# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR makes reply editor variables insert their resolved value (for
example, the contact's name) instead of the raw `{{contact.name}}`
placeholder, matching canned response behavior. This works both when
picking a variable from the `{{` menu and when an agent manually types
out `{{contact.name}}` — it resolves the moment the closing `}}` is
typed.
If a variable has no value, the `{{placeholder}}` is kept so the backend
can still resolve it when the message is sent. Private notes are left
untouched.
For safety, a resolved value that itself contains Liquid syntax `({{ }}`
or `{% %})` also keeps its placeholder, so customer-controlled fields
can never inject Liquid into the outgoing message.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7528/reply-editor-inserts-variable-placeholder-instead-of-the-value
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
1. Open a conversation and add a reply.
2. Type `{{` and pick a variable that has a value (e.g. Contact name) →
it inserts the actual value.
3. Manually type `{{contact.name}}` and close the braces → it
auto-resolves to the value.
4. Insert/type a variable with no value → the `{{placeholder}}` stays;
confirm it resolves correctly on send.
5. Repeat in a private note → placeholders are left as-is.
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds support for inline image uploads in the reply editor for
Email and Website (chat widget) channels.
Agents can now insert images inline between text and resize them
directly in the editor by dragging the bottom corner, similar to the
help center editor experience.
Image sizes are preserved through markdown using the `cw_image_width`
URL param and render correctly in both outgoing emails and chat widget
messages.
Agents can also paste copied images directly into Email or Website
replies using **Shift+Cmd+V** (Shift+Ctrl+V on Windows/Linux). The image
gets inserted inline at the cursor position and supports resizing just
like uploaded images. Regular **Cmd+V / Ctrl+V** behavior remains
unchanged and continues to add images as attachments, so both inline and
attachment flows are supported.
### Prosemirror repo PR:
https://github.com/chatwoot/prosemirror-schema/pull/48
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7133/inline-images-in-live-chat-and-emailhttps://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7225/ghsa-8j9w-jppp-xcfc-html-attribute-injection-via-unvalidated-cw-image
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screencast
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a928f852-ab15-413a-9d35-6ea69b718ecf
<img width="414" height="654" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/205e0729-8f2d-4cc5-9c55-7696f032eca4"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
> Reopened from #13613, now from a personal fork
(`gabrieljablonski/chatwoot`) so maintainers can push edits —
organization-owned forks don't support "Allow edits from maintainers".
The previous PR is closed in favor of this one; same commits, same diff.
## Description
This PR adds support for sending voice messages (voice notes) through
the WhatsApp Cloud API. When agents record audio in Chatwoot, it is now
transcoded in the browser from WebM/Opus to OGG/Opus and sent with the
`voice: true` flag, so it appears as a native voice note bubble on
WhatsApp — not as a file/document attachment.
Closes#13283
**Key Changes:**
- Added `webmOpusToOgg.js` — a pure JS EBML parser + OGG page builder
that remuxes browser-recorded WebM/Opus audio into OGG/Opus entirely
client-side, with no server-side dependencies.
- Updated `AudioRecorder.vue` to use an explicit `mimeType` hint, proper
resource cleanup, and an `AUDIO_EXTENSION_MAP` for correct file
extensions.
- Renamed `mp3ConversionUtils.js` → `audioConversionUtils.js` and added
OGG conversion support via the new remuxer.
- Updated `ReplyBox.vue` to request OGG format for WhatsApp channels,
pass `isVoiceMessage` per-attachment, and handle recording errors with a
user-facing alert.
- Updated `MessageBuilder` to read the `is_voice_message` param and
persist it in attachment metadata.
- Updated `WhatsappCloudService` to:
- Normalize `audio/opus` → `audio/ogg` content type on ActiveStorage
blobs (works around Marcel gem re-detection).
- Send the `voice: true` flag when the attachment is a voice message
with `audio/ogg` content type.
- Use WhatsApp Cloud API `v24.0` for the attachment endpoint.
- Added `AUDIO_CONVERSION_FAILED` i18n key.
**How it works:**
1. The browser records audio as WebM/Opus (Chrome/Firefox default).
2. `audioConversionUtils.js` remuxes it to OGG/Opus using the pure-JS
`webmOpusToOgg` remuxer — no server transcoding needed.
3. The OGG file is uploaded with `is_voice_message: true` in the form
payload.
4. `MessageBuilder` persists `is_voice_message` in the attachment's
`meta` hash.
5. `WhatsappCloudService` normalizes the blob content type if needed,
then sends the attachment with `voice: true` so WhatsApp renders it as a
voice note.
## Type of change
- [X] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
1. Record a voice message in a WhatsApp Cloud conversation.
2. Verify the audio is transcoded to OGG (check file extension in the
attachment preview).
3. Verify the message arrives on WhatsApp as a voice note bubble (not a
document/file).
4. Send an image or document attachment and verify it still works as
before (no `voice` flag).
