Commit Graph
466 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
aakashb95 84c41f03d6 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/feature/cw-7495-llm' into cook/faq-comparison-api 2026-07-22 10:39:37 +05:30
aakashb95 a17734676c fix(captain): use mini model for FAQ matching 2026-07-22 10:37:25 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub e0aa099487 Merge branch 'feature/cw-7495-llm' into feature/cw-7495-api 2026-07-21 18:17:44 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 398b84d5de Merge branch 'develop' into feature/cw-7495-llm 2026-07-21 18:17:36 +05:30
ed30ff9c22 fix(whatsapp): allow calling a contact with no existing conversation (#15014)
## Description

Agents can now place a WhatsApp call to a contact straight from the
contacts screen, even if that contact has never messaged in. Previously
the call only worked once a conversation already existed, so a freshly
added contact would fail with "Unable to start the call. Please try
again." — the only workaround was to get the contact to message the
channel first.


## Type of change

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

- Manually via UI

## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-07-21 18:08:32 +05:30
aakashb95 cf417a2f3e refactor(captain): share FAQ suggestion visibility scope 2026-07-21 18:04:39 +05:30
Sony MathewandGitHub 11143672a6 Merge branch 'develop' into feature/cw-7495-llm 2026-07-21 17:01:38 +05:30
0e376f4fe2 feat(whatsapp-call): support BSUID callers for inbound voice calls (#14743)
## Linear Ticket
-
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7276/bsuid-support-to-whatsapp-voice-calling

## Description

Keeps WhatsApp voice calls in the same thread as the chat when a caller
has adopted a **WhatsApp username** and hidden their phone number.
This makes the inbound-call path BSUID-aware, reusing the same
identifier the messaging pipeline keys on so calls land on the existing
`ContactInbox`/conversation.

## Type of change

- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

-  Locally via UI

## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-07-21 16:19:53 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 67cab7171d feat: show Captain generation path on conversation messages [CW-7484] (#15078) 2026-07-21 15:15:13 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 7a5385cc32 feat: improve captain overview loading and reuse stats for summary [CW-7610] (#15105) 2026-07-21 15:14:18 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub ae49af354d fix: serialize multimodal Captain session content (#15096)
Captain now saves agent session records when a user message includes an
image. The saved record keeps the image URL and excludes downloaded
image bytes, so image replies no longer report a JSON serialization
error after delivery.

Fixes:
https://chatwoot-p3.sentry.io/issues/7618423184/?alert_rule_id=13673680&alert_type=issue&notification_uuid=d22a7ab9-95d6-4bba-85e0-733a28466775&project=6382945

## Root cause

RubyLLM downloads image attachments and caches the binary bytes inside
`RubyLLM::Content`. `SessionCaptureService` passed the live object to
the `run_context` JSON column. Rails then tried to encode the cached
JPEG bytes as UTF-8 and raised `JSON::GeneratorError`.

The error did not block replies, handoffs, or credit updates because
session capture rescues its own failures. The failed write meant that
Chatwoot lost the agent session record for the response.

## How to reproduce

1. Send an image to a Captain V2 assistant.
2. Let RubyLLM load the image during the model request.
3. Save the resulting conversation history in an agent session.
4. Observe the JSON encoding error when Rails reaches the cached image
bytes.

## What changed

`SessionCaptureService` now converts `RubyLLM::Content` to its JSON safe
hash before saving the current turn. The hash contains the message text
and attachment URL without the cached bytes. Other message content is
unchanged.

The focused service spec covers a cached JPEG byte payload and passes
with 12 examples. RuboCop reports no offenses in the changed service and
spec.
2026-07-21 13:04:12 +05:30
Sojan JoseandGitHub eae9841eb4 fix: restore token access to account APIs (#15088)
Token-authenticated requests to Agent Bots, Labels, and affected Captain
endpoints return normal responses again. The regression was caused by
duplicate `current_account` callbacks in subclasses moving account
resolution behind the API entitlement check, leaving `Current.account`
unset.

