Voice calling is now a capability on the existing TwilioSms rather than
a separate Voice model. A single Twilio phone number handles both SMS
and voice calls through one inbox.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6683/add-voice-calling-as-a-capability-on-twilio-sms-channel
and https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-120/add-the-support-for-sms
**What changed**
- Replaced Channel::Voice with voice_enabled flag on Channel::TwilioSms
- Added voice_enabled, twiml_app_sid, api_key_secret columns to
channel_twilio_sms table
- Dropped channel_voice table (no production data)
- All voice logic lives in Enterprise layer via
prepend_mod_with('Channel::TwilioSms')
- Added Voice settings tab on Twilio SMS inbox settings to
enable/disable voice
- Validates Twilio number voice capability before provisioning
- Teardown service cleans up TwiML app and credentials when voice is
disabled
- Frontend voice detection uses isVoiceCallEnabled() /
getVoiceCallProvider() helpers — extensible to future providers
- Gated by channel_voice feature flag
**How to test**
1. Enable feature flag:
Account.find(<id>).enable_features('channel_voice')
2. Create voice inbox: Inboxes → Voice tile → enter Twilio credentials →
verify incoming/outgoing calls and SMS work
3. Enable voice on existing SMS inbox: Inboxes → select Twilio SMS inbox
→ Voice tab → toggle on → provide API key credentials → verify calls
work
4. Disable voice: Voice tab → toggle off → verify TwiML app is deleted,
credentials cleared, SMS still works
5. Re-enable voice: Toggle on again → must provide api_key_secret again
→ new TwiML app provisioned
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
## Linear Ticket
-
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6883/allow-disabling-2fa-using-a-backup-code
## Description
When a user loses access to their authenticator app, they can now
disable 2FA using one of their saved backup codes (in addition to their
password), so they can re-enroll a new authenticator. The disable dialog
includes a toggle to switch between entering a verification code and a
backup code.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Via UI flows
<img width="495" height="423" alt="Screenshot 2026-04-20 at 2 17 21 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cc6b3dc5-39e6-4104-b5b9-cdabdc46947e"
/>
<img width="475" height="409" alt="Screenshot 2026-04-20 at 2 17 36 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/97c7304d-4adb-42ed-b7b4-50f5b38585a3"
/>
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Standardizes the contact company import/filter/automation contract on
`company_name`.
Closes#14096
Revives #9907
## Why
Contact company is read across the current CRM/contact UI from
`additional_attributes['company_name']`, but CSV import and a few
backend filter/automation paths still used the older `company` key. That
meant imported company values could be saved in a place the dashboard,
sorting, filters, and automation conditions did not consistently read
from.
Based on the production data check, the legacy `company` automation
configuration is effectively dead: the affected account did not have
contacts populated with `additional_attributes['company']`. So this PR
intentionally avoids adding long-term fallback behavior and uses
`company_name` as the single key going forward.
## What changed
- Contact CSV import now writes only `company_name` into
`additional_attributes['company_name']`.
- The example contact import CSV now uses the `company_name` header.
- Contact company sorting/filter config now uses `company_name`.
- Automation condition config now uses `company_name`.
- Existing standard automation conditions with `attribute_key:
'company'` are migrated to `company_name`.
- Existing saved contact filters with standard `attribute_key:
'company'` are migrated to `company_name`.
- Custom attributes named `company` are preserved and are not rewritten
by the migration.
## How to test
- Import a contact CSV with a `company_name` column and confirm the
Contact Company field is populated.
- Sort contacts by Company and confirm imported contacts are ordered
correctly.
- Create/edit an automation with Company as a condition and confirm it
saves with `company_name`.
- Verify existing saved contact filters and automation rules using the
old standard `company` key are migrated to `company_name`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
The "conversation continuity via email" toggle was visible to all
accounts regardless of whether they had `inbound_emails` enabled.
Without inbound email infrastructure, replies to those follow-up emails
land in the agent's personal inbox instead of routing back into
Chatwoot. The feature appears to work but silently breaks the reply
path.
The toggle is now gated on the `inbound_emails` feature flag. On
self-hosted without the feature, the toggle is hidden entirely. On
cloud, it remains visible but disabled with upgrade messaging.
