## Description
Adds the account-level `unread_count_for_filters` feature flag as the
dark-launch gate for filtered sidebar unread counts. This reuses the
deprecated `quoted_email_reply` flag slot, resets the reused bit for
existing accounts, and removes stale defaults so new accounts do not
reference the old flag.
This also adds the feature where we are now calculating the unread counts for built in filters like mentions, participating and unattended along with unread count for saved filters/folders.
Closes
[CW-7262](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7262/unread-counts-for-filters-folders)
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7559/inbox-limit-abuse
## Why
The regular inbox API checked limits in the controller, but WhatsApp
embedded signup creates inboxes through a service using `Inbox.create!`.
That let Enterprise account inbox limits be skipped for embedded signup.
## What this change does
- Adds an Inbox create-time validation hook in OSS and implements the
limit check in the Enterprise Inbox module.
- Removes the duplicate controller/helper limit check so the model is
the single enforcement point.
- Preserves the existing `402 Payment Required` API response for account
inbox limit failures.
- Keeps updates to existing inboxes allowed when an account is already
at its inbox limit.
## Validation
- `bundle exec rspec
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/inboxes_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/models/inbox_spec.rb`
Reworks the Captain assistant "hours saved" metric so it produces a
believable number. It previously multiplied assistant reply count by
customer reply-wait time, which inflated the figure into the millions of
hours. It now estimates saved time as replies × a fixed ~2 min per-reply
effort assumption. On the overview card the value renders in days once
it passes 100 hours, and the label/hint copy was updated to match.
## How to test
1. Open the Captain assistant overview page.
2. Check the "Time saved" card shows a sensible value (hours, or days
past 100h).
3. Hover the hint and confirm it reflects the per-reply estimate.
This PR adds a Captain Assistant **Overview** page to show some KPI
metrics (conversations handled, auto-resolution, handoff, hours saved,
reopen-after-resolve, conversation depth) with trend deltas vs the
previous window, a real knowledge card, and a lazily-loaded, cached LLM
welcome summary.
### Highlights
- **Two contextual banners** on the overview:
- **Inbox banner** — prompts the user to connect an inbox when the
assistant has none, so it can actually do work.
- **Coverage banner** — warns when FAQ coverage is below 85% with more
than 100 responses pending review, linking straight to the pending
queue. Dismissal persists per-assistant for 24h via localStorage.
- **Batched stats builder** (`Captain::AssistantStatsBuilder`) computes
both windows in single FILTER-aggregated scans to cut round trips,
behind new `stats`/`summary` endpoints.
- **Cards included but intentionally left dummy / not rendered yet:**
`ResponseQualityCard` (flagged responses) and `CreditUsageCard` (credit
usage + daily chart). Credits are an account-wide counter with no
per-assistant or daily history, so there is no real data to back them
yet; they ship in the codebase but are not wired into the page.
### Index migration
- Replaces `index_messages_on_sender_type_and_sender_id` with
`index_messages_on_sender_and_created` `(sender_type, sender_id,
created_at)`.
- **Why it helps:** the per-assistant windowed lookups filter `sender_*`
*and* a `created_at` range. The old 2-column index matched every
lifetime row for the assistant and filtered the time slice at the heap
(~89% of rows discarded); adding `created_at` as a range column lets
Postgres scan only the window, and fixes the row-count estimate so the
planner picks a hash join over a nested loop on `reporting_events`.
- **Why dropping the old index is safe:** the new index is a left-prefix
superset `(sender_type, sender_id, ...)`, so every query the old one
served is still served. No code references it by name, and dropping it
keeps write amplification on `messages` neutral. Built/dropped with
`CONCURRENTLY` and `if_not_exists`/`if_exists` guards.
