7d17c976cb3beb5cb3d32af4fe97b107a321b2d2
1767
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
7d17c976cb | Merge branch 'develop' into feat/idb-push-invalidation | ||
|
|
d9c07fe2e9 |
feat: expose onboarding help center generation status (#14671)
This PR adds a reload-safe onboarding Help Center generation status path. Previously, generation progress was pushed through ActionCable, which meant the onboarding UI could lose context after a page reload or missed websocket event. The new endpoint exposes the current generation id, raw Redis generation state, and Help Center article/category counts so clients can recover state by fetching from the backend. **What changed** - Added an onboarding Help Center generation status endpoint. - Persisted `help_center_generation_id` when generation is enqueued. - Removed Help Center generation ActionCable broadcasts completely. - Kept generation progress in Redis as the backend source of truth. - Kept Help Center generation out of the onboarding hot path; the existing onboarding controller does not start generation yet. **How to test** 1. Start Help Center generation for an account. 2. Fetch the onboarding generation status endpoint and verify it returns the generation id, Redis state, and article/category counts. 3. Reload the onboarding UI or client state and fetch again to confirm progress can be recovered without relying on websocket events. 4. Verify skipped/completed generation states are reflected from Redis. ## Related PRs - https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/14569 - https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/14568 - https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/14567 - https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/14619 - https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/14565 (Primary onboarding PR) |
||
|
|
f93f2067b6 |
fix(whatsapp): Drop obsolete WABA scope check broken by Meta embedded signup (#14697)
## Description Fixes WhatsApp embedded signup failing with "No WABA scope found in token." Meta recently changed which scopes embedded-signup tokens carry (whatsapp_business_manage_events instead of whatsapp_business_management), which tripped a brittle scope-string check. That check was redundant anyway — PhoneInfoService already verifies the token's access to the specific WABA by calling its /phone_numbers endpoint right before it. This removes the obsolete TokenValidationService and relies on the functional check. ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) ## Checklist: - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
d4dd5c64a7 | refactor: drive cache freshness from pushed key maps | ||
|
|
261deaaeec | feat: transmit cache keys on room channel subscribe | ||
|
|
59d869d1ed | feat: Ability to resize table column width (#14611) | ||
|
|
8a3b129292 |
fix: Disable re-oauth flow for manual whatsapp (#13599)
Restrict the WhatsApp reauthorization flag to channels whose
provider_config source is 'embedded_signup'. Previously the view exposed
resource.channel.reauthorization_required? for all WhatsApp channels;
now it only returns true when (provider_config || {}).to_h['source'] ==
'embedded_signup' && resource.channel.reauthorization_required?. This
prevents showing reauthorization prompts for manual/API-key flows
(non-OAuth) and safely handles nil provider_config.
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes #13553
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
|
||
|
|
af1dfc21f6 |
fix: include account data in webhook payloads (#12445)
Conversation and inbox webhook payloads now include the account object
(`{ id, name }`) so integrations can reliably identify the account
without depending on nested message data.
## Closes
Closes #11753
Closes #12442
## Why
Message, contact, and contact inbox webhook payloads already expose
`account`. Conversation and inbox webhook payloads were outliers, which
forced webhook consumers to infer account context from nested messages
or other fields that may not always be present.
## What changed
- Adds `account: { id, name }` to conversation webhook payloads.
- Adds webhook-specific inbox payload data with `account: { id, name }`
for inbox created/updated events.
- Keeps non-webhook conversation and inbox push payload behavior
unchanged.
## How to test
- Configure an account webhook for `conversation_created`, trigger a new
conversation, and confirm the webhook payload includes `account.id` and
`account.name`.
- Configure an account webhook for `inbox_created`, create a new inbox,
and confirm the webhook payload includes `account.id` and
`account.name`.
- Configure a webhook agent bot and update a conversation status, then
confirm the bot webhook payload includes the same account object.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
|
||
|
|
d1c482cb64 |
fix(email): strip null bytes from inbound mailbox messages (#14546)
Inbound emails containing null bytes could fail while Chatwoot persisted the incoming message, causing IMAP sync to drop and repeatedly retry the same malformed email. This strips null bytes at the inbound mailbox message persistence boundary so the rest of the email can be saved normally. Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7165/argumenterror-string-contains-null-byte-argumenterror Sentry: https://chatwoot-p3.sentry.io/issues/7405946944/ ## Test - [x] added specs - [x] manually tested the logic on prod for the inbox(email) which was throwing the error ## What changed - Sanitizes null bytes only while building attributes for inbound mailbox message persistence. - Uses the sanitized source ID for both duplicate lookup and message creation. - Adds regression coverage for the mailbox message creation path. --------- Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com> |
||
|
|
d8656edc61 |
fix(facebook): Stop force tagging Messenger replies with MESSAGE_TAG/ACCOUNT_UPDATE (#14329)
Outbound Facebook Messenger replies were always sent with `messaging_type: MESSAGE_TAG` and a `tag` of either `HUMAN_AGENT` or `ACCOUNT_UPDATE` (fallback). `ACCOUNT_UPDATE` is reserved by Meta policy for non-recurring account notifications (password resets, suspicious activity, account-status changes), so general agent replies were getting rejected by Facebook with "Invalid parameter" and risked page-level penalties. After this fix, Facebook treats default replies as standard `RESPONSE` messages within the 24-hour window, and only attaches `HUMAN_AGENT` tagging when the operator opts in via `ENABLE_MESSENGER_CHANNEL_HUMAN_AGENT`. ## Closes <!-- Add the relevant issue link, e.g. Closes #1234 --> ## How to reproduce 1. Connect a Facebook page inbox. 2. Leave `ENABLE_MESSENGER_CHANNEL_HUMAN_AGENT` disabled (default). 3. From the dashboard, reply to an active Messenger conversation with a regular/promotional message. 4. Before this PR: the request to Graph API includes `messaging_type=MESSAGE_TAG&tag=ACCOUNT_UPDATE`. Facebook returns "Invalid parameter" for content that does not match the `ACCOUNT_UPDATE` use case, and the message is marked failed in Chatwoot. 5. After this PR: the request omits `messaging_type` and `tag`, so Facebook treats it as a standard `RESPONSE` and accepts it within the 24-hour customer service window. ## What changed - `app/services/facebook/send_on_facebook_service.rb` now mirrors the Instagram service pattern: text and attachment params are built without `messaging_type`/`tag` by default, and a shared `merge_human_agent_tag` helper attaches `MESSAGE_TAG`/`HUMAN_AGENT` only when `ENABLE_MESSENGER_CHANNEL_HUMAN_AGENT` is enabled. - Removed the unused `sent_first_outgoing_message_after_24_hours?` helper (dead code with no callers). - Updated `spec/services/facebook/send_on_facebook_service_spec.rb`: dropped `ACCOUNT_UPDATE` expectations, added a spec asserting no `messaging_type`/`tag` is sent by default, and tightened the HUMAN_AGENT spec to verify both `messaging_type` and `tag`. ## Operator note Operators who were relying on the prior `ACCOUNT_UPDATE` fallback to bypass the 24-hour window were already in violation of Meta policy and likely seeing send failures. They should enable `ENABLE_MESSENGER_CHANNEL_HUMAN_AGENT` (and request the Human Agent permission from Meta) for the 7-day extended window --------- Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
e919a2cef5 |
feat: add contact filter for conversations (#14629)
# Pull Request Template ## Description Adds a Contact condition to the conversation advanced filter so agents can search for an existing contact and filter conversations by `conversations.contact_id`. Fixes [CW-7239](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7239/contact-filter-for-conversations) ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality not to work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? - `eval "$(rbenv init -)" && bundle exec rspec spec/services/conversations/filter_service_spec.rb` - `pnpm exec vitest --no-watch --no-cache --no-coverage --logHeapUsage app/javascript/dashboard/components-next/filter/helper/filterHelper.spec.js app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/conversations/helpers/specs/filterHelpers.spec.js app/javascript/dashboard/helper/specs/customViewsHelper.spec.js app/javascript/dashboard/helper/specs/filterQueryGenerator.spec.js` - `pnpm eslint` - `eval "$(rbenv init -)" && bundle exec rubocop spec/services/conversations/filter_service_spec.rb` ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules --------- Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
45f4b423ae |
fix: captain usage for BYOK OpenAI tasks (#14587)
# Pull Request Template ## Description Fixes: https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7167/label-suggestions-bad-ux ## Type of change Please delete options that are not relevant. - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) ## How Has This Been Tested? Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration. ## Checklist: - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules |
||
|
|
73ba0b26e5 |
fix(instagram): process webhook events after mutex retry exhaustion (#14647)
Instagram webhooks use a Redis mutex to protect the first-message path
for a contact/account pair. When multiple webhook events for the same
Instagram contact arrive at nearly the same time, they can all enter the
“find or create” flow together.