On the backend, `inbound_emails` is added to the manually managed
features list in `InternalAttributesService` so that Stripe webhook plan
syncs don't override it when support enables it for an account.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
This updates macros and automations so agents can explicitly remove
assigned agents or teams, while keeping the existing `Assign -> None`
flow working for backward compatibility.
Fixes: #7551Closes: #7551
## Why
The original macro change exposed unassignment only through `Assign ->
None`, which made macros behave differently from automations and left
the explicit remove actions inconsistent across the product. This keeps
the lower-risk compatibility path and adds the explicit remove actions
requested in review.
## What this change does
- Adds `Remove Assigned Agent` and `Remove Assigned Team` as explicit
actions in macros.
- Adds the same explicit remove actions in automations.
- Keeps `Assign Agent -> None` and `Assign Team -> None` working for
existing behavior and stored payloads.
- Preserves backward compatibility for existing macro and automation
execution payloads.
- Downmerges the latest `develop` and resolves the conflicts while
keeping both the new remove actions and current `develop` behavior.
## Validation
- Verified both remove actions are available and selectable in the macro
editor.
- Verified both remove actions are available and selectable in the
automation builder.
- Applied a disposable macro with `Remove Assigned Agent` and `Remove
Assigned Team` on a real conversation and confirmed both fields were
cleared.
- Applied a disposable macro with `Assign Agent -> None` and `Assign
Team -> None` on a real conversation and confirmed both fields were
still cleared.
Update BulkSelectBar to compute selection state (indeterminate/all) from
visible item IDs and only toggle selection for visible items. Preserve
existing selection for off-screen items when toggling, and guard against
empty visibility. Add detection/rendering for an optional
secondary-actions slot and adjust layout/divider. Also fix
ContactsBulkActionBar selection logic to determine "all selected" by
verifying every visible ID is in the selection. These changes ensure
correct select-all behavior with filtered/visible lists and support
additional UI actions.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d06b78d1-a64a-4c0c-a82a-f870140236c7
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds inline editing support for contact name, phone number,
email, and company fields in the conversation contact sidebar
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
**Screencast**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e9f8e37d-145b-4736-b27a-eb9ea66847bd
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
### Description
This PR fixes an issue where the editor would reset content and move the
cursor while typing. The issue was caused by a dual debounce setup
(400ms + 2500ms) that saved content and then overwrote local state with
stale API responses while the user was still typing.
### What changed
* Editor now uses local state (`localTitle`, `localContent`) as the
source of truth while editing
* Vuex store is only used on initial load or navigation
* Replaced dual debounce with a single 500ms debounce (fewer API calls)
* `UPDATE_ARTICLE` now merges updates instead of replacing the article
* Prevents status changes from wiping unsaved content
* Removed `updateAsync` for a simpler update flow
### How it works
User types
→ local ref updates immediately (editor reads from this)
→ 500ms debounce triggers
→ dispatches `articles/update`
→ API persists the change
→ on success: store merges the response (used by other components)
→ editor remains unaffected (continues using local state)
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6727/better-syncing-of-content-the-editor-randomly-updates-the-content
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
1. Open any Help Center article for editing
2. Type continuously for a few seconds — content should not reset or
jump
3. Change article status (publish/archive/draft) while editing — content
should remain intact
4. Test on a slow network (use DevTools throttling) — typing should
remain smooth
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes, block inline images in message signatures and prevent
auto signature insertion when editor is disabled.
- Strip inline base64 images from signature on save and show warning
message
- Add `INLINE_IMAGE_WARNING` translation key for signature inline image
removal notification
- Add disabled check to `addSignature()` to prevent signature insertion
when editor is disabled
- Add `isEditorDisabled` checks to signature toggle logic in
`toggleSignatureForDraft()`, `replaceText()`, and `clearMessage()`
- Remove unused `replaceText` from the codebase, which belongs to old
`textarea` editor
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6588/the-browser-hangs-when-the-message-signature-contains-inline-image
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/fb556b46a12a4308a737eed732d5ed73
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Custom tools is now discoverable on all plans
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Before:
<img width="390" height="446" alt="CleanShot 2026-04-02 at 13 40 11@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0a751954-f3ad-47d6-85b8-1e2f1476a646"
/>
After:
<img width="392" height="522" alt="CleanShot 2026-04-02 at 13 40 47@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/62a252f6-2551-47a9-b50c-be949f08c456"
/>
<img width="1826" height="638" alt="CleanShot 2026-04-02 at 13 37 39@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/77dc2a75-3d76-44cf-8579-8d3457879bd0"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
Account webhooks sign outgoing payloads with HMAC-SHA256, but agent bot
and API inbox webhooks were delivered unsigned. This PR adds the same
signing to both.