5. Send a regular (non-voice) audio file and verify it arrives without
the voice flag.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR expands the default upload rules to support PFX certificate
files (`application/x-pkcs12`, `application/pkcs12`, `.pfx`) across
private notes, Website, Email, and Telegram channels.
Also adds `.xls` / `.xlsx` extension fallbacks for cases where browsers
upload Excel files with an empty or generic MIME type.
### Utils Repo PR: https://github.com/chatwoot/utils/pull/61
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7085/support-more-file-types-in-private-notes-and-in-app
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshots
<img width="330" height="218" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/80823250-893e-4509-adb9-61f845359151"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: aakashb95 <aakashbakhle@gmail.com>
On WhatsApp and any channel that disables the reply editor outside its
messaging window (WhatsApp Cloud, Twilio WhatsApp, API channels with
`agent_reply_time_window` set), when the window was already expired and
a new inbound message arrived in real-time, the "messaging restricted"
banner correctly hid but the editor itself stayed un-typeable until the
agent refreshed the page. This made the dashboard look like it accepted
replies even though typing did nothing.
Fixes
[CW-7087](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7087/reply-editor-stays-disabled-after-real-time-incoming-message-reopens)
#### How to reproduce
1. Open a WhatsApp conversation whose last incoming message is older
than 24h, so `can_reply` is `false` (banner shown, editor greyed out).
2. With the dashboard open on that conversation, have the customer send
a fresh inbound message (or simulate one via the channel's webhook).
3. Before the fix: banner disappears, editor wrapper loses its disabled
styling, but clicking into the editor and typing does nothing — refresh
required.
4. After the fix: banner disappears and the editor accepts input
immediately.
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds support for resizing the reply editor up to nearly half the
screen height. It also deprecates the old modal-based pop-out reply box,
clicking the same button now expands the editor inline. Users can adjust
the height using the slider or the expand button.
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/be27e1c06d19475ab404289710b3b0da
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes, block inline images in message signatures and prevent
auto signature insertion when editor is disabled.
- Strip inline base64 images from signature on save and show warning
message
- Add `INLINE_IMAGE_WARNING` translation key for signature inline image
removal notification
- Add disabled check to `addSignature()` to prevent signature insertion
when editor is disabled
- Add `isEditorDisabled` checks to signature toggle logic in
`toggleSignatureForDraft()`, `replaceText()`, and `clearMessage()`
- Remove unused `replaceText` from the codebase, which belongs to old
`textarea` editor
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6588/the-browser-hangs-when-the-message-signature-contains-inline-image
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/fb556b46a12a4308a737eed732d5ed73
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds support to auto-focus the editor when clicking reply to
this message, the editor now automatically receives focus so users can
start typing immediately.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6661/typing-box-not-focused-after-clicking-reply-to-message
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screencast
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c5e77055-3f68-4ad8-934e-cfc465166e8a
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
CJK language users (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, etc.) use IME where Enter
confirms character selection. AI input components were intercepting
Enter unconditionally, making them unusable for IME users.
Add `event.isComposing` check to CopilotEditor, CopilotInput, and
AssistantPlayground so Enter during active IME composition is ignored.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
Before:
Add a Japenese keyboard, then go to AI follow-ups, type some word,
selecting it with enter submits the follow up. So CJK users cannot use
follow-ups.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/53517432-d97b-47fc-a802-81675e31d5c9
After:
Type a word, press enter to choose it, press enter again to unselect it
and enter again to send
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6c2a420b-7ee6-4c71-82a6-d9f1d7bbf31a
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Description
Adds missing analytics instrumentation for the editor AI funnel so we
can measure end-to-end usage and outcome quality.
### What was added
- Captain: Editor AI menu opened
- Captain: Generation failed
- Captain: AI-assisted message sent
### Behavior covered
- Tracks AI button click + menu open from both entry points:
- top panel sparkle button
- inline editor copilot button
- Tracks generation failures (initial + follow-up stages).
- Tracks whether accepted AI content was sent as-is or edited before
send.
### Notes
- Applies to editor Captain accept/send flow
(rewrite/summarize/reply_suggestion + follow-ups).
- Does not change Copilot sidebar flow instrumentation.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Manual verification steps
<img width="1906" height="832" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f0ade43b-aa8d-41be-8ca2-20a091a81f60"
/>
<img width="828" height="280" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/be76219e-fb61-4a6e-bff5-dc085b0a3cc9"
/>
<img width="415" height="147" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/36802c5c-33a7-49ed-bf7e-f0b02d86dccc"
/>
<img width="2040" height="516" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/74b95288-bc86-4312-a282-14211ae8f25c"
/>
1. Open a conversation with Captain tasks enabled.
2. Click AI button in top panel and inline editor.
3. Confirm analytics events fire for:
- AI menu opened
4. Run an AI action and force a failure scenario (or empty response
path) and confirm generation-failed event.
5. Accept AI output, then:
- send without changes -> editedBeforeSend: false
- edit then send -> editedBeforeSend: true
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR reverts the plain text editor back to the **advanced editor**,
which was previously removed in
[https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/13058](https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/13058).
