Adds bulk label removal alongside the existing assign-label action for
conversations and contacts, so teams can clean up labels across selected
records without opening each item individually.
For conversations, the remove dropdown is scoped to labels that are
actually applied across the current selection — so agents no longer see
(or accidentally "remove") labels that aren't on any of the selected
items. For contacts, the dropdown still lists all account labels for
now; label data isn't carried on the contact list payload today, so
scoping the contact remove menu cleanly is being tracked as a follow-up.
## Closes
N/A
## How to test
- Open the conversation list, select multiple conversations, open
**Remove labels**, and confirm the dropdown only lists labels that are
applied to at least one selected conversation. Pick a label and confirm
it's removed from the selection.
- Open Contacts, select multiple contacts, use **Remove Labels**, choose
a label, and confirm the selected contacts are refreshed without that
label.
- Verify **Assign Labels** still works for conversations and contacts,
and continues to show every available label.
## What changed
- Adds an `action` prop to the shared `BulkLabelActions` dropdown so it
can render in `assign` or `remove` mode.
- Wires conversation bulk remove to the existing `labels.remove` backend
path and filters the dropdown to the union of labels applied across the
selected conversations.
- Adds contact bulk remove support through
`Contacts::BulkRemoveLabelsService`, routed by
`Contacts::BulkActionService`.
- Raises contact label save failures instead of reporting a successful
bulk action when a contact update is invalid.
## Follow-ups
- Scope the contact remove dropdown to applied labels (needs a
lightweight endpoint, or eventually `cached_label_list` on `Contact`).
## Verification
Conversation bulk remove selector:
<img width="1680" height="1050" alt="Conversation bulk remove label
selector"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2dba4a06-c497-45e1-85b0-e700164b6b2f"
/>
Contact bulk remove selector:
<img width="1680" height="1050" alt="Contact bulk remove label selector"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b3b89959-5978-4064-b5f9-82b1a3e571dc"
/>
Video proof:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fffafe19-4e1c-4e2a-a135-c7182c06bb4d
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
In WhatsApp coexistence setups (Business App + Cloud API on the same
number), some inbound customer messages arrive from Meta as `type:
unsupported` with error `131060` ("This message is unavailable") and no
content — typically the first message of a Click-to-WhatsApp /
Instagram-ad conversation, or a message synced from a companion device.
Chatwoot was dropping these webhooks entirely, so no contact,
conversation, or message was created. The conversation only surfaced
once an agent replied (via an `smb_message_echoes` event), starting
"headless" with zero customer context.
This change persists a placeholder message for these events so the
contact and conversation are created, and renders it with the dedicated
unsupported-message bubble that points agents to the WhatsApp app —
where the original message is still visible.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7166/whatsapp-coexistence-inbound-messages-are-silently-dropped
and https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13464
<img width="3448" height="1604" alt="CleanShot 2026-05-22 at 17 49
35@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0a90ec84-9085-4cba-883d-08d9de33fa3c"
/>
## How to reproduce
1. Connect a WhatsApp Cloud (coexistence) inbox.
2. Receive an inbound message that Meta delivers as `type: unsupported`
with error `131060` (e.g. a Click-to-WhatsApp ad message, or a message
handled on a companion/primary device that fails to sync to the API).
3. **Before:** nothing is created — the conversation only appears after
an agent replies, with no record of the customer's first message.
4. **After:** the contact and conversation are created with an incoming
placeholder message rendered as the amber "unsupported" bubble: _"This
message is unsupported. You can view this message on the WhatsApp app."
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
## Description
When an inbox has `enable_auto_assignment` and `assignment_v2` enabled
but no agents are currently online,
`AutoAssignment::AssignmentService#perform_bulk_assignment` still loaded
up to 100 unassigned conversations and iterated each one, calling
`inbox.available_agents` per conversation. Each call hits Redis presence
lookups that return empty, no conversations get assigned, and the loop
finishes having done only wasted work.
For a busy inbox with a long unassigned backlog and offline agents, this
is hundreds of Redis ops per job, multiplied by every
`AutoAssignment::AssignmentJob` enqueue from the per-save handler. The
pressure is significant when inbound volume is high.
This adds a single early-return guard: if
`inbox.available_agents.empty?`, return `0` immediately. Existing
semantics are preserved (jobs are still enqueued on conversation events;
they just exit cheaply when there is no one to assign to).
