Commit Graph
1726 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Shivam MishraandGitHub 3d20a7b049 feat: generate Help Center for Onboarding (#14370)
## Manually triggering help center generation

Open a Rails console (`bundle exec rails console`):

```ruby
account = Account.find(<ACCOUNT_ID>)
user    = account.users.first

# Optional: refresh brand info from the customer's website
domain = 'example.com'
result = WebsiteBrandingService.new("noreply@#{domain}").perform
account.update!(
  name: result[:title].presence || account.name,
  custom_attributes: account.custom_attributes.merge('website' => domain, 'brand_info' => result)
)

# Optional: wipe existing portals so a fresh one is created
account.portals.destroy_all

Onboarding::HelpCenterCreationService.new(account, user).perform
```

Sidekiq must be running — articles are written by
`Onboarding::HelpCenterArticleGenerationJob`. Avoid running on
production; generation calls the LLM provider.


### Generation flow (Happy Path) 

```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
    autonumber

    participant Kickoff as HelpCenterCreationService
    participant DB as DB
    participant GenJob as HelpCenterArticleGenerationJob
    participant Curator as HelpCenterCurator
    participant Firecrawl as Firecrawl
    participant CuratorLLM as Curation LLM
    participant Redis as Redis Progress
    participant WriterJob as HelpCenterArticleWriterJob
    participant Builder as HelpCenterArticleBuilder
    participant WriterLLM as Writer LLM
    participant Cable as ActionCable

    Kickoff->>DB: Create portal for account<br/>homepage_link=https://chatwoot.com
    Kickoff->>DB: Attach brand logo if available
    Kickoff->>GenJob: Enqueue generation job<br/>account_id, portal_id, user_id, generation_id

    GenJob->>Curator: Curate help center plan
    Curator->>Firecrawl: map https://chatwoot.com<br/>search: docs help support faq
    Firecrawl-->>Curator: Return discovered links
    Curator->>CuratorLLM: Select categories + article plans<br/>from discovered links only
    CuratorLLM-->>Curator: Return categories, articles, allowed_urls

    GenJob->>DB: Create portal categories
    GenJob->>GenJob: Stamp articles with category_id
    GenJob->>GenJob: Filter article URLs against allowed_urls
    GenJob->>GenJob: Drop articles with no category<br/>or no approved source URLs

    GenJob->>Redis: Start progress<br/>status=generating, total=N, finished=0

    loop For each approved article
      GenJob->>WriterJob: Enqueue writer job<br/>title, category_id, approved URLs
    end

    par Writer jobs run independently
      WriterJob->>Builder: Build article from approved URLs
      Builder->>Firecrawl: batch_scrape approved URLs
      Firecrawl-->>Builder: Return Markdown source pages
      Builder->>WriterLLM: Rewrite sources into one article
      WriterLLM-->>Builder: Return title, description, Markdown content
      Builder->>DB: Create draft portal article<br/>meta.source_urls
      WriterJob->>Redis: Increment finished count
      WriterJob->>Cable: Broadcast help_center.article_generated
    end

    WriterJob->>Redis: If finished >= total<br/>mark status=completed
    WriterJob->>Cable: Broadcast help_center.generation_completed
```

### Redis State Management

```mermaid
 stateDiagram-v2
    [*] --> active_pointer_set
    active_pointer_set --> generating: generation job creates valid plan
    active_pointer_set --> skipped: curation skipped/failed

    generating --> generating: each writer job increments finished
    generating --> completed: finished == total
    generating --> ignored_completion: generation_id superseded

    skipped --> [*]
    completed --> [*]
    ignored_completion --> [*]
```
2026-05-21 16:25:01 +05:30
Tanmay Deep SharmaandGitHub 3cd8cf43ce fix: atomically claim conversation to prevent duplicate assignment (#14495)
## Description

Fixes a bug under Assignment V2 where a single conversation could be
reassigned dozens of times in a row by the system, producing long stacks
of "Assigned to X by Automation System via <policy>" activity messages
alternating between agents. After this change each unassigned
conversation is assigned exactly once, even on busy inboxes.

## Fixes # (issue)


## Type of change

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

## How to reproduce
1. Enable `assignment_v2` on an account with at least 2 online agents in
an inbox.
2. Generate sustained resolve/snooze activity in the inbox (each one
enqueues `AutoAssignment::AssignmentJob` for the whole inbox).
3. Watch any one unassigned conversation while the jobs drain — pre-fix
it picks up multiple back-to-back "Assigned to …" activity rows
alternating between agents.


## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-05-21 16:14:28 +05:30
f33e469e9a feat: Unread Count: Frontend changes for showing unread count badges (3/3)[CW-6851] (#14372)
# Pull Request Template

## Description
This is the third and final PR in a series of PRs for Introducing unread
counts in the sidebar for inboxes and labels.

In this PR:
* Added frontend changes to show the badges for unread counts for
Inboxes and Labels
* Added specs for the changes

Issue:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6851/support-unread-conversation-counts



## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update

## How Has This Been Tested?

Tested this locally. Cases to test:
* Send a message from the widget and see if the count changes
* Mark a conversation as unread and see the count change for inbox
* Open an unread conversation as agent and see the count go down
* Add a label to an unread conversation from sidebar right click action
without opening the conversation and see the count of un-reads on the
label change

Added the screenshot of how it will look like

<img width="614" height="990" alt="Screenshot 2026-05-05 at 7 00 11 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/99fbaa9f-bcf2-4d8d-86e2-5727f652a9dd"
/>



## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2026-05-20 19:21:25 +05:30
27f2c2b392 feat: Unread Count: added api, store refresher, invalidation and events (2/3)[CW-6851] (#14369)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

This is the second PR in a series of PRs for Introducing unread counts
in the sidebar for inboxes and labels.

In this PR:

* added api for unread counts 
* Added the store refresher and invalidation with event listeners
* Added action cable event
* Added specs for the changes

Issue:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6851/support-unread-conversation-counts

## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2026-05-20 17:36:09 +05:30
40deaef458 feat: Store WhatsApp BSUID identifiers from inbound webhooks (#14436)
Adds storage support for WhatsApp business-scoped user identifiers
received from Meta Cloud API and Twilio WhatsApp webhooks. The change
keeps existing phone-based behavior intact, stores BSUID and parent
BSUID values as additional `contact_inboxes.source_id` rows for the same
contact, and allows BSUID-only inbound messages to create contacts,
conversations, and messages without requiring a phone number.

Related: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13837

**What changed**
- Extended WhatsApp source ID validation to accept regular BSUID and
parent BSUID formats.
- For Meta Cloud API, stores phone, `user_id`, and `parent_user_id`
identifiers as contact inbox source IDs when they are present.
- For Twilio WhatsApp, stores phone, `ExternalUserId`, and
`ParentExternalUserId` identifiers as contact inbox source IDs while
preserving the existing `whatsapp:` Twilio source ID shape.
- Supports BSUID-only inbound messages by creating a contact, contact
inbox, conversation, and message even when the phone number is missing.
- Links phone-first and later BSUID-only messages to the same contact
when the first payload contains both phone and BSUID.
- Stores WhatsApp usernames in contact `additional_attributes`, matching
existing social channel patterns.
- Keeps existing phone-based outbound and new-conversation behavior
unchanged for this milestone.

**How to test**
1. Send a Meta Cloud webhook payload with both `wa_id` and `user_id`.
2. Verify Chatwoot creates or finds the phone `contact_inbox` and also
creates a BSUID `contact_inbox` for the same contact.
3. Send a later Meta Cloud payload for the same user with only `user_id`
/ `from_user_id`.
4. Verify Chatwoot finds the BSUID `contact_inbox` and creates the
inbound message without requiring a phone number.
5. Send a Twilio WhatsApp webhook with `From: whatsapp:+E164`,
`ExternalUserId`, and optionally `ParentExternalUserId`.
6. Verify Chatwoot stores the Twilio phone and BSUID identifiers as
`whatsapp:`-prefixed source IDs for the same contact.
7. Send a Twilio WhatsApp webhook where `From` is `whatsapp:<BSUID>` and
there is no phone number.
8. Verify Chatwoot creates the contact, contact inbox, conversation, and
message without a phone number.

