## Description
When working with webhooks, it's easy to lose track of which URL is
which. Adding a `name` (optional) column to the webhook model is a
straight-forward solution to make it significantly easier to identify
webhooks.
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Model and controller specs, and also running in production over several
months without any issues.
| Before | After |
| --- | --- |
| <img width="949" height="990" alt="image copy 3"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6b33c072-7d16-4a9c-a129-f9c0751299f5"
/> | <img width="806" height="941" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/77f3cb3a-2eb0-41ac-95bf-d02915589690"
/> |
| <img width="1231" height="650" alt="image copy 2"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/583374af-96e0-4436-b026-4ce79b7f9321"
/> | <img width="1252" height="650" alt="image copy"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa81fb31-fd18-4e21-a40e-d8ab0dc76b4e"
/> |
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Description
The Articles API was ignoring the `status` parameter when creating new
articles. All articles were forced to be drafts due to a hardcoded
`@article.draft!` call in the controller, even when users explicitly
sent `status: 1` (published) in their API request.
This PR removes the hardcoded draft enforcement and allows the status
parameter to be respected while maintaining backward compatibility.
Fixes#12063
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
**Before:**
- API POST with `status: 1` → Created as draft (ignored parameter)
- API POST without status → Created as draft
**After:**
- API POST with `status: 1` → Created as published ✅
- API POST without status → Created as draft (backward compatible) ✅
- UI creates articles → Still creates as draft (UI doesn't send status)
✅
**Tests run:**
```bash
bundle exec rspec spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/articles_controller_spec.rb
# 17 examples, 0 failures
```
Updated tests:
1. Changed 2 existing tests that were verifying the broken behavior
(expecting draft when published was sent)
2. Added new test to verify articles default to draft when status is not
provided
3. All existing tests pass, confirming backward compatibility
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Previously, the lock key for Instagram used sender_id, which for echo
messages (outgoing) would be the account's own ID. This caused all
outgoing messages to compete for the same lock, creating a bottleneck
during bulk messaging.
The fix introduces contact_instagram_id method that correctly identifies
the contact's ID regardless of message direction:
- For echo messages (outgoing): uses recipient.id (the contact)
- For incoming messages: uses sender.id (the contact)
This ensures each conversation has a unique lock, allowing parallel
processing of webhooks while maintaining race condition protection
within individual conversations.
Fixes lock acquisition errors in Sidekiq when processing bulk Instagram
messages.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5931/p0-mutexapplicationjoblockacquisitionerror-failed-to-acquire-lock-for
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes an update to the Captain navigation structure.
## Route Structure
```javascript
1. captain_assistants_responses_index → /captain/:assistantId/faqs
2. captain_assistants_documents_index → /captain/:assistantId/documents
3. captain_assistants_scenarios_index → /captain/:assistantId/scenarios
4. captain_assistants_playground_index → /captain/:assistantId/playground
5. captain_assistants_inboxes_index → /captain/:assistantId/inboxes
6. captain_tools_index → /captain/tools
7. captain_assistants_settings_index → /captain/:assistantId/settings
8. captain_assistants_guardrails_index → /captain/:assistantId/settings/guardrails
9. captain_assistants_guidelines_index → /captain/:assistantId/settings/guidelines
10. captain_assistants_index → /captain/:navigationPath
```
**How it works:**
1. User clicks sidebar item → Routes to `captain_assistants_index` with
`navigationPath`
2. `AssistantsIndexPage` validates route and gets last active assistant,
if not redirects to assistant create page.
3. Routes to actual page: `/captain/:assistantId/:page`
4. Page loads with correct assistant context
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5832/updating-captain-navigation
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
## Description
Modified the phone number validation in Whatsapp::ChannelCreationService
to check for duplicate phone numbers across ALL accounts, not just
within the current account.
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Added test coverage for cross-account phone number validation
- Using actual UI flow
<img width="1493" height="532" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/67d2bb99-2eb9-4115-8d56-449e4785e0d8"
/>
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