## Type of change
- [x] Performance improvement (non-breaking change)
## Test coverage
- [x] Added specs
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This is the third and final PR in a series of PRs for Introducing unread
counts in the sidebar for inboxes and labels.
In this PR:
* Added frontend changes to show the badges for unread counts for
Inboxes and Labels
* Added specs for the changes
Issue:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6851/support-unread-conversation-counts
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tested this locally. Cases to test:
* Send a message from the widget and see if the count changes
* Mark a conversation as unread and see the count change for inbox
* Open an unread conversation as agent and see the count go down
* Add a label to an unread conversation from sidebar right click action
without opening the conversation and see the count of un-reads on the
label change
Added the screenshot of how it will look like
<img width="614" height="990" alt="Screenshot 2026-05-05 at 7 00 11 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/99fbaa9f-bcf2-4d8d-86e2-5727f652a9dd"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This is the second PR in a series of PRs for Introducing unread counts
in the sidebar for inboxes and labels.
In this PR:
* added api for unread counts
* Added the store refresher and invalidation with event listeners
* Added action cable event
* Added specs for the changes
Issue:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6851/support-unread-conversation-counts
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Adds storage support for WhatsApp business-scoped user identifiers
received from Meta Cloud API and Twilio WhatsApp webhooks. The change
keeps existing phone-based behavior intact, stores BSUID and parent
BSUID values as additional `contact_inboxes.source_id` rows for the same
contact, and allows BSUID-only inbound messages to create contacts,
conversations, and messages without requiring a phone number.
Related: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13837
**What changed**
- Extended WhatsApp source ID validation to accept regular BSUID and
parent BSUID formats.
- For Meta Cloud API, stores phone, `user_id`, and `parent_user_id`
identifiers as contact inbox source IDs when they are present.
- For Twilio WhatsApp, stores phone, `ExternalUserId`, and
`ParentExternalUserId` identifiers as contact inbox source IDs while
preserving the existing `whatsapp:` Twilio source ID shape.
- Supports BSUID-only inbound messages by creating a contact, contact
inbox, conversation, and message even when the phone number is missing.
- Links phone-first and later BSUID-only messages to the same contact
when the first payload contains both phone and BSUID.
- Stores WhatsApp usernames in contact `additional_attributes`, matching
existing social channel patterns.
- Keeps existing phone-based outbound and new-conversation behavior
unchanged for this milestone.
**How to test**
1. Send a Meta Cloud webhook payload with both `wa_id` and `user_id`.
2. Verify Chatwoot creates or finds the phone `contact_inbox` and also
creates a BSUID `contact_inbox` for the same contact.
3. Send a later Meta Cloud payload for the same user with only `user_id`
/ `from_user_id`.
4. Verify Chatwoot finds the BSUID `contact_inbox` and creates the
inbound message without requiring a phone number.
5. Send a Twilio WhatsApp webhook with `From: whatsapp:+E164`,
`ExternalUserId`, and optionally `ParentExternalUserId`.
6. Verify Chatwoot stores the Twilio phone and BSUID identifiers as
`whatsapp:`-prefixed source IDs for the same contact.
7. Send a Twilio WhatsApp webhook where `From` is `whatsapp:<BSUID>` and
there is no phone number.
8. Verify Chatwoot creates the contact, contact inbox, conversation, and
message without a phone number.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description
This is the first PR in a series of PRs for Introducing unread counts in
the sidebar for inboxes and labels.
In this PR:
* Added the unread store, counter and builder modules
* Added redis keys for unread count management
* Added specs for all 3 modules, some specs are for testing enterprise
only feature like specific roles and permissions which are added in the
respective enterprise folder itself.
**Note**
None of this changes affect anything else and nothing is wired to
existing modules.
Issue:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6851/support-unread-conversation-counts
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
The bot metrics dashboard can show `handoff_rate + resolution_rate >
100%`. A single conversation can accumulate both
`conversation_bot_handoff` and `conversation_bot_resolved` events, and
the rate queries count them independently against a shared denominator.
## How it happens
```
Customer messages bot inbox
│
▼
┌──────────┐
│ pending │ (bot handling)
└────┬─────┘
│ bot can't help
▼
┌──────────┐
│ open │ (handed off → conversation_bot_handoff event created)
└────┬─────┘
│ agent clicks "Resolve" WITHOUT sending a message
▼
┌──────────┐
│ resolved │ conversation_resolved fires
└──────────┘
│
▼
create_bot_resolved_event guard checks:
✅ inbox.active_bot?
