again → must provide api_key_secret again
→ new TwiML app provisioned

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-04-29 11:32:19 +04:00