Previously, SAML users could bypass password authentication restrictions
by including any sso_auth_token parameter, even invalid ones. Now the
method properly validates SSO tokens against Redis storage before
allowing the bypass, closing the security vulnerability while maintaining
legitimate SSO functionality.
While investigating a customer-reported issue, I found that some emails
were appearing late in Chatwoot. The root cause was query timeouts.
It only happened for emails with an in_reply_to header. In these cases,
Chatwoot first checks if a message exists with message_id = in_reply_to.
If not, it falls back to checking conversations where
additional_attributes->>'in_reply_to' = ?.
We were using:
```rb
@inbox.conversations.where("additional_attributes->>'in_reply_to' = ?", in_reply_to).first
```
This looked harmless, but .first caused timeouts. Without .first, the
query ran fine. The issue was the generated SQL:
```sql
SELECT *
FROM conversations
WHERE inbox_id = $1
AND (additional_attributes->>'in_reply_to' = '<in-reply-to-id>')
ORDER BY id ASC
LIMIT $2;
```
The ORDER BY id forced a full scan, even with <10k records.
The fix was to replace .first with .find_by:
```rb
@inbox.conversations.find_by("additional_attributes->>'in_reply_to' = ?", in_reply_to)
```
This generates:
```sql
SELECT *
FROM conversations
WHERE inbox_id = $1
AND (additional_attributes->>'in_reply_to' = '<in-reply-to-id>')
LIMIT $2;
```
This avoids the scan and runs quickly without needing an index.
By the way, Cursor and Claude failed
[here](https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/12401), it just kept on
adding the index without figuring out the root cause.
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This Pull Request will provide a language selector in the Profile
Settings for each user, and allows them to change the UI language per
agent, defaulting back to the account locale.
Fixes # #678 This does PR addresses the Dashboard view but does not
change the language of the agents emails
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [X ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
1. Go to an Agents Profile settings page
2. Select a language from the Language drop down
3. the UI will update to the new i18n locale
4. navigate through the UI to make sure the appropriate language is
being used
5. Refresh the page to test that the locale persists
270
- [X] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [X] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [X] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [X] My changes generate no new warnings
- [X] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [X] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [X] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Checklist:.724.2708
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Meta announced that Graph API v17.0 will reach end-of-life on September
12, 2025, requiring migration to v18.0 or higher. Updated the default
Facebook API version from v17.0 to v18.0 across configuration files in
response to Meta's deprecation notice.
This PR delivers the first slice of the voice channel: inbound call
handling. When a customer calls a configured voice
number, Chatwoot now creates a new conversation and shows a dedicated
call bubble in the UI. As the call progresses
(ringing, answered, completed), its status updates in real time in both
the conversation list and the call bubble, so
agents can instantly see what’s happening. This focuses on the inbound
flow and is part of breaking the larger voice
feature into smaller, functional, and testable units; further
enhancements will follow in subsequent PRs.
references: #11602 , #11481
## Testing
- Configure a Voice inbox in Chatwoot with your Twilio number.
- Place a call to that number.
- Verify a new conversation appears in the Voice inbox for the call.
- Open it and confirm a dedicated voice call message bubble is shown.
- Watch status update live (ringing/answered); hang up and see it change
to completed in both the bubble and conversation
list.
- to test missed call status, make sure to hangup the call before the
please wait while we connect you to an agent message plays
## Screens
<img width="400" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 3 11 25 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d6a1d2ff-2ded-47b7-9144-a9d898beb380"
/>
<img width="700" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 3 11 33 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c25e6a1e-a885-47f7-b3d7-c3e15eef18c7"
/>
<img width="700" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 3 11 57 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29e7366d-b1d4-4add-a062-4646d2bff435"
/>
<img width="442" height="255" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-04 at 11 55 01 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/703126f6-a448-49d9-9c02-daf3092cc7f9"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
## Description
Fixes a UI bug in the search bar dropdown where long lists were not
scrollable after the latest update.
Adds a `max-height` to the `<ul>` element and enables vertical
scrolling.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Verified scrolling works for long search results.
- Confirmed layout remains correct on different screen sizes.