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-20 13:36:43 +04:00
3fae800936 feat: base layer for unread counts (store, counter and builder) (1/3)[CW-6851] (#14368)
## Description

This is the first PR in a series of PRs for Introducing unread counts in
the sidebar for inboxes and labels.

In this PR:

* Added the unread store, counter and builder modules
* Added redis keys for unread count management
* Added specs for all 3 modules, some specs are for testing enterprise
only feature like specific roles and permissions which are added in the
respective enterprise folder itself.

**Note**
None of this changes affect anything else and nothing is wired to
existing modules.

Issue:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6851/support-unread-conversation-counts

## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2026-05-20 14:26:21 +05:30
Sivin VargheseandGitHub bca95efb82 feat: add image resize support in articles (#14293) 2026-05-19 19:34:43 +05:30
6560dbb68d feat: Add an option on the dashboard to allow switching help center layout (#14491)
<img width="633" height="431" alt="Screenshot 2026-05-18 at 12 32 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/682d4c5f-4c76-465b-8d2f-92fbc2bb2a40"
/>

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
2026-05-19 06:42:48 -07:00
64585faff0 feat: Add a documentation layout design for public help center portal (#14403)
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fc4d15f9-2b54-4627-940f-94772ec739b1

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-18 12:30:08 -07:00
1d2f3e86dd feat(companies): track company last activity (#14435)
Tracks company recency from linked contact activity so the Companies
list and detail page can show/sort by real customer engagement instead
of generic record updates.

## Closes

None.

## Why

Company recency should reflect activity from people associated with the
company. This keeps the signal tied to persisted contact activity,
without treating passive online presence or widget heartbeat pings as
company activity.

## What Changed

- Adds a company helper to record `last_activity_at` from linked contact
activity.
- Rolls up `Contact#last_activity_at` changes to the associated company.
- Initializes company activity when an already-active contact is
associated with a company, including the business-email auto-association
path.
- Throttles company activity rollups to once every 5 minutes per company
to avoid unnecessary writes during active conversations.
- Treats company activity as monotonic: unlinking, moving, or deleting
contacts does not move a company's activity timestamp backwards.
- Leaves historical backfill, online presence tracking, widget visit
tracking, and richer activity attribution out of scope.

## How to Test

1. Open an account with Companies enabled and visit the Companies list.
2. Trigger activity for a contact that belongs to a company, for example
by receiving or sending a message in that contact's conversation.
3. Confirm the linked company shows a recent activity timestamp in the
Companies list/detail page after the contact activity updates.
4. Associate an already-active contact with a company and confirm the
company receives that contact's existing activity timestamp.
5. Confirm repeated contact activity within a short window does not
continuously rewrite the company timestamp.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-18 15:01:05 +05:30
3253e863ed fix: validate OpenAI hook credentials (#14068)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

- Validates openai key while configuring hooks
- added backfill logic

Fixes # (issue)

## Type of change

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)


## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
locally

<img width="1710" height="1234" alt="CleanShot 2026-04-15 at 16 15
02@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3d319fe0-19f9-4fd0-9308-74987daac2e1"
/>

<img width="2884" height="1136" alt="CleanShot 2026-05-11 at 19 22
53@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5eae8650-985b-4c4a-af42-35f7175ff52d"
/>



## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com>
2026-05-18 14:08:57 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 059d840272 feat: Refresh llm settings when superadmin configs change [AI-151] (#14388)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

fixes:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/AI-151/captains-super-admin-config-dont-get-applied-into-rails-without

## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)


## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
specs and locally

To test locally: 
go to super admin -> settings -> captain -> Change endpoint to something
incorrect
go to local app -> captain -> playground -> try chatting (should fail
due to incorrect endpoint)

now in super admin captain settings, set the correct endpoint then chat
in playground. Now it should work.

Current develop code doesn't reflect the changes in installation config
for captain instantly, needs a server restart.

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-05-18 14:08:26 +05:30
b8deb89613 fix: make SAML callback session independent (#14467)
This PR makes SAML login independent of Rails session cookies

## Problem

The normal SAML login flow should be straightforward:

- User opens Chatwoot.
- Chatwoot creates `_chatwoot_session`.
- User starts SSO.
- Chatwoot redirects the browser to the SAML provider.
- The provider authenticates the user.
- The provider sends the browser back to Chatwoot's ACS URL.
- Chatwoot reads the SAML response, finds or creates the user, and logs
them in.

The fragile step is the ACS callback. Most SSO flows return to the app
through browser redirects where cookies usually pass through as
expected. **ADFS commonly returns the SAML response with a cross-site
POST**. With Chatwoot's session cookie using `SameSite=Lax`, browsers
may not send `_chatwoot_session` on that POST.

SAML validation itself does not need the old Rails session cookie. The
problem was our callback handoff after validation. DeviseTokenAuth
stores the verified OmniAuth payload in Rails session, then redirects to
a second callback route. If the browser does not preserve that session,
Chatwoot has already received a valid SAML response but can no longer
finish login.

## Solution

This PR removes the session-backed handoff for SAML only:

- The SAML callback completes login in the same request where OmniAuth
validates the SAML response.
- Chatwoot reads the verified auth payload directly from
`request.env['omniauth.auth']`.
- Account context and RelayState come from callback params or OmniAuth
env data, not Rails session.
- Other OmniAuth providers continue using the existing DeviseTokenAuth
flow.
- Mobile SAML still works when the IdP returns `RelayState=mobile`; the
callback redirects to the mobile deep link with the generated SSO token.

The previous SAML override used `303 See Other` to avoid replaying the
SAML POST into the second callback route. This change keeps that intent,
but removes the second callback route for SAML entirely.

## Screen recording

### SP Initiated

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b0735e93-3864-4cc3-b6fc-419fff4b549e

### IDP Initiated

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3ded0246-933c-4c85-9b7c-fa15fdc34883

## Testing

Manual validation:

- Complete a SAML login.
- In the browser network trace, find the IdP POST to
`/omniauth/saml/callback?account_id=<account-id>`.
- Confirm it redirects directly to `/app/login?...sso_auth_token=...`
for web login.
- For mobile, confirm `RelayState=mobile` redirects to the configured
mobile deep link.
- Confirm there is no intermediate `/auth/saml/callback` request.

Testing with mocksaml.com:

- Configure Chatwoot with a public `FRONTEND_URL`.
- Set the mocksaml ACS URL to:

```text
https://<chatwoot-host>/omniauth/saml/callback?account_id=<account-id>
```

- Set the mocksaml audience/SP entity ID to the value shown in Chatwoot
SAML settings, usually:

```text
https://<chatwoot-host>/saml/sp/<account-id>
```

- Use an email returned by mocksaml that exists in the SAML-enabled
account.
- Start login from Chatwoot's SSO login page.
- Confirm the callback redirects directly to the app login URL with an
SSO token.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2026-05-18 12:52:45 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub ef27e571f7 feat: enable quoted reply for everyone (#14469)
Quoted email replies is now available to every account by default.
Previously this was gated behind the `quoted_email_reply` account-level
feature flag, so accounts needed it toggled on (via Super Admin) before
agents saw the toggle in the reply box.

## How to test

1. Open any conversation on an email inbox.
2. Confirm the **Quote previous email** toggle is visible in the reply
box (and is **not** visible on private notes or non-email channels).
3. Toggle it on, type a reply, and send — the outbound email should
include the quoted prior email below your message.
4. Toggle it off and send another reply — the quoted block should not
appear.
5. The toggle preference should persist per channel type (UI setting),
as before.
6. Verify the toggle works on a brand new account with no feature flags
flipped on (previously it would have been hidden).