There are two pieces involved:
`ContactInbox` maps the external Instagram scoped user id to a Chatwoot
contact inside an inbox. That side already has a unique `(inbox_id,
source_id)` index and retry handling, so duplicate contact-inbox
creation is mostly protected at the database layer.
`Conversation` creation is more fragile. The message builder looks for
an existing active conversation for the contact/inbox and creates one
when none is found. If two first-message jobs run concurrently, both can
see “no active conversation yet” and both can create a conversation. The
mutex exists to bump those jobs apart long enough for the first one to
create the conversation, so the next one appends to it instead of
creating a duplicate.
In production, the old behavior could turn that race dampener into a
drop path. Once `Webhooks::InstagramEventsJob` exhausted its lock
retries, ActiveJob stopped retrying with
`MutexApplicationJob::LockAcquisitionError`. Since ActiveJob retries are
not FIFO, later jobs could still win the lock while older jobs kept
getting deferred until exhaustion.
## Mutex Application Job Changes
This adds `retry_on_lock_conflict` as a small wrapper around the
existing `retry_on LockAcquisitionError` pattern.
The new API keeps the default behavior intact, but lets jobs explicitly
define what should happen after lock retry exhaustion:
```ruby
retry_on_lock_conflict wait: 1.second,
attempts: 3,
on_exhaustion: :process_without_lock
```
The fallback receives the original job arguments, so job classes do not
need to reach into ActiveJob internals like `arguments.first`.
## Instagram Fallback
Instagram now processes the webhook payload even after the mutex retry
window is exhausted.
This matches what the mutex was meant to do in the first place: bump
concurrent events apart long enough to avoid duplicate conversation
creation, not permanently block or drop webhook events. If a job cannot
acquire the lock after a few retries, it continues through the normal
Instagram processing path without the mutex.
## Retry And Lock Tuning
The Instagram lock retry window now uses deterministic backoff:
```ruby
retry_on_lock_conflict wait: ->(executions) { executions.seconds },
attempts: 3,
on_exhaustion: :process_without_lock
```
The lock TTL is also set explicitly:
```ruby
with_lock(key, 3.seconds)
```
This matters because Rails treats `attempts` as total executions, not
retries after the first execution. With a fixed `wait: 1.second` and
`attempts: 3`, the exhaustion handler can run roughly two seconds after
the first lock conflict. That is earlier than a 3-second lock TTL, so
the fallback could process without the lock while the original mutex is
still valid. That would reopen the duplicate-conversation race the lock
is meant to dampen.
Using a proc wait makes the timing predictable and avoids Rails jitter
for this retry path. The first conflict waits about 1 second, the second
waits about 2 seconds, and the final attempt happens around the 3-second
mark. That lines the retry window up with the Redis lock TTL before
falling back to `process_without_lock`.
The protected race window is intentionally small. `ContactInbox`
creation already has database uniqueness protection, while conversation
creation is the softer `find active conversation || create` path. We
only need to give the first job enough time to create the conversation
state that later jobs should reuse.
The mutex still does not preserve message order, and ActiveJob retries
are not FIFO. A longer retry window would mostly add latency for hot
Instagram contacts without making ordering more correct. After the lock
TTL has elapsed, processing without the lock is the better tradeoff than
dead-lettering customer messages.
|
||
|
|
9d808a18df |
fix(drops): Resolve first_name for single-word contact and agent names (#13488)
WhatsApp template variables like `{{contact.first_name}}` previously
resolved to an empty string whenever a contact or agent had a
single-word name (e.g. "Petterson"). Because the variable came back
blank, WhatsApp template sends would either fail validation or get stuck
indefinitely in the "Sending" state. With this fix, `first_name` falls
back to the full single-word name, so templates render correctly for
everyone regardless of how many words their name has.
## Closes
- Fixes #13222
## How to reproduce
1. Create a contact with a single-word name (e.g. `Petterson`).
2. Configure a WhatsApp template action that uses
`{{contact.first_name}}`.
3. Send the template message.
4. **Before:** the variable resolves to an empty string and the message
fails / stays in "Sending".
**After:** the variable resolves to `Petterson` and the message sends.
## What changed
- Removed the "name must have 2+ words" guard from `first_name` in
`ContactDrop` and `UserDrop`, so a single-word name is returned (still
capitalized).
- Capitalization behavior introduced in #6758 is preserved; only the
single-word edge case changes.
- `last_name` still returns `nil` for single-word names, which is the
expected behavior.
- Added specs covering single-word names for both `ContactDrop` and
`UserDrop`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
||
|
|
64c5aeebee |
feat(help-center): support per-locale portal title, name & header (#14642)
Portals can now override their name, page title and header text per locale, with a fallback chain of locale override → default locale → base value. Overrides are stored under portal.config.locale_translations and validated with a JSON schema. Editing is exposed as a "Localize content" action in each non-default locale's menu on the Locale page, and all public-facing portal views (classic + documentation layouts) render the localized values. The live chat widget is also loaded in the active portal locale. <img width="494" height="395" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-03 at 2 48 59 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e55a06e8-f20f-4d8a-9352-92fde28a9a19" /> https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f5affbd2-7ad4-415a-b376-57c759fc2aaa --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
cd9192f7d1 |
chore(captain): update Firecrawl to use the v2 API (#14624)
## Description Migrates Firecrawl from the v1 to the v2 API. `Captain::Tools::FirecrawlService` now targets `api.firecrawl.dev/v2`, with the request body updated to match the v2 schema. > Disclosure: I work at Firecrawl. Fixes # (n/a) ## Type of change - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) ## How Has This Been Tested? Updated `spec/enterprise/services/captain/tools/firecrawl_service_spec.rb` to assert the v2 endpoint and request body. ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes --------- Co-authored-by: Aakash Bakhle <48802744+aakashb95@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
eaffad12e7 |
feat(langfuse): propagate observation metadata for evals (#14634)
# Pull Request Template ## Description We need to pass on trace level attributes down to the spans inside them like tool calls, observations, etc. This way, we can filter observations based on trace level attributes. ## Type of change - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) ## How Has This Been Tested? Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration. Attributes added to observation metadata for easy filtering <img width="1327" height="708" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8f1d1bf8-cde4-481d-a2c2-7920ad2fc52e" /> added a `generation_stage` to differentiate llm_calls that call tools vs those that generate a `final_response` <img width="1806" height="968" alt="CleanShot 2026-06-03 at 15 11 09@2x" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/db1fa8e0-7f2d-404b-a719-27a16d400442" /> propagated attributes to tool calls for future use <img width="903" height="517" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/edc61ce8-93db-465c-a66e-043138e2dc15" /> ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules |
||