## Closes

- https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7641/5xx-errors-in-agent-bot-apis

## How to reproduce

1. Send `GET /api/v1/accounts/:account_id/agent_bots` with a valid
administrator API access token.
2. Observe a `500` from `validate_token_api_access` because
`Current.account` is `nil`.
3. With this change, account resolution runs in the base-controller
order and the request succeeds.

## What changed

- Removed redundant `current_account` callbacks from account-scoped
controllers that already inherit the callback from
`Api::V1::Accounts::BaseController`.
- Kept the standalone direct-upload controller callback unchanged.
- Added regression coverage for administrator API-token access to Agent
Bots.
2026-07-20 15:28:33 -07:00
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 412319462a Merge branch 'develop' into feature/cw-7495-llm 2026-07-20 22:36:29 +05:30
PranavandGitHub 4cb89d0de1 chore: Update brand assets (#15054)
Refresh favicons and app icons from the official brand kit and align the
PWA theme colors with the current brand blue.
2026-07-17 13:56:39 -07:00
aakashb95 8600e9b170 fix(captain): refine FAQ suggestion generation 2026-07-17 15:24:50 +05:30
aakashb95 64d2751c06 fix(captain): scope FAQ suggestions to agent access 2026-07-17 13:11:33 +05:30
aakashb95 f6d97c56b4 fix(captain): harden FAQ suggestion review flow 2026-07-17 12:57:54 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub fc63c7bddf Merge branch 'feature/cw-7495-llm' into feature/cw-7495-api 2026-07-16 21:32:58 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 9749a3dc96 feat: capture captain sessions for v2 assistant responses [CW-7485] (#14971)
Records a `Captain::Session` row for every Captain V2 assistant response
delivered in a conversation, so we can show how a response was generated
and report on credit, FAQ, and document usage. Stacked on #14970 (the
`captain_sessions` model).

## What changed

- `FaqLookupTool` now records the retrieved FAQ ids (and their backing
document ids) into the shared run state, accumulated across tool calls.
- `AgentRunnerService` exposes the raw ai-agents run result via
`last_run_result`; the `generate_response` return shape is unchanged, so
the playground path is unaffected.
- New `Captain::Assistant::SessionCaptureService` builds the session:
scenario resolved from the answering agent name, model from
`assistant.agent_model`, token usage plus the trimmed current-turn
conversation history stored in `run_context`.
- `ResponseBuilderJob` captures after delivery: `credits_consumed`
mirrors the actual charge (1.0 for a billed response, 0.0 for handoffs,
where the session points at the customer-facing handoff message).
Capture runs outside the delivery transaction and swallows its own
failures, so a logging bug can never block or roll back a customer
reply.

V1 responses and copilot are out of scope; copilot capture comes next.

## How to test

On an account with `captain_integration_v2` enabled and an inbox
connected to an assistant with approved FAQs, send a customer message on
a pending conversation. After the assistant replies, a
`Captain::Session` row should exist with the conversation as subject,
the reply message as result, the FAQs/documents used, and the run
context for that turn. Asking for a human agent should produce a
zero-credit session pointing at the handoff message.

<img width="2428" height="1058" alt="CleanShot 2026-07-15 at 17 25
40@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d8e44923-c17b-494f-8c33-c8fa4219438c"
/>
2026-07-16 18:20:44 +05:30
aakashb95 4a73de1581 fix(captain): normalize FAQ suggestion languages 2026-07-16 17:12:45 +05:30
aakashb95 d09ece0b85 docs(captain): explain exact FAQ search 2026-07-16 17:00:51 +05:30
aakashb95 68f60b0672 refactor(captain): extract FAQ conversation content 2026-07-16 15:34:52 +05:30
aakashb95 e1445e4c2d Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/develop' into feature/cw-7495-llm 2026-07-16 15:32:27 +05:30
522e3c4d3f feat: enforce api_and_webhooks feature for token API and account webhooks (#14973)
This gates API-token access and outgoing account webhooks behind the
`api_and_webhooks` account feature introduced in #14972. On Chatwoot
Cloud, Hacker accounts lose token-authenticated account API access and
account webhook delivery, while paid accounts retain them through the
billing-plan feature reconcile. Community and self-hosted installations
continue to work without any upgrade-time interruption.