✅ no outgoing messages with sender_type: 'User' ← agent never messaged!
│
▼
conversation_bot_resolved event ALSO created ← BUG
│
▼
Same conversation counted in BOTH rates → sum exceeds 100%
```
## Why fix at the read path, not the write path
An earlier attempt added guards in the listener to make the two events
mutually exclusive per conversation — deleting `bot_resolved` when a
handoff fires, suppressing resolutions when a handoff exists. This was
rejected because conversations can be reopened across multiple cycles
(bot resolves on day 1, customer returns on day 5, bot hands off).
Deleting the day-1 resolution corrupts historical reports, and the async
event dispatcher makes listener-level guards vulnerable to race
conditions.
## What this PR does
Within a reporting window, if a conversation has both events, **handoff
wins** — the conversation is excluded from the resolution count. This is
applied via SQL subquery across all three read paths:
```
┌─────────────────────────┐
│ Reporting Events DB │
│ │
│ conv_bot_handoff: [A,B] │
│ conv_bot_resolved: [A,C]│
└────────┬────────────────┘
│
┌──────────────┼──────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
BotMetricsBuilder ReportHelper CountReportBuilder
(rate cards) (bot_summary) (timeseries charts)
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
resolutions: resolutions: resolutions:
[A,C] minus [A,B] same logic same logic
= [C] only = [C] only = [C] only
Result: Conversation A → handoff only
Conversation B → handoff only
Conversation C → resolution only
```
For wide date ranges spanning multiple lifecycles, a conversation
bot-resolved in one cycle and handed off in a later cycle will only show
as a handoff. This is an acceptable tradeoff — the alternative (>100%
rates) is clearly worse, and narrow ranges handle this correctly since
the events fall into different windows. No reporting events are
modified, so historical data stays intact.
## Diagnostic tool
`rake bot_metrics:diagnose` — read-only task that prompts for account ID
and date range, shows a before/after rate comparison without modifying
data.
---------
Co-authored-by: aakashb95 <aakashbakhle@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aakash Bakhle <48802744+aakashb95@users.noreply.github.com>
Agents with limited custom roles were receiving notifications (creation,
assignment, mentions, new messages, SLA) for conversations they couldn't
actually open. For example, an agent whose custom role only grants
`conversation_unassigned_manage` was getting notified about
conversations assigned to other agents.
Notifications now go through the same `ConversationPolicy#show?` check
that gates the conversation view itself, so an agent only gets notified
for conversations they're permitted to see. Administrators and agents
without custom roles are unaffected.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Adds the server-side flow that turns Meta WhatsApp Cloud Calling
webhooks into Chatwoot Calls, conversations, voice_call message bubbles,
and ActionCable broadcasts. Stacked on top of #14312 (PR-2 — provider
methods); intentionally does not include the HTTP controller, routes, or
frontend (those land in PR-4 and PR-9).
## Closes
- Part of the WhatsApp Cloud Calling rollout. Linear: TBD
## What changed
**Webhook routing**
- `app/jobs/webhooks/whatsapp_events_job.rb` — append
`prepend_mod_with('Webhooks::WhatsappEventsJob')` so EE can extend it
without forking.
- `enterprise/app/jobs/enterprise/webhooks/whatsapp_events_job.rb` (new)
— overlay that prepends `handle_message_events` to intercept `field:
'calls'` payloads (route to `Whatsapp::IncomingCallService`) and
`interactive.call_permission_reply` messages (route to
`Whatsapp::CallPermissionReplyService`); falls through with `super` for
regular messages.
**Services**
- `enterprise/app/services/whatsapp/incoming_call_service.rb` (new) —
gated on `provider_config['calling_enabled']`; processes `connect`
(creates inbound call via `Voice::InboundCallBuilder` or transitions an
existing outbound call to `in_progress`) and `terminate` events; updates
conversation `additional_attributes` and broadcasts
`voice_call.incoming`/`voice_call.outbound_connected`/`voice_call.ended`.
- `enterprise/app/services/whatsapp/call_permission_reply_service.rb`
(new) — handles WhatsApp interactive `call_permission_reply` replies;
clears the conversation's `call_permission_requested_at` flag and
broadcasts `voice_call.permission_granted` so the agent UI can re-enable
the call button.