Each model gets a dedicated `secret` column rather than reusing the
agent bot's `access_token` (for API auth back into Chatwoot) or the API
inbox's `hmac_token` (for inbound contact identity verification). These
serve different trust boundaries and shouldn't be coupled — rotating a
signing secret shouldn't invalidate API access or contact verification.
The existing `Webhooks::Trigger` already signs when a secret is present,
so the backend change is just passing `secret:` through to the jobs.
Shared token logic is extracted into a `WebhookSecretable` concern
included by `Webhook`, `AgentBot`, and `Channel::Api`. The frontend
reuses the existing `AccessToken` component for secret display. Secrets
are admin-only and excluded from enterprise audit logs.
### How to test
Point an agent bot or API inbox webhook URL at a request inspector. Send
a message and verify `X-Chatwoot-Signature` and `X-Chatwoot-Timestamp`
headers are present. Reset the secret from settings and confirm
subsequent deliveries use the new value.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
## Description
Two improvements to Agent Capacity Policy:
**1. Support exclusion via zero conversation limit**
Allow `conversation_limit` to be `0` on inbox capacity limits. Agents
with a zero limit are excluded from auto-assignment for that inbox while
remaining members for manual assignment.
**2. Fix exclusion rules duration input**
- Default changed from `10` to `null` so time-based exclusion isn't
applied unless explicitly set.
- Minimum lowered from 10 to 1 minute.
- `DurationInput` updated to handle `null` values correctly.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Added model and capacity service specs for zero-limit exclusion
behavior.
- Tested manually via UI flows
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Adds custom tool support to v1
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
<img width="1816" height="958" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-24 at 11 37 33@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2777a953-8b65-4a2d-88ec-39f395b3fb47"
/>
<img width="378" height="488" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-24 at 11 38 18@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f6973c99-efd0-40e4-90fe-4472a2f63cea"
/>
<img width="1884" height="1452" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-24 at 11 38
32@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9fba4fc4-0c33-46da-888a-52ec6bad6130"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
When `allowed_domains` is configured on a web widget inbox, the server
responds with Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors <domains>, which
blocks the widget iframe in mobile app WebViews. This happens because
WebViews load content from file:// or null origins, which cannot match
any domain in the frame-ancestors directive.
This adds a per-inbox toggle — "Enable widget in mobile apps" — that
skips the frame-ancestors header when the request has no valid Origin
(i.e., it comes from a mobile WebView). Web browsers with a real origin
still get domain restrictions enforced as usual.
<img width="2330" height="1490" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-11 at 10 13
01@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d9326fac-020d-4ce7-9ced-0c185468c8fc"
/>
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6560/widget-is-not-loading-from-iosandroid-widgets
How to test
1. Go to Settings → Inboxes → (Web Widget) → Configuration
2. Set allowed_domains to a specific domain (e.g., *.example.com)
3. Try loading the widget in a mobile app WebView — it should be blocked
4. Enable "Enable widget in mobile apps" checkbox
5. Reload the widget in the WebView — it should now load successfully
6. Verify the widget on a website not in the allowed domains list is
still blocked
---------
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
This adds a draft status for Help Center locales so teams can prepare
localized content in the dashboard without exposing those locales in the
public portal switcher until they are ready to publish.
Fixes: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/10412
Closes: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/10412
## Why
Teams need a way to work on locale-specific Help Center content ahead of
launch. The public portal should only show ready locales, while the
admin dashboard should continue to expose every allowed locale for
ongoing article and category work.
