# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR fixes the white background bleed visible in the widget, widget
article viewer and help center when dark mode is active.
**What was happening**
While scrolling, the `<body>` element retained a white background in
dark mode. This occurred because dark mode classes were only applied to
inner container elements, not the root.
**What changed**
* **Widget:** Updated the `useDarkMode` composable to sync the `dark`
class to `<html>` using `watchEffect`, allowing `<body>` to inherit dark
theme variables. Also added background styles to `html`, `body`, and
`#app` in `woot.scss`.
* **Help center portal:** Moved `bg-white dark:bg-slate-900` from
`<main>` to `<body>` in the portal layout so the entire page background
responds correctly to dark mode, including within the widget iframe.
* **ArticleViewer:** Replaced hardcoded `bg-white` with `bg-n-solid-1`
to ensure better theming.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6704/widget-body-colour-not-implemented
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screencasts
### Before
**Widget**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e0224ad1-81a6-440a-a824-e115fb806728
**Help center**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/40a8ded5-5360-474d-9ec5-fd23e037c845
### After
**Widget**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dd37cc68-99fc-4d60-b2ae-cf41f9d4d38c
**Help center**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bc998c4e-ef77-46fa-ac7f-4ea16d912ce3
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
The initial version of prompt deciding to resolve or hand-off to human
agents was too conservative especially in cases where a link or an
action was told to customer. If the customer didn't respond, Captain was
told to hand it off to the agent, but customer may actually have solved
the issue. If not, they can come back and continue the conversation.
Removed two lines about the same and now we should not see needless
handoffs.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
locally
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR fixes
1. Messages being trimmed to the default 1024 limit in `trimContent`
method, instead of channel-specific limits for drafts and AI tasks.
2. Telegram messages are allowed up to 10,000 characters in config, but
the API supports only 4096, causing failures for oversized messages.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6694/captain-ai-rewrite-tasks-truncate-draft-to-1024-chars-trimcontenthttps://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13919
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
**Before**
https://www.loom.com/share/00e9d6b4d19247febf35dffa99da3805
**After**
https://www.loom.com/share/c4900e9effc345c79bcd8a5aa1ee277b
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Repurpose the deprecated response_bot feature flag slot for
custom_tools.
Migration disables the flag on any accounts that had response_bot
enabled so the repurposed slot starts in its default-off state.
Pre-deploy: run the disable script on production using the old flag name
(response_bot) before deploying this migration.
Adds `WebsiteBrandingService` (OSS) with an Enterprise override using
Firecrawl v2 to extract branding and business data from a URL for
onboarding auto-fill.
OSS version uses HTTParty + Nokogiri to extract:
- Business name (og:site_name or title)
- Language (html lang)
- Favicon
- Social links from `<a>` tags
Enterprise version makes a single Firecrawl call to fetch:
- Structured JSON (name, language, industry via LLM)
- Branding (favicon, primary color)
- Page links
Falls back to OSS if Firecrawl is unavailable or fails.
Social handles (WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, Telegram, TikTok, LINE)
are parsed deterministically via a shared `SocialLinkParser`.
> We use links for socials, since the LLM extraction was unreliable,
mostly returned empty, and hallucinated in some rare scenarios
## How to test
```ruby
# OSS (no Firecrawl key needed)
WebsiteBrandingService.new('chatwoot.com').perform
# Enterprise (requires CAPTAIN_FIRECRAWL_API_KEY)
WebsiteBrandingService.new('notion.so').perform
WebsiteBrandingService.new('postman.com').perform
```
Verify the returned hash includes business_name, language,
industry_category, social_handles, and branding with
favicon/primary_color.
<img width="908" height="393" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e3696887-d366-485a-89a0-8e1a9698a788"
/>
## Description
When a customer downgrades from Enterprise to Business, they may retain
unused Stripe credit balance. During an AI credits topup,
Stripe::Invoice.finalize_invoice auto-applies that credit balance to the
invoice. If the credit balance fully covers the invoice amount, Stripe
marks it as paid immediately upon finalization. Calling
Stripe::Invoice.pay on an already-paid invoice throws an error, breaking
the topup flow.
This fix retrieves the invoice status after finalization and skips the
pay call if Stripe has already settled it via credits.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tested against Stripe test mode with the following scenarios:
- Full credit balance payment: Customer has enough Stripe credit balance
to cover the entire invoice. Invoice is marked paid after
finalize_invoice — pay is correctly skipped. Credits are fulfilled
successfully.