## Preview
<img width="2572" height="1754" alt="CleanShot 2026-06-29 at 22 38
51@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3798d09e-7850-48e4-b2cd-508533f15cea"
/>
## Banners
#### Inbox connect alert
<img width="2178" height="612" alt="CleanShot 2026-06-30 at 14 26 55@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/373c371c-bb7d-4291-a0f9-620673078302"
/>
#### Coverage alert
<img width="2178" height="612" alt="CleanShot 2026-06-30 at 14 25 41@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e12d6308-11b6-4ba2-88a2-8a3077dd3e8f"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
defaults new accounts to captain v2
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
locally and specs
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Blocked contacts are now excluded from SLA assignment, processing,
reports, and conversation SLA UI while they remain blocked. Existing SLA
records are preserved, and SLA behavior resumes if the contact is
unblocked.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7435/sla-should-not-trigger-for-blocked-contacts
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- `bundle exec rspec spec/enterprise/models/conversation_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/models/applied_sla_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/enterprise/action_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/sla/evaluate_applied_sla_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/jobs/sla/process_account_applied_slas_job_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/applied_slas_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/conversations_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/controllers/enterprise/api/v1/accounts/conversations_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/presenters/conversations/event_data_presenter_spec.rb` —
78 examples, 0 failures
- `bundle exec rubocop
enterprise/app/controllers/api/v1/accounts/applied_slas_controller.rb
enterprise/app/jobs/sla/process_account_applied_slas_job.rb
enterprise/app/models/applied_sla.rb
enterprise/app/models/enterprise/concerns/conversation.rb
enterprise/app/presenters/enterprise/conversations/event_data_presenter.rb
enterprise/app/services/enterprise/action_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/sla/evaluate_applied_sla_service.rb
lib/tasks/apply_sla.rake
spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/applied_slas_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/conversations_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/controllers/enterprise/api/v1/accounts/conversations_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/jobs/sla/process_account_applied_slas_job_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/models/applied_sla_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/models/conversation_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/presenters/conversations/event_data_presenter_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/enterprise/action_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/sla/evaluate_applied_sla_service_spec.rb` — no
offenses
- `pnpm exec vitest --no-watch --no-cache --no-coverage
app/javascript/dashboard/components/widgets/conversation/specs/ConversationCard.spec.js`
— 2 tests passed
- `pnpm exec eslint
app/javascript/dashboard/components-next/Conversation/ConversationCard/CardMessagePreviewWithMeta.vue
app/javascript/dashboard/components-next/Conversation/ConversationCard/ConversationCardExpanded.vue
app/javascript/dashboard/components/widgets/conversation/ConversationCard.vue
app/javascript/dashboard/components/widgets/conversation/ConversationHeader.vue
app/javascript/dashboard/components/widgets/conversation/specs/ConversationCard.spec.js`
— passed with existing raw-text warnings in `ConversationHeader.vue`
- `git diff --cached --check` — clean
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
## Description
Some inbound WhatsApp calls stayed stuck in "ringing" forever. When a
caller hung up within ~1s of dialing, Meta delivered the terminate
webhook before the connect webhook. The terminate arrived with no call
record yet and was dropped, then connect created the call in ringing
with nothing left to close it. These calls now correctly land as missed
(no_answer), and an agent who taps Accept on a call that already ended
gets a clean "call ended" instead of a generic error.
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- local UI testing
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Description
Routes the remaining system-only and legacy-sensitive LLM jobs through
feature-level model configuration, while preserving system credential
usage and usage-accounting behavior. This adds dedicated defaults for
help center article generation, onboarding content generation, query
translation, transcription, and search embeddings so these flows can be
configured per account without falling back to installation-wide model
settings.
Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7425/test-new-models
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Verified the feature routing defaults and account overrides for the
touched Captain/system LLM paths, including the legacy OpenAI
transcription and paginated FAQ services.
- `eval "$(rbenv init -)" && bundle exec rspec
spec/lib/captain/base_task_service_spec.rb spec/lib/llm/models_spec.rb
spec/models/concerns/captain_featurable_spec.rb
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/captain/preferences_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/paginated_faq_generator_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/pdf_processing_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/messages/audio_transcription_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/onboarding/help_center_article_builder_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/onboarding/website_analyzer_service_spec.rb`
- `eval "$(rbenv init -)" && bundle exec rubocop
app/controllers/api/v1/accounts/captain/preferences_controller.rb
app/models/concerns/account_settings_schema.rb
lib/captain/base_task_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/article_translation_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/article_writer_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/embedding_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/help_center_curation_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/paginated_faq_generator_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/translate_query_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/widget_tagline_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/onboarding/website_analyzer_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/messages/audio_transcription_service.rb
spec/enterprise/services/messages/audio_transcription_service_spec.rb
spec/lib/captain/base_task_service_spec.rb`
- `ruby -e "require 'yaml'; config = YAML.load_file('config/llm.yml');
%w[document_faq_generation help_center_article_generation
onboarding_content_generation help_center_query_translation
audio_transcription help_center_search].each { |feature| abort(%(missing
#{feature})) unless config.dig('features', feature) }; abort('wrong
article default') unless config.dig('features',
'help_center_article_generation', 'default') == 'gpt-5.2'; puts 'llm.yml
ok'"`
- `git diff --check`
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Routes OSS reply-box and small Captain tasks through feature-specific
LLM model resolution. Rewrite, reply suggestion, summary, follow-up, and
CSAT utility analysis now resolve through the `editor` feature; label
suggestion resolves through `label_suggestion`. Existing credentials,
account OpenAI hook behavior, and instrumentation event names remain
unchanged.
Linear: https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7425/test-new-models
Depends on #14839
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
- `bundle exec rspec spec/lib/captain/base_task_service_spec.rb
spec/lib/captain/rewrite_service_spec.rb
spec/lib/captain/reply_suggestion_service_spec.rb
spec/lib/captain/summary_service_spec.rb
spec/lib/captain/label_suggestion_service_spec.rb
spec/lib/captain/csat_utility_analysis_service_spec.rb
spec/lib/captain/follow_up_service_spec.rb` passed with 81 examples, 0
failures.
