# Pull Request Template
## Description
Adds a Contact condition to the conversation advanced filter so agents
can search for an existing contact and filter conversations by
`conversations.contact_id`.
Fixes
[CW-7239](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7239/contact-filter-for-conversations)
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
- `eval "$(rbenv init -)" && bundle exec rspec
spec/services/conversations/filter_service_spec.rb`
- `pnpm exec vitest --no-watch --no-cache --no-coverage --logHeapUsage
app/javascript/dashboard/components-next/filter/helper/filterHelper.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/conversations/helpers/specs/filterHelpers.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/helper/specs/customViewsHelper.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/helper/specs/filterQueryGenerator.spec.js`
- `pnpm eslint`
- `eval "$(rbenv init -)" && bundle exec rubocop
spec/services/conversations/filter_service_spec.rb`
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
Frontend for WhatsApp Cloud Calling: header / contact-panel call
buttons, ringing widget, accept/reject/hangup, mute, in-bubble audio
player + transcript, recording-on-hangup upload, mid-call reload
warning. WebRTC is browser-direct to Meta — no media server bridge.
## Closes
- https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-150
## How to test
Requires backend support — the controller, services, model changes, and
routes ship in **#14334** (`feature/pla-150`). Merge / deploy that first
(or simultaneously); the FE alone won't function without those
endpoints.
Then on staging, for a WhatsApp Cloud + embedded-signup inbox with the
new \`Configuration → Enable voice calling\` toggle ON and webhook
registered:
1. **Outbound** — open a conversation, click the phone icon in the
conversation header (or contact panel), grant mic, your phone rings,
answer, audio both ways, hang up. Recording + transcript land in the
bubble within ~10s.
2. **Inbound** — call the business number from your phone. The
FloatingCallWidget appears bottom-right with caller name. Click accept,
audio both ways, hang up. Recording + transcript appear.
3. **Mute** — during an active WhatsApp call, click the mic icon next to
hangup. Speech stops reaching Meta until you click again.
4. **Mid-call reload guard** — try `Cmd-R` during an active call;
browser shows a confirm prompt.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
### Description
Inbound voice calls now route ownership cleanly: the call widget is
hidden from agents who aren't the conversation assignee, the first agent
to pick up becomes the assignee, and any later join attempt by another
agent is rejected with a clear "<agent> is already handling the call."
alert.
Closes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-98/inbound-voice-calls-assignment-aware-visibility-auto-assignment-on
### How to test
1. As Agent A and Agent B, open the dashboard for the same voice inbox
in two browsers.
2. Place an inbound call to the inbox with the conversation
**unassigned** — both agents should see the call widget.
3. Have Agent A click **Join**. Agent A's widget transitions to the
active call; Agent B's widget disappears (conversation is now assigned
to Agent A).
4. While the call is in progress, attempt to join from a third agent
(e.g., via the bubble in the conversation timeline) — the join is
rejected with the toast `Agent A is already handling the call.`
5. Resolve the conversation, then place a second call to a conversation
that is already manually assigned to Agent A — only Agent A sees the
widget; nobody else does.
6. Race test: trigger two near-simultaneous join attempts (two agents
click Join within a few hundred ms of each other) — exactly one wins;
the other gets the conflict alert.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Twilio voice now uses first-class `Call` records as the source of truth
for call state, instead of storing it on
`conversation.additional_attributes` and `conversation.identifier`. Each
call gets its own record, its own `voice_call` bubble matched by
`call_sid`, and its own conference name keyed off `Call.id`. Multiple
calls on the same conversation (for `lock_to_single_conversation`
inboxes) now work correctly, and the conversation card stays in sync
with the real latest message.
Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-121/lock-to-single-thread
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
This PR enables the **Participating** conversation view in the main
sidebar and keeps the behavior aligned with existing conversation views.
## What changed
- Added **Participating** under Conversations in the new sidebar.
- Added a guard in conversation realtime `addConversation` flow so
generic `conversation.created` events are not injected while the user is
on Participating view.
- Added participating route mapping in conversation-list redirect helper
so list redirects resolve correctly to `/participating/conversations`.
## Scope notes
- Kept changes minimal and consistent with current `develop` behavior.
- No additional update-event filtering was added beyond what existing
views already do.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Agents using API channel inboxes (e.g., WhatsApp Automate) reported
seeing the same conversation appear twice in their conversation list —
one showing the last message preview and the other showing "No
Messages". Backend investigation confirmed no duplicate conversations
exist in the database, making this purely a frontend issue.
The root cause is a race condition in WebSocket event delivery. When a
conversation is created via the API with auto-assignment, the backend
enqueues multiple ActionCable broadcast jobs (`conversation.created`,
`assignee.changed`, `team.changed`) within milliseconds of each other.
In production with multi-threaded Sidekiq workers, these events can
arrive at the frontend out of order. If `assignee.changed` arrives
before `conversation.created`, the `UPDATE_CONVERSATION` mutation pushes
the conversation into the store (since it doesn't exist yet), and then
`ADD_CONVERSATION` blindly pushes it again — resulting in a duplicate
entry.