## What this change does
- Adds `draft_locales` to portal config as a subset of `allowed_locales`
- Hides drafted locales from the public portal language switchers while
keeping direct locale URLs working
- Keeps drafted locales fully visible in the admin dashboard for article
and category management
- Adds locale actions to move an existing locale to draft, publish a
drafted locale, and keep the default locale protected from drafting
- Adds a status dropdown when creating a locale so new locales can be
created as `Published` or `Draft`
- Returns each admin locale with a `draft` flag so the locale UI can
reflect the public visibility state
## Validation
- Seed a portal with multiple locales, draft one locale, and confirm the
public portal switcher hides it while `/hc/:slug/:locale` still loads
directly
- In the admin dashboard, confirm drafted locales still appear in the
locale list and remain selectable for articles and categories
- Create a new locale with `Draft` status and confirm it stays out of
the public switcher until published
- Move an existing locale back and forth between `Published` and `Draft`
and confirm the public switcher updates accordingly
## Demo
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ba22dc26-c2e7-463a-b1f5-adf1fda1f9be
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
## Description
Adds webhook configuration management for WhatsApp Cloud API channels,
allowing administrators to check webhook status and register webhooks
directly from Chatwoot without accessing Meta Business Manager.
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## Screenshots
<img width="1130" height="676" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-05 at 7 04 18 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f5dcd9dd-8827-42c5-a52b-1024012703c2"
/>
<img width="1101" height="651" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-05 at 7 04 29 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e0bd59f9-2a90-4f24-87c0-b79f21e721ee"
/>
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR fixes the console warning in development: `[Vue warn]: Missing
required prop: "name"` on the account settings page.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
**Screenshot**
<img width="599" height="1036" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b0b45854-4cfb-4fe7-ab14-c42a65c523df"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Summary
This PR enables and surfaces **conversation workflow** for social-style
channels that should support either:
- `Create new conversations` after resolve, or
- `Reopen same conversation`
## What is included
- Adds the conversation workflow setting UI as card-based options in
Inbox Settings.
- Expands channel availability in settings to include channels like:
- Telegram
- TikTok
- Instagram
- Line
- WhatsApp
- Facebook
- Updates conversation selection behavior for Line incoming messages to
respect the workflow (reopen vs create-new-after-resolved).
- Updates TikTok conversation selection behavior to respect the workflow
(reopen vs create-new-after-resolved).
- Keeps email behavior unchanged (always starts a new thread).
Fixes: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/8426
## Screenshot
<img width="1400" height="900" alt="pr11079-workflow-sender-clear-tight"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9456821f-8d83-4924-8dcf-7503c811a7b1"
/>
## How To Reproduce
1. Open `Settings -> Inboxes ->
<Telegram/TikTok/Instagram/Line/Facebook/WhatsApp inbox> -> Settings`.
2. Verify **Conversation workflow** is visible with the two card
options.
3. Toggle between both options and save.
4. For Line and TikTok, verify resolved-conversation behavior follows
the selected workflow.
## Testing
- `RAILS_ENV=test bundle exec rspec
spec/builders/messages/instagram/message_builder_spec.rb:213
spec/builders/messages/instagram/message_builder_spec.rb:255
spec/builders/messages/instagram/messenger/message_builder_spec.rb:228
spec/builders/messages/instagram/messenger/message_builder_spec.rb:293
spec/services/tiktok/message_service_spec.rb`
- Result: `16 examples, 0 failures`
## Follow-up
- Migrate Website Live Chat workflow settings into this same
conversation-workflow settings model.
- Add Voice channel support for this workflow setting.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
CSAT templates for WhatsApp are submitted as Utility, but Meta may
reclassify them as Marketing based on content, which can significantly
increase messaging costs.
This PR introduces a Captain-powered CSAT template analyzer for
WhatsApp/Twilio WhatsApp that predicts utility fit, explains likely
risks, and suggests safer rewrites before submission. The flow is manual
(button-triggered), Captain-gated, and applies rewrites only on explicit
user action. It also updates UX copy to clearly set expectations: the
system submits as Utility, Meta makes the final categorization decision.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6424/ai-powered-whatsapp-template-classifier-for-csat-submissionshttps://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8fd1d6db-2f91-447c-9771-3de271b16fd9
## Summary
This change fixes a mismatch in contact details where Telegram data
could be shown in the contact profile/social icon area but was not
available in the editable contact form.