|
|
8e42307bdc |
fix: improve email inbox IMAP and SMTP compatibility (#14589)
Fetch IMAP message content using `BODY.PEEK[]` instead of `RFC822` to avoid provider-specific parser failures while preserving unread state. This also applies the existing SMTP timeout configuration to custom SMTP email-channel replies, so provider SMTP responses have enough time to complete. Fixes: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/12762 ## Why Some IMAP providers can return responses for `FETCH RFC822` that Ruby `net-imap` fails to parse with: `Net::IMAP::ResponseParseError: unexpected RPAR (expected ATOM or NIL)` We reproduced this with iCloud IMAP. Authentication, `INBOX` selection, and header fetches worked, but fetching full message content with `RFC822` failed before Chatwoot received a `Mail::Message`. The same mailbox successfully returned full message content when fetched with `BODY.PEEK[]`. > During end-to-end iCloud validation, inbound fetch worked after the IMAP change, but outbound replies through the custom SMTP settings could still fail with a socket read timeout. The OAuth SMTP path already used explicit SMTP timeout values; the custom SMTP path was relying on mailer defaults instead. ## What this change does - Replaces the full message fetch from `RFC822` to `BODY.PEEK[]` - Reads the returned message content from `BODY[]`, which is how `net-imap` exposes the response attribute - Keeps the existing `BODY.PEEK[HEADER]` header-fetch behavior unchanged - Applies `SMTP_OPEN_TIMEOUT` and `SMTP_READ_TIMEOUT` to custom SMTP email-channel replies - Defaults custom SMTP reply delivery to `open_timeout: 15` and `read_timeout: 30` - Updates IMAP service specs for standard and Microsoft IMAP fetch flows - Updates mailer specs for custom SMTP timeout settings `BODY.PEEK[]` is preferable here because it fetches the full message content without marking messages as read. ## Validation - Configured a local email inbox against iCloud IMAP and SMTP - Confirmed `FETCH RFC822` reproduces `Net::IMAP::ResponseParseError: unexpected RPAR (expected ATOM or NIL)` - Confirmed `BODY[]` and `BODY.PEEK[]` fetch the same mailbox successfully - Confirmed Chatwoot imports iCloud messages after the IMAP change - Sent two outbound replies from the Chatwoot UI through iCloud SMTP after applying the timeout settings - Confirmed both UI-created outbound messages were marked `sent`, had iCloud SMTP `source_id` values, and had no `external_error` - Ran `bundle exec rspec spec/services/imap/fetch_email_service_spec.rb spec/services/imap/microsoft_fetch_email_service_spec.rb` - Ran `bundle exec rspec spec/mailers/conversation_reply_mailer_spec.rb` |
||
|
|
1beaa284c6 |
feat: inline images in website and email channels (#14516)
# Pull Request Template ## Description This PR adds support for inline image uploads in the reply editor for Email and Website (chat widget) channels. Agents can now insert images inline between text and resize them directly in the editor by dragging the bottom corner, similar to the help center editor experience. Image sizes are preserved through markdown using the `cw_image_width` URL param and render correctly in both outgoing emails and chat widget messages. Agents can also paste copied images directly into Email or Website replies using **Shift+Cmd+V** (Shift+Ctrl+V on Windows/Linux). The image gets inserted inline at the cursor position and supports resizing just like uploaded images. Regular **Cmd+V / Ctrl+V** behavior remains unchanged and continues to add images as attachments, so both inline and attachment flows are supported. ### Prosemirror repo PR: https://github.com/chatwoot/prosemirror-schema/pull/48 Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7133/inline-images-in-live-chat-and-email https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7225/ghsa-8j9w-jppp-xcfc-html-attribute-injection-via-unvalidated-cw-image ## Type of change - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## How Has This Been Tested? ### Screencast https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a928f852-ab15-413a-9d35-6ea69b718ecf <img width="414" height="654" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/205e0729-8f2d-4cc5-9c55-7696f032eca4" /> ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules --------- Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
7acbe8b3ff |
fix(whatsapp): truncate location fallback_title to 255 chars to avoid silent message drop (#14517)
## Summary
`Whatsapp::IncomingMessageBaseService#attach_location` builds a
`fallback_title` by concatenating `location['name']` and
`location['address']` with no length cap, then stores it directly into
`Attachment#fallback_title`. `ApplicationRecord` enforces a generic
255-character limit on string columns, so any WhatsApp location whose
`"#{name}, #{address}"` exceeds 255 chars (a common case for Google
Places that include a long full address) raises
`ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid` deep inside the Sidekiq job. The message
and attachment INSERTs are part of the same transaction, so the whole
thing rolls back. Sidekiq retries once; the retry dedup-skips the wamid
silently and exits without an error. **Result: the message is
irrecoverably lost — no row in `messages`, no entry in the UI, no
outgoing webhook, no clue for the operator.**
Confirmed in `v4.13.0`, `v4.14.0`, and `develop` (commit `f33e469`,
2026-05-20). No upstream issue found before opening this PR.
## How to reproduce
1. From WhatsApp, share a Google Place whose `name + ", " + address` is
> 255 chars. The Spanish business address `Gremi de Fusters, 33,
Edificio VIP Asima, Piso 2, Local 2, Norte, 07009 Polígon industrial de
Son Castelló, Illes Balears, España` (132 chars) used as both `name` and
`address` is enough.
2. Sidekiq logs:
```
ERROR ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid: Validation failed:
Attachments fallback title is too long (maximum is 255 characters)
```
3. The `messages` table has no row. The conversation UI shows nothing
for that timestamp.
4. The first retry "Performed" successfully but creates nothing — the
dedup-by-source-id silently swallows the failure.
## Fix
Cap the existing concatenated title at 255 chars via `.first(255)`.
Minimal change, no behavioural difference for any message shorter than
the limit, prevents the silent data loss for any longer ones.
```diff
- location_name = location['name'] ? "#{location['name']}, #{location['address']}" : ''
+ location_name = (location['name'] ? "#{location['name']}, #{location['address']}" : '').first(255)
```
## Alternatives considered
- **Increase the validation limit on `Attachment#fallback_title`**: more
invasive; would touch other inbound channels and possibly require a DB
column change.
- **Use `name` alone (no concat)**: cleaner semantically (in many real
payloads `name == address`), but changes user-visible behaviour. Left as
a follow-up if desired.
- **Truncate with ellipsis**: cosmetic only; deferred.
