# Pull Request Template
## Description
Document auto-sync job pipeline without wiring to controllers or FE
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
specs and locally
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
When a credit top-up's card charge fails, the finalized invoice was left
in an open state with no hook back into our fulfillment service. If that
invoice was later paid (manually via the hosted invoice page, or by a
future dunning flow), the account would never receive its credits —
silent revenue loss.
This change voids the invoice the moment the charge fails, so a failed
top-up cannot turn into a paid-but-unfulfilled invoice.
## Closes
<!-- add the relevant issue / Linear link -->
## How to test
1. On a Business-plan account with a Stripe customer, attach a test card
that will decline on charge (e.g. `4000 0000 0000 0002`).
2. From the dashboard, open the credit top-up flow and purchase a credit
pack.
3. Observe the API returns an error and the account's captain credits
are unchanged.
4. In the Stripe dashboard, confirm the corresponding invoice is in
`void` status (not `open`).
5. Repeat with a good card (`4242 4242 4242 4242`) and confirm the happy
path still fulfills credits.
## What changed
- `finalize_and_pay` in `Enterprise::Billing::TopupCheckoutService` now
rescues `Stripe::CardError`, voids the open invoice via
`Stripe::Invoice.void_invoice`, and re-raises so the controller surfaces
the original decline error to the client.
- Rescue is intentionally narrow to `Stripe::CardError` (declines,
insufficient funds, SCA `authentication_required`). Transient errors
like `APIConnectionError` / `RateLimitError` are left to propagate — the
charge may have actually succeeded and voiding could be wrong.
- Invoices are created with `auto_advance: false`, so Stripe's Smart
Retries won't collect on an open invoice; voiding is the correct
terminal state.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The "conversation continuity via email" toggle was visible to all
accounts regardless of whether they had `inbound_emails` enabled.
Without inbound email infrastructure, replies to those follow-up emails
land in the agent's personal inbox instead of routing back into
Chatwoot. The feature appears to work but silently breaks the reply
path.
The toggle is now gated on the `inbound_emails` feature flag. On
self-hosted without the feature, the toggle is hidden entirely. On
cloud, it remains visible but disabled with upgrade messaging.
On the backend, `inbound_emails` is added to the manually managed
features list in `InternalAttributesService` so that Stripe webhook plan
syncs don't override it when support enables it for an account.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Add migrations for document auto-sync
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
locally
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Adds a Call model to track voice call state across providers (Twilio,
WhatsApp). This replaces storing call data in
conversation.additional_attributes and provides a foundation for call
analytics multi-call-per-conversation support, and future voice
providers.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
## Linear ticket
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6834/billing-upgrade-didnt-work
## Description
A `customer.subscription.updated` Stripe webhook for account 76162
returned 200 OK but did not persist the new `subscribed_quantity`. Root
cause: a race condition between the webhook handler and
`increment_response_usage` (Captain usage counter), both doing
read-modify-write on the `custom_attributes` JSONB column. The webhook
wrote `quantity: 6`, then a concurrent `save` from
`increment_response_usage` overwrote the entire hash with stale data —
restoring `quantity: 5`.
Fix: use atomic `jsonb_set` so usage counter updates only touch the
single key they care about, instead of rewriting the whole
`custom_attributes` hash. `increment_custom_attribute` also performs the
increment in SQL, making concurrent increments correct as well.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- New regression spec in `handle_stripe_event_service_spec.rb` that
simulates concurrent webhook + `increment_response_usage` and asserts
both `subscribed_quantity` and `captain_responses_usage` survive
- Existing account, billing, captain, and topup specs all pass locally
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Removes sentry flooding of unnecessary rubyllm logs of wrong API key.
Logs only system api key error since it would be P0.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
HandoffTool changes conversation status but only posts a private note.
ResponseBuilderJob now detects the tool flag and creates the public
handoff message that was previously only shown in V1.
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Captain V2 was silently forwarding conversations to humans without
showing a handoff message to the customer. The conversation appeared to
just stop
responding.
Root cause: In V2, HandoffTool calls bot_handoff! during agent
execution, which changes conversation status from pending to open. By
the time control returns
to ResponseBuilderJob#process_response, the conversation_pending? guard
returns early - skipping create_handoff_message entirely. The V1 flow
didn't have this
problem because AssistantChatService just returns a string token
(conversation_handoff) and lets ResponseBuilderJob handle everything.
What changed:
1. AgentRunnerService now surfaces the handoff_tool_called flag (already
tracked internally for usage metadata) in its response hash.
2. ResponseBuilderJob#handoff_requested? detects handoffs from both V1
(response token) and V2 (tool flag).
3. ResponseBuilderJob#process_response checks handoff_requested? before
the conversation_pending? guard, so V2 handoffs are processed even when
the status has
already changed.
4. ResponseBuilderJob#process_action('handoff') captures
conversation_pending? before calling bot_handoff! and uses that snapshot
to guard both bot_handoff!
and the OOO message - preventing double-execution when V2's HandoffTool
already ran them.
New V2 handoff flow:
AgentRunnerService
→ agent calls HandoffTool (creates private note, calls bot_handoff!)
