- Add a document details view that surfaces crawled content, source
metadata, and generated FAQ counts.
- Rename the document card action to open details and show the FAQ count
inline in the list.
- Return `responses_count` from the documents API efficiently and expose
document content in the show payload.
- Update related Captain copy to reflect the new details-oriented flow.
**Preview**
<img width="1640" height="1596" alt="CleanShot 2026-06-26 at 09 25
15@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0c408fae-7d37-422a-8869-ece466292cb1"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description
Adds a backend endpoint that powers an account-wide calls dashboard,
letting users list and filter all calls in the account.
## Linear Ticket
- https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/UPM-28/voice-call-dashboard-view
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
- Fixes SLA breach computation to respect the "Only during business
hours" setting
- Backend now pre-computes SLA deadlines, simplifying frontend logic
## How it works
Before: SLA deadlines were calculated using wall-clock time, ignoring
business hours.
After: When an SLA policy has "Only during business hours" enabled and
the inbox has working hours configured, the deadline is calculated by
adding threshold time only during business hours.
**How you check if a conversation has a SLA hit or miss?**
<img width="474" height="510" alt="Screenshot 2026-01-28 at 7 06 53 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/54ec8581-18b8-45c6-a356-de8c778ea78d"
/>
**Example:**
- Conversation created: Friday 4:30 PM
- FRT threshold: 1 hour
- Business hours: Mon-Fri 9 AM - 5 PM
| | Breach time |
|--|--|
| Before | Friday 5:30 PM |
| After | Monday 9:30 AM |
## Test plan
- [x] Create an SLA policy with "Only during business hours" enabled
- [x] Configure inbox with business hours (e.g., Mon-Fri 9-5)
- [x] Conversation created during business hours
- Create a conversation on Wednesday 10:00 AM UTC
- Expected: FRT deadline shows Wednesday 12:00 PM UTC (2 business hours
later)
- [x] Conversation created before business hours
- Create a conversation on Wednesday 7:00 AM UTC
- Expected: FRT deadline shows Wednesday 11:00 AM UTC (counting starts
at 9 AM)
- [x] Conversation created after business hours
- Create a conversation on Wednesday 6:00 PM UTC
- Expected: FRT deadline shows Thursday 11:00 AM UTC (counting starts
next day 9 AM)
- [x] Conversation created on weekend
- Create a conversation on Saturday 10:00 AM UTC
- Expected: FRT deadline shows Monday 11:00 AM UTC (skips weekend)
- [x] Threshold spans weekend
- Create a conversation on Friday 4:00 PM UTC with 2-hour FRT
- Expected: FRT deadline shows Monday 10:00 AM UTC (1h Friday + 1h
Monday)
- [x] SLA without business hours
- Create an SLA policy with only_during_business_hours: false
- Create a conversation on Friday 4:00 PM UTC with 2-hour FRT
- Expected: FRT deadline shows Friday 6:00 PM UTC (wall-clock time)
- [x] All Day marked as closed_all_day
- Create a conversation on Tuesday 4:00 PM UTC with 2-hour FRT
- Expected: FRT deadline shows Thursday 10:00 AM UTC
- [x] All Day marked as open_all_day
- Create a conversation on Saturday 10:00 AM UTC with 2-hour FRT
- Expected: FRT deadline shows Saturday 12:00 PM UTC
- [x] UI displays correct countdown
- Verify conversation card shows correct SLA timer
- Verify timer shows flame icon when breached
- Verify timer shows alarm icon when within threshold
- Time updates automatically when time passes
- [x] Verify the breach with a different timezone than your local
timezone
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com>
Adds the server-side flow that turns Meta WhatsApp Cloud Calling
webhooks into Chatwoot Calls, conversations, voice_call message bubbles,
and ActionCable broadcasts. Stacked on top of #14312 (PR-2 — provider
methods); intentionally does not include the HTTP controller, routes, or
frontend (those land in PR-4 and PR-9).
## Closes
- Part of the WhatsApp Cloud Calling rollout. Linear: TBD
## What changed
**Webhook routing**
- `app/jobs/webhooks/whatsapp_events_job.rb` — append
`prepend_mod_with('Webhooks::WhatsappEventsJob')` so EE can extend it
without forking.
- `enterprise/app/jobs/enterprise/webhooks/whatsapp_events_job.rb` (new)
— overlay that prepends `handle_message_events` to intercept `field:
'calls'` payloads (route to `Whatsapp::IncomingCallService`) and
`interactive.call_permission_reply` messages (route to
`Whatsapp::CallPermissionReplyService`); falls through with `super` for
regular messages.
