## Description
Reverts [#14726](https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/14726)
(\"feat: Add sidebar unread counts for filters (CW-7262)\"), which
shipped in 4.15.0.
After 4.15.0 rolled out to prod the unread-counts-for-filters code path
caused a cascading incident:
- `Counter#ensure_filters_cache!` fires on every `/unread_counts/index`
and `update_last_seen` request.
- On cache miss it calls `Builder#build_filters_for!`, which:
- invokes `store.clear_user_filters!` -> `delete_matching` -> a Redis
`SCAN_each` over a per-user pattern keyspace, and
- runs 4 fresh SQL passes per user (mentions, participating, unattended,
and per-folder `Conversations::FilterService` queries).
- Threads blocked in the SCAN held their DB connections, the connection
pool exhausted, Sidekiq jobs were discarded with
`ActiveJob::DeserializationError: could not obtain a connection from the
pool`, and the enqueued queue blew past 200K.
Related:
[CW-7262](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7262/unread-counts-for-filters-folders)
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Description
Extends the conversation unread-count system so the left sidebar can
show unread badges for Mentions, Participating, Unattended, and saved
conversation folders. Folder badges reuse the existing `custom_filters`
conversation filter semantics, store user-scoped Redis sets lazily, and
skip unsupported folder filters so invalid saved folders continue to
render without a badge. The Unattended badge counts all visible unread
open conversations that match the existing unattended conversation
scope.
Closes
-
[CW-7262](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7262/unread-counts-for-filters-folders)
## What changed
- Added user-scoped unread-count Redis keys and cache builders for
mentions, participating conversations, unattended conversations, and
saved folder filters.
- Reused `Conversations::FilterService` through a relation-returning
path so folder counts match the folder conversation list behavior.
- Invalidated user filter caches from mention, participant,
custom-filter, and relevant conversation update events.
- Extended the unread-count endpoint payload and sidebar Vuex/sidebar
rendering for the new badge counts, including the Unattended sidebar
item.
- Added Ruby, Enterprise, request, listener, and frontend store coverage
for the new unread-count dimensions.
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Created local validation folders for `john@acme.inc` and confirmed the
unread-count payload includes open, resolved, and high-priority folder
badges while excluding the invalid unsupported folder.
- Added coverage for the Unattended badge rule: all visible unread open
conversations matching `Conversation.unattended`.
- Ran focused unread-count Ruby specs, including service, listener,
request, and Enterprise counter coverage.
- Ran frontend unread-count store specs.
- Ran RuboCop on the touched Ruby files.
- Ran ESLint through the project script; it completed with warnings in
existing unrelated files and no errors.
<img width="369" height="525" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-13 at 10 51 39 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/36b1d2c4-dac1-4f6f-9c0e-7ef5a6cc2975"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] Documentation changes are not required for this internal
unread-count behavior
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] No dependent downstream changes are required
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Adds a company selector to the contact details form so agents can
associate a contact with an existing company directly from the contact
page.
Closes
- None
Why
Contacts already expose company information through the CRM fields, but
the form only accepted free-text company names. As we split company CRM
work into smaller PRs, this keeps the contact page aligned with the
structured company model while preserving the existing company-name
behavior used by automations.
What changed
- Shows a company dropdown in the contact details form when the
Companies feature is enabled.
- Keeps legacy free-text company names editable when a contact has no
structured `company_id`.
- Allows Enterprise contact create/update APIs to accept account-scoped
`company_id`.
- Syncs `additional_attributes.company_name` when a contact is
associated with a company, including the existing email-domain
auto-association path.
- Serializes `company_id` in the contact model payload so the form can
show the current association.
How to test
1. Enable Companies for an account and open a contact details page.
2. In Edit contact details, use the Company field to select an existing
company.
3. Save the contact and refresh the page.
4. Confirm the selected company remains visible and the contact is
associated with that company.
5. Confirm contacts with only a legacy free-text company name still show
the text input instead of an empty selector.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description
* Added the ability to sort for 4 sub-sections under conversations
folders, teams, channels and labels.
* the sort options are basically created at, alphabetical and unread
counts along with both directions.
* for folders we don't have an unread count, so we sort it by only
created and alphabetical.
* all the sort preferences are stored on the frontend - easiest
implementation for now.
Fixes # CW-7193
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tested this locally by visually verifying the changes. Also ran the
newly added tests for component level changes.
Here is the screenshot of the changes:
Added the sort option to sub sections in the conversation sidebar:
<img width="282" height="848" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-02 at 1 58 12 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4a7c6061-86e3-438a-92ae-ee643a0128b6"
/>
The sort options looks like this:
<img width="783" height="698" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-02 at 1 58 49 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a15bb0a7-b810-4423-a88c-fbd84d0476c0"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
## Description
This PR fixes a data-corruption bug in the new conversation flow that
surfaces in conversation search results as `Subject: undefined`.