**Builder/model adjustments**
- `enterprise/app/services/voice/inbound_call_builder.rb` —
provider-agnostic; accepts `provider:` and `extra_meta:` kwargs, drops
`account:` (now derived from `inbox.account` to keep the param count
under rubocop's ceiling without disabling cops), uses digits-only
`source_id` for WhatsApp ContactInbox (validation requires
`^\d{1,15}\z`), skips Twilio-only `conference_sid` for non-Twilio
providers.
- `enterprise/app/services/voice/call_message_builder.rb` — adds
`create!`/`update_status!` API and `CALL_TO_VOICE_STATUS` map; uses
direct `Message.create!` (bypasses `Messages::MessageBuilder`'s
incoming-on-non-Api-inbox guard, which would otherwise reject the system
bubble); content is `'WhatsApp Call'` for WhatsApp and `'Voice Call'`
for Twilio. Backwards-compatible `perform!` retained for the existing
Twilio call sites.
- `enterprise/app/models/call.rb` — adds `default_ice_servers` (driven
by `VOICE_CALL_STUN_URLS` env), `direction_label` alias for the
`inbound`/`outbound` strings the FE expects, and
`ringing?`/`in_progress?`/`terminal?` predicates used throughout the
pipeline.
**Outgoing-channel guard**
- `app/services/base/send_on_channel_service.rb` — extends
`invalid_message?` to skip messages with `content_type == 'voice_call'`.
Without this, agent-initiated outbound calls (PR-4) would deliver
\"WhatsApp Call\" as a text message to the contact every time.
**Twilio call-site update**
- `enterprise/app/controllers/twilio/voice_controller.rb` — drops the
now-redundant `account: current_account` kwarg from the
`Voice::InboundCallBuilder.perform!` call.
**Tests**
- New: `spec/enterprise/services/whatsapp/incoming_call_service_spec.rb`
(5 examples — calling-disabled, inbound connect, outbound connect,
terminate completed, terminate no-answer, unknown event).
- New:
`spec/enterprise/services/whatsapp/call_permission_reply_service_spec.rb`
(3 examples — accept, reject, calling-disabled).
- Updated: `spec/enterprise/services/voice/inbound_call_builder_spec.rb`
and `spec/enterprise/controllers/twilio/voice_controller_spec.rb` to
drop the `account:` kwarg from call expectations.
## How to test
In `rails console` against an account with a WhatsApp inbox where
`provider_config['calling_enabled']` is true:
```ruby
inbox = Inbox.find(<id>)
params = { calls: [{ id: 'wacid_test', from: '15550001111', event: 'connect',
session: { sdp: 'v=0...', sdp_type: 'offer' } }] }
Whatsapp::IncomingCallService.new(inbox: inbox, params: params).perform
# => Conversation + Call (status: 'ringing', provider: 'whatsapp') + voice_call message bubble
# => ActionCable broadcasts `voice_call.incoming` to the assignee or account-wide
# Then terminate it:
Whatsapp::IncomingCallService.new(inbox: inbox,
params: { calls: [{ id: 'wacid_test', event: 'terminate', duration: 0, terminate_reason: 'no_answer' }] }
).perform
# => Call status flips to 'no_answer', message bubble updates, `voice_call.ended` broadcast fires
```
End-to-end browser flow (Meta → cable → UI) requires the controller from
PR-4 and the frontend from PR-9.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds IMAP authentication mechanism selection to Chatwoot's email
inbox configuration. Users can now choose between 'plain', 'login', and
'cram-md5' authentication methods when configuring IMAP settings,
providing flexibility for different email providers that require
specific authentication types.