## What changed

- Added `Account#api_and_webhooks_enabled?` as the single backend kill
switch. Core returns enabled; the Enterprise override consults the
account flag on Chatwoot Cloud and remains enabled off-Cloud.
- Account-scoped v1 and v2 requests authenticated with a user or
agent-bot API token now return `403 Forbidden` when the feature is
disabled. Invalid tokens still return 401, and dashboard session
requests are unaffected.
- Profile responses return an empty access token when none of the user's
accounts has access. The stored token is preserved, and the profile UI
disables its token controls with paid-plan copy on Cloud.
- Account webhook delivery stops when the feature is disabled. Webhook
CRUD remains available to session-authenticated dashboard requests,
API-inbox webhooks continue to be delivered, and the Cloud dashboard
shows a webhook paywall instead of the webhook list.
- Removed the database backfill migration. Existing paid Cloud accounts
should be enabled with the one-off script below before enforcement is
deployed.

## Existing paid-account rollout

Run this as an ad-hoc Rails runner script on Chatwoot Cloud. It
intentionally targets only the Startups, Business, and Enterprise plans
and does not add `api_and_webhooks` to `manually_managed_features`, so
future billing reconciles remain authoritative.

```rb
paid_plan_names = %w[Startups Business Enterprise]
accounts = Account.where("custom_attributes ->> 'plan_name' IN (?)", paid_plan_names)

total = accounts.count
enabled = 0
skipped = 0

puts "Enabling api_and_webhooks for #{total} paid account(s)..."

accounts.find_each(batch_size: 500).with_index(1) do |account, processed|
  if account.feature_enabled?('api_and_webhooks')
    skipped += 1
  else
    account.enable_features!('api_and_webhooks')
    enabled += 1
  end

  puts "Processed #{processed}/#{total}..." if (processed % 1000).zero?
end

puts "Done! Enabled: #{enabled}, Skipped: #{skipped}, Total: #{total}"
```

For example, save the snippet outside the repository as
`enable_api_and_webhooks.rb`, then run:

```sh
bundle exec rails runner /path/to/enable_api_and_webhooks.rb
```

## How to test

- On Cloud, use a Hacker account and confirm token-authenticated
requests to account-scoped v1 and v2 endpoints return 403, while the
same dashboard actions continue to work through session authentication.
- Confirm profile access-token controls are disabled with paid-plan copy
when all accounts are ineligible, and remain available when at least one
account has the feature.
- Confirm the Webhooks settings page shows the billing paywall for a
Cloud account without the feature; admins get the billing action and
agents get the existing ask-an-admin message.
- Confirm outgoing account webhooks stop for an ineligible Cloud account
while API-inbox webhooks still deliver.
- Confirm community and self-hosted installations retain API and webhook
behavior after upgrading, even when an existing account does not have
the stored feature bit.


### Screenshots

## Cloud

<img width="2590" height="642" alt="CleanShot 2026-07-15 at 15 13 14@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/431a7bd8-1742-4e7a-b312-d3ad92015f9b"
/>

<img width="2152" height="994" alt="CleanShot 2026-07-15 at 15 14 37@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/475dda48-d1c5-4be5-a3c3-7a96b9713724"
/>

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-07-16 13:43:49 +04:00
354c2cab6b fix(captain): handle resolved conversation context (#14433)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Fixes: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13880

Uses approaches discussed from:
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/13883

Activity messages pertaining to resolve are included along with an
instruction for the LLM to choose whether to consider them or not along

## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

locally and with specs


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
2026-07-15 23:30:17 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 9c68eed676 fix(captain): send custom tool API key headers (#15008)
Captain custom tools configured with API key authentication now send the
configured key in the requested HTTP header. Existing tools begin
working without needing to be recreated or reconfigured, while
credentials remain protected across redirects.

