35 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
6a7ca9dd3b feat: Add report bar drilldown drawer (#14626)
## Description

Adds drilldown support for report bar charts powered by
`ReportContainer`. Clicking a non-zero report bar now opens a right-side
drawer with the conversations or messages that contributed to that
bucket, with each row linking to the underlying conversation and message
rows linking with `messageId`.

This includes a new `GET /api/v2/accounts/:account_id/reports/drilldown`
endpoint, backend drilldown builders/serializers, generic chart click
emission, local drawer state via `useReportDrilldown`, compact drilldown
cards, pagination, stale-response protection, and validation for
unsupported drilldown dimensions.

Fixes # CW-4497

https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4497/drill-down-on-agent-conversations-report

## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update

## How Has This Been Tested?

Ran the focused backend and frontend checks for the drilldown endpoint,
builder, chart click handling, drawer/card UI, API helper, and
stale-response handling.

Here are the screenshots on how it looks like:
<img width="1792" height="1199" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-02 at 11 32
11 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6bdb8832-b9df-4bf3-9a2a-beaefe203b6e"
/>
<img width="1791" height="1230" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-02 at 11 32
34 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/36e92eb7-3208-4855-87f4-0c7f316df54d"
/>
<img width="1784" height="1235" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-02 at 11 32
46 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f7a53916-74f2-4622-9305-042e0ac9e877"
/>



## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
2026-07-02 16:07:26 +05:30
379e28df1f fix: prevent bot metrics double-counting when handoff and resolution coexist [CW-6210] (#14032)
The bot metrics dashboard can show `handoff_rate + resolution_rate >
100%`. A single conversation can accumulate both
`conversation_bot_handoff` and `conversation_bot_resolved` events, and
the rate queries count them independently against a shared denominator.

## How it happens

```
Customer messages bot inbox
        │
        ▼
   ┌──────────┐
   │ pending  │ (bot handling)
   └────┬─────┘
        │ bot can't help
        ▼
   ┌──────────┐
   │   open   │ (handed off → conversation_bot_handoff event created)
   └────┬─────┘
        │ agent clicks "Resolve" WITHOUT sending a message
        ▼
   ┌──────────┐
   │ resolved │ conversation_resolved fires
   └──────────┘
        │
        ▼
   create_bot_resolved_event guard checks:
      inbox.active_bot?
      no outgoing messages with sender_type: 'User'  ← agent never messaged!
        │
        ▼
   conversation_bot_resolved event ALSO created ← BUG
        │
        ▼
   Same conversation counted in BOTH rates → sum exceeds 100%
```

## Why fix at the read path, not the write path

An earlier attempt added guards in the listener to make the two events
mutually exclusive per conversation — deleting `bot_resolved` when a
handoff fires, suppressing resolutions when a handoff exists. This was
rejected because conversations can be reopened across multiple cycles
(bot resolves on day 1, customer returns on day 5, bot hands off).
Deleting the day-1 resolution corrupts historical reports, and the async
event dispatcher makes listener-level guards vulnerable to race
conditions.

## What this PR does

Within a reporting window, if a conversation has both events, **handoff
wins** — the conversation is excluded from the resolution count. This is
applied via SQL subquery across all three read paths:

```
                    ┌─────────────────────────┐
                    │   Reporting Events DB    │
                    │                          │
                    │  conv_bot_handoff: [A,B] │
                    │  conv_bot_resolved: [A,C]│
                    └────────┬────────────────┘
                             │
              ┌──────────────┼──────────────┐
              ▼              ▼              ▼
       BotMetricsBuilder  ReportHelper  CountReportBuilder
       (rate cards)       (bot_summary)  (timeseries charts)
              │              │              │
              ▼              ▼              ▼
       resolutions:        resolutions:   resolutions:
       [A,C] minus [A,B]  same logic     same logic
       = [C] only          = [C] only     = [C] only

       Result: Conversation A → handoff only
               Conversation B → handoff only
               Conversation C → resolution only
```

For wide date ranges spanning multiple lifecycles, a conversation
bot-resolved in one cycle and handed off in a later cycle will only show
as a handoff. This is an acceptable tradeoff — the alternative (>100%
rates) is clearly worse, and narrow ranges handle this correctly since
the events fall into different windows. No reporting events are
modified, so historical data stays intact.

## Diagnostic tool

`rake bot_metrics:diagnose` — read-only task that prompts for account ID
and date range, shows a before/after rate comparison without modifying
data.

---------

Co-authored-by: aakashb95 <aakashbakhle@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aakash Bakhle <48802744+aakashb95@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-13 18:43:23 +05:30
6cbddbdb67 feat(rollup): report builder abstraction [2/3] (#13798)
## PR2: Report builder refactor — DataSource abstraction

The existing report builders (timeseries + summary) had their SQL
queries inlined — each builder constructed its own scopes, groupings,
and aggregations directly. This made it hard to swap the underlying data
source without duplicating builder logic.

