This reverts #14610 so conversation unread counts are again controlled
by the `conversation_unread_counts` feature flag across the API,
ActionCable broadcasts, notifier/listener paths, and dashboard sidebar
fetching.
## Closes
- None
## What changed
- Restores feature-flag checks for conversation unread count reads and
broadcasts.
- Restores the dashboard feature flag constant and sidebar/store
behavior for disabled unread counts.
- Restores the specs that cover disabled-feature behavior.
## How to test
- In an account with `conversation_unread_counts` enabled, verify
sidebar unread counts are fetched and updated in real time.
- Disable `conversation_unread_counts` for the account and verify unread
count requests/broadcasts are skipped.
## Description
Make conversation unread counts always available at runtime by removing
account feature checks from the API endpoint, unread-count listener,
notifier, and ActionCable broadcast path.
Update the dashboard to fetch sidebar unread counts for the active
account without checking FEATURE_FLAGS.CONVERSATION_UNREAD_COUNTS, and
remove the now-unused store clear action that only supported the
disabled state.
Keep the feature entry in config/features.yml to preserve flag bit
order, but mark it enabled and deprecated so fresh installs default to
the always-on behavior while feature-management UI hides it.
Leave existing installation default rows untouched; no migration is
included, so upgraded installs may still store the old flag value but
runtime behavior no longer depends on it.
Update specs around the new always-on contract and remove obsolete
disabled-feature assertions.
Fixes # CW-7237
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Update specs around the new always-on contract and remove obsolete
disabled-feature assertions. Ran specs locally for the changes.
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This is the third and final PR in a series of PRs for Introducing unread
counts in the sidebar for inboxes and labels.
In this PR:
* Added frontend changes to show the badges for unread counts for
Inboxes and Labels
* Added specs for the changes
Issue:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6851/support-unread-conversation-counts
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tested this locally. Cases to test:
* Send a message from the widget and see if the count changes
* Mark a conversation as unread and see the count change for inbox
* Open an unread conversation as agent and see the count go down
* Add a label to an unread conversation from sidebar right click action
without opening the conversation and see the count of un-reads on the
label change
Added the screenshot of how it will look like
<img width="614" height="990" alt="Screenshot 2026-05-05 at 7 00 11 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/99fbaa9f-bcf2-4d8d-86e2-5727f652a9dd"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This is the second PR in a series of PRs for Introducing unread counts
in the sidebar for inboxes and labels.
In this PR:
* added api for unread counts
* Added the store refresher and invalidation with event listeners
* Added action cable event
* Added specs for the changes
Issue:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6851/support-unread-conversation-counts
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
## Description
This is the first PR in a series of PRs for Introducing unread counts in
the sidebar for inboxes and labels.
In this PR:
* Added the unread store, counter and builder modules
* Added redis keys for unread count management
* Added specs for all 3 modules, some specs are for testing enterprise
only feature like specific roles and permissions which are added in the
respective enterprise folder itself.
**Note**
None of this changes affect anything else and nothing is wired to
existing modules.
Issue:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6851/support-unread-conversation-counts
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
## Summary
- add an assignee_agent_bot_id column as an initital step to prototype
this before fully switching to polymorphic assignee
- update assignment APIs and conversation list / show endpoints to
reflect assignee as agent bot
- ensure webhook payloads contains agent bot assignee
[Codex
Task](https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_6912833377e48326b6641b9eee32d50f)
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
1. Add permission filter service to separate permission filtering logic
from conversation queries
2. Implement hierarchical permissions with cleaner logic:
- conversation_manage gives access to all conversations
- conversation_unassigned_manage gives access to unassigned and user's
conversations
- conversation_participating_manage gives access only to user's
conversations
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
This pull request includes significant changes to the filtering logic
for conversations in the frontend, here's a summary of the changes
This includes adding a `matchesFilters` method that evaluates a
conversation against the applied filters. It does so by first evaluating
all the conditions, and later converting the results into a JSONLogic
object that can be evaluated according to Postgres operator precedence
### Alignment Specs
To ensure the frontend and backend implementations always align, we've
added tests on both sides with same cases, for anyone fixing any
regressions found in the frontend implementation, they need to ensure
the existing tests always pass.
Test Case | JavaScript Spec | Ruby Spec | Match?
-- | -- | -- | --
**A AND B OR C** | Present | Present | Yes
Matches when all conditions are true | Present | Present | Yes
Matches when first condition is false but third is true | Present |
Present | Yes
Matches when first and second conditions are false but third is true |
Present | Present | Yes
Does not match when all conditions are false | Present | Present | Yes
**A OR B AND C** | Present | Present | Yes
Matches when first condition is true | Present | Present | Yes
Matches when second and third conditions are true | Present | Present |
Yes
**A AND B OR C AND D** | Present | Present | Yes
Matches when first two conditions are true | Present | Present | Yes
Matches when last two conditions are true | Present | Present | Yes
**Mixed Operators (A AND (B OR C) AND D)** | Present | Present | Yes
Matches when all conditions in the chain are true | Present | Present |
Yes
Does not match when the last condition is false | Present | Present |
Yes
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