The fix adds a uniqueness check in the `ADD_CONVERSATION` mutation to
skip the push if a conversation with the same ID already exists in the
store, matching the dedup pattern already used by
`SET_ALL_CONVERSATION`.
- Add a new conversation sort option "Priority: Highest first, Created:
Oldest first" that sorts by priority descending (urgent > high > medium
> low > none) with created_at ascending as the tiebreaker
We are expanding Chatwoot’s automation capabilities by
introducing **Conversation Workflows**, a dedicated section in settings
where teams can configure rules that govern how conversations are closed
and what information agents must fill before resolving. This feature
helps teams enforce data consistency, collect structured resolution
information, and ensure downstream reporting is accurate.
Instead of having auto‑resolution buried inside Account Settings, we
introduced a new sidebar item:
- Auto‑resolve conversations (existing behaviour)
- Required attributes on resolution (new)
This groups all conversation‑closing logic into a single place.
#### Required Attributes on Resolve
Admins can now pick which custom conversation attributes must be filled
before an agent can resolve a conversation.
**How it works**
- Admin selects one or more attributes from the list of existing
conversation level custom attributes.
- These selected attributes become mandatory during resolution.
- List all the attributes configured via Required Attributes (Text,
Number, Link, Date, List, Checkbox)
- When an agent clicks Resolve Conversation:
If attributes already have values → the conversation resolves normally.
If attributes are missing → a modal appears prompting the agent to fill
them.
<img width="1554" height="1282" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 42
23@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4cd5d6e1-abe8-4999-accd-d4a08913b373"
/>
#### Custom Attributes Integration
On the Custom Attributes page, we will surfaced indicators showing how
each attribute is being used.
Each attribute will show badges such as:
- Resolution → used in the required‑on‑resolve workflow
- Pre‑chat form → already existing
<img width="2390" height="1822" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 43
42@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b92a6eb7-7f6c-40e6-bf23-6a5310f2d9c5"
/>
#### Admin Flow
- Navigate to Settings → Conversation Workflows.
- Under Required attributes on resolve, click Add Required Attribute.
- Pick from the dropdown list of conversation attributes.
- Save changes.
Agents will now be prompted automatically whenever they resolve.
<img width="2434" height="872" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 44 42@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/632fc0e5-767c-4a1c-8cf4-ffe3d058d319"
/>
#### NOTES
- The Required Attributes on Resolve modal should only appear when
values are missing.
- Required attributes must block the resolution action until satisfied.
- Bulk‑resolve actions should follow the same rules — any conversation
missing attributes cannot be bulk‑resolved, rest will be resolved, show
a notification that the resolution cannot be done.
- API resolution does not respect the attributes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
This PR fixes a bug came from assuming the old null check only mattered
for the `is_not_present` filter.
The fix keeps `not_equal_to` working but lets each operator decide what
to do with `null`. Presence filters look at a shared `isNullish` flag,
text filters still rely on `contains`, and date filters skip
conversations with no timestamp. The new spec covers the null-assignee
scenario for both `equal_to` and `not_equal_to` so we don’t miss this
again.
The frontend filtering didn't handle the `id` to `display_id` mapping of
conversations. This PR fixes it
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
The `matchesFilter` is a utility that checks the incoming payload
against a filter and returns `true` or `false`.
For the `greater_than` and `less_than` filter specifically, the date
parsing would fail when the timestamp was a 10 digit number.
This PR solves this by adding a `coerceToDate` method that tries to
parse the given value to a Date object as correctly as possible before
comparing.
Ref: https://github.com/chatwoot/utils/pull/53
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Fixes
[CW-4330](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4330/bug-attachments-in-gallery-view-gets-duplicated-when-you-navigate-back)
**Cause**
When navigating back to a previously viewed conversation, attachments
were being duplicated in the Gallery View. This occurred because the
`SET_ALL_ATTACHMENTS` mutation was appending new attachments to existing
ones `(attachments.push(...data))` instead of replacing them. Each time
a user returned to a conversation, the attachment list would grow,
showing duplicate images.
**Solution**
Updated the `SET_ALL_ATTACHMENTS` mutation to replace the entire
attachments array instead of appending to it. This change ensures
attachments are cleared before adding new ones when returning to a
previously viewed conversation, preventing duplicates.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/b2472c07e95843f6879724b19ef89311?sid=eed42238-b4bc-4dbe-8ede-a25a13b4610d
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
This pull request introduces frontend role filtering to allStatusChat
getter. The key changes include the addition of a new helper function to
get the user's role, updates to the conversation filtering logic to
incorporate role and permissions, and the addition of unit tests for the
new filtering logic.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
This pull request includes significant changes to the filtering logic
for conversations in the frontend, here's a summary of the changes
This includes adding a `matchesFilters` method that evaluates a
conversation against the applied filters. It does so by first evaluating
all the conditions, and later converting the results into a JSONLogic
object that can be evaluated according to Postgres operator precedence
### Alignment Specs
To ensure the frontend and backend implementations always align, we've
added tests on both sides with same cases, for anyone fixing any
regressions found in the frontend implementation, they need to ensure
the existing tests always pass.