This PR is intentionally minimal so it can be merged on its own.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com>
|
||
|
|
b791d75b30 |
fix(microsoft): prevent OAuth admin consent loop (#13962)
Fixes #9775 ## Description This fixes a repeated admin consent loop in the Microsoft OAuth flow when connecting a Microsoft email inbox. Chatwoot was always sending `prompt=consent` in the Microsoft authorization URL. In the current code path, this parameter is only used when building the authorization URL and is not required by the callback, token exchange, token persistence, or refresh flow. By removing the forced consent prompt, the OAuth flow can proceed normally without repeatedly sending users back through the admin consent screen. ## What changed - removed `prompt: 'consent'` from the Microsoft authorization URL - added a regression assertion to ensure `prompt` is not included in the generated URL ## Why this is safe - `redirect_uri`, `scope`, and `state` remain unchanged - callback and token exchange flow remain unchanged - refresh token flow remains unchanged - no other part of the current Microsoft inbox flow depends on forcing a consent screen ## Testing - updated controller spec to assert that the generated authorization URL does not include `prompt` |
||
|
|
36a05097fa |
fix(webhooks): strip trailing newlines from webhook message content (#14272)
The TipTap/ProseMirror editor stores agent messages with trailing paragraph nodes that produce trailing newlines (e.g. \`\n\n\n\`) in the \`content\` field. While Chatwoot's native channel delivery already handles this, webhook payloads and API responses were returning raw content with trailing whitespace — causing visible blank space below messages in every external integration that consumes Chatwoot webhooks (WhatsApp via Evolution API, Telegram bots, custom webhook consumers). Closes #13459 ## Root cause \`Messages::WebhookContentNormalizer\` already strips CommonMark hard line breaks (\`\\\` + newline) for webhook consumers, but it did not strip trailing whitespace. All webhook and API responses flow through this normaliser, so it is the single correct place to apply the fix without touching stored data. ## What changed Added \`.rstrip\` to \`Messages::WebhookContentNormalizer.normalize\`: \`\`\`ruby # before text.gsub(/\\\r?\n/, "\n") # after text.gsub(/\\\r?\n/, "\n").rstrip \`\`\` ## Trade-offs considered | Option | Decision | |---|---| | \`before_save\` on \`Message\` model | Would clean stored data but is a broader change affecting all message creation paths and would require a data migration for existing records. Out of scope for this bug. | | Trim in each channel's send path | DRY violation — many channels, each would need the same patch. | | Fix at normaliser level (chosen) | Single location, only affects webhook/API output, zero risk to stored data or native channel delivery. | **Known limitation:** existing messages in the database still have trailing newlines in storage. They will be delivered correctly through webhooks after this fix, but a follow-up migration could clean stored content if needed. ## How to reproduce 1. Send an agent reply from the Chatwoot UI 2. Inspect the \`content\` field of the outgoing \`message_created\` webhook payload 3. Observe trailing \`\n\n\n\` after the message text After this fix, the \`content\` field is trimmed before delivery. --------- Co-authored-by: Ramalau Debeila <rdebeila@datacentrix.co.za> Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
87df43bdd0 |
revert: restore conversation unread count feature flag (#14623)
This reverts #14610 so conversation unread counts are again controlled by the `conversation_unread_counts` feature flag across the API, ActionCable broadcasts, notifier/listener paths, and dashboard sidebar fetching. ## Closes - None ## What changed - Restores feature-flag checks for conversation unread count reads and broadcasts. - Restores the dashboard feature flag constant and sidebar/store behavior for disabled unread counts. - Restores the specs that cover disabled-feature behavior. ## How to test - In an account with `conversation_unread_counts` enabled, verify sidebar unread counts are fetched and updated in real time. - Disable `conversation_unread_counts` for the account and verify unread count requests/broadcasts are skipped. |
||
|
|
37eed5de1e |
feat(whatsapp): Add support for voice messages (#14606)
> Reopened from #13613, now from a personal fork (`gabrieljablonski/chatwoot`) so maintainers can push edits — organization-owned forks don't support "Allow edits from maintainers". The previous PR is closed in favor of this one; same commits, same diff. ## Description This PR adds support for sending voice messages (voice notes) through the WhatsApp Cloud API. When agents record audio in Chatwoot, it is now transcoded in the browser from WebM/Opus to OGG/Opus and sent with the `voice: true` flag, so it appears as a native voice note bubble on WhatsApp — not as a file/document attachment. Closes #13283 **Key Changes:** - Added `webmOpusToOgg.js` — a pure JS EBML parser + OGG page builder that remuxes browser-recorded WebM/Opus audio into OGG/Opus entirely client-side, with no server-side dependencies. - Updated `AudioRecorder.vue` to use an explicit `mimeType` hint, proper resource cleanup, and an `AUDIO_EXTENSION_MAP` for correct file extensions. - Renamed `mp3ConversionUtils.js` → `audioConversionUtils.js` and added OGG conversion support via the new remuxer. - Updated `ReplyBox.vue` to request OGG format for WhatsApp channels, pass `isVoiceMessage` per-attachment, and handle recording errors with a user-facing alert. - Updated `MessageBuilder` to read the `is_voice_message` param and persist it in attachment metadata. - Updated `WhatsappCloudService` to: - Normalize `audio/opus` → `audio/ogg` content type on ActiveStorage blobs (works around Marcel gem re-detection). - Send the `voice: true` flag when the attachment is a voice message with `audio/ogg` content type. - Use WhatsApp Cloud API `v24.0` for the attachment endpoint. - Added `AUDIO_CONVERSION_FAILED` i18n key. **How it works:** 1. The browser records audio as WebM/Opus (Chrome/Firefox default). 2. `audioConversionUtils.js` remuxes it to OGG/Opus using the pure-JS `webmOpusToOgg` remuxer — no server transcoding needed. 3. The OGG file is uploaded with `is_voice_message: true` in the form payload. 4. `MessageBuilder` persists `is_voice_message` in the attachment's `meta` hash. 5. `WhatsappCloudService` normalizes the blob content type if needed, then sends the attachment with `voice: true` so WhatsApp renders it as a voice note. ## Type of change - [X] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## How Has This Been Tested? 1. Record a voice message in a WhatsApp Cloud conversation. 2. Verify the audio is transcoded to OGG (check file extension in the attachment preview). 3. Verify the message arrives on WhatsApp as a voice note bubble (not a document/file). 4. Send an image or document attachment and verify it still works as before (no `voice` flag). 5. Send a regular (non-voice) audio file and verify it arrives without the voice flag. --------- Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
ecd9c26c8c |
feat: Implemented search results page functionality (#11086)
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Implemented search results page functionality. Now you can press "Enter"
to search by term and display results in a results page. Also now you
can link to /hc/{account}/en/search?query=XXXXXX to view search results
for XXXXXX query.
fixes: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/10945
## Screenshots
Classic layout search results:
<img width="3840" height="2160" alt="classic-results"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3bbb3272-33ca-4eb4-b80a-76ed77442088"
/>
Classic layout pagination:
<img width="3840" height="2160" alt="classic-page-two"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/062b09d3-7c58-4d3b-8611-b94375e7db51"
/>
Classic layout empty search:
<img width="3840" height="2160" alt="no-results"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c5e3f47a-cd9a-4e14-ae92-ccba00c89e98"
/>
Documentation layout search results:
<img width="3840" height="2160" alt="documentation-results"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9e45d8d9-c975-4589-b6c6-3bc7bb3c588e"
/>
Documentation layout dark theme:
<img width="3840" height="2160" alt="documentation-dark"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cdb6ed63-4241-4b32-9f79-7d92ed479fc8"
/>
Plain embedded dark layout:
<img width="3840" height="2160" alt="plain-embedded-dark"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7deb02b9-9f24-48fb-8979-a2ecd7002c05"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Vinay Keerthi <11478411+stonecharioteer@users.noreply.github.com>
|
||
|
|
88e2661ca6 |
feat(conversations): remove unread count feature flag (CW-7237) (#14610)