### The Problem
When creating a conversation through the "New conversation" modal
without typing a subject (every non-email channel never shows the
subject input, and email channels can be left blank), the conversation
gets persisted with `additional_attributes.mail_subject = "undefined"`
(the literal string). The bogus value shows up in conversation search
results as `Subject: undefined`, which started rendering after #10843.
### Root Cause
`createConversationPayload` in
`app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/contactConversations.js` appends
the `mail_subject` field unconditionally:
```js
payload.append('additional_attributes[mail_subject]', mailSubject);
```
`composeConversationHelper.js` only sets `payload.mailSubject` when
`subject` is truthy, so when no subject is provided, `mailSubject` is
destructured as `undefined` in `createConversationPayload`.
`FormData.append` coerces `undefined` to the string `"undefined"`, and
the backend persists it as-is into the JSONB column.
### The Fix
Skip the append when `mailSubject` is falsy. The backend already treats
a missing key the same as an empty subject (the email mailer falls back
to a default subject when `mail_subject` is `nil`), so omitting the
field is safe across channels.
### Key Changes
- Guarded the `additional_attributes[mail_subject]` append in
`createConversationPayload`.
- Added a spec covering the case where `mailSubject` is omitted.
> Note: existing rows persisted before this fix will continue to show
`Subject: undefined` in search until cleaned up. A simple SQL cleanup
for non-email inboxes:
>
> ```sql
> UPDATE conversations
> SET additional_attributes = additional_attributes - 'mail_subject'
> FROM inboxes
> WHERE conversations.inbox_id = inboxes.id
> AND inboxes.channel_type <> 'Channel::Email'
> AND conversations.additional_attributes->>'mail_subject' =
'undefined';
> ```
>
> I'm leaving any data-cleanup migration out of this PR since it's a
maintenance concern that may be handled differently per installation.
## Type of change
- [X] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
1. Open the "New conversation" modal on a non-email inbox (e.g.,
WhatsApp, SMS, API).
2. Create a conversation without filling any subject (field is not
present on those, so regular flow).
3. Open the global search and search for the conversation.
4. **Before:** the result card shows `Subject: undefined`.
**After:** the subject row is hidden.
5. Repeat on an email inbox leaving the subject blank — same result.
6. On an email inbox, type a subject and verify it still persists and
renders correctly.
7. Run the new spec: `pnpm test contactConversations`.
## Checklist:
- [X] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [X] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [X] My changes generate no new warnings
- [X] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [X] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
## Description
Adds the unread count for All Conversations to the left sidebar. The
unread counts API now returns an `all_count` aggregate based on the same
permission-scoped inbox counts already used for sidebar badges, and the
sidebar renders that backend-provided value on the All Conversations
item.
Fixes
[CW-7240](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7240/unread-count-for-all-conversations)
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
- `bundle exec rspec
spec/services/conversations/unread_counts/counter_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/conversations/unread_counts/counter_spec.rb
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/conversations_controller_spec.rb`
- `pnpm test
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/specs/conversationUnreadCounts/actions.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/specs/conversationUnreadCounts/getters.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/specs/conversationUnreadCounts/mutations.spec.js`
- `pnpm exec eslint
app/javascript/dashboard/components-next/sidebar/Sidebar.vue
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/conversationUnreadCounts.js
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/specs/conversationUnreadCounts/actions.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/specs/conversationUnreadCounts/getters.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/specs/conversationUnreadCounts/mutations.spec.js`
- `bundle exec rubocop
app/services/conversations/unread_counts/counter.rb
spec/services/conversations/unread_counts/counter_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/conversations/unread_counts/counter_spec.rb
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/conversations_controller_spec.rb`
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Adds a Contact condition to the conversation advanced filter so agents
can search for an existing contact and filter conversations by
`conversations.contact_id`.
Fixes
[CW-7239](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7239/contact-filter-for-conversations)
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
- `eval "$(rbenv init -)" && bundle exec rspec
spec/services/conversations/filter_service_spec.rb`
- `pnpm exec vitest --no-watch --no-cache --no-coverage --logHeapUsage
app/javascript/dashboard/components-next/filter/helper/filterHelper.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/conversations/helpers/specs/filterHelpers.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/helper/specs/customViewsHelper.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/helper/specs/filterQueryGenerator.spec.js`
- `pnpm eslint`
- `eval "$(rbenv init -)" && bundle exec rubocop
spec/services/conversations/filter_service_spec.rb`
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
This reverts #14610 so conversation unread counts are again controlled
by the `conversation_unread_counts` feature flag across the API,
ActionCable broadcasts, notifier/listener paths, and dashboard sidebar
fetching.
## Closes
- None
## What changed
- Restores feature-flag checks for conversation unread count reads and
broadcasts.