This PR extracts all raw-event querying into a `Reports::RawDataSource`
behind a `Reports::DataSource` factory. Builders now call
`data_source.timeseries`, `.aggregate`, or `.summary` instead of
constructing queries themselves. Behavior is identical —
`DataSource.for(...)` returns `RawDataSource` in all cases today.

The timeseries path had two separate builders (`CountReportBuilder`,
`AverageReportBuilder`) that were selected via a metric-name case
statement in `Conversations::BaseReportBuilder`. These are replaced by a
single `ReportBuilder` that delegates to the data source. The metric
type (count vs average) is now decided inside the data source, not the
builder.

Summary builders similarly moved their inline SQL into
`RawDataSource#summary`, which returns a unified hash keyed by dimension
ID.
 the rollup read path.

## Flow

### Before

```
ReportsController ──▶ case metric ──▶ AverageReportBuilder ──▶ inline SQL ──▶ DB
                                  └──▶ CountReportBuilder   ──▶ inline SQL ──▶ DB

SummaryController ──▶ AgentSummaryBuilder ──▶ inline SQL ──▶ DB
                  └──▶ InboxSummaryBuilder ──▶ inline SQL ──▶ DB
                  └──▶ TeamSummaryBuilder  ──▶ inline SQL ──▶ DB
```

### After

```
ReportsController ──▶ ReportBuilder  ──┐
                                       ├──▶ DataSource.for ──▶ RawDataSource ──▶ DB
SummaryController ──▶ SummaryBuilder ──┘
```


### Expected (after rollup read path)

```
ReportsController ──▶ ReportBuilder  ──┐
                                       ├──▶ DataSource.for ──▶ RawDataSource    ──▶ reporting_events
SummaryController ──▶ SummaryBuilder ──┘                   └──▶ RollupDataSource ──▶ reporting_events_rollups
```

### What changed

- `Reports::DataSource` factory + `Reports::RawDataSource`
- `TimezoneHelper#timezone_name_from_params` — prefers IANA name, falls
back to offset
- Unified `Timeseries::ReportBuilder` replaces `CountReportBuilder` +
`AverageReportBuilder`
- Summary builders delegate to `DataSource` instead of querying directly

### How to test

This is a pure refactor — all existing report pages (Overview, Agent,
Inbox, Label, Team) should produce identical numbers. No feature flag or
new config needed.

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tanmay Deep Sharma <tanmaydeepsharma21@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tanmay Deep Sharma <32020192+tds-1@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-04-20 11:15:48 +05:30
059506b1db feat: Add automatic favicon fetching for companies (#13013)
## Summary

This Enterprise-only feature automatically fetches a favicon for
companies created with a domain, and adds a batch task to backfill
missing avatars for existing companies. The flow only targets companies
that do not already have an attached avatar, so existing avatars are
left untouched.


## Demo 



https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d050334e-769f-4e46-b6e7-f7423727a192



## What changed

- Added `Avatar::AvatarFromFaviconJob` to build a Google favicon URL
from the company domain and fetch it through `Avatar::AvatarFromUrlJob`
- Triggered favicon fetching from `Company` with `after_create_commit`
- Added `Companies::FetchAvatarsJob` to batch existing companies that
are missing avatars
- Added `companies:fetch_missing_avatars` under `enterprise/lib/tasks`
- Kept the company-specific implementation inside the Enterprise
boundary
- Stubbed the new favicon request in unrelated specs that now hit this
callback indirectly
- Updated a couple of CI-sensitive specs that were failing due to
callback side effects / reload-safe exception assertions

## How to verify

1. Create a company in Enterprise with a valid domain and no avatar.
2. Confirm that a favicon-based avatar gets attached shortly after
creation.
3. Create another company with a domain and an avatar already attached.
4. Confirm that the existing avatar is not replaced.
5. Run `companies:fetch_missing_avatars`.
6. Confirm that existing companies without avatars get one, while
companies that already have avatars remain unchanged.

## Notes

- This change does not refresh or overwrite existing company avatars
- Favicon fetching only runs for companies with a present domain
- The branch includes the latest `develop`

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2026-03-05 18:51:28 -08:00
Sojan Jose 9eb3ee44a8 Revert "chore: Upgrade Rails to 7.2.2 and update Gemfile dependencies (#11037)"
This reverts commit ef6ba8aabd.
2026-02-03 21:09:42 -08:00
Sojan JoseandGitHub ef6ba8aabd chore: Upgrade Rails to 7.2.2 and update Gemfile dependencies (#11037)
Upgrade rails to 7.2.2 so that we can proceed with the rails 8 upgrade
afterwards
 