Test Case | JavaScript Spec | Ruby Spec | Match?
-- | -- | -- | --
**A AND B OR C** | Present | Present | Yes
Matches when all conditions are true | Present | Present | Yes
Matches when first condition is false but third is true | Present |
Present | Yes
Matches when first and second conditions are false but third is true |
Present | Present | Yes
Does not match when all conditions are false | Present | Present | Yes
**A OR B AND C** | Present | Present | Yes
Matches when first condition is true | Present | Present | Yes
Matches when second and third conditions are true | Present | Present |
Yes
**A AND B OR C AND D** | Present | Present | Yes
Matches when first two conditions are true | Present | Present | Yes
Matches when last two conditions are true | Present | Present | Yes
**Mixed Operators (A AND (B OR C) AND D)** | Present | Present | Yes
Matches when all conditions in the chain are true | Present | Present |
Yes
Does not match when the last condition is false | Present | Present |
Yes
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
This PR allows Copilot to be used without connecting the Captain assistant to an inbox. Currently, if Captain is enabled on an account, it takes over conversations and responds directly to users. This PR enables the use of Captain as a Copilot without allowing it to respond to users. Additionally, it allows using a different assistant for Copilot instead of the default Captain assistant.
The selection logic for the Copilot assistant follows this order of preference:
- If the user has selected a specific assistant, it takes first preference for Copilot.
- If the above is not available, the assistant connected to the inbox takes preference.
- If neither of the above is available, the first assistant in the account takes preference.
This PR target two issues
### CC & BCC not updated correctly
When moving from one conversation to another, the store may not have the
list of all the messages. A fetch is subsequently made to get the
messages. However, this update does not trigger the `currentChat`
watcher. This PR fixes it by adding a new watcher on
`currentChat.messages`.
We also update the `setCCAndToEmailsFromLastChat` method to reset the
`cc`, `bcc` and `to` fields if the last email is not found. This ensures
that the data is not carried forward from a previous email
Fixes: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/10477
### To address are not added correctly to the `CC`
If the `to` address of a previous email has multiple recipient, there
was no case to add them to the CC.
Fixes: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/8925
---
Depends on: https://github.com/chatwoot/utils/pull/41
When the chat is viewed, a function `fetchAllAttachments` is run to get all attachments for a particular conversation. This function, before updating the record creates the `attachments` property on the `chat` object in the store.
If in any case this function fails, the `attachments` property is not created, and when the code reaches the `dashboard/store/modules/conversations/index.js` the error occurs
This PR fixes it by ensuring that `SET_ALL_ATTACHMENTS` is always run. And it handles the default case as well
---
Sentry Issue:
[CHATWOOT-FRONTEND-APP-5Y](https://chatwoot-p3.sentry.io/issues/5459056982/)
```
TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'some')
at forEach(./app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/conversations/index.js:160:31)
at Array.forEach(<anonymous>)
at mutations(./app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/conversations/index.js:159:27)
at handler(./node_modules/vuex/dist/vuex.js:771:7)
at forEach(./node_modules/vuex/dist/vuex.js:470:9)
at Array.forEach(<anonymous>)
at fn(./node_modules/vuex/dist/vuex.js:469:13)
at Store.prototype._withCommit(./node_modules/vuex/dist/vuex.js:574:5)
at Store.prototype.commit(./node_modules/vuex/dist/vuex.js:468:10)
at this.commit(./node_modules/vuex/dist/vuex.js:420:21)
at call(./app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/conversations/actions.js:273:7)
at tryCatch(./node_modules/videojs-record/dist/videojs.record.js:2868:27)
at _invoke(./node_modules/videojs-record/dist/videojs.record.js:3088:32)
at prototype[method](./node_modules/videojs-record/dist/videojs.record.js:2921:31)
at as(/packs/js/application-cf716bca3c984faeb095.js:4:76)
at as(/packs/js/application-cf716bca3c984faeb095.js:4:76)
at nrWrapper(/app/accounts/81898/conversations/95:6:17817)
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
# Replace the deprecated `eventBus` with mitt.js
## Description
Since eventBus and it's respective methods are deprecated and removed
from all future releases of vue, this was blocking us from migrating.
This PR replaces eventBus with
[mitt](https://github.com/developit/mitt). I have created a wrapper
mitt.js to simulate the same old event names so it's backwards
compatible, without making a lot of changes.
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
1. Made sure all the places we're listening to bus events are working as
expected.
2. Respective specsf or the events from mitt.
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Updating the `unattended` tab to include conversations where the customer responded and is awaiting an agent's response.
Previously it showed only the conversations where the first response was pending.
Co-authored-by: Pranav Raj S <pranav@chatwoot.com>