## Description Make conversation unread counts always available at runtime by removing account feature checks from the API endpoint, unread-count listener, notifier, and ActionCable broadcast path. Update the dashboard to fetch sidebar unread counts for the active account without checking FEATURE_FLAGS.CONVERSATION_UNREAD_COUNTS, and remove the now-unused store clear action that only supported the disabled state. Keep the feature entry in config/features.yml to preserve flag bit order, but mark it enabled and deprecated so fresh installs default to the always-on behavior while feature-management UI hides it. Leave existing installation default rows untouched; no migration is included, so upgraded installs may still store the old flag value but runtime behavior no longer depends on it. Update specs around the new always-on contract and remove obsolete disabled-feature assertions. Fixes # CW-7237 ## Type of change Please delete options that are not relevant. - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality not to work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? Update specs around the new always-on contract and remove obsolete disabled-feature assertions. Ran specs locally for the changes. ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules |
||
|
|
04ac9d3780 |
fix: use UPN for imap_login on Microsoft OAuth callback (#14522)
Outgoing email on a Microsoft email inbox was failing with `535 5.7.3 Authentication unsuccessful` immediately after the user re-authenticated, while incoming (IMAP) continued to work. The root cause is in our OAuth callback: we persist the id_token's `email` claim into `channel.imap_login`, but Microsoft's SMTP AUTH (XOAUTH2) validates the username against the access token's **UPN**, not the mailbox's primary SMTP address or aliases. When those diverge — common in tenants that use one domain for sign-in identities and another for mailbox addresses — SMTP rejects every send. This PR makes `OauthCallbackController#update_channel` prefer `preferred_username` (v2.0) / `upn` (v1.0) from the id_token over `email`, with `email` as the fallback so Google flows are unchanged. ## What changed - `app/controllers/oauth_callback_controller.rb` — extract `imap_login_identity` (default: `users_data['email']`, same as before). `update_channel` now calls it instead of inlining the email claim. No behavioural change in the base controller. - `app/controllers/microsoft/callbacks_controller.rb` — override `imap_login_identity` to return `preferred_username || upn || super`. Provider-specific knowledge stays in the provider subclass; Google's flow is literally untouched. - `spec/controllers/microsoft/callbacks_controller_spec.rb` — adds one example that reproduces the divergent shape (`email: <alias>`, `preferred_username: <upn>`) and asserts `imap_login` lands on the UPN while `channel.email` stays on the mailbox alias. `channel.email` and `find_channel_by_email` still key on the id_token's `email` claim everywhere, so customer-facing From identity and reconnect-by-email matching are unchanged. Behavioural matrix: | Provider / shape | `imap_login` before | `imap_login` after | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|--------------------| | Microsoft, `upn == email` (common case) | email | UPN (= email, same string) | | Microsoft, `upn != email` (e.g. UPN on one domain, mailbox alias on another) | alias (broken) | UPN (works) | | Google | email | email (no change, base impl used) | ## Why this happens (Microsoft side, for context) Two facts that together produce the bug — one is documented, the other we verified empirically because Microsoft's docs don't address it: 1. **`email` and `upn` are different claims and can legitimately diverge.** In Entra, the UPN is the sign-in identity; the id_token's `email` claim is the user's mailbox property (which can be a proxy address). For v2.0 tokens (which is what we use — `/common/oauth2/v2.0/token` in `MicrosoftConcern`), the documented "username to sign in as" claim is `preferred_username`. See [ID token claims reference](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/identity-platform/id-token-claims-reference). So `users_data['email']` was the wrong source for `imap_login`; tenants where UPN == primary SMTP happened to mask the bug. 2. **Exchange's XOAUTH2 SMTP rejects aliases in the `user=` field, even though IMAP accepts them.** This asymmetry is **not** in [Microsoft's canonical XOAUTH2 doc](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/client-developer/legacy-protocols/how-to-authenticate-an-imap-pop-smtp-application-by-using-oauth) — the doc treats the SASL `user=` field uniformly across IMAP, POP, and SMTP, with only a shared-mailbox carve-out spelled out. We confirmed the SMTP-strict behaviour empirically by running an XOAUTH2 AUTH probe with the same access token: `user=<alias>` returned `535 5.7.3`, `user=<UPN>` returned `235`. Same token, only the `user=` field differed. That's what tied the symptom to claim-shape. Hence the patch: read the documented "sign-in name" claim and persist that, not the customer-facing mailbox address. ## How to reproduce (before the fix) 1. Set up a Microsoft email inbox in a tenant where the user's UPN domain differs from the user's primary SMTP / mailbox domain (e.g. UPN `user@tenant-a.example`, mailbox `User@tenant-b.example` where `tenant-b.example` is a proxy address on the same mailbox). 2. Connect or re-authenticate the inbox through the standard flow. 3. Inspect the channel: ```ruby ch.imap_login # => "User@tenant-b.example" (alias — wrong) token = ch.provider_config['access_token'] JSON.parse(Base64.urlsafe_decode64(token.split('.')[1].then { |s| s + '=' * (-s.length % 4) }))['upn'] # => "user@tenant-a.example" (UPN — what SMTP actually needs) ``` 4. Send a reply. SMTP returns `535 5.7.3 Authentication unsuccessful`. Incoming IMAP continues to work fine. After the fix, `imap_login` is set to the UPN at callback time and SMTP succeeds. ## Notes for review - The id_token decoding path (`users_data`) already exists and is trusted by the rest of the callback — no new attack surface. - Scoped to Microsoft on purpose. A provider-agnostic fallback chain in the base controller would also have worked (Google id_tokens don't carry `preferred_username` / `upn`, so it'd land on email anyway), but keeping Google's code path identical to today removes any risk of an unintended interaction with whatever a future Google update might add to its id_token. Pattern matches the existing `find_channel_by_email` override Google already has. - The [id_token claims reference](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/identity-platform/id-token-claims-reference) warns that `preferred_username` is mutable and "can't be used to make authorization decisions." That warning targets apps using the claim as a stable cross-session identifier for app-level authz — we're not. We use it as the SASL `user=` string for SMTP AUTH, validated by Microsoft against the same token it just issued. The claim's mutability matters only if a tenant admin renames a UPN between re-auths, in which case the stored `imap_login` goes stale and SMTP 535s — but the pre-patch code has the identical mutability characteristic on the `email` claim (rename a mailbox's primary SMTP and you get the same stale-then-535). The patch doesn't enlarge that failure surface; it shrinks it, because UPN-vs-alias divergence is now handled rather than always-broken. - Related but out of scope: SMTP failures don't trigger `channel.authorization_error!` today. `ExceptionList::SMTP_EXCEPTIONS` (`lib/exception_list.rb`) only contains `Net::SMTPSyntaxError`; `Net::SMTPAuthenticationError` bubbles unhandled, and `ApplicationMailer#handle_smtp_exceptions` only logs. So a 535 — whether from this bug or any other identity drift — never prompts re-auth in the UI, unlike the IMAP path (`fetch_imap_emails_job` catches `OAuth2::Error` and calls `authorization_error!`). Worth a separate PR; flagging here so we don't pretend stale-identity SMTP errors are self-healing. - The alternative I considered — decoding the access token's `upn` directly — is more correct in principle but relies on Microsoft access tokens being JWTs, which is undocumented behaviour for the `outlook.office.com` audience and contradicts the [docs guidance](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/identity-platform/access-tokens) that access tokens are opaque to clients. - **Not addressed here, flagging for follow-up:** existing channels that were re-authenticated before this fix still hold the alias in `imap_login` and will keep 535ing until the user re-auths again. A one-shot rake task could decode the stored access tokens and reconcile, but fixing forward via natural re-auth is lower-risk; let me know if you want the backfill. - Also out of scope: `app/mailers/conversation_reply_mailer_helper.rb` reads `provider_config['access_token']` raw without going through `Microsoft::RefreshOauthTokenService`, while the IMAP path refreshes. That's a real asymmetry but unrelated to this bug (the token here was minutes-old) and worth its own PR. |
||
|
|
3eed8905cc |
fix(facebook): render shared links as fallback attachments (#14554)
Fixes Facebook fallback and shared-post attachments so they render as clickable links in conversations. Closes: - https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/4767 - https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/5327 Why: Facebook can send shared links as `fallback` attachments with a top-level `url`, and shared posts as `share` attachments with the URL under `payload.url`. The current flow either misses the nested URL or treats `share` as downloadable media, so these messages do not render correctly. What changed: - Store Facebook fallback URLs from either `attachment.url` or `attachment.payload.url`. - Treat Facebook `share` attachments as fallback link attachments instead of downloading them as files. - Render fallback attachments in the next message bubble UI as clickable links. How to test: 1. Connect a Facebook inbox. 2. Send a shared link to the page. 3. Send/share a Facebook post to the page. 4. Open the conversation in Chatwoot. 5. Confirm both messages appear as clickable link bubbles. Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