- Partial credit balance payment: Customer has some Stripe credit
balance but not enough to cover the full amount. Invoice remains open
after finalization — pay is called and charges the remaining amount to
the default payment method. Credits are fulfilled successfully.
- Zero credit balance (normal payment): Customer has no Stripe credit
balance. Invoice remains open after finalization — pay charges the full
amount. Credits are fulfilled successfully.
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Adds Estonian to the settings language dropdown so accounts can select
the existing `et` translation from the UI.
Fixes: N/A
Closes: N/A
## Why
Estonian translation files already exist in the repo and in Crowdin, but
the settings dropdown is driven by `LANGUAGES_CONFIG`, where `et` was
missing.
## What this change does
- Adds `et` / `Eesti (et)` to `LANGUAGES_CONFIG`
- Makes Estonian available in the settings language selectors backed by
`enabledLanguages`
## Validation
- `ruby -c config/initializers/languages.rb`
- Opened the local UI at `/app/accounts/1/settings/general` and verified
`Eesti (et)` appears in the `Site language` dropdown
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
## Description
When Assignment V2 is enabled, the V2 capacity policies
(AgentCapacityPolicy / InboxCapacityLimit) are not respected during
team-based assignment paths. The system falls back to the legacy V1
max_assignment_limit, and since V1 is deprecated and typically
unconfigured in V2 setups, agents receive unlimited assignments
regardless of their V2 capacity.
Root cause: Inbox class directly defined
member_ids_with_assignment_capacity, which shadowed the
Enterprise::InboxAgentAvailability module override in Ruby's method
resolution order (MRO). This made the V2 capacity check unreachable
(dead code) for any code path using member_ids_with_assignment_capacity.
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
⏺ Before the fix
1. Enable assignment_v2 + advanced_assignment on account
2. Create AgentCapacityPolicy with InboxCapacityLimit = 1 for an inbox
3. Assign the policy to an agent (e.g., John)
4. Create 1 open conversation assigned to John (now at capacity)
5. Create a new unassigned conversation in the same inbox
6. Assign a team (containing John) to that conversation
7. Result: John gets assigned despite being at capacity
⏺ After the fix
Same steps 1–6.
7. Result: John is NOT assigned — conversation stays unassigned (no
agents with capacity available)
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
This ignores `CVE-2026-33658` in `bundler-audit` after validating that
Chatwoot's default and recommended storage setups do not use Active
Storage proxy mode.
Fixes: N/A
Closes: N/A
## Why
`CVE-2026-33658` is an Active Storage proxy-mode DoS issue triggered by
multi-range requests.
For Chatwoot, the default and recommended setups do not appear to route
file downloads through Rails proxy mode:
- `config/environments/production.rb` selects the Active Storage service
but does not opt into `rails_storage_proxy`
- `.env.example` defaults to `ACTIVE_STORAGE_SERVICE=local`
- Chatwoot's storage docs recommend local/cloud storage with optional
direct uploads to the storage provider
- existing specs expect redirect/disk-style Active Storage URLs rather
than proxy-mode URLs
Given that validation, ignoring this advisory is a smaller and more
accurate response than a framework-wide Rails upgrade.
## What this change does
- adds `.bundler-audit.yml`
- preserves the existing advisory ignore entries already used by
Chatwoot
- ignores `CVE-2026-33658`
- documents why the ignore is acceptable for Chatwoot's current defaults
- notes that this should be revisited if Chatwoot enables
`rails_storage_proxy` or other app-served Active Storage proxy routes
## Validation
- reviewed `config/environments/production.rb`
- reviewed `.env.example`
- reviewed Chatwoot storage docs:
https://developers.chatwoot.com/self-hosted/deployment/storage/s3-bucket
- reviewed Active Storage URL expectations in
`spec/controllers/slack_uploads_controller_spec.rb` and
`spec/services/line/send_on_line_service_spec.rb`
- ran `bundle exec bundle-audit check --no-update`
This change blocks Help Center access for default/Hacker-plan accounts
and closes the downgrade gap that could leave `help_center` enabled
after a subscription falls back to the default cloud plan.
Fixes: none
Closes: none
## Why
Default-plan accounts should not be able to access the Help Center, but
the downgrade fallback path only reset the plan name and did not
reconcile premium feature flags. That meant some accounts could keep
`help_center` enabled even after landing back on the Hacker/default
plan.