## What changed

- Removed all `isFeatureEnabledonAccount(..., QUOTED_EMAIL_REPLY)` gates
from `ReplyBox.vue`, so the toggle and quoted-content behavior are
unconditional on email channels.
- Removed the `QUOTED_EMAIL_REPLY` constant from
`dashboard/featureFlags.js`.
- Marked the flag as `deprecated: true` in `config/features.yml` (kept
the entry in place to preserve FlagShihTzu bit positions on existing
accounts; `deprecated: true` hides it from the Super Admin UI).
- Dropped the now-unnecessary
`account.enable_features('quoted_email_reply')` setup from the message
builder spec.
2026-05-15 10:59:48 -07:00
5f6bd951b9 fix: portals#create returns 500 when custom_domain is omitted (#14400)
## Description

`POST /api/v1/accounts/:account_id/portals` returns a generic 500
(`{"status":500,"error":"Internal Server Error"}`) whenever the request
body omits `custom_domain`. Root cause: `parsed_custom_domain` calls
`URI.parse(@portal.custom_domain)` and `URI.parse(nil)` raises
`URI::InvalidURIError`. Existing callers either had to know to pass
`"custom_domain": ""` as a workaround or hit a 500 with no useful
diagnostic.

This PR guards `parsed_custom_domain` against blank values so the
existing fall-through (`else @portal.custom_domain`) applies —
equivalent to passing an empty string.

It also moves the `process_attached_logo` guard from the helper into the
`create` call site so `create` mirrors `update` (`process_attached_logo
if params[:blob_id].present?`) and avoids an unnecessary signed-blob
lookup on every create that doesn't include a logo.

Fixes #14397

## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Two new request specs in
`spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/portals_controller_spec.rb` covering
the regression:

- `creates portal when custom_domain is omitted from request body` — the
previously-broken case, now returns 200.
- `creates portal when custom_domain is blank` — verifies the existing
workaround (`"custom_domain": ""`) still works after the change.

Manually verified against `chatwoot/chatwoot:latest` Docker image before
the fix (500) and against this branch (200) using the curl repro from
the issue.

```bash
curl -X POST "https://<host>/api/v1/accounts/<account_id>/portals" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "api_access_token: <token>" \
  -d '{"name":"Test Portal","slug":"test-portal","color":"#3b82f6"}'
```

Before: `{"status":500,"error":"Internal Server Error"}`
After: `200 OK` with the portal payload.

## Checklist

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (no doc
change needed — controller behaviour, fully backward-compatible)
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2026-05-15 11:11:18 +05:30
dc332dd93e feat: add attachments endpoint for contact media view (#14391)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

This PR adds an endpoint to fetch all attachments shared with or by a
contact across all of their conversations.

Results are scoped based on the access:
* Admins can access all attachments
* Agents can access attachments only from inboxes they belong to
* Custom role agents are further filtered based on their conversation
permissions

Each attachment payload includes `conversation_id`, allowing the UI to
deep-link back to the source conversation.

Added `GET
/api/v1/accounts/:account_id/contacts/:contact_id/attachments` under the
existing contacts scope.

Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7021/add-media-view-to-the-contact-details-page

## Type of change

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2026-05-14 21:34:39 +05:30
13f66e3a88 fix: incorrect scope across controllers (#14459)
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2026-05-14 20:34:18 +05:30
fbcb89e955 fix(swagger): prevent path traversal in docs controller (#14458)
This hardens the development/test Swagger docs endpoint by ensuring
requested files are resolved only within the `swagger/` directory.

This did not affect production security because the Swagger controller
only renders files in development or test environments; production
already returns `404`. The change still closes the scanner finding and
prevents future automated reports from flagging the development-only
path.

## Closes

Addresses: GHSA-xhp7-ggjq-p2rg

## How to reproduce

1. Start Chatwoot locally in development.
2. Visit `/swagger/%2Fetc%2Fpasswd`.
3. Before this change, the endpoint could render files outside the
Swagger directory in development/test.

## What changed

- Resolve Swagger file requests relative to `Rails.root/swagger`.
- Return `404` when the resolved path is outside the Swagger directory
or does not point to a file.
- Strip leading slashes from derived request paths.
- Add a request spec for the encoded absolute-path case.

## How to test

1. Start the app locally.
2. Visit `/swagger` and confirm the ReDoc page loads.
3. Visit `/swagger/swagger.json` and confirm the Swagger JSON loads.
4. Visit `/swagger/%2Fetc%2Fpasswd` and confirm it returns `404` with no
file contents.

Note: `bundle exec rspec spec/controllers/swagger_controller_spec.rb`
was passing locally earlier during this fix. A final rerun before
opening the PR was blocked because local Postgres on `localhost:5432`
was not accepting connections.

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-05-14 18:52:14 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 8712879681 test: Stabilize SafeFetch spec against constant-identity flake (#14454)
`spec/lib/safe_fetch_spec.rb` has been flaking intermittently under
full-suite runs with errors like:

```
expected SafeFetch::FileTooLargeError, got #<SafeFetch::FileTooLargeError: exceeded 1048576 bytes>
```

The class name on both sides is identical — yet RSpec reports a
mismatch. This PR replaces the constant-identity assertions in this spec
with a name-based matcher so the comparison stops depending on the live
Class object's identity. We have made a similar fix earlier, but that
wasn't addressing the core of the issue in #14139.


**How to reproduce:** The flake only surfaces under load. Running the
spec in isolation almost always passes, here's a [run failing in
CI](https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/actions/runs/25852294516/job/75961520248?pr=14370)

## What's actually going on

Three facts combine:

1. **Test env reloads classes.** `config/environments/test.rb` sets
`cache_classes = false` so Zeitwerk reloads autoloadable code on demand.
2. **`lib/` is on the reloadable autoload tree.**
`config/application.rb` adds `lib` to `eager_load_paths`, which (with
`eager_load = false` in test) makes it lazily loaded by Zeitwerk's
*main* (reloading) autoloader. `lib/safe_fetch/` lives under that
umbrella.
3. **RSpec's `raise_error(Klass)` snapshots the Class object.**
`raise_error` matcher captures `Klass` (a specific `Class` instance)
when the matcher is built. At raise time it compares with `Module#===`,
which is identity-based.

When the executor between examples triggers
`Rails.application.reloader.reload!`, Zeitwerk does
`remove_const(:SafeFetch)` and re-installs an autoload trigger. The next
access produces a **fresh** `Class` object for
`SafeFetch::FileTooLargeError` — same name, different identity. The
matcher's snapshot now points at the dead Class, and the live raise
produces the new one. Identity fails, even though the error is
semantically correct.

This bites SafeFetch specifically because:

- SafeFetch is a *namespace* with 7 nested error classes — one reload
invalidates all of them.
- The spec contains 14+ `raise_error(SafeFetch::Foo)` assertions — many
chances to land in a reload window.
- SafeFetch is exercised by request-driven code (webhook delivery,
avatar fetch). Earlier specs in the suite warm up the reloader
machinery, which then fires during this spec.

Other custom-error specs don't visibly flake because their consumers
`rescue ConstName => e` (dynamic class lookup at raise time, walks the
ancestor chain via `Module#===` *at the moment of raise*, with no
captured snapshot), rather than RSpec's snapshot-then-compare pattern.

## What this PR does

Adds a small local helper to the spec that matches by class name string,
not by Class identity:

```ruby
def safe_fetch_error(name, message_pattern = nil)
  satisfy("raise SafeFetch::#{name}#{" matching #{message_pattern.inspect}" if message_pattern}") do |error|
    error.class.name == "SafeFetch::#{name}" &&
      (message_pattern.nil? || message_pattern.match?(error.message))
  end
end
```

Every `raise_error(described_class::FooError)` becomes
`raise_error(safe_fetch_error('FooError'))`. Class names are strings;
string equality survives any number of reloads. The semantic assertion
("this raised the right kind of error") is preserved.

This is the pattern CLAUDE.md already endorses for this codebase:

> Specs in parallel/reloading environments: prefer comparing
`error.class.name` over constant class equality when asserting raised
errors.

## Why this approach (even though it's suboptimal)

To be honest with reviewers: **this is a workaround, not a root-cause
fix.** Future spec authors who use `raise_error(SafeFetch::Foo)` in
other files will hit the same flake. The "real" fix removes the failure
mode at the source rather than dodging it per-spec.

