# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR expands the default upload rules to support PFX certificate
files (`application/x-pkcs12`, `application/pkcs12`, `.pfx`) across
private notes, Website, Email, and Telegram channels.
Also adds `.xls` / `.xlsx` extension fallbacks for cases where browsers
upload Excel files with an empty or generic MIME type.
### Utils Repo PR: https://github.com/chatwoot/utils/pull/61
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7085/support-more-file-types-in-private-notes-and-in-app
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshots
<img width="330" height="218" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/80823250-893e-4509-adb9-61f845359151"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: aakashb95 <aakashbakhle@gmail.com>
Quoted email replies is now available to every account by default.
Previously this was gated behind the `quoted_email_reply` account-level
feature flag, so accounts needed it toggled on (via Super Admin) before
agents saw the toggle in the reply box.
## How to test
1. Open any conversation on an email inbox.
2. Confirm the **Quote previous email** toggle is visible in the reply
box (and is **not** visible on private notes or non-email channels).
3. Toggle it on, type a reply, and send — the outbound email should
include the quoted prior email below your message.
4. Toggle it off and send another reply — the quoted block should not
appear.
5. The toggle preference should persist per channel type (UI setting),
as before.
6. Verify the toggle works on a brand new account with no feature flags
flipped on (previously it would have been hidden).
## What changed
- Removed all `isFeatureEnabledonAccount(..., QUOTED_EMAIL_REPLY)` gates
from `ReplyBox.vue`, so the toggle and quoted-content behavior are
unconditional on email channels.
- Removed the `QUOTED_EMAIL_REPLY` constant from
`dashboard/featureFlags.js`.
- Marked the flag as `deprecated: true` in `config/features.yml` (kept
the entry in place to preserve FlagShihTzu bit positions on existing
accounts; `deprecated: true` hides it from the Super Admin UI).
- Dropped the now-unnecessary
`account.enable_features('quoted_email_reply')` setup from the message
builder spec.
On WhatsApp and any channel that disables the reply editor outside its
messaging window (WhatsApp Cloud, Twilio WhatsApp, API channels with
`agent_reply_time_window` set), when the window was already expired and
a new inbound message arrived in real-time, the "messaging restricted"
banner correctly hid but the editor itself stayed un-typeable until the
agent refreshed the page. This made the dashboard look like it accepted
replies even though typing did nothing.
Fixes
[CW-7087](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7087/reply-editor-stays-disabled-after-real-time-incoming-message-reopens)
#### How to reproduce
1. Open a WhatsApp conversation whose last incoming message is older
than 24h, so `can_reply` is `false` (banner shown, editor greyed out).
2. With the dashboard open on that conversation, have the customer send
a fresh inbound message (or simulate one via the channel's webhook).
3. Before the fix: banner disappears, editor wrapper loses its disabled
styling, but clicking into the editor and typing does nothing — refresh
required.
4. After the fix: banner disappears and the editor accepts input
immediately.
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Twilio voice now uses first-class `Call` records as the source of truth
for call state, instead of storing it on
`conversation.additional_attributes` and `conversation.identifier`. Each
call gets its own record, its own `voice_call` bubble matched by
`call_sid`, and its own conference name keyed off `Call.id`. Multiple
calls on the same conversation (for `lock_to_single_conversation`
inboxes) now work correctly, and the conversation card stays in sync
with the real latest message.
Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-121/lock-to-single-thread
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds support for resizing the reply editor up to nearly half the
screen height. It also deprecates the old modal-based pop-out reply box,
clicking the same button now expands the editor inline. Users can adjust
the height using the slider or the expand button.
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/be27e1c06d19475ab404289710b3b0da
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
## Summary
This PR enables the **Participating** conversation view in the main
sidebar and keeps the behavior aligned with existing conversation views.
## What changed
- Added **Participating** under Conversations in the new sidebar.
- Added a guard in conversation realtime `addConversation` flow so
generic `conversation.created` events are not injected while the user is
on Participating view.