- Restores the dashboard feature flag constant and sidebar/store
behavior for disabled unread counts.
- Restores the specs that cover disabled-feature behavior.
## How to test
- In an account with `conversation_unread_counts` enabled, verify
sidebar unread counts are fetched and updated in real time.
- Disable `conversation_unread_counts` for the account and verify unread
count requests/broadcasts are skipped.
## Description
Make conversation unread counts always available at runtime by removing
account feature checks from the API endpoint, unread-count listener,
notifier, and ActionCable broadcast path.
Update the dashboard to fetch sidebar unread counts for the active
account without checking FEATURE_FLAGS.CONVERSATION_UNREAD_COUNTS, and
remove the now-unused store clear action that only supported the
disabled state.
Keep the feature entry in config/features.yml to preserve flag bit
order, but mark it enabled and deprecated so fresh installs default to
the always-on behavior while feature-management UI hides it.
Leave existing installation default rows untouched; no migration is
included, so upgraded installs may still store the old flag value but
runtime behavior no longer depends on it.
Update specs around the new always-on contract and remove obsolete
disabled-feature assertions.
Fixes # CW-7237
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Update specs around the new always-on contract and remove obsolete
disabled-feature assertions. Ran specs locally for the changes.
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This is the third and final PR in a series of PRs for Introducing unread
counts in the sidebar for inboxes and labels.
In this PR:
* Added frontend changes to show the badges for unread counts for
Inboxes and Labels
* Added specs for the changes
Issue:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6851/support-unread-conversation-counts
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tested this locally. Cases to test:
* Send a message from the widget and see if the count changes
* Mark a conversation as unread and see the count change for inbox
* Open an unread conversation as agent and see the count go down
* Add a label to an unread conversation from sidebar right click action
without opening the conversation and see the count of un-reads on the
label change
Added the screenshot of how it will look like
<img width="614" height="990" alt="Screenshot 2026-05-05 at 7 00 11 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/99fbaa9f-bcf2-4d8d-86e2-5727f652a9dd"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
- Validates openai key while configuring hooks
- added backfill logic
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
locally
<img width="1710" height="1234" alt="CleanShot 2026-04-15 at 16 15
02@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3d319fe0-19f9-4fd0-9308-74987daac2e1"
/>
<img width="2884" height="1136" alt="CleanShot 2026-05-11 at 19 22
53@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5eae8650-985b-4c4a-af42-35f7175ff52d"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR enables the **Participating** conversation view in the main
sidebar and keeps the behavior aligned with existing conversation views.
## What changed
- Added **Participating** under Conversations in the new sidebar.
- Added a guard in conversation realtime `addConversation` flow so
generic `conversation.created` events are not injected while the user is
on Participating view.
- Added participating route mapping in conversation-list redirect helper
so list redirects resolve correctly to `/participating/conversations`.
## Scope notes
- Kept changes minimal and consistent with current `develop` behavior.
- No additional update-event filtering was added beyond what existing
views already do.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Agents using API channel inboxes (e.g., WhatsApp Automate) reported
seeing the same conversation appear twice in their conversation list —
one showing the last message preview and the other showing "No
Messages". Backend investigation confirmed no duplicate conversations
exist in the database, making this purely a frontend issue.
The root cause is a race condition in WebSocket event delivery. When a
conversation is created via the API with auto-assignment, the backend
enqueues multiple ActionCable broadcast jobs (`conversation.created`,
`assignee.changed`, `team.changed`) within milliseconds of each other.
In production with multi-threaded Sidekiq workers, these events can
arrive at the frontend out of order. If `assignee.changed` arrives
before `conversation.created`, the `UPDATE_CONVERSATION` mutation pushes
the conversation into the store (since it doesn't exist yet), and then
`ADD_CONVERSATION` blindly pushes it again — resulting in a duplicate
entry.
The fix adds a uniqueness check in the `ADD_CONVERSATION` mutation to
skip the push if a conversation with the same ID already exists in the
store, matching the dedup pattern already used by
`SET_ALL_CONVERSATION`.
For large accounts, summary report queries can take several seconds to
complete, often times hitting the 15-second production request timeout.
The existing implementation silently swallows these failures and
provides no feedback during loading. Users see stale data with no
indication that a fetch is in progress, and if they interact with
filters while a request is in flight, they trigger race conditions that
can result in mismatched data being displayed.
This is a UX-level fix for what is fundamentally a performance problem.
While the underlying query performance is addressed separately, users
need proper feedback either way
## Approach
The PR adds three things:
1. A loading overlay on the table, to provide feedback on loading state
2. Disabled filter inputs during loading so that the user does not
request new information that can cause race conditions in updating the
store
3. Silent retry before showing an error.
The retry exists because these queries often succeed on the second
attempt—likely due to database query caching. Rather than immediately
showing an error and forcing the user to manually retry, we do it
automatically. If the second attempt also fails, we show a toast so the
user knows something went wrong.