 # Changelog
- `.circleci/config.yml` — align CI DB setup with GitHub Actions
(`db:create` + `db:schema:load`) to avoid trigger-dependent prep steps.
- `.rubocop.yml` — add `rubocop-rspec_rails` and disable new cops that
don't match existing spec style.
- `AGENTS.md` — document that specs should run without `.env` (rename
temporarily when present).
- `Gemfile` — upgrade to Rails 7.2, switch Azure storage gem, pin
`commonmarker`, bump `sidekiq-cron`, add `rubocop-rspec_rails`, and
relax some gem pins.
- `Gemfile.lock` — dependency lockfile updates from the Rails 7.2 and
gem changes.
- `app/controllers/api/v1/accounts/integrations/linear_controller.rb` —
stringify params before passing to the Linear service to keep key types
stable.
- `app/controllers/super_admin/instance_statuses_controller.rb` — use
`MigrationContext` API for migration status in Rails 7.2.
- `app/models/installation_config.rb` — add commentary on YAML
serialization and future JSONB migration (no behavior change).
- `app/models/integrations/hook.rb` — ensure hook type is set on create
only and guard against missing app.
- `app/models/user.rb` — update enum syntax for Rails 7.2 deprecation,
serialize OTP backup codes with JSON, and use Ruby `alias`.
- `app/services/crm/leadsquared/setup_service.rb` — stringify hook
settings keys before merge to keep JSON shape consistent.
- `app/services/macros/execution_service.rb` — remove macro-specific
assignee activity workaround; rely on standard assignment handlers.
- `config/application.rb` — load Rails 7.2 defaults.
- `config/storage.yml` — update Azure Active Storage service name to
`AzureBlob`.
- `db/migrate/20230515051424_update_article_image_keys.rb` — use
credentials `secret_key_base` with fallback to legacy secrets.
- `docker/Dockerfile` — add `yaml-dev` and `pkgconf` packages for native
extensions (Ruby 3.4 / psych).
- `lib/seeders/reports/message_creator.rb` — add parentheses for clarity
in range calculation.
- `package.json` — pin Vite version and bump `vite-plugin-ruby`.
- `pnpm-lock.yaml` — lockfile changes from JS dependency updates.
- `spec/builders/v2/report_builder_spec.rb` — disable transactional
fixtures; truncate tables per example via Rails `truncate_tables` so
after_commit callbacks run with clean isolation; keep builder spec
metadata minimal.
- `spec/builders/v2/reports/label_summary_builder_spec.rb` — disable
transactional fixtures + truncate tables via Rails `truncate_tables`;
revert to real `resolved!`/`open!`/`resolved!` flow for multiple
resolution events; align date range to `Time.zone` to avoid offset gaps;
keep builder spec metadata minimal.
- `spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/macros_controller_spec.rb` — assert
`assignee_id` instead of activity message to avoid transaction-timing
flakes.
- `spec/services/telegram/incoming_message_service_spec.rb` — reference
the contact tied to the created conversation instead of
`Contact.all.first` to avoid order-dependent failures when other specs
leave data behind.
-
`spec/mailers/administrator_notifications/shared/smtp_config_shared.rb`
— use `with_modified_env` instead of stubbing mailer internals.
- `spec/services/account/sign_up_email_validation_service_spec.rb` —
compare error `class.name` for parallel/reload-safe assertions.
2026-02-03 14:29:26 -08:00
5ec77aca64 feat: Add first response time distribution report endpoint (#13400)
The index is already added in production.

Adds a new reporting API that returns conversation counts grouped by
channel type and first response time buckets (0-1h, 1-4h, 4-8h, 8-24h,
24h+).

- GET /api/v2/accounts/:id/reports/first_response_time_distribution
- Uses SQL aggregation to handle large datasets efficiently
- Adds composite index on reporting_events for query performance

Tested on production workload.
Request: GET
`/api/v2/accounts/1/reports/first_response_time_distribution?since=<since>&until=<until>`
Response payload:
```
{
    "Channel::WebWidget": {
      "0-1h": 120,
      "1-4h": 85,
      "4-8h": 32,
      "8-24h": 12,
      "24h+": 3
    },
    "Channel::Email": {
      "0-1h": 12,
      "1-4h": 28,
      "4-8h": 45,
      "8-24h": 35,
      "24h+": 10
    },
    "Channel::FacebookPage": {
      "0-1h": 50,
      "1-4h": 30,
      "4-8h": 15,
      "8-24h": 8,
      "24h+": 2
    }
  }
```

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-01-30 22:22:27 +04:00
6f45af605c feat: Add inbox-label matrix report endpoint (#13394)
This PR added new API endpoint GET
/api/v2/accounts/:account_id/reports/inbox_label_matrix that returns
conversation counts grouped by inbox and label in a matrix format.
Supports optional filtering by date range, inbox_ids, and label_ids.

---------

Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
2026-01-29 13:32:59 -08:00
PranavandGitHub 0917e1a646 feat: Add an API to support querying metrics by ChannelType (#13255)
This API gives you how many conversations exist per channel, broken down
by status in a given time period. The max time period is capped to 6
months for now.