All channels now use the **ProseMirror editor**, with formatting applied
based on each channel’s configuration.
This PR also fixes issues where **new lines were not properly preserved
during Markdown serialization**, for both:
* `Enter or CMD/Ctrl+enter` (new paragraph)
* `Shift+Enter` (`hard_break`)
Additionally, it resolves related **[Sentry
issue](https://chatwoot-p3.sentry.io/issues/?environment=production&project=4507182691975168&query=is%3Aunresolved%20markdown&referrer=issue-list&statsPeriod=7d)**.
With these changes:
* Line breaks and spacing are now preserved correctly when saving canned
responses.
* When editing a canned response, the content retains the exact spacing
and formatting as saved in editor.
* Canned responses are now correctly converted to plain text where
required and displayed consistently in the canned response list.
### https://github.com/chatwoot/prosemirror-schema/pull/38
---
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
1. This PR is an enhancement to
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/13045
It strips unsupported formatting from **message signatures** based on
each channel’s formatting capabilities defined in the `FORMATTING`
config
2. Remove usage of plain editor in Compose new conversation modal
Only the following signature elements are considered:
<strong>bold (<code inline="">strong</code>), italic (<code
inline="">em</code>), links (<code inline="">link</code>), images (<code
inline="">image</code>)</strong>.</p>
Any formatting not supported by the target channel is automatically
removed before the signature is appended.
<h3>Channel-wise Signature Formatting Support</h3>
Channel | Keeps in Signature | Strips from Signature
-- | -- | --
Email | bold, italic, links, images | —
WebWidget | bold, italic, links, images | —
API | bold, italic | links, images
WhatsApp | bold, italic | links, images
Telegram | bold, italic, links | images
Facebook | bold, italic | links, images
Instagram | bold, italic | links, images
Line | bold, italic | links, images
SMS | — | everything
Twilio SMS | — | everything
Twitter/X | — | everything
<hr>
<h3>📝 Note</h3>
<blockquote>
<p>Message signatures only support <strong>bold, italic, links, and
images</strong>.<br>
Other formatting options available in the editor (lists, code blocks,
strike-through, etc.) do <strong>not apply</strong> to signatures and
are ignored.</p>
</blockquote>
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/d325ab86ca514c6d8f90dfe72a8928dd
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes,
1. **Channel-specific formatting and menu options** for the rich reply
editor.
2. **Removal of the plain reply editor** and full **standardization** on
the rich reply editor across all channels.
3. **Fix for multiple canned responses insertion:**
* **Before:** The plain editor only allowed inserting canned responses
at the beginning of a message, making it impossible to combine multiple
canned responses in a single reply. This caused inconsistent behavior
across the app.
* **Solution:** Replaced the plain reply editor with the rich
(ProseMirror) editor to ensure a unified experience. Agents can now
insert multiple canned responses at any cursor position.
4. **Floating editor menu** for the reply box to improve accessibility
and overall user experience.
5. **New Strikethrough formatting option** added to the editor menu.
---
**Editor repo PR**:
https://github.com/chatwoot/prosemirror-schema/pull/36
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/12517,
[CW-5924](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5924/standardize-the-editor),
[CW-5679](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5679/allow-inserting-multiple-canned-responses-in-a-single-message)
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshot
**Dark**
<img width="850" height="345" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/47748e6c-380f-44a3-9e3b-c27e0c830bd0"
/>
**Light**
<img width="850" height="345" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6746cf32-bf63-4280-a5bd-bbd42c3cbe84"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Vinay Keerthi <11478411+stonecharioteer@users.noreply.github.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR fixes the handling of attachments and file limits in reply
modes:
* Applies **default file size and type limits** for private notes
* **Resets attachments** automatically when switching reply modes
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/abad3e6a0383405ea5f31314c1494f2f?sid=38715fd0-e305-4a9b-8f4d-fc6a6e5c0833
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
**Issue:** When typing "@" in reply mode and then switching to private
note mode, the user mentions menu remains visible and cannot be
dismissed.
**Cause:** The Prose Mirror suggestion plugin for "@" was active in both
reply modes (normal and private). When triggered in normal reply mode
and then switching to private note mode, the menu would remain open and
couldn't be dismissed.
**Solution**
```
createSuggestionPlugin({
trigger: '@',
showMenu: showUserMentions,
searchTerm: mentionSearchKey,
isAllowed: () => props.isPrivate, // Only allow @ mentions in private note mode
}),
```
1. By setting `isAllowed: () => props.isPrivate`, the @ mention trigger
will only activate when in private note mode
2. In normal reply mode, the plugin won't activate at all since
`isAllowed` returns false
3. This prevents the menu from being triggered in the wrong context and
fix the scenario where the menu gets stuck.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
**Before**
https://www.loom.com/share/5333f0c6498d4a9ea4d220b1de1b608c?sid=1425f24f-2c6f-4ff5-aab3-23c3203d2e05
**After**
https://www.loom.com/share/9f183c76d6a94b618a7c2aaed280b780?sid=19ef08b8-2b70-434b-ad5a-267410212e11
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