## How to reproduce

1. Create a Captain custom tool using API Key authentication.
2. Configure `X-API-Key` as the header name and save the tool.
3. Invoke the tool and inspect the incoming request.
4. Before this change, the API key header is absent; after this change,
the configured endpoint receives it.

## What changed

The UI persists API key authentication as `name` and `key`, but the
request builder also required an unused `location: header` property. The
request builder now treats API key authentication as header-based,
matching the only mode exposed by the UI.

Custom authentication headers are also registered as sensitive with
`SafeFetch`. They are retained for the configured endpoint and
same-origin redirects, but stripped when a redirect crosses origins to
prevent credential leakage. Factory, request, and redirect specs cover
the real UI payload and both public and private-network fetch paths.
2026-07-15 22:43:30 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 6d38b4d39c fix(captain): improve complex migration instructions (#15002)
Improves Captain V1 → V2 migration for complex legacy instructions so
mandatory triggers, workflows, language rules, and escalation behavior
remain active while query-dependent product knowledge is prepared as
pending FAQ candidates.

## What changed

- Added explicit preservation rules for mandatory triggers, verification
steps, escalation conditions, exceptions, and language behavior.
- Added an auditor that checks the draft and fixes any issues before
manual review.
- Kept the existing migration application contract and schema limits
unchanged
- Added focused regression coverage for the complex-prompt classifier
contract.

## How to reproduce

Generate a migration draft for an assistant with dense legacy
instructions containing mandatory handoff triggers, verification rules,
product facts, and multi-step workflows. The resulting draft should keep
actions active, place query-dependent facts in FAQ candidates, and avoid
silently dropping or reversing source requirements.

Focused Captain migration specs and RuboCop checks pass locally.
2026-07-15 14:51:51 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub fd625981e9 fix(captain): keep custom tools available in Captain V2 (#15015)
Captain V2 assistants can now use every enabled custom tool from their
account through the main assistant. The change keeps existing custom
tool access when an assistant has no migrated scenarios, so switching
from V1 does not remove the capability without warning.

## How to reproduce

1. Create and enable an account custom tool.
2. Use an assistant with no custom instructions and no generated
scenarios.
3. Enable Captain V2 for the account.
4. Before this change, the main assistant receives only FAQ lookup and
handoff. After this change, it also receives the enabled account custom
tool.

## What changed

The main V2 assistant now loads enabled custom tools through its account
association. Scenario agents still load only the tools named in their
scenario instructions. The account custom tool limit keeps the added
tool count bounded.

Focused model coverage verifies enabled tools, disabled tools, account
isolation, FAQ lookup, and handoff. Existing V1 assistant, V2 scenario,
and V2 runner coverage passes. RuboCop passes.
2026-07-15 11:35:57 +05:30
aakashb95 f0edabebb1 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/feature/cw-7495-llm' into codex/update-cw-7495-api 2026-07-14 23:40:24 +05:30
aakashb95 3a36f096d2 fix(captain): use exact search for FAQ grouping 2026-07-14 23:40:13 +05:30
aakashb95 30e50c00e8 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/feature/cw-7495-llm' into codex/update-cw-7495-api 2026-07-14 23:18:21 +05:30
aakashb95 2e84ebb4de fix(captain): cap FAQ source previews 2026-07-14 23:15:08 +05:30
aakashb95 cf1fdff04b fix(captain): filter FAQ signals with business context 2026-07-14 23:13:03 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 2ac55c8728 fix(captain): honor mandatory handoff guidelines (#15003)
Ensures Captain follows explicit mandatory-transfer rules from active
Response Guidelines and Guardrails instead of allowing the generic
consent-first fallback to override those rules.