f27bbef73b |
feat: show processing status for one-off campaigns (#14592)
## Summary One-off SMS and WhatsApp campaigns now show a `Processing` state while the audience send is in progress. The campaign moves to `Completed` after processing finishes, and already-processing campaigns are skipped by the scheduler to avoid duplicate sends. ## Closes - [CW-6037: feat: Introduce an in-progress status for campaigns](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6037/feat-introduce-an-in-progress-status-for-campaigns) ## Screenshot SMS campaign card showing the new `Processing` status. <img width="3840" height="2160" alt="framed-campaign-processing-status" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/de7913b5-65fb-4121-9034-24a568eb0382" /> ## What changed - Added `processing` as a campaign status. - Mark one-off campaigns as `processing` under a row lock before the send service runs. - Complete SMS, Twilio SMS, and WhatsApp one-off campaigns after audience processing finishes. - Keep campaigns in `processing` if an unexpected service error escapes, so the scheduler does not automatically resend the audience. - Added the `Processing` label for SMS and WhatsApp campaign cards. ## Known operational behavior If a worker is interrupted or an unexpected service error escapes after a campaign is marked `processing`, the campaign can remain in `processing`. This is intentional for now to avoid automatic full-audience resends. Installation admins can decide whether to mark the campaign completed or restart it manually from the Rails console after checking what was sent. ## How to test - Create a one-off SMS or WhatsApp campaign scheduled for now. - Run the scheduled job or trigger the campaign job. - Confirm the campaign card shows `Processing` while the audience is being processed. For small audiences, refresh during processing or use a larger audience so the state is observable. - Confirm the campaign moves to `Completed` after audience processing finishes. - Confirm an already-processing campaign is not enqueued again by the scheduled job. |
||
|
|
1afcd36dee |
fix(contacts): align contact export permissions (#14601)
Allows contact managers to export and import contacts from the Contacts page while keeping plain agents blocked. The contacts action menu now mirrors backend permissions for both export and import. ## Closes - https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4438/contact-export-is-broken ## What changed - Allows Enterprise custom roles with `contact_manage` to pass `ContactPolicy#export?` and `ContactPolicy#import?`. - Shows Export and Import to admins and contact managers only. - Adds Enterprise policy coverage for contact export and import. ## Screenshots Admin: Export and Import are available. <img width="3840" height="2160" alt="Admin contact actions with Export and Import visible" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2b2cdaf2-ca8f-470d-be34-31cba68b9dce" /> Contact manager: Export and Import are available. <img width="3840" height="2160" alt="Contact manager contact actions with Export and Import visible" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/48fc038b-2e78-4d0c-ba17-a5965641bd88" /> Regular agent: Export and Import are hidden. <img width="3840" height="2160" alt="Regular agent contact actions with Export and Import hidden" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a63b5731-743a-4223-8dab-ce58383067fe" /> ## How to test - Sign in as an administrator and open Contacts; the action menu shows Export and Import. - Sign in as a custom-role user with `contact_manage`; the action menu shows Export and Import. - Sign in as a plain agent; Export and Import are not available and both APIs remain unauthorized. |
||
|
|
a3ffb48a47 |
refactor(onboarding): use separate onboarding controller (#14507)
Depends on: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/14370 This PR creates a new onboarding controller, this allows more control that the default account update API. Allowing us to spin tasks and update details required specifically during the onboarding flow |
||
|
|
6c8741b314 |
fix: increase audit log page size (#14582)
Audit logs now return up to 25 records per page instead of 15. This reduces page turns for admins and API consumers while keeping the page size server-defined. Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7172/allow-an-option-to-fetch-more-audit-logs |
||
|
|
68e358d732 |
feat: voice-call UX fixes (#14579)
## Linear ticket https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7187/voice-calls-followup-tasks ## Description Improvements to the WhatsApp voice-calling experience plus a cheaper, more accurate audio-transcription model. - First-time callers now get a real name. An inbound WhatsApp call creates the contact from the caller's WhatsApp profile name instead of the bare phone number. - Clear, consistent call attribution. Call bubbles show a unified "Handled by {agent}" - Cleaner call widget. The dismiss (✕) button is shown only for incoming calls - WhatsApp calling for manual inboxes. voice_calling_supported? now covers any whatsapp_cloud inbox - Transcription: whisper-1 → gpt-4o-mini-transcribe. ## Type of change - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## Checklist: - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules |
||
|
|
d20950c5b4 |
feat: scheduler fairness [AI-159] (#14425)
# Pull Request Template ## Description Better scheduling and queueing mechanics for document auto-sync - add jitter plan wise for document sync - move auto-sync documents to purgeable queue ## Type of change Please delete options that are not relevant. - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) ## How Has This Been Tested? Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration. locally tested and with specs ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules --------- Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com> Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
94daf26ead |
chore: update jwt and faraday (#14577)
This PR updates two dependencies — `faraday` (2.14.1 → 2.14.2) and `jwt` (2.10.1 → 2.10.3) — to pick up security patches flagged by `bundle-audit`. Both are bumped to the minimal patched release within their existing major lines to keep the blast radius small. ### Faraday `Faraday::Connection#build_exclusive_url` still allowed a protocol-relative host override when the request target was passed as a `URI` object (rather than a `String`), bypassing the earlier fix for the string-based variant (CVE-2026-25765 / GHSA-33mh-2634-fwr2). On a fixed-base connection this could redirect a request to an attacker-controlled host while still forwarding connection-scoped headers such as `Authorization` — i.e. off-host request forgery (CVE-2026-33637 / GHSA-5rv5-xj5j-3484). The fix is a clean patch bump to `2.14.2`, within Faraday's existing version range — no API changes and no other gems affected. ### JWT `jwt` 2.10.1 accepts an empty/`nil` HMAC key during verification: `JWT.decode(token, "", true, algorithm: 'HS256')` (and keyfinder paths returning `""`/`nil`) verify a forged token, because the empty-key HMAC digest is treated as valid and `enforce_hmac_key_length` defaults to `false` (CVE-2026-45363, High). The advisory offers two fixes — `~> 2.10.3` or `>= 3.2.0`. We chose **2.10.3** deliberately: jumping to 3.x cascaded into upgrading `oauth2`, `twilio-ruby`, `googleauth`, `web-push`, and `signet` (all pinned `jwt < 3.0`), and `jwt` is used directly in 8+ places here (token services, OAuth callbacks, integration helpers), so a major bump carries real breakage risk for no extra security benefit. The Gemfile is pinned `'~> 2.10', '>= 2.10.3'` to hold the 2.x line. **Spec changes.** 2.10.3 tightens key handling: HMAC sign/verify now raises on a `nil`, empty, or non-`String` key instead of silently coercing it. A few specs relied on the old lax behaviour and needed updating: - `microsoft` / `google` callback specs built unsigned ID tokens via `JWT.encode(payload, false)`. Replaced with the correct unsigned form, `JWT.encode(payload, nil, 'none')`. - `instagram` / `linear` / `shopify` helper specs have a "client secret not configured" context where `client_secret` is `nil`. Their shared `valid_token` `let` signed with that `nil` secret, which Ruby evaluates before the helper runs — now raising. Since the helper short-circuits on the blank secret and never decodes the token, those contexts now override `valid_token` with a throwaway string. **Production is unaffected.** Every production HMAC path uses a real, non-empty key — `Rails.application.secret_key_base` (`BaseTokenService`, `Widget::TokenService`) or a client secret guarded by `return if client_secret.blank?` (Instagram/TikTok/Shopify/Linear helpers). The one `nil`-key call, `JWT.decode(id_token, nil, false)` in `OauthCallbackController`, runs with verification disabled, so the key is never inspected. Twilio voice tokens use `Twilio::JWT::AccessToken` from `twilio-ruby`, not this gem. The specs failed precisely because they exercised the unsafe empty-key pattern the patch now blocks — production never did. |
||
|
|
7c16071fc7 |
fix: Support allowlisted private API inbox webhooks (#14548)