**Input Params:**
- **since:** Unix timestamp (seconds) - start of date range
- **until:** Unix timestamp (seconds) - end of date range


**Response Payload:**

```json
{
  "Channel::Sms": {
    "resolved": 85,
    "snoozed": 10,
    "open": 5,
    "pending": 5,
    "total": 100
  },
  "Channel::Email": {
    "resolved": 72,
    "snoozed": 15,
    "open": 13,
    "pending": 13,
    "total": 100
  },
  "Channel::WebWidget": {
    "resolved": 90,
    "snoozed": 7,
    "open": 3,
    "pending": 3,
    "total": 100
  }
}
```

**Definitons:**
resolved = Number of conversations created within the selected time
period that are currently marked as resolved.
snoozed = Number of conversations created within the selected time
period that are currently marked as snoozed.
pending = Number of conversations created within the selected time
period that are currently marked as pending.
open = Number of conversations created within the selected time period
that are currently open.
total = Total number of conversations created within the selected time
period, across all statuses.
2026-01-12 23:18:47 -08:00
Vishnu NarayananandGitHub 08b9134486 feat: speed up circleci and github actions (#12849)
# 🚀 Speed up CI/CD test execution with parallelization

## TL;DR

- **Problem**: CI tests took 36-42 minutes per commit, blocking
developer workflow
- **Solution**: Implemented 16-way parallelization + optimized slow
tests + fixed Docker builds
- **Impact**: **1,358 hours/month saved** (7.7 FTE) across GitHub
Actions + CircleCI
  - GitHub Actions tests: 36m → 7m (82% faster)
  - Backend tests: 28m → 4m (87% faster with 16-way parallelization)
  - CircleCI tests: 42m → 7m (83% faster)
  - Docker builds: 34m → 5m (85% faster)
- **Result**: 5-6x faster feedback loops, 100% success rate on recent
runs

---

## Problem
CI test runs were taking **36-42 minutes per commit push** (GitHub
Actions: 36m avg, CircleCI: 42m P95), creating a significant bottleneck
in the development workflow.

## Solution
This PR comprehensively restructures both CI test pipelines to leverage
16-way parallelization and optimize test execution, reducing test
runtime from **36-42 minutes to ~7 minutes** - an **82% improvement**.

---

## 📊 Real Performance Data (Both CI Systems)

### GitHub Actions

#### Before (develop branch - 5 recent runs)
```
Individual runs: 35m 29s | 36m 1s | 40m 0s | 36m 4s | 34m 18s
Average: 36m 22s
```

#### After (feat/speed_up_ci branch - 9 successful runs)
```
Individual runs: 6m 39s | 7m 2s | 6m 53s | 6m 26s | 6m 52s | 6m 42s | 6m 45s | 6m 40s | 6m 37s
Average: 6m 44s
Range: 6m 26s - 7m 2s
```

**Improvement**:  **81.5% faster** (29m 38s saved per run)


#### Backend Tests Specific Impact
With 16-way parallelization, backend tests show dramatic improvement:
- **Before**: 27m 52s (sequential execution)
- **After**: 3m 44s (longest of 16 parallel runners)
  - Average across runners: 2m 30s
  - Range: 1m 52s - 3m 44s
- **Improvement**:  **86.6% faster** (24m 8s saved)
---

### CircleCI

#### Before (develop branch - CircleCI Insights)
```
Duration (P95): 41m 44s
Runs: 70 (last 30 days)
Success Rate: 84%
```

#### After (feat/speed_up_ci branch - Last 2 pipeline runs)
```
Run 1 (1h ago): 7m 7s
  ├─ lint: 4m 12s
  ├─ frontend-tests: 5m 36s
  ├─ backend-tests: 6m 23s
  ├─ coverage: 20s
  └─ build: 1s

Run 2 (2h ago): 7m 21s
  ├─ lint: 3m 47s
  ├─ frontend-tests: 5m 4s
  ├─ backend-tests: 6m 33s
  ├─ coverage: 19s
  └─ build: 1s

Average: 7m 14s
Success Rate: 100% 
```

**Improvement**:  **82.7% faster** (34m 30s saved per run)

---

## 🐳 Related Work: Docker Build Optimization

As part of the broader CI/CD optimization effort, Docker build
performance was improved separately in **PR #12859**.

### Docker Build Fix (Merged Separately)
**Problem**: Multi-architecture Docker builds (amd64/arm64) were taking
~34 minutes due to cache thrashing

**Solution**: Added separate cache scopes per platform in
`.github/workflows/test_docker_build.yml`:
```yaml
cache-from: type=gha,scope=${{ matrix.platform }}
cache-to: type=gha,mode=max,scope=${{ matrix.platform }}
```

**Results** (measured from November 2025 data):
- **Before**: 34.2 minutes/run average (15,547 minutes across 454 runs)
- **After**: 5 minutes/run
- **Improvement**: 85% faster, 29.2 minutes saved per run
- **Frequency**: 25.2 runs/day
- **Monthly savings**: **369 hours** (46 developer-days)

This prevents different architectures from invalidating each other's
caches and contributes 27% of total CI/CD time savings.