- No other UI elements affected.
## Checklist
- [x] Code follows project style guidelines
- [x] Self-reviewed code
- [x] Changes generate no new warnings
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
This PR adds the foundation for account-level SAML SSO configuration in
Chatwoot Enterprise. It introduces a new `AccountSamlSettings` model and
management API that allows accounts to configure their own SAML identity
providers independently, this also includes the certificate generation
flow
The implementation includes a new controller
(`Api::V1::Accounts::SamlSettingsController`) that provides CRUD
operations for SAML configuration
The feature is properly gated behind the 'saml' feature flag and
includes administrator-only authorization via Pundit policies.
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds the `AssignmentCard` component with a story for the agent
management UI.
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshot
<img width="1061" height="357" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e5548325-294a-48f8-8c7f-0a0c9272bf76"
/>
<img width="1061" height="357" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cfb76bf4-bddc-4ec4-a27d-27be3efb0e8f"
/>
<img width="1061" height="357" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6efc6617-4ce5-42df-b239-c296bbd0acc5"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
There was a fundamental difference in how resolution counts were
calculated between the agent summary and timeseries reports, causing
confusion for users when the numbers didn't match.
The agent summary report counted all `conversation_resolved` events
within a time period by querying the `reporting_events` table directly.
However, the timeseries report had an additional constraint that
required the conversation to currently be in resolved status
(`conversations.status = 1`). This meant that if an agent resolved a
conversation that was later reopened, the resolution action would be
counted in the summary but not in the timeseries.
This fix aligns both reports to count resolution events rather than
conversations in resolved state. When an agent resolves a conversation,
they should receive credit for that action regardless of what happens to
the conversation afterward. The same logic now applies to bot
resolutions as well.
The change removes the `conversations: { status: :resolved }` condition
from both `scope_for_resolutions_count` and
`scope_for_bot_resolutions_count` methods in CountReportBuilder, and
updates the corresponding test expectations to reflect that all
resolution events are counted.
## About timezone
When a timezone is specified via `timezone_offset` parameter, the
reporting system:
1. Converts timestamps to the target timezone before grouping
2. Groups data by local day/week/month boundaries in that timezone, but
the primary boundaries are sent by the frontend and used as-is
3. Returns timestamps representing midnight in the target timezone
This means the same events can appear in different day buckets depending
on the timezone used. For summary reports, it works fine, since the user
only needs the total count between two timestamps and the frontend sends
the timestamps adjusted for timezone.
## Testing Locally
Run the following command, this will erase all data for that account and
put in 1000 conversations over last 3 months, parameters of this can be
tweaked in `Seeders::Reports::ReportDataSeeder`
I'd suggest updating the values to generate data over 30 days, with
10000 conversations, it will take it's sweet time to run but then the
data will be really rich, great for testing.
```
ACCOUNT_ID=2 ENABLE_ACCOUNT_SEEDING=true bundle exec rake db:seed:reports_data
```
Pro Tip: Don't run the app when the seeder is active, we manually create
the reporting events anyway. So once done just use `redis-cli FLUSHALL`
to clear all sidekiq jobs. Will be easier on the system
Use the following scripts to test it
- https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/1263a922f5efd24df8e448a816a06257
- https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/ca0b861fa0139e2cccdb72526ea844b2
- https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/5fe73d1f48f35422fd1fd142ea3498f3
- https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/3b7b1f9e2ff149007170e5c329432f45
- https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/f245fa2f44cd973e5d60aac64f979162
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshots
**Before**
<img width="1129" height="862" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4752a3d9-bbe1-497f-9488-572c65768f7c"
/>
**After**
<img width="1129" height="862" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ec8d5194-f279-4d23-b6df-9e99fce74e69"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Linked PR
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/12113
## Linear Link
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4515/upload-pdfs-to-captain
## Description
This PR adds support for PDF file uploads to the Captain document
knowledge base system. The feature enables users to upload PDF files
directly to the knowledge base for FAQ generation and document
processing, expanding beyond the existing URL-based document ingestion.
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Unit Tests
- Manually via UI
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Shivam Mishra