Self-hosted installations can now opt SafeFetch into private-network access after SSRF hardening. The default remains unchanged: private IP destinations are blocked unless the instance owner explicitly enables private-network requests with `SAFE_FETCH_ALLOW_PRIVATE_NETWORK=true`. Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7131 Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/14489 Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/14494 ## How to use For self-hosted installations that need API inbox webhooks, or other SafeFetch-backed requests, to call trusted private services, enable private-network access with a single environment variable: ```bash SAFE_FETCH_ALLOW_PRIVATE_NETWORK=true ``` This is disabled by default. Enable it only when the instance owner controls the deployment network and trusts the configured URLs. |
||
|
|
b981ba766f |
feat: support bulk label removal (#14534)
Adds bulk label removal alongside the existing assign-label action for conversations and contacts, so teams can clean up labels across selected records without opening each item individually. For conversations, the remove dropdown is scoped to labels that are actually applied across the current selection — so agents no longer see (or accidentally "remove") labels that aren't on any of the selected items. For contacts, the dropdown still lists all account labels for now; label data isn't carried on the contact list payload today, so scoping the contact remove menu cleanly is being tracked as a follow-up. ## Closes N/A ## How to test - Open the conversation list, select multiple conversations, open **Remove labels**, and confirm the dropdown only lists labels that are applied to at least one selected conversation. Pick a label and confirm it's removed from the selection. - Open Contacts, select multiple contacts, use **Remove Labels**, choose a label, and confirm the selected contacts are refreshed without that label. - Verify **Assign Labels** still works for conversations and contacts, and continues to show every available label. ## What changed - Adds an `action` prop to the shared `BulkLabelActions` dropdown so it can render in `assign` or `remove` mode. - Wires conversation bulk remove to the existing `labels.remove` backend path and filters the dropdown to the union of labels applied across the selected conversations. - Adds contact bulk remove support through `Contacts::BulkRemoveLabelsService`, routed by `Contacts::BulkActionService`. - Raises contact label save failures instead of reporting a successful bulk action when a contact update is invalid. ## Follow-ups - Scope the contact remove dropdown to applied labels (needs a lightweight endpoint, or eventually `cached_label_list` on `Contact`). ## Verification Conversation bulk remove selector: <img width="1680" height="1050" alt="Conversation bulk remove label selector" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2dba4a06-c497-45e1-85b0-e700164b6b2f" /> Contact bulk remove selector: <img width="1680" height="1050" alt="Contact bulk remove label selector" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b3b89959-5978-4064-b5f9-82b1a3e571dc" /> Video proof: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fffafe19-4e1c-4e2a-a135-c7182c06bb4d --------- Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
37c8e7e699 |
fix: firecrawl long external link (#14566)
# Pull Request Template ## Description Fixes urls going past 255 chars, this is because of arabic urls, where each character balloons to 8-9 characters and goes past the 255 limit ## Type of change Please delete options that are not relevant. - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) ## How Has This Been Tested? Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration. specs ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules |
||
|
|
56e30102eb |
fix(whatsapp): store and surface unavailable coexistence messages (CW-7166) (#14547)
In WhatsApp coexistence setups (Business App + Cloud API on the same
number), some inbound customer messages arrive from Meta as `type:
unsupported` with error `131060` ("This message is unavailable") and no
content — typically the first message of a Click-to-WhatsApp /
Instagram-ad conversation, or a message synced from a companion device.
Chatwoot was dropping these webhooks entirely, so no contact,
conversation, or message was created. The conversation only surfaced
once an agent replied (via an `smb_message_echoes` event), starting
"headless" with zero customer context.
This change persists a placeholder message for these events so the
contact and conversation are created, and renders it with the dedicated
unsupported-message bubble that points agents to the WhatsApp app —
where the original message is still visible.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7166/whatsapp-coexistence-inbound-messages-are-silently-dropped
and https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13464
<img width="3448" height="1604" alt="CleanShot 2026-05-22 at 17 49
35@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0a90ec84-9085-4cba-883d-08d9de33fa3c"
/>
## How to reproduce
1. Connect a WhatsApp Cloud (coexistence) inbox.
2. Receive an inbound message that Meta delivers as `type: unsupported`
with error `131060` (e.g. a Click-to-WhatsApp ad message, or a message
handled on a companion/primary device that fails to sync to the API).
3. **Before:** nothing is created — the conversation only appears after
an agent replies, with no record of the customer's first message.
4. **After:** the contact and conversation are created with an incoming
placeholder message rendered as the amber "unsupported" bubble: _"This
message is unsupported. You can view this message on the WhatsApp app."
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
|
||
|
|
6fbff026eb |
fix: skip AutoAssignment bulk loop when no agents are online (#14500)
## Description When an inbox has `enable_auto_assignment` and `assignment_v2` enabled but no agents are currently online, `AutoAssignment::AssignmentService#perform_bulk_assignment` still loaded up to 100 unassigned conversations and iterated each one, calling `inbox.available_agents` per conversation. Each call hits Redis presence lookups that return empty, no conversations get assigned, and the loop finishes having done only wasted work. For a busy inbox with a long unassigned backlog and offline agents, this is hundreds of Redis ops per job, multiplied by every `AutoAssignment::AssignmentJob` enqueue from the per-save handler. The pressure is significant when inbound volume is high. This adds a single early-return guard: if `inbox.available_agents.empty?`, return `0` immediately. Existing semantics are preserved (jobs are still enqueued on conversation events; they just exit cheaply when there is no one to assign to). ## Type of change - [x] Performance improvement (non-breaking change) ## Test coverage - [x] Added specs |
||
|
|
52da165cb7 |
feat: add timeout for imap email job and skip problematic emails (#11981)
# Pull Request Template ## Description Large emails (2MB+ with multiple attachments) were causing IMAP email processing jobs to timeout silently, blocking all subsequent emails from being processed. This created an infinite loop where: - Problematic emails were repeatedly fetched but never successfully processed - Other emails in the queue were never processed as we iterated sequentially - silent failures ### Solution Enhanced the FetchImapEmailsJob with individual email processing isolation: ### Key Changes 1. Individual Email Processing: Changed from map to each for better memory efficiency 2. Timeout Protection: Added configurable timeout per email (default: 60 seconds) 3. Failure Tracking: Track failed emails with 6-hour expiry for retry opportunities 4. Skip Logic: Skip emails that have failed 3+ times to prevent infinite loops 5. Error Isolation: Each email is processed in its own error boundary ### Configuration - Timeout: Configurable via EMAIL_PROCESSING_TIMEOUT_SECONDS using GlobalConfigService - Default: 60 seconds per email - Failure Limit: 3 attempts before skipping - Retry Window: 6 hours so that emails get 8 more chances in the 2 day window ### Benefits - Prevents queue blocking: One problematic email cannot stop others - Maintains email order: Older emails (customers waiting longer) processed first - Automatic recovery: Failed emails get retry opportunities - Better monitoring: Clear logging when emails timeout or are skipped - Configurable: Deployments can adjust the timeout based on their needs This fix ensures email processing reliability while maintaining existing functionality. ## Type of change Please delete options that are not relevant. - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality not to work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration. ## Checklist: - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules |
||
|
|
3d20a7b049 |
feat: generate Help Center for Onboarding (#14370)
## Manually triggering help center generation
Open a Rails console (`bundle exec rails console`):
```ruby
account = Account.find(<ACCOUNT_ID>)
user = account.users.first
# Optional: refresh brand info from the customer's website
domain = 'example.com'
result = WebsiteBrandingService.new("noreply@#{domain}").perform
account.update!(
name: result[:title].presence || account.name,
custom_attributes: account.custom_attributes.merge('website' => domain, 'brand_info' => result)
)
# Optional: wipe existing portals so a fresh one is created
account.portals.destroy_all
Onboarding::HelpCenterCreationService.new(account, user).perform
```
Sidekiq must be running — articles are written by
`Onboarding::HelpCenterArticleGenerationJob`. Avoid running on
production; generation calls the LLM provider.