Here's the menu of options we considered and the tradeoffs:

### Option A — Spec-side name matcher (this PR)

- **What:** the helper above.
- **Pro:** one-file change, zero blast radius beyond the spec.
- **Pro:** matches CLAUDE.md's documented stance.
- **Con:** every new spec touching reloadable error classes needs to
remember this pattern. It's a discipline tax, not a structural fix.
- **Verdict:** chosen for this PR.

### Option B — Pin SafeFetch outside Zeitwerk

```ruby
# config/application.rb
Rails.autoloaders.main.ignore(
  Rails.root.join('lib/safe_fetch.rb'),
  Rails.root.join('lib/safe_fetch'),
)
require Rails.root.join('lib/safe_fetch')
```

- **Pro:** real root-cause fix. `SafeFetch::*` constants become
process-lifetime stable. The spec helper becomes unnecessary, every
assertion in any spec works correctly.
- **Pro:** preserves the public API exactly.
- **Con:** loses hot-reload for SafeFetch in dev (need server restart to
see edits).
- **Con:** modifies `application.rb`, which has cross-team review
weight.
- **Verdict:** rejected for scope reasons in this PR; a sensible
follow-up.

### Option C — Move error classes to a non-reloadable location

Define top-level error classes in
`config/initializers/safe_fetch_errors.rb`. Initializers run once at
boot, constants are never reloaded.

- **Pro:** identity-stable errors, no spec helper needed.
- **Con:** API change — `SafeFetch::FileTooLargeError` becomes
`SafeFetchFileTooLargeError` (or similar). Every consumer's `rescue`
clause has to update.
- **Con:** namespace pollution at top-level.
- **Verdict:** rejected. The constraint of touching initializers is what
motivated the simpler PR.

### Option D — Vendor SafeFetch as a path gem

Move `lib/safe_fetch/` → `vendor/gems/safe_fetch/` with a gemspec.
Bundler `require`s gems once; Zeitwerk has zero involvement.

- **Pro:** structurally the most correct fix. Same identity stability as
Option B, no Zeitwerk plumbing required.
- **Pro:** zero API change for consumers.
- **Con:** larger refactor (6+ files moved, gemspec authored,
Gemfile/Gemfile.lock updated).
- **Con:** SafeFetch becomes harder to iterate on in dev (gem-style
edit-then-restart loop).
- **Verdict:** rejected for scope in this PR; the cleanest long-term
home for a security primitive.

### Option E — Drop custom errors, return a `Result`

Refactor SafeFetch to yield a result hash (`{ ok: true, ... }` / `{ ok:
false, kind: :unsafe_url, ... }`) instead of raising for anticipated
outcomes. Failure kinds become symbols, which are interned for the
process lifetime.

- **Pro:** eliminates the failure mode at its true root — there are no
custom exception classes to reload, anywhere.
- **Pro:** forces explicit, exhaustive handling at every call site — a
feature for a security primitive.
- **Pro:** spec assertions become data assertions (`expect(result).to
match(ok: false, kind: :too_large)`), which are robust against any
reload, any reordering.
- **Con:** paradigm shift away from the exception-driven style used
everywhere else in the codebase.
- **Con:** every consumer rewrites their `rescue` block into
pattern-matched handling.
- **Verdict:** rejected for scope in this PR; the architecturally
cleanest answer if we ever revisit SafeFetch's API.

## Why we're shipping A despite knowing B–E are better

This flake has been chewing CI time intermittently and previously took a
partial fix (#14139). We need it stable *now*. Options B–E are real
refactors with broader review surface (`application.rb`, consumer code,
or the lib's public contract). Option A:

- Costs nothing — one helper, mechanical replacements.
- Doesn't preclude any of B/C/D/E later. The helper goes away cleanly
once a root-cause fix lands.
- Aligns with the project's documented guidance for this scenario.

When SafeFetch next gets a substantive change, that's the right moment
to fold in B or D. Until then, the spec is stable and CI gets its time
back.

## What changed

- `spec/lib/safe_fetch_spec.rb`: added `safe_fetch_error(name,
message_pattern = nil)` helper; converted all 14
`raise_error(described_class::FooError[, /regex/])` assertions to
`raise_error(safe_fetch_error('FooError'[, /regex/]))`.
2026-05-14 16:48:14 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 05bda5f742 feat: don't let onboarding write domain (#14442)
Stop the onboarding flow from writing the user's company website into
`accounts.domain`. That column is reserved for the inbound email domain
used to construct reply-to addresses (`reply+<uuid>@<domain>`), and
silently overloading it from onboarding was breaking email continuity
for accounts whose domain MX didn't point at Chatwoot's inbound —
customer replies were going to an unreachable address.

The website value now lives in `custom_attributes.website`, which is
what the rest of the app already treats as the "company website" field.
2026-05-13 20:09:48 +05:30
379e28df1f fix: prevent bot metrics double-counting when handoff and resolution coexist [CW-6210] (#14032)
The bot metrics dashboard can show `handoff_rate + resolution_rate >
100%`. A single conversation can accumulate both
`conversation_bot_handoff` and `conversation_bot_resolved` events, and
the rate queries count them independently against a shared denominator.

## How it happens

```
Customer messages bot inbox
        │
        ▼
   ┌──────────┐
   │ pending  │ (bot handling)
   └────┬─────┘
        │ bot can't help
        ▼
   ┌──────────┐
   │   open   │ (handed off → conversation_bot_handoff event created)
   └────┬─────┘
        │ agent clicks "Resolve" WITHOUT sending a message
        ▼
   ┌──────────┐
   │ resolved │ conversation_resolved fires
   └──────────┘
        │
        ▼
   create_bot_resolved_event guard checks:
      inbox.active_bot?
      no outgoing messages with sender_type: 'User'  ← agent never messaged!
        │
        ▼
   conversation_bot_resolved event ALSO created ← BUG
        │
        ▼
   Same conversation counted in BOTH rates → sum exceeds 100%
```

## Why fix at the read path, not the write path

An earlier attempt added guards in the listener to make the two events
mutually exclusive per conversation — deleting `bot_resolved` when a
handoff fires, suppressing resolutions when a handoff exists. This was
rejected because conversations can be reopened across multiple cycles
(bot resolves on day 1, customer returns on day 5, bot hands off).
Deleting the day-1 resolution corrupts historical reports, and the async
event dispatcher makes listener-level guards vulnerable to race
conditions.

## What this PR does

Within a reporting window, if a conversation has both events, **handoff
wins** — the conversation is excluded from the resolution count. This is
applied via SQL subquery across all three read paths:

```
                    ┌─────────────────────────┐
                    │   Reporting Events DB    │
                    │                          │
                    │  conv_bot_handoff: [A,B] │
                    │  conv_bot_resolved: [A,C]│
                    └────────┬────────────────┘
                             │
              ┌──────────────┼──────────────┐
              ▼              ▼              ▼
       BotMetricsBuilder  ReportHelper  CountReportBuilder
       (rate cards)       (bot_summary)  (timeseries charts)
              │              │              │
              ▼              ▼              ▼
       resolutions:        resolutions:   resolutions:
       [A,C] minus [A,B]  same logic     same logic
       = [C] only          = [C] only     = [C] only

       Result: Conversation A → handoff only
               Conversation B → handoff only
               Conversation C → resolution only
```

For wide date ranges spanning multiple lifecycles, a conversation
bot-resolved in one cycle and handed off in a later cycle will only show
as a handoff. This is an acceptable tradeoff — the alternative (>100%
rates) is clearly worse, and narrow ranges handle this correctly since
the events fall into different windows. No reporting events are
modified, so historical data stays intact.

## Diagnostic tool

`rake bot_metrics:diagnose` — read-only task that prompts for account ID
and date range, shows a before/after rate comparison without modifying
data.

---------

Co-authored-by: aakashb95 <aakashbakhle@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aakash Bakhle <48802744+aakashb95@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-13 18:43:23 +05:30
71cc5168be feat(linear): Auto link Linear issues from private notes (#14405)
When an agent pastes a Linear issue URL into a private note on a
conversation, Chatwoot now links the issue to the conversation
automatically — no need to click "Link to Linear issue" first. The
standard activity message ("X linked Linear issue ABC-123") is posted
just like a manual link.