- `bundle exec rubocop lib/captain/base_task_service.rb
lib/captain/rewrite_service.rb lib/captain/reply_suggestion_service.rb
lib/captain/summary_service.rb lib/captain/label_suggestion_service.rb
lib/captain/csat_utility_analysis_service.rb
lib/captain/follow_up_service.rb
enterprise/lib/enterprise/captain/reply_suggestion_service.rb
spec/lib/captain/base_task_service_spec.rb
spec/lib/captain/rewrite_service_spec.rb
spec/lib/captain/reply_suggestion_service_spec.rb
spec/lib/captain/summary_service_spec.rb
spec/lib/captain/label_suggestion_service_spec.rb
spec/lib/captain/csat_utility_analysis_service_spec.rb
spec/lib/captain/follow_up_service_spec.rb` passed with no offenses.
- `git diff --check` passed.
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Description
Adds the foundation for feature-specific LLM model routing so Captain AI
features can resolve their effective provider/model from code defaults
and account-level overrides. This fixes the provider metadata key in
`config/llm.yml`, adds `Llm::FeatureRouter`, and routes existing
`CaptainFeaturable` model defaults through the shared resolver.
Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7425/test-new-models
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
- `bundle exec rspec spec/lib/llm/models_spec.rb
spec/lib/llm/feature_router_spec.rb
spec/models/concerns/captain_featurable_spec.rb` - 23 examples, 0
failures
- `bundle exec rubocop lib/llm/models.rb lib/llm/feature_router.rb
app/models/concerns/captain_featurable.rb spec/lib/llm/models_spec.rb
spec/lib/llm/feature_router_spec.rb
spec/models/concerns/captain_featurable_spec.rb` - no offenses
- `bundle exec ruby -e "require 'yaml'; config =
YAML.load_file('config/llm.yml'); abort('missing providers') unless
config['providers']; abort('missing models') unless config['models'];
abort('missing features') unless config['features']; puts 'llm.yml ok'"`
- `git diff --check`
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
After entering their account details, new admins land on an **Inbox
setup** screen that shows what we've already set up for them and lets
them connect their conversation channels without leaving onboarding. It
surfaces the auto-created live chat widget (and Help Center on
Enterprise), highlights channels detected from their website, and offers
a **View all** dialog to connect any supported channel inline.
### Channel status
| Channel | How it connects | Status | PR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live chat (Website) | Auto-created during setup | ✅ Done |
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/14314 |
| WhatsApp | Meta embedded signup | ✅ Done |
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/14619 |
| Facebook | Login + page picker | ✅ Done |
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/14619 |
| Instagram | OAuth redirect | ✅ Done |
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/14568 |
| TikTok | OAuth redirect | ✅ Done |
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/14569 |
| LINE | Inline credential form | ✅ Done | — |
| Telegram | Inline credential form | ✅ Done | — |
| Gmail / Outlook | OAuth (email) | ⚠️ Disabled — coming in a follow-up
| https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/14567 |
| SMS / API / Voice / Other email | — | ⛔ Unavailable | — |
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Dyte is sunsetting its existing infrastructure after the Cloudflare
acquisition, so this migrates Chatwoot’s video call integration to
Cloudflare RealtimeKit.
The integration now uses Cloudflare Account ID, RealtimeKit App ID, and
a Cloudflare API token with Realtime Admin permissions. Meeting creation
and participant token generation now call Cloudflare’s RealtimeKit APIs,
while the existing Chatwoot call experience remains unchanged for agents
and customers.
This also adds setup-time credential validation, so admins get clearer
errors when the API token is invalid, the Cloudflare account or
permissions are incorrect, or the RealtimeKit App ID does not belong to
the selected account.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-176/migrate-dyte-integration-to-cloudflare-realtimekit
**How to test**
1. Go to Settings → Integrations → Cloudflare RealtimeKit.
2. Add a Cloudflare Account ID, RealtimeKit App ID, and API token with
Realtime Admin permissions.
3. Confirm the integration saves successfully with valid credentials.
4. Try invalid credentials and confirm the error identifies whether the
token, account/permissions, or app ID is wrong.
5. Start a video call from a conversation and confirm the RealtimeKit
meeting opens.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
## Description
Reverts [#14726](https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/14726)
(\"feat: Add sidebar unread counts for filters (CW-7262)\"), which
shipped in 4.15.0.
After 4.15.0 rolled out to prod the unread-counts-for-filters code path
caused a cascading incident:
- `Counter#ensure_filters_cache!` fires on every `/unread_counts/index`
and `update_last_seen` request.
- On cache miss it calls `Builder#build_filters_for!`, which:
- invokes `store.clear_user_filters!` -> `delete_matching` -> a Redis
`SCAN_each` over a per-user pattern keyspace, and
- runs 4 fresh SQL passes per user (mentions, participating, unattended,
and per-folder `Conversations::FilterService` queries).
