Added support for Telegram Business bots. Telegram webhooks from such bots include the business_message field, which we transform into a standard message for Chatwoot. This PR also modifies how we handle replies, attachments, and image uploads when working with Telegram Business bots.
demo: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yz82wXBVRtb-mxjXogkUju4hlJbt3qyh/view?usp=sharing&t=4Fixes#10181
- Use direct message object reference instead of re-querying through
inbox
- Add message.reload after unsend operation to get updated state
- Remove unnecessary inbox reload that could cause timing issues
- Remove redundant assertions for better test atomicity
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
This PR adds support for handling Telegram's video_note messages (circular video messages), which are commonly used for short voice-style video replies in messaging.
Fixes: #11503
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Users get confused between app routes and API routes. Instead of hitting
/api, they append /app in the API call, which ends up calling the
dashboard controller and throws an error. To fix this, we added a check
to throw a 406 Not Acceptable for non-HTML requests. But Meta requires
Accept: \*/\* to return 200 for the integration to be accepted.
This change will only throw an error for JSON requests.
Fixes#11697
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/11251
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/11205
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Added input_select message type support for LINE
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [X] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
add testcase. and test manually by myself
## Checklist:
- [X] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [X] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
## Summary
- support region option when configuring Dialogflow integration
- connect to region endpoint when set
- use session identification based on the region
Fixes: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/4129
…on (#11584)"
This reverts commit b5ebc47637.
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
- Extended CsatSurveyResponsePolicy to support report_manage permission
- Added enterprise extension module following existing pattern
- Users with report_manage custom role can now access CSAT index,
metrics, and download
- Added comprehensive tests for both base and enterprise policy behavior
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/11569
## Problem
On platforms like WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger, customers cannot
reply to messages after 24 hours (or other channel-specific messaging
windows). Despite this limitation, the system continued sending CSAT
surveys to customers outside their messaging window, making it
impossible for them to respond.
## Solution
Added a check for `conversation.can_reply?` in the
`should_send_csat_survey?` method. This leverages the existing
`MessageWindowService` which already handles all channel-specific
messaging window logic.
- Enable jobs by default when a copilot thread or a message is created.
- Rename thread_id to copilot_thread_id to keep it consistent with the
model name
- Add a spec for search_linear_issues service
- Automate the deletion of accounts that have requested deletion via
account settings.
- Add a Sidekiq job that runs daily to find accounts that have requested
deletion and have passed the 7-day window.
- This job deletes the account and then soft-deletes users if they do
not belong to any other account.
- This job also sends an email to the Chatwoot instance admin for
compliance purposes.
- The Chatwoot instance admin's email is configurable via the
`CHATWOOT_INSTANCE_ADMIN_EMAIL` global config.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
- Add API support for creating a thread
- Add API support for creating a message
- Remove uuid from thread (no longer required, we will use existing
websocket connection to send messages)
- Update message_type to a column (user, assistant, assistant_thinking)
A while back, we added a UX enhancement that disabled sending the OOO
message when an agent had replied to the conversation in the last 5
minutes.
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/11073
This would not send a "we will be back" message even if that reply was a
private note. This would break for bots that posted private notes, and
even for agents who need to just add a note and not actually reply to
the email.
Shivam Mishra