Fixes
[CW-7032](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7032/if-someone-post-a-linear-url-in-the-private-notes-automatically-link)

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2026-05-12 13:03:40 +04:00
58fdd20625 test(voice): WhatsApp Cloud Calling specs [5] (#14357)
Backend test coverage for the WhatsApp Cloud Calling pipeline introduced
in #14356. Stacked on top of that PR so the controller and service under
test exist when CI runs.

## Closes
- Replaces #14348 (which was based on the abandoned \`feature/pla-150\`)

## What's covered

-
\`spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/whatsapp_calls_controller_spec.rb\`
(new, ~210 lines)
- \`show / accept / reject / terminate / initiate / upload_recording\`
happy paths
- 422 paths: missing sdp_offer, missing recording, calling_disabled
inbox, missing contact phone, ringing-state guards, AlreadyAccepted,
NotRinging, CallFailed
- 138006 (no permission) → throttled opt-in template send under
conversation lock; idempotency on retry
  - \`upload_recording\` idempotency guard (\`already_uploaded\`)

- \`spec/enterprise/services/whatsapp/call_service_spec.rb\` (new, ~135
lines)
- State machine: ringing → in_progress → completed; ringing → failed
(reject); ringing → no_answer (terminate)
- Lock contention: concurrent terminate during accept doesn't corrupt
the message/conversation broadcast
- Provider failure paths surface as \`Voice::CallErrors::CallFailed\`
(transport and business)

- \`spec/models/channel/whatsapp_spec.rb\` — extends existing file with
\`voice_enabled?\` matrix (provider × source × calling_enabled)

## Verification

- 77/77 examples pass locally on this branch (controller + service +
channel + incoming-call + permission-reply + open-ai message builder)
- RuboCop clean

## Stack

- Backend: #14356 (\`feat/whatsapp-call-meta-bridge\` — base of this PR)
- FE: #14346 (\`feat/whatsapp-call-ui\`)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 12:40:13 +05:30
6c67eb9ba0 fix(notifications): Respect conversation access when notifying agents (#14412)
Agents with limited custom roles were receiving notifications (creation,
assignment, mentions, new messages, SLA) for conversations they couldn't
actually open. For example, an agent whose custom role only grants
`conversation_unassigned_manage` was getting notified about
conversations assigned to other agents.

Notifications now go through the same `ConversationPolicy#show?` check
that gates the conversation view itself, so an agent only gets notified
for conversations they're permitted to see. Administrators and agents
without custom roles are unaffected.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-05-12 10:57:29 +04:00
de696a55cb feat(voice): add WhatsApp inbound call webhook pipeline [3] (#14315)
Adds the server-side flow that turns Meta WhatsApp Cloud Calling
webhooks into Chatwoot Calls, conversations, voice_call message bubbles,
and ActionCable broadcasts. Stacked on top of #14312 (PR-2 — provider
methods); intentionally does not include the HTTP controller, routes, or
frontend (those land in PR-4 and PR-9).

## Closes
- Part of the WhatsApp Cloud Calling rollout. Linear: TBD

## What changed

**Webhook routing**
- `app/jobs/webhooks/whatsapp_events_job.rb` — append
`prepend_mod_with('Webhooks::WhatsappEventsJob')` so EE can extend it
without forking.
- `enterprise/app/jobs/enterprise/webhooks/whatsapp_events_job.rb` (new)
— overlay that prepends `handle_message_events` to intercept `field:
'calls'` payloads (route to `Whatsapp::IncomingCallService`) and
`interactive.call_permission_reply` messages (route to
`Whatsapp::CallPermissionReplyService`); falls through with `super` for
regular messages.

**Services**
- `enterprise/app/services/whatsapp/incoming_call_service.rb` (new) —
gated on `provider_config['calling_enabled']`; processes `connect`
(creates inbound call via `Voice::InboundCallBuilder` or transitions an
existing outbound call to `in_progress`) and `terminate` events; updates
conversation `additional_attributes` and broadcasts
`voice_call.incoming`/`voice_call.outbound_connected`/`voice_call.ended`.
- `enterprise/app/services/whatsapp/call_permission_reply_service.rb`
(new) — handles WhatsApp interactive `call_permission_reply` replies;
clears the conversation's `call_permission_requested_at` flag and
broadcasts `voice_call.permission_granted` so the agent UI can re-enable
the call button.

**Builder/model adjustments**
- `enterprise/app/services/voice/inbound_call_builder.rb` —
provider-agnostic; accepts `provider:` and `extra_meta:` kwargs, drops
`account:` (now derived from `inbox.account` to keep the param count
under rubocop's ceiling without disabling cops), uses digits-only
`source_id` for WhatsApp ContactInbox (validation requires
`^\d{1,15}\z`), skips Twilio-only `conference_sid` for non-Twilio
providers.
- `enterprise/app/services/voice/call_message_builder.rb` — adds
`create!`/`update_status!` API and `CALL_TO_VOICE_STATUS` map; uses
direct `Message.create!` (bypasses `Messages::MessageBuilder`'s
incoming-on-non-Api-inbox guard, which would otherwise reject the system
bubble); content is `'WhatsApp Call'` for WhatsApp and `'Voice Call'`
for Twilio. Backwards-compatible `perform!` retained for the existing
Twilio call sites.
- `enterprise/app/models/call.rb` — adds `default_ice_servers` (driven
by `VOICE_CALL_STUN_URLS` env), `direction_label` alias for the
`inbound`/`outbound` strings the FE expects, and
`ringing?`/`in_progress?`/`terminal?` predicates used throughout the
pipeline.

**Outgoing-channel guard**
- `app/services/base/send_on_channel_service.rb` — extends
`invalid_message?` to skip messages with `content_type == 'voice_call'`.
Without this, agent-initiated outbound calls (PR-4) would deliver
\"WhatsApp Call\" as a text message to the contact every time.

**Twilio call-site update**
- `enterprise/app/controllers/twilio/voice_controller.rb` — drops the
now-redundant `account: current_account` kwarg from the
`Voice::InboundCallBuilder.perform!` call.

**Tests**
- New: `spec/enterprise/services/whatsapp/incoming_call_service_spec.rb`
(5 examples — calling-disabled, inbound connect, outbound connect,
terminate completed, terminate no-answer, unknown event).
- New:
`spec/enterprise/services/whatsapp/call_permission_reply_service_spec.rb`
(3 examples — accept, reject, calling-disabled).
- Updated: `spec/enterprise/services/voice/inbound_call_builder_spec.rb`
and `spec/enterprise/controllers/twilio/voice_controller_spec.rb` to
drop the `account:` kwarg from call expectations.

## How to test

In `rails console` against an account with a WhatsApp inbox where
`provider_config['calling_enabled']` is true:

```ruby
inbox = Inbox.find(<id>)
params = { calls: [{ id: 'wacid_test', from: '15550001111', event: 'connect',
                     session: { sdp: 'v=0...', sdp_type: 'offer' } }] }
Whatsapp::IncomingCallService.new(inbox: inbox, params: params).perform
# => Conversation + Call (status: 'ringing', provider: 'whatsapp') + voice_call message bubble
# => ActionCable broadcasts `voice_call.incoming` to the assignee or account-wide

# Then terminate it:
Whatsapp::IncomingCallService.new(inbox: inbox,
  params: { calls: [{ id: 'wacid_test', event: 'terminate', duration: 0, terminate_reason: 'no_answer' }] }
).perform
# => Call status flips to 'no_answer', message bubble updates, `voice_call.ended` broadcast fires
```

End-to-end browser flow (Meta → cable → UI) requires the controller from
PR-4 and the frontend from PR-9.

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 11:23:57 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 3489298726 feat: add WidgetCreationService for onboarding web widget setup (#14314)
When a new account finishes onboarding we want to land them on a
dashboard with a working web widget already configured, branded, named,
and assigned to them, instead of an empty inbox list. This PR adds the
services that produce that widget. **No user-visible change yet:** the
services are dormant until the trigger and background job are wired up
in the follow-up PR.