- Added participating route mapping in conversation-list redirect helper
so list redirects resolve correctly to `/participating/conversations`.
## Scope notes
- Kept changes minimal and consistent with current `develop` behavior.
- No additional update-event filtering was added beyond what existing
views already do.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes, block inline images in message signatures and prevent
auto signature insertion when editor is disabled.
- Strip inline base64 images from signature on save and show warning
message
- Add `INLINE_IMAGE_WARNING` translation key for signature inline image
removal notification
- Add disabled check to `addSignature()` to prevent signature insertion
when editor is disabled
- Add `isEditorDisabled` checks to signature toggle logic in
`toggleSignatureForDraft()`, `replaceText()`, and `clearMessage()`
- Remove unused `replaceText` from the codebase, which belongs to old
`textarea` editor
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6588/the-browser-hangs-when-the-message-signature-contains-inline-image
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/fb556b46a12a4308a737eed732d5ed73
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR fixes
1. Messages being trimmed to the default 1024 limit in `trimContent`
method, instead of channel-specific limits for drafts and AI tasks.
2. Telegram messages are allowed up to 10,000 characters in config, but
the API supports only 4096, causing failures for oversized messages.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6694/captain-ai-rewrite-tasks-truncate-draft-to-1024-chars-trimcontenthttps://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13919
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
**Before**
https://www.loom.com/share/00e9d6b4d19247febf35dffa99da3805
**After**
https://www.loom.com/share/c4900e9effc345c79bcd8a5aa1ee277b
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds support to auto-focus the editor when clicking reply to
this message, the editor now automatically receives focus so users can
start typing immediately.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6661/typing-box-not-focused-after-clicking-reply-to-message
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screencast
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c5e77055-3f68-4ad8-934e-cfc465166e8a
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
CJK language users (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, etc.) use IME where Enter
confirms character selection. AI input components were intercepting
Enter unconditionally, making them unusable for IME users.
Add `event.isComposing` check to CopilotEditor, CopilotInput, and
AssistantPlayground so Enter during active IME composition is ignored.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
Before:
Add a Japenese keyboard, then go to AI follow-ups, type some word,
selecting it with enter submits the follow up. So CJK users cannot use
follow-ups.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/53517432-d97b-47fc-a802-81675e31d5c9
After:
Type a word, press enter to choose it, press enter again to unselect it
and enter again to send
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6c2a420b-7ee6-4c71-82a6-d9f1d7bbf31a
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add a new conversation sort option "Priority: Highest first, Created:
Oldest first" that sorts by priority descending (urgent > high > medium
> low > none) with created_at ascending as the tiebreaker
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes,
1. Adjusting the inbox settings page layout width from 3xl to 4xl for
the collaborators, configuration, and bot configuration sections.
2. Adding a dynamic max-width for inbox settings banners based on the
selected tab.
3. Making the sender name preview layout responsive.
4. Reordering automation rule row buttons so Clone appears before
Delete.
5. Update the Gmail icon ratio.
6. Fix height issues with team/inbox pages
7. The delete button changes to red on hover
8. Add border to conversation header when no dashboard apps present
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR updates settings page UI
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds support for removing labels from the conversation card
context menu. Assigned labels now show a checkmark, and clicking an
already-selected label will remove it.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6400/allow-removing-labels-directly-from-the-right-click-menuhttps://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13367
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
**Screencast**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4e3a6080-a67d-4851-9d10-d8dbf3ceeb04
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Description
Adds missing analytics instrumentation for the editor AI funnel so we
can measure end-to-end usage and outcome quality.
### What was added
- Captain: Editor AI menu opened
- Captain: Generation failed
- Captain: AI-assisted message sent
### Behavior covered
- Tracks AI button click + menu open from both entry points:
- top panel sparkle button
- inline editor copilot button
- Tracks generation failures (initial + follow-up stages).
- Tracks whether accepted AI content was sent as-is or edited before
send.