The store previously caught and discarded errors entirely. It now
rethrows them after resetting the loading flag, allowing components to
handle failures as they see fit.
### Previews
#### Double Retry and Error
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c189b173-8017-44b7-9493-417d65582c95
#### Loading State
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9f899c20-fbad-469b-93cc-f0d05d0853b0
---------
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
We are expanding Chatwoot’s automation capabilities by
introducing **Conversation Workflows**, a dedicated section in settings
where teams can configure rules that govern how conversations are closed
and what information agents must fill before resolving. This feature
helps teams enforce data consistency, collect structured resolution
information, and ensure downstream reporting is accurate.
Instead of having auto‑resolution buried inside Account Settings, we
introduced a new sidebar item:
- Auto‑resolve conversations (existing behaviour)
- Required attributes on resolution (new)
This groups all conversation‑closing logic into a single place.
#### Required Attributes on Resolve
Admins can now pick which custom conversation attributes must be filled
before an agent can resolve a conversation.
**How it works**
- Admin selects one or more attributes from the list of existing
conversation level custom attributes.
- These selected attributes become mandatory during resolution.
- List all the attributes configured via Required Attributes (Text,
Number, Link, Date, List, Checkbox)
- When an agent clicks Resolve Conversation:
If attributes already have values → the conversation resolves normally.
If attributes are missing → a modal appears prompting the agent to fill
them.
<img width="1554" height="1282" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 42
23@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4cd5d6e1-abe8-4999-accd-d4a08913b373"
/>
#### Custom Attributes Integration
On the Custom Attributes page, we will surfaced indicators showing how
each attribute is being used.
Each attribute will show badges such as:
- Resolution → used in the required‑on‑resolve workflow
- Pre‑chat form → already existing
<img width="2390" height="1822" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 43
42@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b92a6eb7-7f6c-40e6-bf23-6a5310f2d9c5"
/>
#### Admin Flow
- Navigate to Settings → Conversation Workflows.
- Under Required attributes on resolve, click Add Required Attribute.
- Pick from the dropdown list of conversation attributes.
- Save changes.
Agents will now be prompted automatically whenever they resolve.
<img width="2434" height="872" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 44 42@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/632fc0e5-767c-4a1c-8cf4-ffe3d058d319"
/>
#### NOTES
- The Required Attributes on Resolve modal should only appear when
values are missing.
- Required attributes must block the resolution action until satisfied.
- Bulk‑resolve actions should follow the same rules — any conversation
missing attributes cannot be bulk‑resolved, rest will be resolved, show
a notification that the resolution cannot be done.
- API resolution does not respect the attributes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
CSAT scores are helpful, but on their own they rarely tell the full
story. A drop in rating can come from delayed timelines, unclear
expectations, or simple misunderstandings, even when the issue itself
was handled correctly.
Review Notes for CSAT let admins/report manager roles add internal-only
context next to each CSAT response. This makes it easier to interpret
scores properly and focus on patterns and root causes, not just numbers.
<img width="2170" height="1680" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56df7fab-d0a7-4a94-95b9-e4c459ad33d5"
/>
### Why this matters
* Capture the real context behind individual CSAT ratings
* Clarify whether a low score points to a genuine service issue or a
process gap
* Spot recurring themes across conversations and teams
* Make CSAT reviews more useful for leadership reviews and
retrospectives
### How Review Notes work
**View CSAT responses**
Open the CSAT report to see overall metrics, rating distribution, and
individual responses.
**Add a Review Note**
For any CSAT entry, managers can add a Review Note directly below the
customer’s feedback.
**Document internal insights**
Use Review Notes to capture things like:
* Why a score was lower or higher than expected
* Patterns you are seeing across similar cases
* Observations around communication, timelines, or customer expectations
Review Notes are visible only to administrators and people with report
access only. We may expand visibility to agents in the future based on
feedback. However, customers never see them.
Each note clearly shows who added it and when, making it easy to review
context and changes over time.
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds support for exporting conversation summary reports as CSV.
Previously, the Conversations report incorrectly showed an option to
download agent reports; this has now been fixed to export
conversation-level data instead.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6176/conversation-reports-export-button-exports-agent-reports-instead
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshot
<img width="1859" height="1154" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/419d26f4-fda9-4782-aea6-55ffad0c37ab"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
## Description
Implements comprehensive search functionality with advanced filtering
capabilities for Chatwoot (Linear: CW-5956).