## Context

Milestone 1 added `Account::BrandingEnrichmentJob`, which calls
context.dev during signup and stores brand data on
`account.custom_attributes['brand_info']`, plus the new onboarding form
that captures `domain`, `name`, `industry`, etc. Milestone 2 starts
using that data, and the first thing we want is a web widget
materialized automatically. Splitting the service layer from the
orchestration plumbing (Redis key, `onboarding_step` extension,
controller wiring, ActionCable) keeps this diff focused and lets the
LLM/widget logic merge independently.

## How to test

Run against an existing account that already has `brand_info` populated.

```ruby
account = Account.find(<account_id>)
user    = account.administrators.first
inbox   = WidgetCreationService.new(account, user).perform

inbox.channel.widget_color     # color from brand_info, or '#1f93ff'
inbox.channel.welcome_title    # brand_info[:title], or account.name
inbox.channel.welcome_tagline  # LLM tagline (Enterprise + system key set),
                               # else brand_info[:slogan]/[:description]/nil
inbox.inbox_members.pluck(:user_id)
```

Toggle `InstallationConfig['CAPTAIN_OPEN_AI_API_KEY']` to flip between
LLM and brand-text tagline paths. To verify failure isolation, raise
inside `Captain::Llm::WidgetTaglineService#perform` and confirm widget
creation still succeeds with the fallback tagline.
2026-05-11 16:10:48 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub bc768bf04f chore: verbosely log errors for leadsquare activity failure (#14407) 2026-05-11 10:58:23 +05:30
202403873d feat: Ability to specify the authentication type for imap server (#12306)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

This PR adds IMAP authentication mechanism selection to Chatwoot's email
inbox configuration. Users can now choose between 'plain', 'login', and
'cram-md5' authentication methods when configuring IMAP settings,
providing flexibility for different email providers that require
specific authentication types.

https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/8867

The implementation includes:
- Frontend dropdown with numeric keys (1, 2, 3) matching SMTP auth style
- Backend API validation for allowed authentication mechanisms
- Consistent 'cram-md5' format throughout the codebase
- Updated IMAP service to handle different auth types properly

This feature maintains consistency with existing SMTP authentication
options and follows the established UI/UX patterns in the application.

## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update

## How Has This Been Tested?

### Manual Testing:
- Tested in Docker environment
- Verified IMAP auth dropdown appears in inbox settings
- Confirmed all three auth mechanisms (plain, login, cram-md5) can be
selected and saved
- Tested API validation by attempting to save invalid auth mechanisms

### Automated Testing:
- Updated existing IMAP service tests to use consistent lowercase values
- Updated API controller tests for authentication parameter handling
- All tests pass locally with the new changes

### Test Configuration:
- Tested with both new and existing inbox configurations

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

## Additional Notes

- This feature is backward compatible and doesn't break existing IMAP
configurations
- The 'cram-md5' format is used consistently throughout (UI, API,
storage, services)
- Net::IMAP compatibility is maintained by converting to 'CRAM-MD5'
internally
- Follows the same pattern established by SMTP authentication
configuration

---------

Co-authored-by: João Santos <joao.santos@madigital.eu>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
2026-05-08 16:40:15 +05:30
9c1d1c4070 feat(labels): remove label associations asynchronously on delete (#13531)
## Summary
- Remove label deletion dependency on association cleanup by deleting
immediately and enqueueing a background job.
- Add `Labels::RemoveAssociationsJob` to strip deleted label references
from tagged conversations and contacts.
- Keep this version simple by removing the label count/prompt
requirement requested.

## Implementation notes
- Enqueue job from `Api::V1::Accounts::LabelsController#destroy` with
label title + account id.
- Background work performed in `Labels::DestroyService`.

## References
- Linear issue:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4765/cw-2857-enhancement-removing-labels-is-inconsistent
- GitHub issue: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/1249

## Testing
- `bundle exec rspec
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/labels_controller_spec.rb
spec/services/labels/destroy_service_spec.rb
spec/jobs/labels/remove_associations_job_spec.rb
spec/services/labels/update_service_spec.rb`
- `bundle exec rubocop
app/controllers/api/v1/accounts/labels_controller.rb
app/jobs/labels/remove_associations_job.rb
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/labels_controller_spec.rb
spec/jobs/labels/remove_associations_job_spec.rb
spec/services/labels/destroy_service_spec.rb`

---------

Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-08 13:40:36 +05:30
5c6ea78ce6 fix(security): Enforce admin authorization on custom attribute definitions API (#14392)
Custom attribute definitions can now only be created, edited, or deleted
by administrators, matching the existing settings UI restriction.
Previously, an agent could call the `custom_attribute_definitions` API
directly and modify account configuration that they couldn't reach
through the dashboard — a Broken Access Control vulnerability reported
externally.

Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7038/broken-access-control-on-custom-attribute-definitions-api

## How to test

1. Sign in as an agent.
2. Try to create a custom attribute by calling `POST
/api/v1/accounts/<id>/custom_attribute_definitions` directly (the
settings page is hidden for agents — use curl with the agent's
`api_access_token`).
3. Expect `401 Unauthorized` with body `{"error":"You are not authorized
to do this action"}`. Repeat for `PATCH` and `DELETE`.
4. Sign in as an administrator and confirm create/edit/delete still work
from Settings → Custom Attributes.
5. As either role, the listing endpoint (`GET
.../custom_attribute_definitions`) should still succeed — agents need
this to render attributes in conversation and contact panels.

Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-08 11:42:23 +04:00
Tanmay Deep SharmaandGitHub e6b8f48b3b fix: settle captain credits on subscription cancellation (#14089)
## Linear Ticket
-
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6875/captain-credits-3-bugs-in-stripe-subscription-lifecycle-cancel-ratchet

## Description

Fixes Captain credit settlement on subscription cancellation. Previously
`limits['captain_responses']` and `captain_responses_usage` were left in
their pre-cancellation state, which caused incorrect credit totals when
a customer re-subscribed. Cancellation now settles the monthly allotment
(preserving any remaining topup) and resets the usage counter.

## Type of change

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

1. Set up an account subscribed to a paid plan (e.g. Startups) so
`limits['captain_responses']` reflects the plan allotment.
2. Fire `customer.subscription.deleted` for that account's Stripe
customer. Confirm the limits.
3. Fire `customer.subscription.updated` re-subscribing to the paid plan.
Confirm the limits.
4. Repeat cancel → re-subscribe several times;


## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-05-08 12:18:53 +05:30
53b2a517d7 fix: resolve SendReplyJob flaky specs (#14394)
`SendReplyJob` was caching reloadable service class objects in
`CHANNEL_SERVICES`. In test, a request spec can trigger Rails constant
reloading after `SendReplyJob` has already been loaded, leaving the job
with stale class objects while later specs stub the reloaded constants.
This resolves the channel service at perform time so the job follows the
current Rails constant table.

How to reproduce
Run the CircleCI shard that contains send_reply_job_spec, or the
minimized order-dependent reproduction:
```sh
bundle exec rspec --format progress spec/builders/v2/reports/label_summary_builder_spec.rb spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/bulk_actions_controller_spec.rb spec/jobs/send_reply_job_spec.rb:32
```

What changed
- Store service class names in `SendReplyJob::CHANNEL_SERVICES` instead
of class objects.
- Resolve the service with constantize inside perform so reloads do not
leave stale cached classes.

Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-07 22:47:09 +05:30
7a7db22a43 fix: Implement resend confirmation feature for login page (#11970)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

This PR fixes the non-functional resend confirmation feature on the V3
login page where clicking "Resend confirmation" did nothing. The issue
was caused by the V3 store not having the `resendConfirmation` action
that the login page was trying to dispatch.

**Key improvements:**
- Fixed V3 store integration by importing `resendConfirmation` directly
from auth API
- Added comprehensive UX improvements with loading states and 60-second
cooldown timer
- Implemented environment-aware debug logging for development
- Added proper error handling and user feedback
- Enhanced backend test coverage

**Context:** Users with unconfirmed accounts were unable to resend
confirmation emails from the login page, creating a poor user experience
and potential support burden.