---

## 🎯 Key Findings

### Both CI Systems Now Perform Similarly
- **CircleCI**: 7m 14s average
- **GitHub Actions**: 6m 44s average
- **Difference**: Only 30 seconds apart (remarkably consistent!)

### Combined Performance
- **Average improvement across both systems**: **82.1% faster**
- **Time saved per commit**: ~32 minutes
- **Developer feedback loop**: 36-42 minutes → ~7 minutes

### Success Rate Improvement
- **CircleCI**: 84% → 100% (on feat/speed_up_ci branch)
- **GitHub Actions**: 100% (all 9 recent runs successful)
- Fixed all test isolation issues that caused intermittent failures

### Impact at Scale (Based on Real November 2025 Data)
- **CI runs per day**: **30.8 average** for tests, **25.2** for Docker
builds
  - Measured from GitHub Actions Usage Metrics (18 days)
  - Weekdays: 38-54 runs/day
  - Peak: up to 68 runs in a single day
- **This PR (test suite only)**:
  - **Daily time saved**: **15.3 hours** (GitHub Actions + CircleCI)
- **Monthly time saved**: **458 hours** (57 developer-days) on GitHub
Actions
  - Additional **531 hours** (66 developer-days) on CircleCI
- **Combined with Docker optimization** (PR #12859): **1,358
hours/month** (see Summary)
- **Developer experience**: 5-6x faster iteration cycles

---

## Code Changes

### 1. **Backend Test Parallelization (16x)**
Both CI systems now use 16-way parallelization with identical
round-robin test distribution:

```bash
# Distribute tests evenly across 16 runners
SPEC_FILES=($(find spec -name '*_spec.rb' | sort))
for i in "${!SPEC_FILES[@]}"; do
  if [ $(( i % 16 )) -eq $RUNNER_INDEX ]; then
    TESTS="$TESTS ${SPEC_FILES[$i]}"
  fi
done
```

**Why round-robin over timing-based?**
- CircleCI's timing-based splitting grouped similar tests together
- This caused race conditions with OAuth callback tests (Linear,
Shopify, Notion)
- Round-robin ensures even distribution and better test isolation
- Both CI systems now behave identically

### 2. **Frontend Test Optimization**
Enabled Vitest thread parallelization in `vite.config.ts`:

```typescript
pool: 'threads',
poolOptions: {
  threads: {
    singleThread: false,
  },
},
```

### 3. **CI Architecture Restructuring**
Split monolithic CI jobs into parallel stages:
- **Lint** (backend + frontend) - runs independently for fast feedback
- **Frontend tests** - runs in parallel with backend
- **Backend tests** - 16-way parallelized across runners
- **Coverage** - aggregates results from test jobs
- **Build** (CircleCI only) - final job for GitHub status check
compatibility

### 4. **Critical Test Optimization**
**report_builder_spec.rb**: Changed `before` to `before_all`
- Reduced execution time from **19 minutes to 1.2 minutes** (16x
speedup)
- Setup now runs once instead of 21 times
- Single biggest performance improvement after parallelization

---

## Test Stability Fixes (10 spec files)

Parallelization exposed latent test isolation issues that were fixed:

### Object Identity Comparisons (6 files)
Tests were comparing Ruby object instances instead of IDs:
- `spec/models/integrations/hook_spec.rb` - Use `.pluck(:id)` for
comparisons
- `spec/enterprise/models/captain/scenario_spec.rb` - Compare IDs
instead of objects
- `spec/models/notification_spec.rb` - Compare IDs for sort order
validation
- `spec/models/account_spec.rb` - Compare IDs in scope queries
- `spec/services/widget/token_service_spec.rb` - Compare class names
instead of class objects
- `spec/models/concerns/avatarable_shared.rb` - Use `respond_to` checks
for ActiveStorage

### Database Query Caching
- `spec/jobs/delete_object_job_spec.rb` - Added `.reload` to force fresh
database queries

### Test Expectations Timing
- `spec/jobs/mutex_application_job_spec.rb` - Removed flaky unlock
expectation after error block
  - Related to original PR #8770
- Expectation after error block never executes in parallel environments

### Timezone Handling
- `spec/mailers/account_notification_mailer_spec.rb` - Fixed date
parsing at timezone boundaries
  - Changed test time from 23:59:59Z to 12:00:00Z

### Test Setup
- `spec/builders/v2/report_builder_spec.rb` - Optimized with
`before_all`

---

##  CircleCI GitHub Integration Fix

### Problem
GitHub PR checks were stuck on "Waiting for status" even when all
CircleCI jobs passed. GitHub was expecting a job named `build` but the
workflow only had a workflow named "build".