## What changed

- Made explicit transfer requirements take precedence over generic
consent-first handoff defaults only when their condition matches.
- Added explicit Response Guideline and Guardrail transfer rules to the
human-handoff protocol.
- Added focused prompt regression coverage.

## How to reproduce

Configure a Response Guideline or Guardrail that requires immediate
transfer for a specific condition, then send a request matching that
condition. Captain should invoke the human-handoff path without asking
the user to consent again. Unmatched requests continue to use the
existing consent-first fallback.

The assistant prompt renderer, agent prompt context, and focused
regression specs pass locally.
2026-07-14 19:38:43 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 102f19fe41 feat(captain): add FAQ suggestion data model (1/3) (#14977)
Resolved conversations need a separate suggestion layer so repeated FAQ
signals can be grouped without creating untrusted knowledge entries.
This PR adds the persistence foundation only; it introduces no
user-facing behavior by itself.

## Closes

-
[CW-7495](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7495/backend-llm-changes-to-make-conversation-faqs-as-signalssuggestions)
(stacked PR 1/3; the issue is complete after the full stack lands)

## What changed

- Added `captain_faq_suggestions` with question, answer, embedding,
source count, and review status.
- Added `captain_faq_observations` to retain conversation-level signals.
- Added Captain assistant, account, and conversation associations.
- Added vector and lookup indexes for semantic grouping.

## How to test

This layer has no standalone UI behavior. Apply the migration and
confirm Captain assistants can persist open FAQ suggestions with
attached conversation observations.
2026-07-14 14:31:08 +05:30
aakashb95 44ad817fb3 fix(captain): guard FAQ suggestion review data 2026-07-14 14:10:26 +05:30
aakashb95 f98cfd2184 fix(captain): authorize FAQ suggestion review actions 2026-07-14 14:10:26 +05:30
aakashb95 7723f19816 feat(captain): add FAQ suggestion review API 2026-07-14 14:10:26 +05:30
aakashb95 69216db45d fix(captain): compare FAQ languages by base code 2026-07-14 14:10:17 +05:30
aakashb95 c272de5be9 feat(captain): group FAQ suggestions by language 2026-07-14 14:10:17 +05:30
aakashb95 f6f688acbb feat(captain): group conversation FAQ signals 2026-07-14 14:10:17 +05:30
aakashb95 61f5198b99 fix(captain): enforce FAQ observation account scope 2026-07-14 14:10:03 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 1dd91cda92 Merge branch 'develop' into feature/cw-7495-models 2026-07-14 13:12:50 +05:30
1b6a80d84d fix(captain): improve conversation completion evaluation (#14967)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/AI-136/check-conversation-status-while-auto-resolving

- After 60mins of inactivity, we run a job that decides if pending
conversations are resolvable or need handoff
- the prompt was a bit conservative and didn't have conversation state
context

## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
locally ran a sample eval 

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
2026-07-14 11:45:40 +05:30
aakashb95 c3635128ef fix(captain): avoid FAQ migration and callback conflicts 2026-07-13 18:44:24 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub cb5b4a539c Merge branch 'develop' into feature/cw-7495-models 2026-07-13 18:39:28 +05:30
aakashb95 dfb93ef58f fix(captain): scope FAQ observations to account 2026-07-13 18:32:19 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 9c444315a6 feat: add api_and_webhooks feature flag reconciled from billing plan (#14972)
This introduces a new `api_and_webhooks` account feature flag that will
control access to the token-authenticated API and account webhooks. The
flag is part of the Startup plan features, so paid plans — including
trials of paid plans — get it through the billing reconcile, while
accounts on the default (Hacker) plan don't, with
`manually_managed_features` available as a per-account override. The
flag defaults to enabled, and nothing enforces it yet, so this PR is
behavior-neutral — enforcement lands in a follow-up.