## What this change does
- blocks Help Center portal and article access for default/Hacker-plan
accounts
- reconciles premium feature flags when a subscription falls back to the
default cloud plan, so `help_center` is disabled immediately instead of
waiting for a later webhook
- preserves existing account `custom_attributes` during Stripe customer
recreation instead of overwriting them
- adds Enterprise coverage for the default-plan access checks on hosted
and custom-domain Help Center routes
- fixes the public access check to use the resolved portal object so
blocked requests return the intended response instead of raising an
error
## Validation
1. Create or use an account on the default/Hacker cloud plan with an
active portal.
2. Visit the portal home page and a published article on both the
Chatwoot-hosted URL and a configured custom domain.
3. Confirm the Help Center is blocked for that account.
4. Downgrade a paid account back to the default/Hacker plan through the
Stripe webhook flow.
5. Confirm `help_center` is disabled right after the downgrade fallback
is processed and the account can no longer access the Help Center.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR upgrades the ProseMirror editor and enables automatic URL
linkification on paste. Previously, URLs were only linkified after a
user input event (e.g., typing a space). With this change, URLs are now
linkified instantly when pasted.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6682/email-channel-links-are-not-working
### https://github.com/chatwoot/prosemirror-schema/pull/42
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
**Screencast**
**Before**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d38725c9-a152-4c2c-8c33-3ee717f1628f
**After**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9a69a0b6-93ee-421e-896b-5a4e01a167ba
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR fixes the link formatting issue on the backend by adding
`:autolink` to `ChatwootMarkdownRenderer#render_message`, ensuring all
URLs are converted to `<a>` tags.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6682/email-channel-links-are-not-working
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
issue: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13921
Fix a typo in the Messages API operationId where `converation` was used
instead of `conversation`. This causes cspell errors when generating
client code with tools like Orval.
## What changed
- `swagger/paths/public/inboxes/messages/index.yml`: fixed operationId
from `list-all-converation-messages` to `list-all-conversation-messages`
- `swagger/swagger.json` and `swagger/tag_groups/client_swagger.json`:
regenerated to reflect the fix
## Note
If you are using a code generator like Orval against this swagger spec,
the generated function name will change from
`listAllConverationMessages` to `listAllConversationMessages`.
Self-hosted installations were incorrectly hitting the daily email rate
limit of 100, seeded from `installation_config`. Since self-hosted users
control their own infrastructure, email rate limiting should only apply
to Chatwoot Cloud.
Closes#13913
After a successful WhatsApp OAuth reauthorization, the health check runs
immediately and finds the phone number in a pending provisioning state
(`platform_type: NOT_APPLICABLE`). This incorrectly triggers
`prompt_reauthorization!`, re-setting the Redis disconnect flag and
sending a disconnect email — even though the reauth just succeeded.
The fix skips the health check during reauthorization flows. It still
runs for new channel creation.
Closes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/12556
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How to reproduce
1. Have a WhatsApp channel with a phone number in pending provisioning
state (display name not yet approved by Meta)
2. Complete the OAuth reauthorization flow
3. Observe that the user receives a "success" response but immediately
gets a disconnect email
## What changed
- `Whatsapp::EmbeddedSignupService#perform` now skips
`check_channel_health_and_prompt_reauth` when `inbox_id` is present
(reauthorization flow)
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
When syncing contacts to LeadSquared, the `Lead.CreateOrUpdate` API
defaults to searching by email. If a contact has no email (or a
different email) but a phone number matching an existing lead, the API
fails with `MXDuplicateEntryException` instead of finding and updating
the existing lead. This accounted for ~69% of all LeadSquared
integration errors, and cascaded into "Lead not found" failures when
posting transcript and conversation activities (~14% of errors).
## What changed
- `LeadClient#create_or_update_lead` now catches
`MXDuplicateEntryException` and retries the request once with
`SearchBy=Phone` appended to the body, telling the API to match on phone
number instead
- Once the retry succeeds, the returned lead ID is stored on the contact
(existing behavior), so all future events use the direct `update_lead`
path and never hit the duplicate error again
## How to reproduce
1. Create a lead in LeadSquared with phone number `+91-75076767676` and
email `a@example.com`
2. In Chatwoot, create a contact with the same phone number but a
different email (or no email)
3. Trigger a contact sync (via conversation creation or contact update)
4. Before fix: `MXDuplicateEntryException` error in logs, contact fails
to sync
5. After fix: retry with `SearchBy=Phone` finds and updates the existing
lead, stores the lead ID on the contact
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
- Add language_code setting to Dialogflow integration configuration
- Support 'auto' mode to detect language from contact's
additional_attributes
- Fallback to 'en-US' when no language is configured or detected
- Include comprehensive language options (22 languages)
- Add tests for language code configuration scenarios
Fixes#3071
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
<img width="815" height="506" alt="Screenshot 2026-01-10 220410"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/26d2619c-ed42-4c9a-a41d-9fb07ef91a30"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
This pull request fixes the model annotation tooling due to previous
incomplete migration from `annotate` to `annotaterb` gem (#12600). It
also improves the handling of serialized values in the
`InstallationConfig` model by ensuring a default value is set,
simplifying the code, and removing a workaround for YAML
deserialization.
