Comprehensive update to Traditional Chinese (Taiwan) translations. As a
native zh-TW speaker and active user based in Taiwan, I found the
existing translations were quite incomplete (~54% overall) with many
strings still in English. Some existing translations also used
Simplified Chinese terms or unnatural phrasing.
I chose to submit this as a direct PR rather than going through Crowdin
because working through all the files at once is much faster and lets me
ensure consistent terminology across the entire locale.
Closes#14003
## What changed
**Backend (`config/locales/zh_TW.yml`)**
- Translated all ~259 previously untranslated strings (was ~19%
complete, now 100%)
- Covers: error messages, notifications, activity logs, integration
descriptions, Captain AI, public portal, reports
**Frontend (42 JSON files under `dashboard/i18n/locale/zh_TW/`)**
- Translated ~2,627 previously untranslated strings (was ~50% complete,
now ~100%)
- Most impacted files: `inboxMgmt.json`, `integrations.json`,
`settings.json`, `conversation.json`, `contact.json`, `report.json`
**Quality fixes across all files**
- Replaced Simplified Chinese terms mixed into zh-TW: 账→帳, 获→取得, 模板→範本,
收件箱→收件匣, 重置→重設, 自定義→自訂
- Standardized terminology for consistency: 客服人員 (agent), 延後 (snooze),
稽核 (audit), 巨集 (macro)
- Fixed incorrect translations (e.g., audit log table headers were
swapped, availability label was wrong)
## How to test
1. Set account/user language to 中文（台灣）
2. Navigate through the dashboard — settings, inbox management,
integrations, reports, conversations
3. Verify strings display in natural Traditional Chinese with no
remaining English gaps
4. Check that all placeholders (names, counts, dates) render correctly
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes, block inline images in message signatures and prevent
auto signature insertion when editor is disabled.
- Strip inline base64 images from signature on save and show warning
message
- Add `INLINE_IMAGE_WARNING` translation key for signature inline image
removal notification
- Add disabled check to `addSignature()` to prevent signature insertion
when editor is disabled
- Add `isEditorDisabled` checks to signature toggle logic in
`toggleSignatureForDraft()`, `replaceText()`, and `clearMessage()`
- Remove unused `replaceText` from the codebase, which belongs to old
`textarea` editor
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6588/the-browser-hangs-when-the-message-signature-contains-inline-image
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/fb556b46a12a4308a737eed732d5ed73
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Previously, signing up gave immediate access to the app. Now,
unconfirmed users are redirected to a verification page where they can
resend the confirmation email.
- After signup, the user is routed to `/auth/verify-email` instead of
the dashboard
- After login, unconfirmed users are redirected to the verification page
- The dashboard route guard catches unconfirmed users and redirects them
- `active_for_authentication?` is removed from the sessions controller
so unconfirmed users can authenticate — the frontend gates access
instead
- If the user visits the verification page after already confirming,
they're automatically redirected to the dashboard
- No session is issued until the user is verified
<details><summary>Demo</summary>
<p>
#### Fresh Signup
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/abb735e5-7c8e-44a2-801c-96d9e4823e51
#### Google Fresh Signup
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ab9e389a-a604-4a9d-b492-219e6d94ee3f
#### Create new account from Dashboard
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c456690d-1946-4e0b-834b-ad8efcea8369
</p>
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Custom tools is now discoverable on all plans
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Before:
<img width="390" height="446" alt="CleanShot 2026-04-02 at 13 40 11@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0a751954-f3ad-47d6-85b8-1e2f1476a646"
/>
After:
<img width="392" height="522" alt="CleanShot 2026-04-02 at 13 40 47@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/62a252f6-2551-47a9-b50c-be949f08c456"
/>
<img width="1826" height="638" alt="CleanShot 2026-04-02 at 13 37 39@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/77dc2a75-3d76-44cf-8579-8d3457879bd0"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
Account webhooks sign outgoing payloads with HMAC-SHA256, but agent bot
and API inbox webhooks were delivered unsigned. This PR adds the same
signing to both.
Each model gets a dedicated `secret` column rather than reusing the
agent bot's `access_token` (for API auth back into Chatwoot) or the API
inbox's `hmac_token` (for inbound contact identity verification). These
serve different trust boundaries and shouldn't be coupled — rotating a
signing secret shouldn't invalidate API access or contact verification.
The existing `Webhooks::Trigger` already signs when a secret is present,
so the backend change is just passing `secret:` through to the jobs.
Shared token logic is extracted into a `WebhookSecretable` concern
included by `Webhook`, `AgentBot`, and `Channel::Api`. The frontend
reuses the existing `AccessToken` component for secret display. Secrets
are admin-only and excluded from enterprise audit logs.
### How to test
Point an agent bot or API inbox webhook URL at a request inspector. Send
a message and verify `X-Chatwoot-Signature` and `X-Chatwoot-Timestamp`
headers are present. Reset the secret from settings and confirm
subsequent deliveries use the new value.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
## Description
Two improvements to Agent Capacity Policy:
**1. Support exclusion via zero conversation limit**
Allow `conversation_limit` to be `0` on inbox capacity limits. Agents
with a zero limit are excluded from auto-assignment for that inbox while
remaining members for manual assignment.