## What changed

- Added `api_and_webhooks` to `features.yml` (first flag on the
`feature_flags_ext_1` column, default enabled).
- Added the flag to `STARTUP_PLAN_FEATURES` in
`Enterprise::Billing::ReconcilePlanFeaturesService`, so all paid tiers
get it and the default plan loses it on reconcile.
- Added the flag to the manually manageable features list so it can be
granted per account via Super Admin.

```rb
# Enables the api_and_webhooks feature for all existing accounts and marks it
# as manually managed so cloud billing reconciles never strip it.
#
# NOT committed to source control — run manually on production.
#
# Usage:
#   bundle exec rails runner enable_api_and_webhooks.rb
#   ACCOUNT_ID=123 bundle exec rails runner enable_api_and_webhooks.rb
#
# Idempotent: accounts already grandfathered are skipped; safe to re-run.

probe = Internal::Accounts::InternalAttributesService.new(Account.new)
abort 'api_and_webhooks is not in valid_feature_list — deploy the feature flag PR first.' unless probe.valid_feature_list.include?('api_and_webhooks')

account_id = ENV.fetch('ACCOUNT_ID', nil)
accounts = account_id.present? ? Account.where(id: account_id) : Account.all

abort "Account with ID #{account_id} not found" if account_id.present? && accounts.empty?

total = accounts.count
puts "Grandfathering api_and_webhooks for #{total} account(s)..."
puts "Started at: #{Time.current}"

updated = 0
skipped = 0
errored = 0

accounts.find_each(batch_size: 500) do |account|
  service = Internal::Accounts::InternalAttributesService.new(account)
  features = service.manually_managed_features

  if features.include?('api_and_webhooks') && account.feature_enabled?('api_and_webhooks')
    skipped += 1
  else
    service.manually_managed_features = features + ['api_and_webhooks'] unless features.include?('api_and_webhooks')
    account.enable_features!('api_and_webhooks')
    updated += 1
  end

  processed = updated + skipped + errored
  puts "Processed #{processed}/#{total}..." if (processed % 1000).zero?
rescue StandardError => e
  errored += 1
  puts "Account #{account.id}: FAILED - #{e.message}"
end

puts "Done! Updated: #{updated}, Skipped: #{skipped}, Errored: #{errored}, Total: #{total}"
```
2026-07-13 18:20:36 +05:30
df7f137657 feat: add captain sessions model [CW-7485] (#14970)
This adds a `captain_sessions` table to log every Captain run, starting
with Assistant Responses and Copilot Responses. Each session records the
assistant, model, credits consumed, the FAQs/documents/scenario that
contributed to the response, and the full run context — giving customers
visibility into how a response was generated and giving us durable stats
on credit, FAQ, and document usage (which today only exist as ephemeral
trace metadata and an aggregate account counter).

## What changed

- New `Captain::Session` model with a `session_type` enum (`assistant`,
`copilot`). The subject (`Conversation` / `CopilotThread`) and result
(`Message` / `CopilotMessage`) classes are inferred from the session
type, so the table stores plain `subject_id` / `result_id` ids.
`result_id` is nullable so failed runs that still consumed credits can
be logged.
- Composite indexes on `[session_type, subject_id]`, `[session_type,
result_id]`, and `[account_id, session_type, created_at]` for lookup and
usage-stats queries.
- Factory and model specs.

This PR is schema + model only; the writer/instrumentation that records
sessions from the assistant and copilot flows will follow.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
2026-07-13 18:18:20 +05:30
08260f3be7 feat: show crawled document details and FAQ counts in Captain (#14863)
- Add a document details view that surfaces crawled content, source
metadata, and generated FAQ counts.
- Rename the document card action to open details and show the FAQ count
inline in the list.
- Return `responses_count` from the documents API efficiently and expose
document content in the show payload.
- Update related Captain copy to reflect the new details-oriented flow. 


**Preview**
<img width="1640" height="1596" alt="CleanShot 2026-06-26 at 09 25
15@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0c408fae-7d37-422a-8869-ece466292cb1"
/>

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-13 17:47:00 +05:30