- Threads blocked in the SCAN held their DB connections, the connection
pool exhausted, Sidekiq jobs were discarded with
`ActiveJob::DeserializationError: could not obtain a connection from the
pool`, and the enqueued queue blew past 200K.
Related:
[CW-7262](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7262/unread-counts-for-filters-folders)
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Description
Extends the conversation unread-count system so the left sidebar can
show unread badges for Mentions, Participating, Unattended, and saved
conversation folders. Folder badges reuse the existing `custom_filters`
conversation filter semantics, store user-scoped Redis sets lazily, and
skip unsupported folder filters so invalid saved folders continue to
render without a badge. The Unattended badge counts all visible unread
open conversations that match the existing unattended conversation
scope.
Closes
-
[CW-7262](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7262/unread-counts-for-filters-folders)
## What changed
- Added user-scoped unread-count Redis keys and cache builders for
mentions, participating conversations, unattended conversations, and
saved folder filters.
- Reused `Conversations::FilterService` through a relation-returning
path so folder counts match the folder conversation list behavior.
- Invalidated user filter caches from mention, participant,
custom-filter, and relevant conversation update events.
- Extended the unread-count endpoint payload and sidebar Vuex/sidebar
rendering for the new badge counts, including the Unattended sidebar
item.
- Added Ruby, Enterprise, request, listener, and frontend store coverage
for the new unread-count dimensions.
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Created local validation folders for `john@acme.inc` and confirmed the
unread-count payload includes open, resolved, and high-priority folder
badges while excluding the invalid unsupported folder.
- Added coverage for the Unattended badge rule: all visible unread open
conversations matching `Conversation.unattended`.
- Ran focused unread-count Ruby specs, including service, listener,
request, and Enterprise counter coverage.
- Ran frontend unread-count store specs.
- Ran RuboCop on the touched Ruby files.
- Ran ESLint through the project script; it completed with warnings in
existing unrelated files and no errors.
<img width="369" height="525" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-13 at 10 51 39 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/36b1d2c4-dac1-4f6f-9c0e-7ef5a6cc2975"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] Documentation changes are not required for this internal
unread-count behavior
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] No dependent downstream changes are required
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Storage migration functionality, which allows the transfer of images
from one on-premises provider to another (e.g. AWS, Google, etc.) using
Active Storage.
I ran the unit and integration tests and they all passed correctly.
**The command to execute the migration is `FROM=from_service
TO=to_service rake storage:migrate`**
Fixes#7907
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
I have tested the storage migration functionality by running the
provided unit and integration tests. Additionally, I manually tested the
migration process in a local development environment by following these
steps:
Set up two storage services (e.g., AWS S3 and Google Cloud Storage) with
valid configurations.
Execute the `FROM=local TO=amazon rake storage:migrate` task with
appropriate FROM and TO arguments to migrate blobs between the services.
Verified that the blobs were successfully transferred to the target
storage service.
Checked for any error messages or unexpected behavior during the
migration process.
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Prevent deleted email conversations from being synced into Chatwoot
again while they are still within the IMAP sync window.
When an admin explicitly deletes an email conversation, the incoming
email message IDs are stored temporarily in Redis. IMAP sync checks
these recently deleted message IDs in addition to existing message
records. Each Redis key expires automatically after two days.
This applies only to explicit conversation deletion. Individual message
deletion, inbox deletion, and account deletion keep their existing
behavior.
Fixes
[CW-7214](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7214/deleted-mails-in-gmail-inbox-gets-synced-again)
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Adds a Contact condition to the conversation advanced filter so agents
can search for an existing contact and filter conversations by
`conversations.contact_id`.
Fixes
[CW-7239](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7239/contact-filter-for-conversations)
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
- `eval "$(rbenv init -)" && bundle exec rspec
spec/services/conversations/filter_service_spec.rb`
- `pnpm exec vitest --no-watch --no-cache --no-coverage --logHeapUsage
app/javascript/dashboard/components-next/filter/helper/filterHelper.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/conversations/helpers/specs/filterHelpers.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/helper/specs/customViewsHelper.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/helper/specs/filterQueryGenerator.spec.js`
- `pnpm eslint`
- `eval "$(rbenv init -)" && bundle exec rubocop
spec/services/conversations/filter_service_spec.rb`
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Fixes:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7167/label-suggestions-bad-ux
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
We need to pass on trace level attributes down to the spans inside them
like tool calls, observations, etc.
This way, we can filter observations based on trace level attributes.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
Attributes added to observation metadata for easy filtering
<img width="1327" height="708" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8f1d1bf8-cde4-481d-a2c2-7920ad2fc52e"
/>
added a `generation_stage` to differentiate llm_calls that call tools vs
those that generate a `final_response`
<img width="1806" height="968" alt="CleanShot 2026-06-03 at 15 11 09@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/db1fa8e0-7f2d-404b-a719-27a16d400442"
/>
propagated attributes to tool calls for future use
<img width="903" height="517" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/edc61ce8-93db-465c-a66e-043138e2dc15"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds support for inline image uploads in the reply editor for
Email and Website (chat widget) channels.