### Solution
Added an explicit `build` job that runs after all other jobs:

```yaml
build:
  steps:
    - run:
        name: Legacy build aggregator
        command: echo "All main jobs passed"
  requires:
    - lint
    - coverage
```

This ensures GitHub's required status checks work correctly.


---

##  Testing & Validation

-  **GitHub Actions**: 9 successful runs, consistent 6m 26s - 7m 2s
runtime
-  **CircleCI**: 2 successful runs, consistent 7m 7s - 7m 21s runtime
-  Both CI systems produce identical, consistent results
-  GitHub PR status checks complete correctly
-  Success rate improved from 84% to 100% (recent runs)
-  No test regressions introduced
-  All flaky tests fixed (callback controllers, mutex jobs, etc.)

---

## 🎉 Summary

This PR delivers an **82% improvement** in test execution time across
both CI systems:

- **GitHub Actions tests**: 36m → 7m (81.5% faster)
- Backend tests specifically: 28m → 4m (86.6% faster)
- **CircleCI tests**: 42m → 7m (82.7% faster)
- **Developer feedback loop**: 5-6x faster
- **Test stability**: 84% → 100% success rate

### 📊 Total CI/CD Impact (All Optimizations)

Based on real November 2025 data, combining this PR with Docker build
optimization (PR #12859):

**Monthly Time Savings**: **1,358 hours/month** = **170
developer-days/month** = **7.7 FTE**

| System | Runs/Day | Before | After | Savings | Monthly Impact |
|--------|----------|---------|--------|---------|----------------|
| **GitHub Actions Tests** | 30.8 | 36.5m | 6.7m | 29.8m/run | 458 hrs
(34%) |
| **GitHub Actions Docker** | 25.2 | 34.2m | 5.0m | 29.2m/run | 369 hrs
(27%) |
| **CircleCI Tests** | 30.8 | 41.7m | 7.2m | 34.5m/run | 531 hrs (39%) |

*Data source: GitHub Actions Usage Metrics (November 2025, 18 days),
CircleCI Insights (30 days)*

The combined optimizations save the equivalent of **nearly 8 full-time
developers** worth of CI waiting time every month, significantly
improving developer velocity and reducing CI costs. All test isolation
issues exposed by parallelization have been fixed, ensuring reliable and
consistent results across both CI platforms.

woot woot !!!

---------
2025-11-19 15:32:48 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 76c110e60e fix: resolution count does not have account scope (#12370) 2025-09-04 18:04:00 +05:30
ef4e287f0d fix: wrong resolution count in timeseries reports (#12261)
There was a fundamental difference in how resolution counts were
calculated between the agent summary and timeseries reports, causing
confusion for users when the numbers didn't match.

The agent summary report counted all `conversation_resolved` events
within a time period by querying the `reporting_events` table directly.
However, the timeseries report had an additional constraint that
required the conversation to currently be in resolved status
(`conversations.status = 1`). This meant that if an agent resolved a
conversation that was later reopened, the resolution action would be
counted in the summary but not in the timeseries.

This fix aligns both reports to count resolution events rather than
conversations in resolved state. When an agent resolves a conversation,
they should receive credit for that action regardless of what happens to
the conversation afterward. The same logic now applies to bot
resolutions as well.

The change removes the `conversations: { status: :resolved }` condition
from both `scope_for_resolutions_count` and
`scope_for_bot_resolutions_count` methods in CountReportBuilder, and
updates the corresponding test expectations to reflect that all
resolution events are counted.


## About timezone

When a timezone is specified via `timezone_offset` parameter, the
reporting system:

1. Converts timestamps to the target timezone before grouping
2. Groups data by local day/week/month boundaries in that timezone, but
the primary boundaries are sent by the frontend and used as-is
3. Returns timestamps representing midnight in the target timezone

This means the same events can appear in different day buckets depending
on the timezone used. For summary reports, it works fine, since the user
only needs the total count between two timestamps and the frontend sends
the timestamps adjusted for timezone.

## Testing Locally

Run the following command, this will erase all data for that account and
put in 1000 conversations over last 3 months, parameters of this can be
tweaked in `Seeders::Reports::ReportDataSeeder`

I'd suggest updating the values to generate data over 30 days, with
10000 conversations, it will take it's sweet time to run but then the
data will be really rich, great for testing.

```
ACCOUNT_ID=2 ENABLE_ACCOUNT_SEEDING=true bundle exec rake db:seed:reports_data
```

Pro Tip: Don't run the app when the seeder is active, we manually create
the reporting events anyway. So once done just use `redis-cli FLUSHALL`
to clear all sidekiq jobs. Will be easier on the system

Use the following scripts to test it

- https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/1263a922f5efd24df8e448a816a06257
- https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/ca0b861fa0139e2cccdb72526ea844b2
- https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/5fe73d1f48f35422fd1fd142ea3498f3
- https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/3b7b1f9e2ff149007170e5c329432f45
- https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/f245fa2f44cd973e5d60aac64f979162