### What changed
- Added Telegram to the social links section of the next-gen contact
form so agents can view and edit it alongside Facebook, Instagram,
TikTok, Twitter, GitHub, and LinkedIn.
- Added Telegram support to the legacy conversation contact edit form
for parity between both contact editing experiences.
- Mapped social_telegram_user_name into the editable socialProfiles
payload when preparing contact form state, so Telegram usernames sourced
from channel attributes are visible in the form.
- Updated the conversation contact social profile merge logic so
Telegram display prefers an explicitly saved social profile value and
falls back to social_telegram_user_name when needed.
- Added the missing English i18n placeholder: Add Telegram.
### Why
Without this, users could see Telegram info in some contact views but
could not reliably edit it in contact details, creating inconsistent
behavior between display and edit states.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes,
1. Adjusting the inbox settings page layout width from 3xl to 4xl for
the collaborators, configuration, and bot configuration sections.
2. Adding a dynamic max-width for inbox settings banners based on the
selected tab.
3. Making the sender name preview layout responsive.
4. Reordering automation rule row buttons so Clone appears before
Delete.
5. Update the Gmail icon ratio.
6. Fix height issues with team/inbox pages
7. The delete button changes to red on hover
8. Add border to conversation header when no dashboard apps present
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR updates settings page UI
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Linear Ticket:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6081/review-feedback
## Description
Assignment V2 Service Enhancements
- Enable Assignment V2 on plan upgrade
- Fix UI issue with fair distribution policy display
- Add advanced assignment feature flag and enhance Assignment V2
capabilities
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
This has been tested using the UI.
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> **Medium Risk**
> Changes auto-assignment execution paths, rate limiting defaults, and
feature-flag gating (including premium plan behavior), which could
affect which conversations get assigned and when. UI rewires inbox
settings and policy flows, so regressions are possible around
navigation/linking and feature visibility.
>
> **Overview**
> **Adds a new premium `advanced_assignment` feature flag** and uses it
to gate capacity/balanced assignment features in the UI (sidebar entry,
settings routes, assignment-policy landing cards) and backend
(Enterprise balanced selector + capacity filtering).
`advanced_assignment` is marked premium, included in Business plan
entitlements, and auto-synced in Enterprise accounts when
`assignment_v2` is toggled.
>
> **Improves Assignment V2 policy UX** by adding an inbox-level
“Conversation Assignment” section (behind `assignment_v2`) that can
link/unlink an assignment policy, navigate to create/edit policy flows
with `inboxId` query context, and show an inbox-link prompt after
creating a policy. The policy form now defaults to enabled, disables the
`balanced` option with a premium badge/message when unavailable, and
inbox lists support click-to-navigate.
>
> **Tightens/adjusts auto-assignment behavior**: bulk assignment now
requires `inbox.enable_auto_assignment?`, conversation ordering uses the
attached `assignment_policy` priority, and rate limiting uses
`assignment_policy` config with an infinite default limit while still
tracking assignments. Tests and i18n strings are updated accordingly.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
23bc03bf75ee4376071e4d7fc7cd564c601d33d7. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
For large accounts, summary report queries can take several seconds to
complete, often times hitting the 15-second production request timeout.
The existing implementation silently swallows these failures and
provides no feedback during loading. Users see stale data with no
indication that a fetch is in progress, and if they interact with
filters while a request is in flight, they trigger race conditions that
can result in mismatched data being displayed.
This is a UX-level fix for what is fundamentally a performance problem.
While the underlying query performance is addressed separately, users
need proper feedback either way
## Approach
The PR adds three things:
1. A loading overlay on the table, to provide feedback on loading state
2. Disabled filter inputs during loading so that the user does not
request new information that can cause race conditions in updating the
store
3. Silent retry before showing an error.
The retry exists because these queries often succeed on the second
attempt—likely due to database query caching. Rather than immediately
showing an error and forcing the user to manually retry, we do it
automatically. If the second attempt also fails, we show a toast so the
user knows something went wrong.
The store previously caught and discarded errors entirely. It now
rethrows them after resetting the loading flag, allowing components to
handle failures as they see fit.
### Previews
#### Double Retry and Error
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c189b173-8017-44b7-9493-417d65582c95
#### Loading State
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9f899c20-fbad-469b-93cc-f0d05d0853b0
---------
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