Agents can now insert images inline between text and resize them
directly in the editor by dragging the bottom corner, similar to the
help center editor experience.
Image sizes are preserved through markdown using the `cw_image_width`
URL param and render correctly in both outgoing emails and chat widget
messages.
Agents can also paste copied images directly into Email or Website
replies using **Shift+Cmd+V** (Shift+Ctrl+V on Windows/Linux). The image
gets inserted inline at the cursor position and supports resizing just
like uploaded images. Regular **Cmd+V / Ctrl+V** behavior remains
unchanged and continues to add images as attachments, so both inline and
attachment flows are supported.
### Prosemirror repo PR:
https://github.com/chatwoot/prosemirror-schema/pull/48
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7133/inline-images-in-live-chat-and-emailhttps://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7225/ghsa-8j9w-jppp-xcfc-html-attribute-injection-via-unvalidated-cw-image
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screencast
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a928f852-ab15-413a-9d35-6ea69b718ecf
<img width="414" height="654" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/205e0729-8f2d-4cc5-9c55-7696f032eca4"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Self-hosted installations can now opt SafeFetch into private-network
access after SSRF hardening. The default remains unchanged: private IP
destinations are blocked unless the instance owner explicitly enables
private-network requests with `SAFE_FETCH_ALLOW_PRIVATE_NETWORK=true`.
Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7131
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/14489
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/14494
## How to use
For self-hosted installations that need API inbox webhooks, or other
SafeFetch-backed requests, to call trusted private services, enable
private-network access with a single environment variable:
```bash
SAFE_FETCH_ALLOW_PRIVATE_NETWORK=true
```
This is disabled by default. Enable it only when the instance owner
controls the deployment network and trusts the configured URLs.
## Description
Fixes rubocop for alfred.rb file on develop
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Description
Fixes a bug under Assignment V2 where a single conversation could be
reassigned dozens of times in a row by the system, producing long stacks
of "Assigned to X by Automation System via <policy>" activity messages
alternating between agents. After this change each unassigned
conversation is assigned exactly once, even on busy inboxes.
## Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
## How to reproduce
1. Enable `assignment_v2` on an account with at least 2 online agents in
an inbox.
2. Generate sustained resolve/snooze activity in the inbox (each one
enqueues `AutoAssignment::AssignmentJob` for the whole inbox).
3. Watch any one unassigned conversation while the jobs drain — pre-fix
it picks up multiple back-to-back "Assigned to …" activity rows
alternating between agents.
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This is the second PR in a series of PRs for Introducing unread counts
in the sidebar for inboxes and labels.
In this PR:
* added api for unread counts
* Added the store refresher and invalidation with event listeners
* Added action cable event
* Added specs for the changes
Issue:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6851/support-unread-conversation-counts
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Adds storage support for WhatsApp business-scoped user identifiers
received from Meta Cloud API and Twilio WhatsApp webhooks. The change
keeps existing phone-based behavior intact, stores BSUID and parent
BSUID values as additional `contact_inboxes.source_id` rows for the same
contact, and allows BSUID-only inbound messages to create contacts,
conversations, and messages without requiring a phone number.
Related: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13837
**What changed**
- Extended WhatsApp source ID validation to accept regular BSUID and
parent BSUID formats.
- For Meta Cloud API, stores phone, `user_id`, and `parent_user_id`
identifiers as contact inbox source IDs when they are present.
- For Twilio WhatsApp, stores phone, `ExternalUserId`, and
`ParentExternalUserId` identifiers as contact inbox source IDs while
preserving the existing `whatsapp:` Twilio source ID shape.
- Supports BSUID-only inbound messages by creating a contact, contact
inbox, conversation, and message even when the phone number is missing.
- Links phone-first and later BSUID-only messages to the same contact
when the first payload contains both phone and BSUID.
- Stores WhatsApp usernames in contact `additional_attributes`, matching
existing social channel patterns.
- Keeps existing phone-based outbound and new-conversation behavior
unchanged for this milestone.
**How to test**
1. Send a Meta Cloud webhook payload with both `wa_id` and `user_id`.
2. Verify Chatwoot creates or finds the phone `contact_inbox` and also
creates a BSUID `contact_inbox` for the same contact.
3. Send a later Meta Cloud payload for the same user with only `user_id`
/ `from_user_id`.
4. Verify Chatwoot finds the BSUID `contact_inbox` and creates the
inbound message without requiring a phone number.
5. Send a Twilio WhatsApp webhook with `From: whatsapp:+E164`,
`ExternalUserId`, and optionally `ParentExternalUserId`.
6. Verify Chatwoot stores the Twilio phone and BSUID identifiers as
`whatsapp:`-prefixed source IDs for the same contact.
7. Send a Twilio WhatsApp webhook where `From` is `whatsapp:<BSUID>` and
there is no phone number.