This PR adds:
1. **Time-based filtering** for contacts and conversations (SQL-based
search)
2. **Advanced message search** with multiple filters
(OpenSearch/Elasticsearch-based)
- **`from` filter**: Filter messages by sender (format: `contact:42` or
`agent:5`)
- **`inbox_id` filter**: Filter messages by specific inbox
- **Time range filters**: Filter messages using `since` and `until`
parameters (Unix timestamps in seconds)
- **90-day limit enforcement**: Automatically limits searches to the
last 90 days to prevent performance issues
The implementation extends the existing `Enterprise::SearchService`
module for advanced features and adds time filtering to the base
`SearchService` for SQL-based searches.
## API Documentation
### Base URL
All search endpoints follow this pattern:
```
GET /api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/search/{resource}
```
### Authentication
All requests require authentication headers:
```
api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN
```
---
## 1. Search All Resources
**Endpoint:** `GET /api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/search`
Returns results from all searchable resources (contacts, conversations,
messages, articles).
### Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Description | Required |
|-----------|------|-------------|----------|
| `q` | string | Search query | Yes |
| `page` | integer | Page number (15 items per page) | No |
| `since` | integer | Unix timestamp (contacts/conversations only) | No
|
| `until` | integer | Unix timestamp (contacts/conversations only) | No
|
### Example Request
```bash
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search?q=customer" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
### Example Response
```json
{
"payload": {
"contacts": [...],
"conversations": [...],
"messages": [...],
"articles": [...]
}
}
```
---
## 2. Search Contacts
**Endpoint:** `GET /api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/search/contacts`
Search contacts by name, email, phone number, or identifier with
optional time filtering.
### Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Description | Required |
|-----------|------|-------------|----------|
| `q` | string | Search query | Yes |
| `page` | integer | Page number (15 items per page) | No |
| `since` | integer | Unix timestamp - filter by last_activity_at | No |
| `until` | integer | Unix timestamp - filter by last_activity_at | No |
### Example Requests
**Basic search:**
```bash
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/contacts?q=john" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Search contacts active in the last 7 days:**
```bash
SINCE=$(date -v-7d +%s)
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/contacts?q=john&since=${SINCE}" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Search contacts active between 30 and 7 days ago:**
```bash
SINCE=$(date -v-30d +%s)
UNTIL=$(date -v-7d +%s)
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/contacts?q=john&since=${SINCE}&until=${UNTIL}" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
### Example Response
```json
{
"payload": {
"contacts": [
{
"id": 42,
"email": "john@example.com",
"name": "John Doe",
"phone_number": "+1234567890",
"identifier": "user_123",
"additional_attributes": {},
"created_at": 1701234567
}
]
}
}
```
---
## 3. Search Conversations
**Endpoint:** `GET /api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/search/conversations`
Search conversations by display ID, contact name, email, phone number,
or identifier with optional time filtering.
### Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Description | Required |
|-----------|------|-------------|----------|
| `q` | string | Search query | Yes |
| `page` | integer | Page number (15 items per page) | No |
| `since` | integer | Unix timestamp - filter by last_activity_at | No |
| `until` | integer | Unix timestamp - filter by last_activity_at | No |
### Example Requests
**Basic search:**
```bash
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/conversations?q=billing" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Search conversations active in the last 24 hours:**
```bash
SINCE=$(date -v-1d +%s)
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/conversations?q=billing&since=${SINCE}" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Search conversations from last month:**
```bash
SINCE=$(date -v-30d +%s)
UNTIL=$(date +%s)
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/conversations?q=billing&since=${SINCE}&until=${UNTIL}" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
### Example Response
```json
{
"payload": {
"conversations": [
{
"id": 123,
"display_id": 45,
"inbox_id": 1,
"status": "open",
"messages": [...],
"meta": {...}
}
]
}
}
```
---
## 4. Search Messages (Advanced)
**Endpoint:** `GET /api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/search/messages`
Advanced message search with multiple filters powered by
OpenSearch/Elasticsearch.