**Services**
- `enterprise/app/services/whatsapp/incoming_call_service.rb` (new) —
gated on `provider_config['calling_enabled']`; processes `connect`
(creates inbound call via `Voice::InboundCallBuilder` or transitions an
existing outbound call to `in_progress`) and `terminate` events; updates
conversation `additional_attributes` and broadcasts
`voice_call.incoming`/`voice_call.outbound_connected`/`voice_call.ended`.
- `enterprise/app/services/whatsapp/call_permission_reply_service.rb`
(new) — handles WhatsApp interactive `call_permission_reply` replies;
clears the conversation's `call_permission_requested_at` flag and
broadcasts `voice_call.permission_granted` so the agent UI can re-enable
the call button.
**Builder/model adjustments**
- `enterprise/app/services/voice/inbound_call_builder.rb` —
provider-agnostic; accepts `provider:` and `extra_meta:` kwargs, drops
`account:` (now derived from `inbox.account` to keep the param count
under rubocop's ceiling without disabling cops), uses digits-only
`source_id` for WhatsApp ContactInbox (validation requires
`^\d{1,15}\z`), skips Twilio-only `conference_sid` for non-Twilio
providers.
- `enterprise/app/services/voice/call_message_builder.rb` — adds
`create!`/`update_status!` API and `CALL_TO_VOICE_STATUS` map; uses
direct `Message.create!` (bypasses `Messages::MessageBuilder`'s
incoming-on-non-Api-inbox guard, which would otherwise reject the system
bubble); content is `'WhatsApp Call'` for WhatsApp and `'Voice Call'`
for Twilio. Backwards-compatible `perform!` retained for the existing
Twilio call sites.
- `enterprise/app/models/call.rb` — adds `default_ice_servers` (driven
by `VOICE_CALL_STUN_URLS` env), `direction_label` alias for the
`inbound`/`outbound` strings the FE expects, and
`ringing?`/`in_progress?`/`terminal?` predicates used throughout the
pipeline.
**Outgoing-channel guard**
- `app/services/base/send_on_channel_service.rb` — extends
`invalid_message?` to skip messages with `content_type == 'voice_call'`.
Without this, agent-initiated outbound calls (PR-4) would deliver
\"WhatsApp Call\" as a text message to the contact every time.
**Twilio call-site update**
- `enterprise/app/controllers/twilio/voice_controller.rb` — drops the
now-redundant `account: current_account` kwarg from the
`Voice::InboundCallBuilder.perform!` call.
**Tests**
- New: `spec/enterprise/services/whatsapp/incoming_call_service_spec.rb`
(5 examples — calling-disabled, inbound connect, outbound connect,
terminate completed, terminate no-answer, unknown event).
- New:
`spec/enterprise/services/whatsapp/call_permission_reply_service_spec.rb`
(3 examples — accept, reject, calling-disabled).
- Updated: `spec/enterprise/services/voice/inbound_call_builder_spec.rb`
and `spec/enterprise/controllers/twilio/voice_controller_spec.rb` to
drop the `account:` kwarg from call expectations.
## How to test
In `rails console` against an account with a WhatsApp inbox where
`provider_config['calling_enabled']` is true:
```ruby
inbox = Inbox.find(<id>)
params = { calls: [{ id: 'wacid_test', from: '15550001111', event: 'connect',
session: { sdp: 'v=0...', sdp_type: 'offer' } }] }
Whatsapp::IncomingCallService.new(inbox: inbox, params: params).perform
# => Conversation + Call (status: 'ringing', provider: 'whatsapp') + voice_call message bubble
# => ActionCable broadcasts `voice_call.incoming` to the assignee or account-wide
# Then terminate it:
Whatsapp::IncomingCallService.new(inbox: inbox,
params: { calls: [{ id: 'wacid_test', event: 'terminate', duration: 0, terminate_reason: 'no_answer' }] }
).perform
# => Call status flips to 'no_answer', message bubble updates, `voice_call.ended` broadcast fires
```
End-to-end browser flow (Meta → cable → UI) requires the controller from
PR-4 and the frontend from PR-9.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Add migrations for document auto-sync
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
locally
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Adds custom tool support to v1
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
<img width="1816" height="958" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-24 at 11 37 33@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2777a953-8b65-4a2d-88ec-39f395b3fb47"
/>
<img width="378" height="488" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-24 at 11 38 18@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f6973c99-efd0-40e4-90fe-4472a2f63cea"
/>
<img width="1884" height="1452" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-24 at 11 38
32@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9fba4fc4-0c33-46da-888a-52ec6bad6130"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
This PR adds the foundation for account-level SAML SSO configuration in
Chatwoot Enterprise. It introduces a new `AccountSamlSettings` model and
management API that allows accounts to configure their own SAML identity
providers independently, this also includes the certificate generation
flow
The implementation includes a new controller
(`Api::V1::Accounts::SamlSettingsController`) that provides CRUD
operations for SAML configuration
The feature is properly gated behind the 'saml' feature flag and
includes administrator-only authorization via Pundit policies.