---------

Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2025-09-03 15:47:16 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub ac3bce3932 fix: missing metrics and labels from label summary (#11718) 2025-06-12 17:58:56 +05:30
35f06f30e7 feat: label reports overview (#11194)
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2025-06-11 14:35:46 +05:30
Sojan JoseandGitHub bc42aec68e chore: upgrade ruby version to 3.4.4 (#11524)
- Chore upgrade ruby version to 3.4.4 before we migrate to rails 7.2
over #11037
2025-05-21 19:40:07 +05:30
Muhsin KelothGitHubSivin VargheseCopilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>Shivam Mishra
d827e66453 feat: Instagram Inbox using Instagram Business Login (#11054)
This PR introduces basic minimum version of **Instagram Business
Login**, making Instagram inbox setup more straightforward by removing
the Facebook Page dependency. This update enhances user experience and
aligns with Meta’s recommended best practices.

Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-3728/instagram-login-how-to-implement-the-changes


## Why Introduce Instagram as a Separate Inbox?


Currently, our Instagram integration requires linking an Instagram
account to a Facebook Page, making setup complex. To simplify this
process, Instagram now offers **Instagram Business Login**, which allows
users to authenticate directly with their Instagram credentials.

The **Instagram API with Instagram Login** enables businesses and
creators to send and receive messages without needing a Facebook Page
connection. While an Instagram Business or Creator account is still
required, this approach provides a more straightforward integration
process.

| **Existing Approach (Facebook Login for Business)** | **New Approach
(Instagram Business Login)** |
| --- | --- |
| Requires linking Instagram to a Facebook Page | No Facebook Page
required |
| Users log in via Facebook credentials | Users log in via Instagram
credentials |
| Configuration is more complex | Simpler setup |

Meta recommends using **Instagram Business Login** as the preferred
authentication method due to its easier configuration and improved
developer experience.

---

## Implementation Plan

The core messaging functionality is already in place, but the transition
to **Instagram Business Login** requires adjustments.

### Changes & Considerations

- **API Adjustments**: The Instagram API uses `graph.instagram`, whereas
Koala (our existing library) interacts with `graph.facebook`. We may
need to modify API calls accordingly.
- **Three Main Modules**:
  1. **Instagram Business Login** – Handle authentication flow.
2. **Permissions & Features** – Ensure necessary API scopes are granted.
  3. **Webhooks** – Enable real-time message retrieval.

![CleanShot 2025-03-10 at 21 32
28@2x](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1b019001-8d16-4e59-aca2-ced81e98f538)


---

## Instagram Login Flow

1. User clicks **"Create Inbox"** for Instagram.
2. App redirects to the [Instagram Authorization
URL](https://developers.facebook.com/docs/instagram-platform/instagram-api-with-instagram-login/business-login#embed-the-business-login-url).
3. After authentication, Instagram returns an authorization code.
5. The app exchanges the code for a **long-lived token** (valid for 60
days).
6. Tokens are refreshed periodically to maintain access.
7. Once completed, the app creates an inbox and redirects to the
Chatwoot dashboard.

---

## How to Test the Instagram Inbox

1. Create a new app on [Meta's Developer
Portal](https://developers.facebook.com/apps/).
2. Select **Business** as the app type and configure it.
3. Add the Instagram product and connect a business account.
4. Copy Instagram app ID and Instagram app secret
5. Add the Instagram app ID and Instagram app secret to your app config
via `{Chatwoot installation
url}/super_admin/app_config?config=instagram`
6. Configure Webhooks:
   - Callback URL: `{your_chatwoot_url}/webhooks/instagram`
   - Verify Token: `INSTAGRAM_VERIFY_TOKEN`
- Subscribe to `messages`, `messaging_seen`, and `message_reactions`
events.
7. Set up **Instagram Business Login**:
   - Redirect URL: `{your_chatwoot_url}/instagram/callback`
8. Test inbox creation via the Chatwoot dashboard.


## Troubleshooting & Common Errors

### Insufficient Developer Role Error

- Ensure the Instagram user is added as a developer:
- **Meta Dashboard → App Roles → Roles → Add People → Enter Instagram
ID**

### API Access Deactivated

- Ensure the **Privacy Policy URL** is valid and correctly set.

### Invalid request: Request parameters are invalid: Invalid
redirect_uri

- Please configure the Frontend URL. The Frontend URL does not match the
authorization URL.
---


## To-Do List

- [x] Basic integration setup completed.  
- [x] Enable sending messages via [Messaging
API](https://developers.facebook.com/docs/instagram-platform/instagram-api-with-instagram-login/messaging-api).
- [x] Implement automatic webhook subscriptions on inbox creation.  
- [x] Handle **canceled authorization errors**.  
- [x] Handle all the errors
https://developers.facebook.com/docs/instagram-platform/instagram-graph-api/reference/error-codes
- [x] Dynamically fetch **account IDs** instead of hardcoding them.  
- [x] Prevent duplicate Instagram channel creation for the same account.
- [x] Use **Global Config** instead of environment variables.  
- [x] Explore **Human Agent feature** for message handling.  
- [x] Write and refine **test cases** for all scenarios.  
- [x] Implement **token refresh mechanism** (tokens expire after 60
days).
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/10440

---------

Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
2025-04-08 10:47:41 +05:30
PranavandGitHub c52282307a feat(v4): Update team, agent summary builder to include resolution metrics (#10607)
Following https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/10604, this PR
introduces similar reporting features for Agents and Teams.