Fixes #3157

## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update

## How Has This Been Tested?

**Backend Testing:**
- All existing resend_confirmation tests passing (7/7)
- Added comprehensive new test suite in
`spec/requests/api/v1/resend_confirmation_spec.rb`
- API endpoint returns 200 OK responses in ~0.39 seconds
- Email delivery confirmed via SMTP with test user `info@airbonar.com`

**Frontend Testing:**
- All frontend tests passing 
- ESLint compliant code with automatic corrections applied
- Manual testing of login page functionality:
  - 60-second cooldown timer with countdown display
  - Error handling with user-friendly messages
  - Development logging works (console output in dev mode only)

**Test Configuration:**
- Ruby/Rails backend with RSpec test suite
- Vue.js frontend with Jest/testing-library
- Development environment with Gmail SMTP configured
- Test user: unconfirmed account `info@airbonar.com`

**Reproduction Steps:**
1. Navigate to login page with unconfirmed account
2. Click "Resend confirmation link"
3. Observe loading state, API call, and success feedback
4. Verify 60-second cooldown prevents spam
5. Check email delivery.

## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
2026-05-07 15:13:04 +05:30
salmonumbrellaandGitHub fe44b07147 feat(companies): add company detail page (#14054) 2026-05-06 20:50:27 +05:30
42bba748cf fix(mailbox): render inline images without Content-Disposition (#11949)
## Description
This pull request addresses issue #11948, where inline images embedded
in emails (such as those sent from Outlook) are not rendered correctly
if the Content-Disposition header is missing.

The solution ensures that images referenced via cid: in the HTML body
are correctly identified and rewritten using url_for.

Fixes #11948

## Type of change
Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?
Added test: detects image inline attachment by cid reference when
Content-Disposition is missing

## Checklist:

- [X] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [X] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [X] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [X] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 18:56:31 +05:30
d43a87c9dc feat: Add labels to contact import/export (#13313)
Adds label support to contact import and export so teams can carry
approved contact labels through CSV workflows. Imports accept a `labels`
column with labels that already exist in the account; multiple labels
should be entered as a quoted comma-separated CSV value, for example
`"customer,vip"`.

Imports are additive: they add labels to contacts and do not remove
labels already on a contact. Removing a label from the CSV row or
leaving the `labels` cell blank will not clear existing contact labels.
To remove a label, edit the contact directly.

## Closes

- Closes #8535

## How to test

1. Create a few contact labels in the account, such as `customer`,
`vip`, and `lead`.
2. Go to Contacts -> Import contacts and download the sample CSV.
3. Import contacts with a `labels` column. Use a single label like
`lead`, or quote multiple labels like `"customer,vip"`.
4. Confirm imported contacts are created with the expected labels.
5. Re-import an existing contact with a new label and confirm the new
label is added without removing existing labels.
6. Try a row with an unknown label, such as `"vip,unknown_label"`, and
confirm only that row is rejected in the failed records CSV while the
other valid rows are imported.
7. Export contacts and confirm the CSV includes a `labels` column with
comma-separated approved labels.

## What changed

- Contact exports include approved `labels` in the default CSV columns.
This adds a new default export column for CSV consumers.
- Contact imports parse `labels` as comma-separated values inside the
CSV cell.
- Imported labels are validated against labels that already exist in the
account.
- Rows with unknown labels are rejected with an `Unknown labels: ...`
error; valid rows in the same import continue to process.
- Imported labels are additive and do not remove existing contact
labels.
- Label application during import does not dispatch an additional
per-contact update event.
- The sample CSV includes an import-safe `labels` column. The modal
keeps the existing generic CSV import copy.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2026-05-06 18:46:36 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub d7d1e4113c fix: captain auto sync scheduler resilience (#14379)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

skip documents that fail with ActiveRecord errors possibly due to
stale/corrupt data and not crash scheduler

How did we find out about this error?

before October 28th, 2025, we did not have url normalisation.
so we had document rows as: 
id: 123 `https://example.com` status: `in_progress` --> likely stuck
crawl
id 234: `https://example.com/` status: `available` 

When the schedule sync job ran, it ran an `document.update!(sync_status:
:syncing, last_sync_attempted_at: Time.current)` on the 234 one since it
was `available`

now `update!` runs `before_validation :normalize_external_link`
so `https://example.com/` became `https://example.com`

which invalidated:
`validates :external_link, uniqueness: { scope: :assistant_id }`

so the scheduler crashed.

This PR logs the skipped ones with their errors and continues to pick
other documents to scheduler doesn't crash

## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
spec

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-05-06 18:07:22 +05:30
Sivin VargheseandGitHub 8f532f45ff feat: add attachments section to conversation sidebar (#14371) 2026-05-06 15:13:51 +05:30
Sojan JoseandGitHub 00ba468486 fix(macros): disable public visibility for agents (#14349) 2026-05-06 15:10:11 +05:30
b8108b71c1 fix(tiktok): Resolve media upload failures and gate attachments by conversation capability (#13643)
This PR fixes TikTok attachment send failures and adds a
capability-based guard so attachments are only enabled for conversations
that support media sending.

- Fixed TikTok media upload request formatting so TikTok accepts image
uploads reliably.
- Added TikTok capability check (IMAGE_SEND) during conversation
creation.
- Stored capability in
conversation.additional_attributes.tiktok_capabilities.
- Updated reply composer UI to disable/hide attachment upload for TikTok
conversations where image_send is false.

Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6532/enable-attachments-based-on-the-conversation-capability
and
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6996/unable-to-send-image-attachments-to-tiktok-customer-400-parsing-error

---------

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-06 11:21:15 +04:00
2192af80f4 fix: html-escape captured values in helpcenter article markdown embeds (#14140)
Embed templates interpolate regex captures from user-authored article
URLs into HTML attribute values. CommonMark's angle-bracket link
destination syntax allows characters that the capture regexes don't
filter, so the unescaped substitution could produce malformed attribute
output. Escaping at substitution time keeps the render deterministic
regardless of the URL.

### How was this tested?
Added specs.

Fixes [CW-6934](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6934/)

Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-05 17:46:21 +05:30
a9ac1c633d fix: added HMAC validation for Whatsapp and Instagram webhooks (#14280)
## Description
* Added Meta webhook HMAC validation in meta_token_verify_concern.rb.
* Wired it into instagram_controller.rb and whatsapp_controller.rb.
* WhatsApp now verifies X-Hub-Signature-256 with WHATSAPP_APP_SECRET.
* Instagram now verifies with either FB_APP_SECRET or
INSTAGRAM_APP_SECRET.
* Updated request specs so missing/invalid signatures return 401 and
valid signatures still enqueue jobs.


Fixes # (issue):
[CW-6786](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6786/ghsa-7rw7-pc8v-mrr3-unauthenticated-message-injection-via-missing)

## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update

## How Has This Been Tested?

* Updated the controller specs and ran them successfully.
* The original issue is no longer reproducible.


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-05-05 15:01:11 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 70f799ab35 fix(captain): add v1 handoff classifier [AI-137] (#14337)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Captain (v1) makes false promises by saying it will handoff but doesn't.
This happens due to an exact string match comparison and the prompt
gives the model a lot of responsibilities:
- identity
- what to respond
- obey custom instructions
- decide on tool calls

This PR decouples responsibility, the core prompt responds, and an
additional llm call evaluates if handoff was needed or not after that
message.

## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

Locally


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-05-05 14:34:31 +05:30
Tanmay Deep SharmaandGitHub 21c0f4dc52 fix(transcription): guard Whisper 25MB limit and zero temperature for stable output (#14335)
Two production-grade fixes to the existing audio transcription service.
**Independent of the WhatsApp Calling work** — these affect every audio
attachment that goes through Whisper (voice notes, call recordings,
voicemails, etc.).