### Notes
- Applies to editor Captain accept/send flow
(rewrite/summarize/reply_suggestion + follow-ups).
- Does not change Copilot sidebar flow instrumentation.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Manual verification steps
<img width="1906" height="832" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f0ade43b-aa8d-41be-8ca2-20a091a81f60"
/>
<img width="828" height="280" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/be76219e-fb61-4a6e-bff5-dc085b0a3cc9"
/>
<img width="415" height="147" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/36802c5c-33a7-49ed-bf7e-f0b02d86dccc"
/>
<img width="2040" height="516" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/74b95288-bc86-4312-a282-14211ae8f25c"
/>
1. Open a conversation with Captain tasks enabled.
2. Click AI button in top panel and inline editor.
3. Confirm analytics events fire for:
- AI menu opened
4. Run an AI action and force a failure scenario (or empty response
path) and confirm generation-failed event.
5. Accept AI output, then:
- send without changes -> editedBeforeSend: false
- edit then send -> editedBeforeSend: true
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Summary
Fix hardcoded `Chatwoot` branding in two UI tooltips using the existing
`useBranding` flow so self-hosted/white-label deployments no longer show
the wrong brand text.
## Changes
- LabelSuggestion tooltip now uses:
- `replaceInstallationName($t('LABEL_MGMT.SUGGESTIONS.POWERED_BY'))`
- Message avatar tooltip (native app/external echo) now uses:
- `replaceInstallationName(t('CONVERSATION.NATIVE_APP_ADVISORY'))`
## Why
This follows the existing branding pattern already used in the product
and keeps behavior consistent across deployments.
## Notes
- No change to message logic or API behavior.
- `AGENTS.md` updated with a branding guidance note.
## Fixes
- Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13306
- Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13466
## Testing
<img width="195" height="155" alt="Screenshot 2026-02-13 at 3 55 39 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5b295cdd-6e5d-42c0-bbd7-23ba7052e1c3"
/>
<img width="721" height="152" alt="Screenshot 2026-02-13 at 3 55 48 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/19cec2a0-451f-4fb3-bd61-7c2e591fc3c7"
/>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes the following updates:
1. Updated the design system color tokens by introducing new tokens for
surfaces, overlays, buttons, labels, and cards, along with refinements
to existing shades.
2. Refreshed both light and dark themes with adjusted background,
border, and solid colors.
3. Replaced static Inter font files with the Inter variable font
(including italic), supporting weights from 100–900.
4. Added custom font weights (420, 440, 460, 520) along with custom
typography classes to enable more fine-grained and consistent typography
control.
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
CSAT scores are helpful, but on their own they rarely tell the full
story. A drop in rating can come from delayed timelines, unclear
expectations, or simple misunderstandings, even when the issue itself
was handled correctly.
Review Notes for CSAT let admins/report manager roles add internal-only
context next to each CSAT response. This makes it easier to interpret
scores properly and focus on patterns and root causes, not just numbers.
<img width="2170" height="1680" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56df7fab-d0a7-4a94-95b9-e4c459ad33d5"
/>
### Why this matters
* Capture the real context behind individual CSAT ratings
* Clarify whether a low score points to a genuine service issue or a
process gap
* Spot recurring themes across conversations and teams
* Make CSAT reviews more useful for leadership reviews and
retrospectives
### How Review Notes work
**View CSAT responses**
Open the CSAT report to see overall metrics, rating distribution, and
individual responses.
**Add a Review Note**
For any CSAT entry, managers can add a Review Note directly below the
customer’s feedback.
**Document internal insights**
Use Review Notes to capture things like:
* Why a score was lower or higher than expected
* Patterns you are seeing across similar cases
* Observations around communication, timelines, or customer expectations
Review Notes are visible only to administrators and people with report
access only. We may expand visibility to agents in the future based on
feedback. However, customers never see them.
Each note clearly shows who added it and when, making it easy to review
context and changes over time.