8. Verify Chatwoot creates the contact, contact inbox, conversation, and
message without a phone number.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description
This is the first PR in a series of PRs for Introducing unread counts in
the sidebar for inboxes and labels.
In this PR:
* Added the unread store, counter and builder modules
* Added redis keys for unread count management
* Added specs for all 3 modules, some specs are for testing enterprise
only feature like specific roles and permissions which are added in the
respective enterprise folder itself.
**Note**
None of this changes affect anything else and nothing is wired to
existing modules.
Issue:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6851/support-unread-conversation-counts
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
- Validates openai key while configuring hooks
- added backfill logic
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
locally
<img width="1710" height="1234" alt="CleanShot 2026-04-15 at 16 15
02@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3d319fe0-19f9-4fd0-9308-74987daac2e1"
/>
<img width="2884" height="1136" alt="CleanShot 2026-05-11 at 19 22
53@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5eae8650-985b-4c4a-af42-35f7175ff52d"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com>
When a new account finishes onboarding we want to land them on a
dashboard with a working web widget already configured, branded, named,
and assigned to them, instead of an empty inbox list. This PR adds the
services that produce that widget. **No user-visible change yet:** the
services are dormant until the trigger and background job are wired up
in the follow-up PR.
## Context
Milestone 1 added `Account::BrandingEnrichmentJob`, which calls
context.dev during signup and stores brand data on
`account.custom_attributes['brand_info']`, plus the new onboarding form
that captures `domain`, `name`, `industry`, etc. Milestone 2 starts
using that data, and the first thing we want is a web widget
materialized automatically. Splitting the service layer from the
orchestration plumbing (Redis key, `onboarding_step` extension,
controller wiring, ActionCable) keeps this diff focused and lets the
LLM/widget logic merge independently.
## How to test
Run against an existing account that already has `brand_info` populated.
```ruby
account = Account.find(<account_id>)
user = account.administrators.first
inbox = WidgetCreationService.new(account, user).perform
inbox.channel.widget_color # color from brand_info, or '#1f93ff'
inbox.channel.welcome_title # brand_info[:title], or account.name
inbox.channel.welcome_tagline # LLM tagline (Enterprise + system key set),
# else brand_info[:slogan]/[:description]/nil
inbox.inbox_members.pluck(:user_id)
```
Toggle `InstallationConfig['CAPTAIN_OPEN_AI_API_KEY']` to flip between
LLM and brand-text tagline paths. To verify failure isolation, raise
inside `Captain::Llm::WidgetTaglineService#perform` and confirm widget
creation still succeeds with the fallback tagline.
The SafeFetch spec suite was failing in CI with `NameError:
uninitialized constant SafeFetch::Fetcher` across every example that
exercised `SafeFetch.fetch`. From a product perspective, this made the
external-file fetch path look unreliable even though the failure
happened before any network validation, SSRF protection, content-type
checks, or tempfile handling could run.
The symptom pointed to a load-order issue rather than an actual fetch
behavior regression. `SafeFetch.fetch` referenced `Fetcher` from the
top-level module, but that nested class was not guaranteed to be loaded
in every test execution path before the method was invoked.
This change keeps the existing SafeFetch split between the public API
and the implementation classes, but makes the public entry point
responsible for loading the implementation it needs before use. That is
intentionally smaller than folding all of the fetcher logic into
`lib/safe_fetch.rb`; the separate files still keep the request option
parsing and streaming implementation readable, while the public API no
longer depends on Rails or the test runner having loaded nested
constants in a particular order.
The file also now uses a single `SafeFetch` module declaration. That
removes the awkward reopen pattern and makes the dependency boundary
easier to see: constants and errors are defined first, then the public
`fetch` method loads and delegates to the implementation classes.
Embed templates interpolate regex captures from user-authored article
URLs into HTML attribute values. CommonMark's angle-bracket link
destination syntax allows characters that the capture regexes don't
filter, so the unescaped substitution could produce malformed attribute
output. Escaping at substitution time keeps the render deterministic
regardless of the URL.
### How was this tested?
Added specs.
Fixes [CW-6934](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6934/)
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
### Description
Inbound voice calls now route ownership cleanly: the call widget is
hidden from agents who aren't the conversation assignee, the first agent
to pick up becomes the assignee, and any later join attempt by another
agent is rejected with a clear "<agent> is already handling the call."
alert.
Closes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-98/inbound-voice-calls-assignment-aware-visibility-auto-assignment-on
### How to test
1. As Agent A and Agent B, open the dashboard for the same voice inbox
in two browsers.
2. Place an inbound call to the inbox with the conversation
**unassigned** — both agents should see the call widget.
3. Have Agent A click **Join**. Agent A's widget transitions to the
active call; Agent B's widget disappears (conversation is now assigned
to Agent A).