→ returns response with handoff_tool_called: true
ResponseBuilderJob#process_response
→ handoff_requested? detects the flag
→ process_action('handoff')
→ create_handoff_message (public message for customer)
→ bot_handoff! skipped (conversation_pending? is false)
→ OOO skipped (conversation_pending? is false)
Fixes#13881
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Update existing response_builder_job_spec.rb covering the V2 handoff
path, V2 normal response path, and V1 regression
- Updated existing agent_runner_service_spec.rb expectations for the new
handoff_tool_called key and added a context for when the flag is true
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Aakash Bakhle <48802744+aakashb95@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: aakashb95 <aakashbakhle@gmail.com>
## Account branding enrichment during signup
This PR does the following
### Replace Firecrawl with Context.dev
Switches the enterprise brand lookup from Firecrawl to Context.dev for
better data quality, built-in caching, and automatic filtering of
free/disposable email providers. The service interface changes from URL
to email input to match Context.dev's email endpoint. OSS still falls
back to basic HTML scraping with a normalized output shape across both
paths.
The enterprise path intentionally does not fall back to HTML scraping on
failure — speed matters more than completeness. We want the user on the
editable onboarding form fast, and a slow fallback scrape is worse than
letting them fill it in.
Requires `CONTEXT_DEV_API_KEY` in Super Admin → App Config. Without it,
falls back to OSS HTML scraping.
### Add job to enrich account details
After account creation, `Account::BrandingEnrichmentJob` looks up the
signup email and pre-fills the account name, colors, logos, social
links, and industry into `custom_attributes['brand_info']`.
The job signals completion via a short-lived Redis key (30s TTL) + an
ActionCable broadcast (`account.enrichment_completed`). The Redis key
lets the frontend distinguish "still running" from "finished with no
results."
Account webhooks sign outgoing payloads with HMAC-SHA256, but agent bot
and API inbox webhooks were delivered unsigned. This PR adds the same
signing to both.
Each model gets a dedicated `secret` column rather than reusing the
agent bot's `access_token` (for API auth back into Chatwoot) or the API
inbox's `hmac_token` (for inbound contact identity verification). These
serve different trust boundaries and shouldn't be coupled — rotating a
signing secret shouldn't invalidate API access or contact verification.
The existing `Webhooks::Trigger` already signs when a secret is present,
so the backend change is just passing `secret:` through to the jobs.
Shared token logic is extracted into a `WebhookSecretable` concern
included by `Webhook`, `AgentBot`, and `Channel::Api`. The frontend
reuses the existing `AccessToken` component for secret display. Secrets
are admin-only and excluded from enterprise audit logs.
### How to test
Point an agent bot or API inbox webhook URL at a request inspector. Send
a message and verify `X-Chatwoot-Signature` and `X-Chatwoot-Timestamp`
headers are present. Reset the secret from settings and confirm
subsequent deliveries use the new value.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
## Description
Two improvements to Agent Capacity Policy:
**1. Support exclusion via zero conversation limit**
Allow `conversation_limit` to be `0` on inbox capacity limits. Agents
with a zero limit are excluded from auto-assignment for that inbox while
remaining members for manual assignment.
**2. Fix exclusion rules duration input**
- Default changed from `10` to `null` so time-based exclusion isn't
applied unless explicitly set.
- Minimum lowered from 10 to 1 minute.
- `DurationInput` updated to handle `null` values correctly.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Added model and capacity service specs for zero-limit exclusion
behavior.
- Tested manually via UI flows
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
## Summary
When a Super Admin creates a new account via the Administrate dashboard,
the `manually_managed_features` field (a virtual attribute stored in
`internal_attributes` JSON) is passed to `Account.new(...)`, raising
`ActiveModel::UnknownAttributeError`. The existing `update` action
already strips this param — this fix adds the same handling to `create`.
Closes -> https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/INF-66
Related Sentry ->
https://chatwoot-p3.sentry.io/issues/7168237533/?project=6382945&referrer=Linear
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How to reproduce
1. Log in as Super Admin
2. Navigate to Accounts → New
3. Fill in the form (with or without manually managed features selected)
4. Submit → `ActiveModel::UnknownAttributeError: unknown attribute
'manually_managed_features' for Account`
## What changed
- Added a `create` override in
`Enterprise::SuperAdmin::AccountsController` that strips
`manually_managed_features` from params before calling `super`, then
persists them via `InternalAttributesService` after the account is
saved.
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Adds custom tool support to v1
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
<img width="1816" height="958" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-24 at 11 37 33@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2777a953-8b65-4a2d-88ec-39f395b3fb47"
/>
<img width="378" height="488" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-24 at 11 38 18@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f6973c99-efd0-40e4-90fe-4472a2f63cea"
/>
<img width="1884" height="1452" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-24 at 11 38
32@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9fba4fc4-0c33-46da-888a-52ec6bad6130"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
The initial version of prompt deciding to resolve or hand-off to human
agents was too conservative especially in cases where a link or an
action was told to customer. If the customer didn't respond, Captain was
told to hand it off to the agent, but customer may actually have solved
the issue. If not, they can come back and continue the conversation.