### Prerequisites
- OpenSearch/Elasticsearch must be running (`OPENSEARCH_URL` env var
configured)
- Account must have `advanced_search` feature flag enabled
- Messages must be indexed in OpenSearch
### Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Description | Required |
|-----------|------|-------------|----------|
| `q` | string | Search query | Yes |
| `page` | integer | Page number (15 items per page) | No |
| `from` | string | Filter by sender: `contact:{id}` or `agent:{id}` |
No |
| `inbox_id` | integer | Filter by specific inbox ID | No |
| `since` | integer | Unix timestamp - searches from this time (max 90
days ago) | No |
| `until` | integer | Unix timestamp - searches until this time | No |
### Important Notes
- **90-Day Limit**: If `since` is not provided, searches default to the
last 90 days
- If `since` exceeds 90 days, returns `422` error: "Search is limited to
the last 90 days"
- All time filters use message `created_at` timestamp
### Example Requests
**Basic message search:**
```bash
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/messages?q=refund" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Search messages from a specific contact:**
```bash
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/messages?q=refund&from=contact:42" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Search messages from a specific agent:**
```bash
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/messages?q=refund&from=agent:5" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Search messages in a specific inbox:**
```bash
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/messages?q=refund&inbox_id=3" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Search messages from the last 7 days:**
```bash
SINCE=$(date -v-7d +%s)
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/messages?q=refund&since=${SINCE}" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Search messages between specific dates:**
```bash
SINCE=$(date -v-30d +%s)
UNTIL=$(date -v-7d +%s)
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/messages?q=refund&since=${SINCE}&until=${UNTIL}" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Combine all filters:**
```bash
SINCE=$(date -v-14d +%s)
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/messages?q=refund&from=contact:42&inbox_id=3&since=${SINCE}" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Attempt to search beyond 90 days (returns error):**
```bash
SINCE=$(date -v-120d +%s)
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/messages?q=refund&since=${SINCE}" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
### Example Response (Success)
```json
{
"payload": {
"messages": [
{
"id": 789,
"content": "I need a refund for my purchase",
"message_type": "incoming",
"created_at": 1701234567,
"conversation_id": 123,
"inbox_id": 3,
"sender": {
"id": 42,
"type": "contact"
}
}
]
}
}
```
### Example Response (90-day limit exceeded)
```json
{
"error": "Search is limited to the last 90 days"
}
```
**Status Code:** `422 Unprocessable Entity`
---
## 5. Search Articles
**Endpoint:** `GET /api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/search/articles`
Search help center articles by title or content.
### Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Description | Required |
|-----------|------|-------------|----------|
| `q` | string | Search query | Yes |
| `page` | integer | Page number (15 items per page) | No |
### Example Request
```bash
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/articles?q=installation" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
### Example Response
```json
{
"payload": {
"articles": [
{
"id": 456,
"title": "Installation Guide",
"slug": "installation-guide",
"portal_slug": "help",
"account_id": 1,
"category_name": "Getting Started",
"status": "published",
"updated_at": 1701234567
}
]
}
}
```
---
## Technical Implementation
### SQL-Based Search (Contacts, Conversations, Articles)
- Uses PostgreSQL `ILIKE` queries by default
- Optional GIN index support via `search_with_gin` feature flag for
better performance
- Time filtering uses `last_activity_at` for contacts/conversations
- Returns paginated results (15 per page)
### Advanced Search (Messages)
- Powered by OpenSearch/Elasticsearch via Searchkick gem
- Requires `OPENSEARCH_URL` environment variable
- Requires `advanced_search` account feature flag
- Enforces 90-day lookback limit via
`Limits::MESSAGE_SEARCH_TIME_RANGE_LIMIT_DAYS`
- Validates inbox access permissions before filtering
- Returns paginated results (15 per page)
---
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] Enhancement (improves existing functionality)
---
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Unit Tests
- **Contact Search Tests**: 3 new test cases for time filtering
(`since`, `until`, combined)
- **Conversation Search Tests**: 3 new test cases for time filtering
- **Message Search Tests**: 10+ test cases covering:
- Individual filters (`from`, `inbox_id`, time range)
- Combined filters
- Permission validation for inbox access
- Feature flag checks
- 90-day limit enforcement
- Error handling for exceeded time limits
### Test Commands
```bash
# Run all search controller tests
bundle exec rspec spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/search_controller_spec.rb
# Run search service tests (includes enterprise specs)
bundle exec rspec spec/services/search_service_spec.rb
```
### Manual Testing Setup
A rake task is provided to create 50,000 test messages across multiple
inboxes:
```bash
# 1. Create test data
bundle exec rake search:setup_test_data
# 2. Start OpenSearch
mise elasticsearch-start
# 3. Reindex messages
rails runner "Message.search_index.import Message.all"
# 4. Enable feature flag
rails runner "Account.first.enable_features('advanced_search')"
# 5. Test via API or Rails console
```
---
## Checklist
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (this PR
description)
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---
## Additional Notes
### Requirements
- **OpenSearch/Elasticsearch**: Required for advanced message search
- Set `OPENSEARCH_URL` environment variable
- Example: `export OPENSEARCH_URL=http://localhost:9200`
- **Feature Flags**:
- `advanced_search`: Account-level flag for message advanced search
- `search_with_gin` (optional): Account-level flag for GIN-based SQL
search
### Performance Considerations
- 90-day limit prevents expensive long-range queries on large datasets
- GIN indexes recommended for high-volume search on SQL-based resources
- OpenSearch/Elasticsearch provides faster full-text search for messages
### Breaking Changes
- None. All new parameters are optional and backward compatible.