4. While the call is in progress, attempt to join from a third agent
(e.g., via the bubble in the conversation timeline) — the join is
rejected with the toast `Agent A is already handling the call.`
5. Resolve the conversation, then place a second call to a conversation
that is already manually assigned to Agent A — only Agent A sees the
widget; nobody else does.
6. Race test: trigger two near-simultaneous join attempts (two agents
click Join within a few hundred ms of each other) — exactly one wins;
the other gets the conflict alert.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR fixes an issue where Slack emojis are rendered as text
shortcodes (e.g. 🚀) instead of the actual emoji characters in
Chatwoot messages.
It introduces a new EmojiFormatter class that uses the emoji-data
mapping to convert shortcodes to unicode characters.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR fixes an issue where outgoing Email messages (via API) do not
preserve single line breaks in rendered HTML.
#### Cause
Messages are stored with `\n`, but rendering differs:
* **Other channel** (`markdown-it`, `breaks: true`) → `\n` → `<br>`
* **Email** (CommonMark) without `HARDBREAKS` → `\n` collapsed into
spaces
Result: multi-line messages appear as a single paragraph in Email.
#### Solution
* Added `hardbreaks:` option to `render_message` (default: false)
* Enabled `hardbreaks: true` in `EmailHelper#render_email_html`
This ensures `\n` renders as `<br />` in Email, matching web widget
behavior.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6941/outgoing-email-messages-strip-single-newlines-from-plain-text-content
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
#### Screenshots
**Before**
<img width="604" height="104" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f9086ffb-a5c7-4688-99aa-97ea5edcccde"
/>
**After**
<img width="604" height="210" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a8f21c76-bcb8-4058-937a-dd185fb6745c"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
When a WhatsApp contact starts a new conversation by sending multiple
images at once (an album), each image arrives as a separate webhook.
Because no conversation exists yet, the concurrent workers each pass the
"does a conversation exist?" check and each create their own
conversation — producing one conversation per image instead of one
grouped conversation.
This fix serializes webhook processing per `(inbox, contact)` using a
Redis lock at the job level, so only one webhook at a time can create
the initial conversation for a given contact. Concurrent workers retry
with backoff and append to the same conversation once the lock is
released.
## Closes
- Closes#13261
## How to test
1. On a WhatsApp inbox, ensure there is no active (open) conversation
with a specific test contact — resolve or delete any existing one.
2. From a phone, select 6+ images in the WhatsApp gallery and send them
as a single album to the Chatwoot-connected number.
3. Open the Chatwoot dashboard and confirm exactly **one** new
conversation is created, with all images grouped under it.
4. Repeat the test with a mix of attachment types (XMLs, PDFs, images)
sent in rapid succession — still one conversation.
## What changed
- New Redis key `WHATSAPP_MESSAGE_CREATE_LOCK::<inbox_id>::<sender_id>`
in `lib/redis/redis_keys.rb`.
- `Webhooks::WhatsappEventsJob` now inherits from `MutexApplicationJob`
and wraps event processing in `with_lock(key)`, matching the pattern
already used by `FacebookEventsJob`, `InstagramEventsJob`, and
`TiktokEventsJob`.
- Uses `retry_on LockAcquisitionError, wait: 1.second, attempts: 8` so
concurrent webhooks retry until the lock is free instead of poll-waiting
inside the service.
- Sender ID is derived from the webhook payload (contact's `from`, or
`to` for SMB echo events); status-only webhooks bypass the lock.
- Issue 1 from the report (same `source_id` redelivery) was already
handled previously by `Whatsapp::MessageDedupLock` (atomic `SET NX EX`);
no changes needed there.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
When a customer responds to a bot's interactive prompt (input_select,
input_csat, form, input_email) from the widget, the response shows up in
the Chatwoot agent UI but is not reflected in the linked Slack channel —
Slack only ever shows the original question. This happens because the
widget submits the answer as an UPDATE to the original message (writing
`content_attributes.submitted_values` or `submitted_email`), but the
Slack hook only listened to `message.created`, so updates were ignored.
Closes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-147
### Preview
<img width="1290" height="1106" alt="CleanShot 2026-04-21 at 13 19
19@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cd2a9d3f-89d3-4e81-9230-5b078e1b7b44"
/>
### How to test
1. Connect a web widget inbox to a Slack channel.
2. Trigger each bot message type (input_select, form, input_csat,
input_email) in a conversation.
3. Submit responses from the widget.
4. Verify each response now appears in the Slack thread, appended to the
original bot question.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This routes external downloads used by webhook fetch used by macros and
acutomations through SafeFetch. It closes the SSRF exposure from raw
Down.download paths, preserves provider-specific auth and header flows,
and adds regression coverage for blocked internal URLs plus
authenticated downloads.
Fixes # (issue):
[CW-6940](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6940/ssrf-via-webhooksautomationmacros-non-upload-non-avatar)
Standardizes the contact company import/filter/automation contract on
`company_name`.
