# Pull Request Template
## Description
Fixes: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13880
Uses approaches discussed from:
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/13883
Activity messages pertaining to resolve are included along with an
instruction for the LLM to choose whether to consider them or not along
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
locally and with specs
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
Contact custom attributes filled in the pre-chat form (e.g. a CPF field)
were silently lost when the visitor's email or phone matched an existing
contact. The widget sent the attributes in a separate request that raced
the conversation create: creating the conversation merges the widget
contact into the existing contact, so the attribute update landed on the
destroyed contact and vanished without an error. New visitors were
unaffected, which made the bug hard to spot.
The fix sends contact custom attributes inside the same request that
identifies the contact. The widget conversation create endpoint now
accepts `contact.custom_attributes` and applies them through
`ContactIdentifyAction` in the same transaction as the merge, so the
submitted values always land on the surviving contact. The campaign path
folds the attributes into the existing contact update call the same way.
<details>
<summary>Reproduction script (rails runner, concurrent
threads)</summary>
```ruby
# Concurrent reproduction of the pre-chat form race that loses contact
# custom attributes when the visitor's email matches an existing contact.
#
# The old widget fired two unawaited requests on pre-chat submit. Each
# iteration replays them as real concurrent threads:
# - create thread = POST /widget/conversations: resolves the widget contact,
# then runs ContactIdentifyAction (which merges the widget contact into the
# existing contact) inside a transaction held open while the conversation
# and message are created.
# - patch thread = PATCH /widget/contact: resolves the widget contact via its
# contact inbox and applies the custom attributes through
# ContactIdentifyAction, exactly like Widget::ContactsController#update.
#
# Run with: bundle exec rails runner confirm_prechat_race.rb
# Creates throwaway contacts on Account.first and deletes them afterwards.
ITERATIONS = 20
CPF = '123.456.789-09'.freeze
account = Account.first!
inbox = account.inboxes.first!
losses = 0
ITERATIONS.times do |i|
existing = account.contacts.create!(name: 'Existing Contact', email: "race-existing-#{SecureRandom.hex(6)}@example.com")
temp = account.contacts.create!(name: 'Widget Visitor')
contact_inbox = ContactInbox.create!(contact: temp, inbox: inbox, source_id: SecureRandom.uuid)
begin
create_request = Thread.new do
ActiveRecord::Base.connection_pool.with_connection do
widget_contact = ContactInbox.find(contact_inbox.id).contact # set_contact before_action
ActiveRecord::Base.transaction do
ContactIdentifyAction.new(
contact: widget_contact,
params: { email: existing.email, phone_number: nil, name: 'Widget Visitor' },
retain_original_contact_name: true,
discard_invalid_attrs: true
).perform
sleep(0.02) # conversation + message creation keeps the transaction open
end
end
end
patch_request = Thread.new do
ActiveRecord::Base.connection_pool.with_connection do
sleep(rand * 0.02) # network jitter between the two requests
widget_contact = ContactInbox.find(contact_inbox.id).contact # set_contact before_action
ContactIdentifyAction.new(
contact: widget_contact,
params: { custom_attributes: { cpf: CPF } },
discard_invalid_attrs: true
).perform
end
end
create_request.join
patch_request.join
survivor = existing.reload
if survivor.custom_attributes['cpf'] == CPF
puts "iteration #{i + 1}: CPF survived"
else
losses += 1
puts "iteration #{i + 1}: CPF LOST (survivor custom_attributes: #{survivor.custom_attributes.inspect})"
end
ensure
account.contacts.where(id: [existing.id, temp.id]).find_each(&:destroy!)
end
end
puts
puts "#{losses}/#{ITERATIONS} iterations lost the CPF -- race #{losses.positive? ? 'confirmed' : 'not reproduced in this run'}"
```
Result: **20/20 iterations lose the CPF** (consistent across repeated
runs). The conversation create holds its transaction open across the
contact merge, so the fast attribute update either resolves the
soon-to-be-destroyed widget contact or blocks on its row lock and then
updates 0 rows — silently, with no error. This is why the customer sees
the loss every time, not intermittently.
Note: the script replays the old two-request flow at the service layer,
so it reproduces the loss even with this fix applied — the fix works by
removing the second request from the widget, not by changing the raced
code paths. The new request spec (`saves contact custom attributes on
the surviving contact when merged into an existing contact`) covers the
fixed contract.
</details>
## Closes
- Reported via support conversation:
https://app.chatwoot.com/app/accounts/1/conversations/84465
## How to reproduce
1. Create a website inbox with a pre-chat form that has a contact custom
attribute field (e.g. CPF).
2. Create a contact with a known email address.
3. As a visitor, open the widget and fill the pre-chat form using that
same email plus a value for the custom attribute.
4. Before: the attribute never appears on the contact profile. After: it
is saved on the existing contact, overwriting any stale value.