## Linear reference:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4649/re-imagine-assignments
## Description
This PR introduces the foundation for Assignment V2 system by
implementing agent_capacity and their association with inboxes and
users.
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Test Coverage:
- Controller specs for assignment policies CRUD operations
- Enterprise-specific specs for balanced assignment order
- Model specs for community/enterprise separation
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
## Description
This PR introduces WhatsApp Embedded Signup functionality, enabling
users to connect their WhatsApp Business accounts through Meta's
streamlined OAuth flow without manual webhook configuration. This
significantly improves the user experience by automating the entire
setup process.
**Key Features:**
- Embedded signup flow using Facebook SDK and Meta's OAuth 2.0
- Automatic webhook registration and phone number configuration
- Enhanced provider selection UI with card-based design
- Real-time progress tracking during signup process
- Comprehensive error handling and user feedback
## Required Configuration
The following environment variables must be configured by administrators
before this feature can be used:
Super Admin Configuration (via
super_admin/app_config?config=whatsapp_embedded)
- `WHATSAPP_APP_ID`: The Facebook App ID for WhatsApp Business API
integration
- `WHATSAPP_CONFIGURATION_ID`: The Configuration ID for WhatsApp
Embedded Signup flow (obtained from Meta Developer Portal)
- `WHATSAPP_APP_SECRET`: The App Secret for WhatsApp Embedded Signup
flow (required for token exchange)
## How Has This Been Tested?
#### Backend Tests (RSpec):
- Authentication validation for embedded signup endpoints
- Authorization code validation and error handling
- Missing business parameter validation
- Proper response format for configuration endpoint
- Unauthorized access prevention
#### Manual Test Cases:
- Complete embedded signup flow (happy path)
- Provider selection UI navigation
- Facebook authentication popup handling
- Error scenarios (cancelled auth, invalid business data, API failures)
- Configuration presence/absence behavior
## Related Screenshots:
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-2131/spec-for-whatsapp-cloud-channels-sign-in-with-facebook
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
- Add API support for creating a thread
- Add API support for creating a message
- Remove uuid from thread (no longer required, we will use existing
websocket connection to send messages)
- Update message_type to a column (user, assistant, assistant_thinking)
Currently, it’s unclear whether an FAQ item is generated from a
document, derived from a conversation, or added manually.
This PR resolves the issue by providing visibility into the source of
each FAQ. Users can now see whether an FAQ was generated or manually
added and, if applicable, by whom.
- Move the document_id to a polymorphic relation (documentable).
- Updated the APIs to accommodate the change.
- Update the service to add corresponding references.
- Updated the specs.
<img width="1007" alt="Screenshot 2025-01-15 at 11 27 56 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7d58f798-19c0-4407-b3e2-748a919d14af"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR introduces a review step for generated FAQs, allowing a human to
validate and approve them before use in customer interactions. While
hallucinations are minimal, this step ensures accurate and reliable FAQs
for Captain to use during LLM calls when responding to customers.
- Added a status field for the FAQ
- Allow the filter on the UI.
<img width="1072" alt="Screenshot 2025-01-15 at 6 39 26 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/81dfc038-31e9-40e6-8a09-586ebc4e8384"
/>
Migration Guide: https://chwt.app/v4/migration
This PR imports all the work related to Captain into the EE codebase. Captain represents the AI-based features in Chatwoot and includes the following key components:
- Assistant: An assistant has a persona, the product it would be trained on. At the moment, the data at which it is trained is from websites. Future integrations on Notion documents, PDF etc. This PR enables connecting an assistant to an inbox. The assistant would run the conversation every time before transferring it to an agent.
- Copilot for Agents: When an agent is supporting a customer, we will be able to offer additional help to lookup some data or fetch information from integrations etc via copilot.
- Conversation FAQ generator: When a conversation is resolved, the Captain integration would identify questions which were not in the knowledge base.
- CRM memory: Learns from the conversations and identifies important information about the contact.
---------
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <vishnu@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