## Closes
- [PLA-151 — PR-5: Recording Upload + Transcription
Pipeline](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-151/pr-5-recording-upload-transcription-pipeline)

## Why this is needed

### 1. Whisper rejects payloads larger than 25 MB

OpenAI's [Whisper
API](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/speech-to-text) hard-caps
file uploads at 25 MB. Long audio recordings — voice notes from chatty
contacts, ~70+ min Opus call recordings — currently hit OpenAI with the
full payload and 413 (\`Payload Too Large\`). The job retries via the
existing \`Faraday::BadRequestError\` discard path, but the agent still
sees a transcription failure for an attachment we knew was too big up
front.

This PR adds a pre-flight \`audio_too_large?\` check via the blob's
\`byte_size\` and returns a controlled error without hitting OpenAI. The
audio attachment is preserved (agents can still listen), only the
transcription is skipped.

### 2. Whisper hallucinates on silence at non-zero temperature

At \`temperature: 0.4\` (the previous value), Whisper produces
well-documented hallucinated repeats on silence and near-silent segments
— e.g. \`Oh, dear. Oh, dear. Oh, dear.\` filling the transcript. This
shows up in real recordings whenever there's a hold or quiet moment.
\`temperature: 0.0\` matches OpenAI's recommended default for
transcription and eliminates the spirals.

Reference:
[openai/whisper#928](https://github.com/openai/whisper/discussions/928),
[openai-python#1010](https://github.com/openai/openai-python/issues/1010).

## Are WhatsApp call recordings already handled?

Yes — by the existing pipeline, **before this PR**:

\`\`\`
Browser MediaRecorder → upload_recording (PR-4)
  → @call.message.attachments.create!(file_type: :audio, ...)
→ Enterprise::Concerns::Attachment#enqueue_audio_transcription
(after_create_commit hook)
      → Messages::AudioTranscriptionJob.perform_later(attachment.id)
        → Messages::AudioTranscriptionService → Whisper
\`\`\`

The \`after_create_commit\` hook already fires for every audio
attachment regardless of source. PR-4's \`upload_recording\` endpoint
creates the attachment; the existing job/service take it from there. No
new wiring needed.

This PR just makes the existing service more robust:
- Calls longer than ~70 min (Opus 48 kbps) no longer 413 against OpenAI
- Quiet recordings no longer produce hallucinated transcripts

## How to test

\`\`\`ruby
# In rails console with a real audio attachment:
service = Messages::AudioTranscriptionService.new(Attachment.audio.last)

# Normal-sized audio: unchanged behaviour
service.perform # => { success: true, transcriptions: ... }

# Large audio: new guard returns error instead of 413-ing OpenAI
allow(attachment.file.blob).to
receive(:byte_size).and_return(30.megabytes)
service.perform # => { error: 'Audio too large for Whisper' }
\`\`\`

Existing transcription specs cover the happy path; one new spec
exercises the byte-limit guard.

## Risk

Low. Both changes are pre-flight guards or parameter values — they
reduce the surface of OpenAI calls that can fail. Failure to transcribe
is already non-fatal (the audio attachment is preserved either way).
2026-05-05 11:49:28 +07:00
0bd0cab868 feat(voice): Attach call recordings + show call duration on the bubble (#14344)
When an inbound voice call ends, the conversation bubble now (1) renders
an inline audio player as soon as Twilio finishes the recording and (2)
shows the call duration alongside "Call ended" so the agent gets the
at-a-glance summary without opening the recording.

Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-118/feat-recordings-on-calls-should-be-attached-on-the-conversation
and
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-119/duration-of-the-call-is-not-visible-on-the-chat-bubble

## How to test

1. Set up a Twilio voice inbox and trigger an inbound call.
2. Answer the call from an agent, talk for a few seconds, then hang up.
3. As soon as the call ends, the bubble should read **"Call ended —
0:NN"** (where NN is the call duration in seconds).
4. Wait a few seconds for Twilio to finish processing the recording
(usually <30s after hangup).
5. The same bubble should now show an inline audio player below the
duration. Press play; the recording should be audible.
6. Refresh the page — both the duration and the player should still be
there.
7. End a second call on the same conversation — its bubble should get
its own duration + player, independent of the first.

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-04 17:14:01 +04:00
Aakash BakhleandGitHub d00867d636 fix: captain auto sync scheduler config (#14336) 2026-05-04 13:37:25 +05:30
PranavandGitHub a01adf860a fix: [CW-7001] Limit emails fetch (#14354)
This PR limits IMAP email fetching to 500 messages per sync run to avoid
expensive/long-running mailbox scans. It also filters out
already-imported emails and Chatwoot-generated notification emails
during the header fetch phase, before fetching full email bodies,
reducing unnecessary IMAP work.

Fixes #CW-7001 (issue) :
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7001/emails-not-syncing
2026-05-04 13:26:28 +05:30
Tanmay Deep SharmaandGitHub 28ec1794f4 feat(voice): add WhatsApp Cloud Calling provider methods (#14312)
Adds the Meta WhatsApp Cloud API surface needed for browser-based
calling. This is the second slice of the WhatsApp calling feature,
sitting on top of `feat/voice-call-model-wiring` and consumed by later
PRs (incoming-webhook pipeline, call service, frontend).

This PR ships only the provider-level HTTP wrapper and one error class.
It is feature-flag-free and does not change any user-visible behaviour
on its own — without later PRs, no caller invokes these methods.

## Linear
-
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-148/pr-2-meta-cloud-api-provider-methods

## What changed
- Add `Whatsapp::Providers::WhatsappCloudCallMethods`
(`enterprise/app/services/whatsapp/providers/whatsapp_cloud_call_methods.rb`)
wrapping six Meta endpoints:
- `pre_accept_call`, `accept_call`, `reject_call`, `terminate_call` —
`POST /{phone_id}/calls` with the relevant action payload.
- `send_call_permission_request` — `POST /{phone_id}/messages`
interactive `call_permission_request`.
- `initiate_call` — `POST /{phone_id}/calls` with `audio`/`offer`
session.
- Prepend the module into `Whatsapp::Providers::WhatsappCloudService`
only if defined, so OSS continues to work without the enterprise
overlay.
- Add `Voice::CallErrors::NoCallPermission`
(`enterprise/lib/voice/call_errors.rb`) — raised when Meta returns error
code `138006` from `initiate_call`. The remaining call-service errors
(`NotRinging`, `AlreadyAccepted`, `CallFailed`) will land with PR-4.

## How to test
There is no UI in this PR. Smoke-test from a Rails console with a
WhatsApp inbox configured for calling:

```ruby
inbox = Inbox.find(<id>)
svc = inbox.channel.provider_service
svc.respond_to?(:initiate_call)            # => true
svc.respond_to?(:send_call_permission_request) # => true

# Optional live calls (require a real phone + Meta call-permission opt-in):
svc.send_call_permission_request('15551234567')
svc.initiate_call('15551234567', '<sdp_offer>')
```

Failure path: `initiate_call` against a contact who has not granted call
permission should raise `Voice::CallErrors::NoCallPermission` with
Meta's user-facing message.
2026-05-04 12:44:19 +07:00
1124c1b4c2 feat(voice): Wire Twilio voice flow through unified call model (#14091)
Twilio voice now uses first-class `Call` records as the source of truth
for call state, instead of storing it on
`conversation.additional_attributes` and `conversation.identifier`. Each
call gets its own record, its own `voice_call` bubble matched by
`call_sid`, and its own conference name keyed off `Call.id`. Multiple
calls on the same conversation (for `lock_to_single_conversation`
inboxes) now work correctly, and the conversation card stays in sync
with the real latest message.
Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-121/lock-to-single-thread

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-04-30 11:25:39 +04:00
TonyandGitHub cd9c8e3303 fix: skip self-mention notification in private notes (#14318)
When an agent mentions themselves in a private note, they no longer
receive a redundant notification for their own mention.

Closes: #4096

# Pull Request Template

## Description

Agents who mention themselves in a private note no longer receive a
conversation_mention notification. Previously, the mention service would
generate a notification for every mentioned user without checking
whether the sender and the
mentioned user were the same person.
2026-04-29 23:27:14 +05:30