Removed two lines about the same and now we should not see needless
handoffs.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
locally
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Adds `WebsiteBrandingService` (OSS) with an Enterprise override using
Firecrawl v2 to extract branding and business data from a URL for
onboarding auto-fill.
OSS version uses HTTParty + Nokogiri to extract:
- Business name (og:site_name or title)
- Language (html lang)
- Favicon
- Social links from `<a>` tags
Enterprise version makes a single Firecrawl call to fetch:
- Structured JSON (name, language, industry via LLM)
- Branding (favicon, primary color)
- Page links
Falls back to OSS if Firecrawl is unavailable or fails.
Social handles (WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, Telegram, TikTok, LINE)
are parsed deterministically via a shared `SocialLinkParser`.
> We use links for socials, since the LLM extraction was unreliable,
mostly returned empty, and hallucinated in some rare scenarios
## How to test
```ruby
# OSS (no Firecrawl key needed)
WebsiteBrandingService.new('chatwoot.com').perform
# Enterprise (requires CAPTAIN_FIRECRAWL_API_KEY)
WebsiteBrandingService.new('notion.so').perform
WebsiteBrandingService.new('postman.com').perform
```
Verify the returned hash includes business_name, language,
industry_category, social_handles, and branding with
favicon/primary_color.
<img width="908" height="393" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e3696887-d366-485a-89a0-8e1a9698a788"
/>
## Description
When a customer downgrades from Enterprise to Business, they may retain
unused Stripe credit balance. During an AI credits topup,
Stripe::Invoice.finalize_invoice auto-applies that credit balance to the
invoice. If the credit balance fully covers the invoice amount, Stripe
marks it as paid immediately upon finalization. Calling
Stripe::Invoice.pay on an already-paid invoice throws an error, breaking
the topup flow.
This fix retrieves the invoice status after finalization and skips the
pay call if Stripe has already settled it via credits.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tested against Stripe test mode with the following scenarios:
- Full credit balance payment: Customer has enough Stripe credit balance
to cover the entire invoice. Invoice is marked paid after
finalize_invoice — pay is correctly skipped. Credits are fulfilled
successfully.
- Partial credit balance payment: Customer has some Stripe credit
balance but not enough to cover the full amount. Invoice remains open
after finalization — pay is called and charges the remaining amount to
the default payment method. Credits are fulfilled successfully.
- Zero credit balance (normal payment): Customer has no Stripe credit
balance. Invoice remains open after finalization — pay charges the full
amount. Credits are fulfilled successfully.
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Description
When Assignment V2 is enabled, the V2 capacity policies
(AgentCapacityPolicy / InboxCapacityLimit) are not respected during
team-based assignment paths. The system falls back to the legacy V1
max_assignment_limit, and since V1 is deprecated and typically
unconfigured in V2 setups, agents receive unlimited assignments
regardless of their V2 capacity.
Root cause: Inbox class directly defined
member_ids_with_assignment_capacity, which shadowed the
Enterprise::InboxAgentAvailability module override in Ruby's method
resolution order (MRO). This made the V2 capacity check unreachable
(dead code) for any code path using member_ids_with_assignment_capacity.
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
⏺ Before the fix
1. Enable assignment_v2 + advanced_assignment on account
2. Create AgentCapacityPolicy with InboxCapacityLimit = 1 for an inbox
3. Assign the policy to an agent (e.g., John)
4. Create 1 open conversation assigned to John (now at capacity)
5. Create a new unassigned conversation in the same inbox
6. Assign a team (containing John) to that conversation
7. Result: John gets assigned despite being at capacity
⏺ After the fix
Same steps 1–6.
7. Result: John is NOT assigned — conversation stays unassigned (no
agents with capacity available)
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
This change blocks Help Center access for default/Hacker-plan accounts
and closes the downgrade gap that could leave `help_center` enabled
after a subscription falls back to the default cloud plan.
Fixes: none
Closes: none
## Why
Default-plan accounts should not be able to access the Help Center, but
the downgrade fallback path only reset the plan name and did not
reconcile premium feature flags. That meant some accounts could keep
`help_center` enabled even after landing back on the Hacker/default
plan.
## What this change does
- blocks Help Center portal and article access for default/Hacker-plan
accounts
- reconciles premium feature flags when a subscription falls back to the
default cloud plan, so `help_center` is disabled immediately instead of
waiting for a later webhook
- preserves existing account `custom_attributes` during Stripe customer
recreation instead of overwriting them
- adds Enterprise coverage for the default-plan access checks on hosted
and custom-domain Help Center routes
- fixes the public access check to use the resolved portal object so
blocked requests return the intended response instead of raising an
error
## Validation
1. Create or use an account on the default/Hacker cloud plan with an
active portal.
2. Visit the portal home page and a published article on both the
Chatwoot-hosted URL and a configured custom domain.
3. Confirm the Help Center is blocked for that account.
4. Downgrade a paid account back to the default/Hacker plan through the
Stripe webhook flow.
5. Confirm `help_center` is disabled right after the downgrade fallback
is processed and the account can no longer access the Help Center.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