Updates in this PR:
- Added additional methods to the base class to avoid repetition.
- Improve reporting for Teams and Agents to include resolution count.
2024-12-20 19:16:56 +05:30
4fd9bddb9d feat(v4): Add API to fetch aggregate reports for inboxes (#10604)
The Inbox Overview section is being updated to offer a more detailed
report, showing an overall view of the account grouped by inboxes. To
view detailed reports and access specific graphs for individual inboxes,
click on the inbox name to navigate to its dedicated report page.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2024-12-19 14:47:19 -08:00
PranavandGitHub 87d92f73d4 feat: Improve Report API performance (#9476)
- Re-write the methods for clarity
- Remove the dependency on the ReportHelper class.
- Remove n+1 queries in the average metric time series data.
2024-05-22 17:34:24 -07:00
881d4bf644 feat: Add backend APIs for the bot metrics (#9031)
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
2024-03-01 08:20:20 -08:00
Vishnu NarayananandGitHub 415bb23c37 fix: Handle invalid metric in ReportsController (#8086)
Co-authored-by: Pranav Raj S <pranav@chatwoot.com>

Fixes CW-2643
2023-10-12 17:01:23 +05:30
Sojan JoseandGitHub 6ab964b161 chore: fix flaky spec (#7686)
- fix flaky reporting specs
- fix flaky export spec
2023-08-25 00:11:41 -07:00
Pranav Raj SandGitHub d7566c453d chore: Take the count directly rather than grouping the conversations (#7535) 2023-07-19 12:12:30 -07:00
Shivam MishraandGitHub 2e79a32db7 fix: calculation for resolution count (#7293)
* fix: calculation for resolution count

* test: resolution count bug fix

- ensure enqueued jobs are run
- fix the dates check, conversations resolved today should show up in today

* feat: ensure conversations are resolved

* test: do not count extra events if the conversation is not resolved currently

* fix: typo
2023-06-14 13:50:10 +05:30
Sojan JoseandGitHub 7ab7bac6bf chore: Enable the new Rubocop rules (#7122)
fixes: https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-1574/renable-the-disabled-rubocop-rules
2023-05-19 14:37:10 +05:30
6b2736aa63 fix: inconsistency in report and summary for metric counts (#6817)
* feat: include timezone offset in summary calculation

* fix: exlcude end in date range

* test: explicit end of day

* fix: test for report builder

* fix: reports.spec.js

---------

Co-authored-by: Tejaswini Chile <tejaswini@chatwoot.com>
2023-04-20 12:55:04 +05:30
Jan MatuszewskiandGitHub d46f96e45c Fix performance of report builder spec (#6024) 2023-01-17 09:27:50 +05:30
Sojan JoseandGitHub 6a6a37a67b chore: Ability to Disable Gravatars (#5027)
fixes: #3853

- Introduced DISABLE_GRAVATAR Global Config, which will stop chatwoot from making API requests to gravatar
- Cleaned up avatar-related logic and centralized it into the avatarable concern
- Added specs for the missing cases
- Added migration for existing installations to move the avatar to attachment, rather than making the API that results in 404.
2022-07-21 19:27:12 +02:00
4260441f8c Chore: clean up Reporting Events (#4044)
Tech debt clean up

Fixes #4057

Co-authored-by: Aswin Dev P S <aswin@chatwoot.com>
2022-02-28 18:16:12 +05:30
Aswin Dev P.SandGitHub e6f8895c1b feat: Group by filter in reports (#3973) 2022-02-15 17:10:49 +05:30
1c6a539c0a feat: Add Reports for teams (#3116)
Co-authored-by: Pranav Raj S <pranav@chatwoot.com>
2021-10-06 23:53:51 +05:30
2ddd508aee Add missing conversation id for first response event (#2922)
- Add missing conversation id for first response event
- Fixing the flaky test

Fixes #2746

Co-authored-by: Tejaswini <tejaswini@chatwoot.com>
2021-09-02 00:16:09 +05:30
Tejaswini ChileandGitHub 65f3e83afd feat: APIs to filter reports (#2889)
Fixes #2823
2021-08-27 22:46:32 +05:30
Subin T PandGitHub e56132c506 Non blocking event dispatch (#652)
- Performance improvements for event dispatch
2020-03-29 19:18:30 +05:30
Subin T PandGitHub 8f6f07177d Enhancement: Move reporting metrics to postgres (#606) 2020-03-18 16:53:35 +05:30