**Annotation tooling updates:**
* Added `.annotaterb.yml` to configure the `annotate_rb` gem with
project-specific options, centralizing annotation settings.
* Replaced the custom `auto_annotate_models.rake` task with the standard
rake task from `annotate_rb`, and added `lib/tasks/annotate_rb.rake` to
load annotation tasks in development environments.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-9450d2359e45f1db407b3871dde787a25d60bb721aed179a65ffd2692e95fb4bL1-L61)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-578cdfc7ad56637e42472ea891ea286dff8803d9a1750afdbfeafec164d9b8b2R1-R8)
**Model serialization improvements:**
* Updated the `InstallationConfig` model to set a default value for the
`serialized_value` attribute, ensuring it always has a hash with
indifferent access and removing the need for a deserialization
workaround in the `value` method.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-b4bdde42c1ad0f584073818bd43dbd865b1b3b50d4701b131979f900d7c68297L22-R22)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-b4bdde42c1ad0f584073818bd43dbd865b1b3b50d4701b131979f900d7c68297L36-L39)
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Adds a Platform API endpoint that allows migrating existing Google and
Microsoft email channels (with OAuth credentials) into Chatwoot without
requiring end-users to re-authenticate. This enables customers who lack
Rails console access to programmatically migrate email channels from
legacy systems.
### How to test
1. Create a Platform App and grant it permissible access to a target
account
2. `POST /platform/api/v1/accounts/:account_id/email_channel_migrations`
with a payload like:
```json
{
"migrations": [
{
"email": "support@example.com",
"provider": "google",
"provider_config": {
"access_token": "...",
"refresh_token": "...",
"expires_on": "..."
},
"inbox_name": "Migrated Support"
}
]
}
```
3. Verify channels are created with correct provider, provider_config, and IMAP defaults
4. Verify partial failures (e.g. duplicate email) don't roll back other migrations in the batch
5. Verify unauthenticated and non-permissible requests return 401
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Webhook payloads (`message_created`, `message_updated`) started sending
channel-rendered HTML in the `content` field instead of the original raw
message content after PR #12878. This broke downstream agent bots and
integrations that expected plain text or markdown.
Closes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-109/webhook-payloads-send-channel-rendered-html-instead-of-raw-content
## How to reproduce
1. Connect an agent bot to a WebWidget inbox
2. Send a message with markdown formatting (e.g. `**bold**`) from the
widget
3. Observe the agent bot webhook payload — `content` field contains
`<p><strong>bold</strong></p>` instead of `**bold**`
## What changed
Split `MessageContentPresenter` into two public methods:
- `outgoing_content` — renders markdown for the target channel (used by
channel delivery services)
- `webhook_content` — returns raw content with CSAT survey URL when
applicable, no markdown rendering (used by `webhook_data`)
Updated `Message#webhook_data` to use `webhook_content` instead of
`outgoing_content`.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
- Adds `LimitNOFILE=65536` to both web and worker systemd service units
- Fixes recurring `Errno::EMFILE` (Too many open files) errors during
peak traffic after deploys
## Context
Puma workers idle at 720-770 open FDs against the default soft limit of
1024, leaving ~250 FDs of headroom. During deploy-triggered instance
refreshes at peak traffic, concurrent requests exhaust the remaining
FDs, causing EMFILE across all web instances.
3 incidents in March 2026 with escalating event counts. The hard limit
is already 524288, so this just raises the soft limit to a standard
production value.
Self-hosted instances pick this up automatically via `cwctl --upgrade`.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6685/errnoemfile-too-many-open-files-rb-sysopen
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Relocate controller from enterprise/ to app/ and add
Api::V1::Accounts::Captain::TasksController.prepend_mod_with for EE
overrides.
Fixes: Ai assist giving 404 on CE
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
before:
<img width="482" height="130" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f51dc28a-ac54-45c4-9015-6f956fdf5057"
/>
after:
<img width="458" height="182" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/eb86a679-5482-4157-9f4e-f3e9953d8649"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
Muhsin