**2. Fix exclusion rules duration input**
- Default changed from `10` to `null` so time-based exclusion isn't
applied unless explicitly set.
- Minimum lowered from 10 to 1 minute.
- `DurationInput` updated to handle `null` values correctly.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Added model and capacity service specs for zero-limit exclusion
behavior.
- Tested manually via UI flows
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
### Description
When integrating the web widget via the JS SDK, customers call
setConversationCustomAttributes and setLabel on chatwoot:ready — before
any conversation exists. These API calls silently fail because the
backend endpoints require an existing conversation. When the visitor
sends their first message, the conversation is created without those
attributes/labels, so the message_created webhook payload is missing the
expected metadata.
This change queues SDK-set conversation custom attributes and labels in
the widget store when no conversation exists yet, and includes them in
the API request when the first message (or attachment) creates the
conversation. The backend now permits and applies these params during
conversation creation — before the message is saved and webhooks fire.
### How to test
1. Configure a web widget without a pre-chat form.
2. Open the widget on a test page and run the following in the browser
console after chatwoot:ready:
`window.$chatwoot.setConversationCustomAttributes({ plan: 'enterprise'
});`
`window.$chatwoot.setLabel('vip');` // must be a label that exists in
the account
3. Send the first message from the widget.
4. Verify in the Chatwoot dashboard that the conversation has plan:
enterprise in custom attributes and the vip label applied.
5. Set up a webhook subscriber for `message_created` confirm the first
payload includes the conversation metadata.
6. Verify that calling `setConversationCustomAttributes` / `setLabel` on
an existing conversation still works as before (direct API path, no
regression).
7. Verify the pre-chat form flow still works as expected.
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Adds custom tool support to v1
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
<img width="1816" height="958" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-24 at 11 37 33@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2777a953-8b65-4a2d-88ec-39f395b3fb47"
/>
<img width="378" height="488" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-24 at 11 38 18@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f6973c99-efd0-40e4-90fe-4472a2f63cea"
/>
<img width="1884" height="1452" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-24 at 11 38
32@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9fba4fc4-0c33-46da-888a-52ec6bad6130"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR fixes the white background bleed visible in the widget, widget
article viewer and help center when dark mode is active.
**What was happening**
While scrolling, the `<body>` element retained a white background in
dark mode. This occurred because dark mode classes were only applied to
inner container elements, not the root.
**What changed**
* **Widget:** Updated the `useDarkMode` composable to sync the `dark`
class to `<html>` using `watchEffect`, allowing `<body>` to inherit dark
theme variables. Also added background styles to `html`, `body`, and
`#app` in `woot.scss`.
* **Help center portal:** Moved `bg-white dark:bg-slate-900` from
`<main>` to `<body>` in the portal layout so the entire page background
responds correctly to dark mode, including within the widget iframe.
* **ArticleViewer:** Replaced hardcoded `bg-white` with `bg-n-solid-1`
to ensure better theming.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6704/widget-body-colour-not-implemented
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screencasts
### Before
**Widget**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e0224ad1-81a6-440a-a824-e115fb806728
**Help center**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/40a8ded5-5360-474d-9ec5-fd23e037c845
### After
**Widget**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dd37cc68-99fc-4d60-b2ae-cf41f9d4d38c
**Help center**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bc998c4e-ef77-46fa-ac7f-4ea16d912ce3
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR fixes
1. Messages being trimmed to the default 1024 limit in `trimContent`
method, instead of channel-specific limits for drafts and AI tasks.
2. Telegram messages are allowed up to 10,000 characters in config, but
the API supports only 4096, causing failures for oversized messages.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6694/captain-ai-rewrite-tasks-truncate-draft-to-1024-chars-trimcontenthttps://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13919
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
**Before**
https://www.loom.com/share/00e9d6b4d19247febf35dffa99da3805
**After**
https://www.loom.com/share/c4900e9effc345c79bcd8a5aa1ee277b
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds support to auto-focus the editor when clicking reply to
this message, the editor now automatically receives focus so users can
start typing immediately.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6661/typing-box-not-focused-after-clicking-reply-to-message
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screencast
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c5e77055-3f68-4ad8-934e-cfc465166e8a
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Captain v1 does not have access to contact attributes. Added a toggle to
let user choose if they want contact information available to Captain.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
Specs and locally
<img width="1924" height="740" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-19 at 18 48 19@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/353cfeaa-cd58-40eb-89e7-d660a1dc1185"
/>
![Uploading CleanShot 2026-03-19 at 18.53.26@2x.png…]()
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Description
Add missing JSON imports and spread exports for `companies`,
`contentTemplates`, `mfa`, `snooze`, `webhooks`, and `yearInReview` so
these translations are properly loaded in the pt_BR locale. Without
these imports, those sections of the UI were falling back to English for
Brazilian Portuguese users.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