## What changed
- `POST /api/v1/widget/conversations` now permits
`contact.custom_attributes` and passes it to `ContactIdentifyAction`,
which deep-merges it atomically with the contact merge.
- The widget pre-chat form sends contact custom attributes inside the
conversation create payload instead of a separate `setCustomAttributes`
call; the campaign path includes them in the `contacts/update` payload.
## Description
The widget contact update endpoint (`PATCH /api/v1/widget/contact`)
applied updates that set an `identifier` without validating the
`identifier_hash`, unlike `set_user`, which already does. This change
runs the same validation on the update path whenever an `identifier` is
supplied, keeping identity validation consistent across the widget
contact endpoints.
Anonymous updates that don't pass an identifier (prechat
name/email/phone and custom attributes) keep working unchanged,
including on inboxes with mandatory identity validation.
Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7118
---------
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Dyte is sunsetting its existing infrastructure after the Cloudflare
acquisition, so this migrates Chatwoot’s video call integration to
Cloudflare RealtimeKit.
The integration now uses Cloudflare Account ID, RealtimeKit App ID, and
a Cloudflare API token with Realtime Admin permissions. Meeting creation
and participant token generation now call Cloudflare’s RealtimeKit APIs,
while the existing Chatwoot call experience remains unchanged for agents
and customers.
This also adds setup-time credential validation, so admins get clearer
errors when the API token is invalid, the Cloudflare account or
permissions are incorrect, or the RealtimeKit App ID does not belong to
the selected account.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-176/migrate-dyte-integration-to-cloudflare-realtimekit
**How to test**
1. Go to Settings → Integrations → Cloudflare RealtimeKit.
2. Add a Cloudflare Account ID, RealtimeKit App ID, and API token with
Realtime Admin permissions.
3. Confirm the integration saves successfully with valid credentials.
4. Try invalid credentials and confirm the error identifies whether the
token, account/permissions, or app ID is wrong.
5. Start a video call from a conversation and confirm the RealtimeKit
meeting opens.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
### Description
When integrating the web widget via the JS SDK, customers call
setConversationCustomAttributes and setLabel on chatwoot:ready — before
any conversation exists. These API calls silently fail because the
backend endpoints require an existing conversation. When the visitor
sends their first message, the conversation is created without those
attributes/labels, so the message_created webhook payload is missing the
expected metadata.
This change queues SDK-set conversation custom attributes and labels in
the widget store when no conversation exists yet, and includes them in
the API request when the first message (or attachment) creates the
conversation. The backend now permits and applies these params during
conversation creation — before the message is saved and webhooks fire.
### How to test
1. Configure a web widget without a pre-chat form.
2. Open the widget on a test page and run the following in the browser
console after chatwoot:ready:
`window.$chatwoot.setConversationCustomAttributes({ plan: 'enterprise'
});`
`window.$chatwoot.setLabel('vip');` // must be a label that exists in
the account
3. Send the first message from the widget.
4. Verify in the Chatwoot dashboard that the conversation has plan:
enterprise in custom attributes and the vip label applied.
5. Set up a webhook subscriber for `message_created` confirm the first
payload includes the conversation metadata.
6. Verify that calling `setConversationCustomAttributes` / `setLabel` on
an existing conversation still works as before (direct API path, no
regression).
7. Verify the pre-chat form flow still works as expected.
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Dyte V1 API's are soon going to be deprecated, hence making sure we
update Chatwoot before that happens
Fixes#10704
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
1. Open a new or existing conversation from the inbox
2. Press the video call icon on the message composer
3. Verify that the message dialog shows up with the join video call
button
4. Verify that clicking on join call does join the call
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes (Unable
to run this locally)
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
The `before_type_cast` method sometimes returns a string for
`message_type`, creating inconsistencies in different payloads. This
pull request will remove all `before_type_cast` usage and replace it
with `to_i` methods.
* refactor: use has_email instead of email
* feat: remove usage of details directly in forms
* test: update payload
* test: fix transcript test
* refactor: use computed hasEmail
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
- Mark all messages as read by providing the conversation ID and timestamp.
- For Instagram, ensure all previous messages that weren't marked as failed are now marked as read. This is because the read events are only triggered for the most recent message and not for any previous ones.
Currently, if Enable email collect box is enabled, and the user starting the chat already has an account with the same email, it will override the current account with {name} from the email name@email.com , this fixes it.
Co-authored-by: Sojan <sojan@pepalo.com>
At present, the websocket pubsub tokens are present at the contact objects in chatwoot. A better approach would be to have these tokens at the contact_inbox object instead. This helps chatwoot to deliver the websocket events targetted to the specific widget connection, stop contact events from leaking into other chat sessions from the same contact.
Fixes#1682Fixes#1664
Co-authored-by: Pranav Raj S <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