### Generation flow (Happy Path)
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant Kickoff as HelpCenterCreationService
participant DB as DB
participant GenJob as HelpCenterArticleGenerationJob
participant Curator as HelpCenterCurator
participant Firecrawl as Firecrawl
participant CuratorLLM as Curation LLM
participant Redis as Redis Progress
participant WriterJob as HelpCenterArticleWriterJob
participant Builder as HelpCenterArticleBuilder
participant WriterLLM as Writer LLM
participant Cable as ActionCable
Kickoff->>DB: Create portal for account<br/>homepage_link=https://chatwoot.com
Kickoff->>DB: Attach brand logo if available
Kickoff->>GenJob: Enqueue generation job<br/>account_id, portal_id, user_id, generation_id
GenJob->>Curator: Curate help center plan
Curator->>Firecrawl: map https://chatwoot.com<br/>search: docs help support faq
Firecrawl-->>Curator: Return discovered links
Curator->>CuratorLLM: Select categories + article plans<br/>from discovered links only
CuratorLLM-->>Curator: Return categories, articles, allowed_urls
GenJob->>DB: Create portal categories
GenJob->>GenJob: Stamp articles with category_id
GenJob->>GenJob: Filter article URLs against allowed_urls
GenJob->>GenJob: Drop articles with no category<br/>or no approved source URLs
GenJob->>Redis: Start progress<br/>status=generating, total=N, finished=0
loop For each approved article
GenJob->>WriterJob: Enqueue writer job<br/>title, category_id, approved URLs
end
par Writer jobs run independently
WriterJob->>Builder: Build article from approved URLs
Builder->>Firecrawl: batch_scrape approved URLs
Firecrawl-->>Builder: Return Markdown source pages
Builder->>WriterLLM: Rewrite sources into one article
WriterLLM-->>Builder: Return title, description, Markdown content
Builder->>DB: Create draft portal article<br/>meta.source_urls
WriterJob->>Redis: Increment finished count
WriterJob->>Cable: Broadcast help_center.article_generated
end
WriterJob->>Redis: If finished >= total<br/>mark status=completed
WriterJob->>Cable: Broadcast help_center.generation_completed
```
### Redis State Management
```mermaid
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> active_pointer_set
active_pointer_set --> generating: generation job creates valid plan
active_pointer_set --> skipped: curation skipped/failed
generating --> generating: each writer job increments finished
generating --> completed: finished == total
generating --> ignored_completion: generation_id superseded
skipped --> [*]
completed --> [*]
ignored_completion --> [*]
```
|
||
|
|
3cd8cf43ce |
fix: atomically claim conversation to prevent duplicate assignment (#14495)
## Description Fixes a bug under Assignment V2 where a single conversation could be reassigned dozens of times in a row by the system, producing long stacks of "Assigned to X by Automation System via <policy>" activity messages alternating between agents. After this change each unassigned conversation is assigned exactly once, even on busy inboxes. ## Fixes # (issue) ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) ## How Has This Been Tested? ## How to reproduce 1. Enable `assignment_v2` on an account with at least 2 online agents in an inbox. 2. Generate sustained resolve/snooze activity in the inbox (each one enqueues `AutoAssignment::AssignmentJob` for the whole inbox). 3. Watch any one unassigned conversation while the jobs drain — pre-fix it picks up multiple back-to-back "Assigned to …" activity rows alternating between agents. ## Checklist: - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules |
||
|
|
f33e469e9a |
feat: Unread Count: Frontend changes for showing unread count badges (3/3)[CW-6851] (#14372)
# Pull Request Template ## Description This is the third and final PR in a series of PRs for Introducing unread counts in the sidebar for inboxes and labels. In this PR: * Added frontend changes to show the badges for unread counts for Inboxes and Labels * Added specs for the changes Issue: https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6851/support-unread-conversation-counts ## Type of change Please delete options that are not relevant. - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality not to work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? Tested this locally. Cases to test: * Send a message from the widget and see if the count changes * Mark a conversation as unread and see the count change for inbox * Open an unread conversation as agent and see the count go down * Add a label to an unread conversation from sidebar right click action without opening the conversation and see the count of un-reads on the label change Added the screenshot of how it will look like <img width="614" height="990" alt="Screenshot 2026-05-05 at 7 00 11 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/99fbaa9f-bcf2-4d8d-86e2-5727f652a9dd" /> ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules --------- Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com> |
||
|
|
27f2c2b392 |
feat: Unread Count: added api, store refresher, invalidation and events (2/3)[CW-6851] (#14369)
# Pull Request Template ## Description This is the second PR in a series of PRs for Introducing unread counts in the sidebar for inboxes and labels. In this PR: * added api for unread counts * Added the store refresher and invalidation with event listeners * Added action cable event * Added specs for the changes Issue: https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6851/support-unread-conversation-counts ## Type of change Please delete options that are not relevant. - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality not to work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration. ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules --------- Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com> |
||
|
|
40deaef458 |
feat: Store WhatsApp BSUID identifiers from inbound webhooks (#14436)
Adds storage support for WhatsApp business-scoped user identifiers received from Meta Cloud API and Twilio WhatsApp webhooks. The change keeps existing phone-based behavior intact, stores BSUID and parent BSUID values as additional `contact_inboxes.source_id` rows for the same contact, and allows BSUID-only inbound messages to create contacts, conversations, and messages without requiring a phone number. Related: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13837 **What changed** - Extended WhatsApp source ID validation to accept regular BSUID and parent BSUID formats. - For Meta Cloud API, stores phone, `user_id`, and `parent_user_id` identifiers as contact inbox source IDs when they are present. - For Twilio WhatsApp, stores phone, `ExternalUserId`, and `ParentExternalUserId` identifiers as contact inbox source IDs while preserving the existing `whatsapp:` Twilio source ID shape. - Supports BSUID-only inbound messages by creating a contact, contact inbox, conversation, and message even when the phone number is missing. - Links phone-first and later BSUID-only messages to the same contact when the first payload contains both phone and BSUID. - Stores WhatsApp usernames in contact `additional_attributes`, matching existing social channel patterns. - Keeps existing phone-based outbound and new-conversation behavior unchanged for this milestone. **How to test** 1. Send a Meta Cloud webhook payload with both `wa_id` and `user_id`. 2. Verify Chatwoot creates or finds the phone `contact_inbox` and also creates a BSUID `contact_inbox` for the same contact. 3. Send a later Meta Cloud payload for the same user with only `user_id` / `from_user_id`. 4. Verify Chatwoot finds the BSUID `contact_inbox` and creates the inbound message without requiring a phone number. 5. Send a Twilio WhatsApp webhook with `From: whatsapp:+E164`, `ExternalUserId`, and optionally `ParentExternalUserId`. 6. Verify Chatwoot stores the Twilio phone and BSUID identifiers as `whatsapp:`-prefixed source IDs for the same contact. 7. Send a Twilio WhatsApp webhook where `From` is `whatsapp:<BSUID>` and there is no phone number. 8. Verify Chatwoot creates the contact, contact inbox, conversation, and message without a phone number. --------- Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
3fae800936 |
feat: base layer for unread counts (store, counter and builder) (1/3)[CW-6851] (#14368)
## Description This is the first PR in a series of PRs for Introducing unread counts in the sidebar for inboxes and labels. In this PR: * Added the unread store, counter and builder modules * Added redis keys for unread count management * Added specs for all 3 modules, some specs are for testing enterprise only feature like specific roles and permissions which are added in the respective enterprise folder itself. **Note** None of this changes affect anything else and nothing is wired to existing modules. Issue: https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6851/support-unread-conversation-counts ## Type of change Please delete options that are not relevant. - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality not to work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration. ## Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes - [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules --------- Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com> |
||
|
|
bca95efb82 | feat: add image resize support in articles (#14293) | ||
|
|
6560dbb68d |
feat: Add an option on the dashboard to allow switching help center layout (#14491)
<img width="633" height="431" alt="Screenshot 2026-05-18 at 12 32 55 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/682d4c5f-4c76-465b-8d2f-92fbc2bb2a40" /> --------- Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
64585faff0 |
feat: Add a documentation layout design for public help center portal (#14403)
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fc4d15f9-2b54-4627-940f-94772ec739b1 --------- Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com> |