### Frontend Integration
- Frontend PR tracking advanced search UI will consume these endpoints
- Time range pickers should convert JavaScript `Date` to Unix timestamps
(seconds)
- Date conversion: `Math.floor(date.getTime() / 1000)`
### Error Handling
- Invalid `from` parameter format is silently ignored (filter not
applied)
- Time range exceeding 90 days returns `422` with error message
- Missing `q` parameter returns `422` (existing behavior)
- Unauthorized inbox access is filtered out (no error, just excluded
from results)
---------
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
fixes: #11834
This pull request introduces TikTok channel integration, enabling users
to connect and manage TikTok business accounts similarly to other
supported social channels. The changes span backend API endpoints,
authentication helpers, webhook handling, configuration, and frontend
components to support TikTok as a first-class channel.
**Key Notes**
* This integration is only compatible with TikTok Business Accounts
* Special permissions are required to access the TikTok [Business
Messaging
API](https://business-api.tiktok.com/portal/docs?id=1832183871604753).
* The Business Messaging API is region-restricted and is currently
unavailable to users in the EU.
* Only TEXT, IMAGE, and POST_SHARE messages are currently supported due
to limitations in the TikTok Business Messaging API
* A message will be successfully sent only if it contains text alone or
one image attachment. Messages with multiple attachments or those
combining text and attachments will fail and receive a descriptive error
status.
* Messages sent directly from the TikTok App will be synced into the
system
* Initiating a new conversation from the system is not permitted due to
limitations from the TikTok Business Messaging API.
**Backend: TikTok Channel Integration**
* Added `Api::V1::Accounts::Tiktok::AuthorizationsController` to handle
TikTok OAuth authorization initiation, returning the TikTok
authorization URL.
* Implemented `Tiktok::CallbacksController` to handle TikTok OAuth
callback, process authorization results, create or update channel/inbox,
and handle errors or denied scopes.
* Added `Webhooks::TiktokController` to receive and verify TikTok
webhook events, including signature verification and event dispatching.
* Created `Tiktok::IntegrationHelper` module for JWT-based token
generation and verification for secure TikTok OAuth state management.
**Configuration and Feature Flags**
* Added TikTok app credentials (`TIKTOK_APP_ID`, `TIKTOK_APP_SECRET`) to
allowed configs and app config, and registered TikTok as a feature in
the super admin features YAML.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-5e46e1d248631a1147521477d84a54f8ba6846ea21c61eca5f70042d960467f4R43)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-8bf37a019cab1dedea458c437bd93e34af1d6e22b1672b1d43ef6eaa4dcb7732R69)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-123164bea29f3c096b0d018702b090d5ae670760c729141bd4169a36f5f5c1caR74-R79)
**Frontend: TikTok Channel UI and Messaging Support**
* Added `TiktokChannel` API client for frontend TikTok authorization
requests.
* Updated channel icon mappings and tests to include TikTok
(`Channel::Tiktok`).
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-b852739ed45def61218d581d0de1ba73f213f55570aa5eec52aaa08f380d0e16R16)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-3cd3ae32e94ef85f1f2c4435abf0775cc0614fb37ee25d97945cd51573ef199eR64-R69)
* Enabled TikTok as a supported channel in contact forms, channel
widgets, and feature toggles.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-ec59c85e1403aaed1a7de35971fe16b7033d5cd763be590903ebf8f1ca25a010R47)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-ec59c85e1403aaed1a7de35971fe16b7033d5cd763be590903ebf8f1ca25a010R69)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-725b90ca7e3a6837ec8291e9f57094f6a46b3ee00e598d16564f77f32cf354b0R26-R29)
[[4]](diffhunk://#diff-725b90ca7e3a6837ec8291e9f57094f6a46b3ee00e598d16564f77f32cf354b0R51-R54)
[[5]](diffhunk://#diff-725b90ca7e3a6837ec8291e9f57094f6a46b3ee00e598d16564f77f32cf354b0R68)
* Updated message meta logic to support TikTok-specific message statuses
(sent, delivered, read).
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696R23)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696L63-R65)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696L81-R84)
[[4]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696L103-R107)
* Added support for embedded message attachments (e.g., TikTok embeds)
with a new `EmbedBubble` component and updated message rendering logic.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-c3d701caf27d9c31e200c6143c11a11b9d8826f78aa2ce5aa107470e6fdb9d7fR31)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-047859f9368a46d6d20177df7d6d623768488ecc38a5b1e284f958fad49add68R1-R19)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-c3d701caf27d9c31e200c6143c11a11b9d8826f78aa2ce5aa107470e6fdb9d7fR316)
[[4]](diffhunk://#diff-cbc85e7c4c8d56f2a847d0b01cd48ef36e5f87b43023bff0520fdfc707283085R52)
* Adjusted reply policy and UI messaging for TikTok's 48-hour reply
window.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-0d691f6a983bd89502f91253ecf22e871314545d1e3d3b106fbfc76bf6d8e1c7R208-R210)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-0d691f6a983bd89502f91253ecf22e871314545d1e3d3b106fbfc76bf6d8e1c7R224-R226)
These changes collectively enable end-to-end TikTok channel support,
from configuration and OAuth flow to webhook processing and frontend
message handling.