Closes#14096
Revives #9907
## Why
Contact company is read across the current CRM/contact UI from
`additional_attributes['company_name']`, but CSV import and a few
backend filter/automation paths still used the older `company` key. That
meant imported company values could be saved in a place the dashboard,
sorting, filters, and automation conditions did not consistently read
from.
Based on the production data check, the legacy `company` automation
configuration is effectively dead: the affected account did not have
contacts populated with `additional_attributes['company']`. So this PR
intentionally avoids adding long-term fallback behavior and uses
`company_name` as the single key going forward.
## What changed
- Contact CSV import now writes only `company_name` into
`additional_attributes['company_name']`.
- The example contact import CSV now uses the `company_name` header.
- Contact company sorting/filter config now uses `company_name`.
- Automation condition config now uses `company_name`.
- Existing standard automation conditions with `attribute_key:
'company'` are migrated to `company_name`.
- Existing saved contact filters with standard `attribute_key:
'company'` are migrated to `company_name`.
- Custom attributes named `company` are preserved and are not rewritten
by the migration.
## How to test
- Import a contact CSV with a `company_name` column and confirm the
Contact Company field is populated.
- Sort contacts by Company and confirm imported contacts are ordered
correctly.
- Create/edit an automation with Company as a condition and confirm it
saves with `company_name`.
- Verify existing saved contact filters and automation rules using the
old standard `company` key are migrated to `company_name`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR fixes an issue where signature images (with
`?cw_image_height=...`) render at their original large size in the email
bubble.
### Cause
Renderer output:
```html
<img src="..." height="24px" width="auto" />
```
Email UI and clients (Gmail, Outlook) apply CSS like:
`img { max-width: 100%; height: auto; }`
This overrides `height="24px"`.
Other channels work because they use inline styles (`style="height:
24px;"`).
### Solution
Use inline style instead:
```html
<img src="..." style="height: 24px;" />
```
### Why backend fix
* Fixes root cause and aligns Ruby + JS renderers
* Works in both Chatwoot UI and recipient inboxes
* Covers all email-rendered content
* Minimal change
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6948/email-signature-image-renders-oversized-in-chatwoot-ui
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
#### Screenshots
**Before**
<img width="1637" height="377" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0477f6fb-3b95-4fc3-9ea8-f59b71e27f47"
/>
**After**
<img width="1637" height="289" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/de5ea4c1-8452-4c5f-aeb1-e1e11e0fe7d5"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
This routes external downloads used by avatar sync through SafeFetch. It closes the SSRF exposure from raw Down.download paths, preserves provider-specific auth and header flows, and adds regression coverage
for blocked internal URLs plus authenticated downloads.
Fixes # (issue): [CW-6931](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6931/avatarwidget-url-ssrf-downdownload-unprotected-unauth)
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Document auto-sync job pipeline without wiring to controllers or FE
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
specs and locally
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
We're getting many customer reports saying "I'm not getting
notifications." We can't always identify the root cause since there are
multiple points of failure. Added a **Push Diagnostics** tool in Super
Admin to help us investigate mobile/web push issues.
Here's how it works:
- Look up a user by email/ID → see all their registered subscriptions
with device info (iOS/Android, brand, model), token freshness, and
last-updated time
- Send a customizable test push and read the raw FCM/web-push/relay
response to see if the customer is receiving push notifications—if not,
it will show proper errors.
- Delete broken subscriptions so the mobile app re-registers on next
launch
<img width="3816" height="1974" alt="CleanShot 2026-04-20 at 12 56
56@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/08ecab6f-7ec3-44b3-a114-5e6eb8cf0879"
/>
Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6892/push-diagnostics-tool
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
RubyLLM bundles a static models.json that doesn't know about models
released after the gem was published. Self-hosted users configuring
newer models hit ModelNotFoundError.
Added a rake task that refreshes the registry from models.dev and saves
to disk. ~~Called during Docker image build so every deploy gets fresh
model data. Falls back silently to the bundled registry if models.dev is
unreachable.~~
Commit the models.json file to code so it is available across
deployments.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
AI-generated summaries now respect the account's language setting.
Previously, summaries were always returned in English regardless of the
user's configured language, making section headings like "Customer
Intent" and "Action Items" appear in English even for non-English
accounts.
Previous behavior:
<img width="1336" height="790" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5df8b78b-1218-438d-9578-a806b5cb94ac"
/>
Current Behavior:
<img width="1253" height="372" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ae932c97-06da-4baf-9f77-9719bc9162e8"
/>
## What changed
- Added explicit account locale to the AI system prompt in
`Captain::SummaryService`
- Updated the summary prompt template to instruct the model to translate
section headings
## How to test
1. Configure an account with a non-English language (e.g., Portuguese)
2. Open a conversation with messages
3. Use the Copilot "Summarize" feature
4. Verify that section headings ("Customer Intent", "Conversation
Summary", etc.) appear in the account's language
---------
Co-authored-by: Aakash Bakhle <48802744+aakashb95@users.noreply.github.com>