------------
# TikTok App Setup & Configuration
1. Grant access to the Business Messaging API
([Documentation](https://business-api.tiktok.com/portal/docs?id=1832184145137922))
2. Set the app authorization redirect URL to
`https://FRONTEND_URL/tiktok/callback`
3. Update the installation config with TikTok App ID and Secret
4. Create a Business Messaging Webhook configuration and set the
callback url to `https://FRONTEND_URL/webhooks/tiktok`
([Documentation](https://business-api.tiktok.com/portal/docs?id=1832190670631937))
. You can do this by calling
`Tiktok::AuthClient.update_webhook_callback` from rails console once you
finish Tiktok channel configuration in super admin ( will be automated
in future )
5. Enable TikTok channel feature in an account
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This Pull Request will provide a language selector in the Profile
Settings for each user, and allows them to change the UI language per
agent, defaulting back to the account locale.
Fixes # #678 This does PR addresses the Dashboard view but does not
change the language of the agents emails
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [X ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
1. Go to an Agents Profile settings page
2. Select a language from the Language drop down
3. the UI will update to the new i18n locale
4. navigate through the UI to make sure the appropriate language is
being used
5. Refresh the page to test that the locale persists
270
- [X] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [X] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [X] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [X] My changes generate no new warnings
- [X] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [X] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [X] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Checklist:.724.2708
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds support for WhatsApp campaigns to Chatwoot, allowing
businesses to reach their customers through WhatsApp. The implementation
includes backend support for WhatsApp template messages, frontend UI
components, and integration with the existing campaign system.
Fixes#8465
Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-3390/whatsapp-campaigns
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Tested WhatsApp campaign creation UI flow
- Verified backend API endpoints for campaign creation
- Tested campaign service integration with WhatsApp templates
- Validated proper filtering of WhatsApp campaigns in the store
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## What we have changed:
We have added support for WhatsApp campaigns as requested in the
discussion.
Ref: https://github.com/orgs/chatwoot/discussions/8465
**Note:** This implementation doesn't exactly match the maintainer's
specification and variable support is missing. This is an initial
implementation that provides the core WhatsApp campaign functionality.
### Changes included:
**Backend:**
- Added `template_params` column to campaigns table (migration + schema)
- Created `Whatsapp::OneoffCampaignService` for WhatsApp campaign
execution
- Updated campaign model to support WhatsApp inbox types
- Added template_params support to campaign controller and API
**Frontend:**
- Added WhatsApp campaign page, dialog, and form components
- Updated campaign store to filter WhatsApp campaigns separately
- Added WhatsApp-specific routes and empty state
- Updated i18n translations for WhatsApp campaigns
- Modified sidebar to include WhatsApp campaigns navigation
This provides a foundation for WhatsApp campaigns that can be extended
with variable support and other enhancements in future iterations.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR introduces a new channel type for voice conversations.
ref: #11481
## Changes
- Add database migration for channel_voice table with phone_number and
provider_config
- Create Channel::Voice model with E.164 phone number validation and
Twilio config validation
- Add voice channel association to Account model
- Extend inbox helpers and types to support voice channels
- Add voice channel setup UI with Twilio configuration form
- Include voice channel in channel factory and list components
- Add API routes and store actions for voice channel creation
- Add comprehensive translations for voice channel management
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
### Summary
- Converts conversation auto-resolution duration from days to minutes
for more
granular control
- Updates validation to allow values from 10 minutes (minimum) to 999
days (maximum)
- Implements smart messaging to show appropriate time units in activity
messages
### Changes
- Created migration to convert existing durations from days to minutes
(x1440)
- Updated conversation resolver to use minutes instead of days
- Added dynamic translation key selection based on duration value
- Updated related specs and documentation
- Added support for displaying durations in days, hours, or minutes
based on value
### Test plan
- Verify account validation accepts new minute-based ranges
- Confirm existing account settings are correctly migrated
- Test auto-resolution works properly with minute values
- Ensure proper time unit display in activity messages
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
- Add agent bots management UI in settings with avatar upload
- Enable agent bot configuration for all inbox types
- Implement proper CRUD operations with webhook URL support
- Fix agent bots menu item visibility in settings sidebar
- Remove all CSML-related code and features
- Add migration to convert existing CSML bots to webhook bots
- Simplify agent bot model and services to focus on webhook bots
- Improve UI to differentiate between system bots and account bots
## Video
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3f4edbb7-b758-468c-8dd6-a9537b983f7d
---------
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
We have added warnings for existing Instagram messenger inboxes via
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/11303. There is an issue with
finding the correct Instagram/messenger inbox. This PR will fixes that
issue.
## Description
Add account delete option in the user account settings.
Fixes#1555
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan.official@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