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/8867
The implementation includes:
- Frontend dropdown with numeric keys (1, 2, 3) matching SMTP auth style
- Backend API validation for allowed authentication mechanisms
- Consistent 'cram-md5' format throughout the codebase
- Updated IMAP service to handle different auth types properly
This feature maintains consistency with existing SMTP authentication
options and follows the established UI/UX patterns in the application.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Manual Testing:
- Tested in Docker environment
- Verified IMAP auth dropdown appears in inbox settings
- Confirmed all three auth mechanisms (plain, login, cram-md5) can be
selected and saved
- Tested API validation by attempting to save invalid auth mechanisms
### Automated Testing:
- Updated existing IMAP service tests to use consistent lowercase values
- Updated API controller tests for authentication parameter handling
- All tests pass locally with the new changes
### Test Configuration:
- Tested with both new and existing inbox configurations
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Additional Notes
- This feature is backward compatible and doesn't break existing IMAP
configurations
- The 'cram-md5' format is used consistently throughout (UI, API,
storage, services)
- Net::IMAP compatibility is maintained by converting to 'CRAM-MD5'
internally
- Follows the same pattern established by SMTP authentication
configuration
---------
Co-authored-by: João Santos <joao.santos@madigital.eu>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
## Summary
- Remove label deletion dependency on association cleanup by deleting
immediately and enqueueing a background job.
- Add `Labels::RemoveAssociationsJob` to strip deleted label references
from tagged conversations and contacts.
- Keep this version simple by removing the label count/prompt
requirement requested.
## Implementation notes
- Enqueue job from `Api::V1::Accounts::LabelsController#destroy` with
label title + account id.
- Background work performed in `Labels::DestroyService`.
## References
- Linear issue:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4765/cw-2857-enhancement-removing-labels-is-inconsistent
- GitHub issue: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/1249
## Testing
- `bundle exec rspec
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/labels_controller_spec.rb
spec/services/labels/destroy_service_spec.rb
spec/jobs/labels/remove_associations_job_spec.rb
spec/services/labels/update_service_spec.rb`
- `bundle exec rubocop
app/controllers/api/v1/accounts/labels_controller.rb
app/jobs/labels/remove_associations_job.rb
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/labels_controller_spec.rb
spec/jobs/labels/remove_associations_job_spec.rb
spec/services/labels/destroy_service_spec.rb`
---------
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR limits IMAP email fetching to 500 messages per sync run to avoid
expensive/long-running mailbox scans. It also filters out
already-imported emails and Chatwoot-generated notification emails
during the header fetch phase, before fetching full email bodies,
reducing unnecessary IMAP work.
Fixes #CW-7001 (issue) :
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7001/emails-not-syncing
When an agent mentions themselves in a private note, they no longer
receive a redundant notification for their own mention.
Closes: #4096
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Agents who mention themselves in a private note no longer receive a
conversation_mention notification. Previously, the mention service would
generate a notification for every mentioned user without checking
whether the sender and the
mentioned user were the same person.
## PR2: Report builder refactor — DataSource abstraction
The existing report builders (timeseries + summary) had their SQL
queries inlined — each builder constructed its own scopes, groupings,
and aggregations directly. This made it hard to swap the underlying data
source without duplicating builder logic.
This PR extracts all raw-event querying into a `Reports::RawDataSource`
behind a `Reports::DataSource` factory. Builders now call
`data_source.timeseries`, `.aggregate`, or `.summary` instead of
constructing queries themselves. Behavior is identical —
`DataSource.for(...)` returns `RawDataSource` in all cases today.
The timeseries path had two separate builders (`CountReportBuilder`,
`AverageReportBuilder`) that were selected via a metric-name case
statement in `Conversations::BaseReportBuilder`. These are replaced by a
single `ReportBuilder` that delegates to the data source. The metric
type (count vs average) is now decided inside the data source, not the
builder.
Summary builders similarly moved their inline SQL into
`RawDataSource#summary`, which returns a unified hash keyed by dimension
ID.
the rollup read path.
## Flow
### Before
```
ReportsController ──▶ case metric ──▶ AverageReportBuilder ──▶ inline SQL ──▶ DB
└──▶ CountReportBuilder ──▶ inline SQL ──▶ DB
SummaryController ──▶ AgentSummaryBuilder ──▶ inline SQL ──▶ DB
└──▶ InboxSummaryBuilder ──▶ inline SQL ──▶ DB
└──▶ TeamSummaryBuilder ──▶ inline SQL ──▶ DB
```
### After
```
ReportsController ──▶ ReportBuilder ──┐
├──▶ DataSource.for ──▶ RawDataSource ──▶ DB
SummaryController ──▶ SummaryBuilder ──┘
```
### Expected (after rollup read path)
```
ReportsController ──▶ ReportBuilder ──┐
├──▶ DataSource.for ──▶ RawDataSource ──▶ reporting_events
SummaryController ──▶ SummaryBuilder ──┘ └──▶ RollupDataSource ──▶ reporting_events_rollups
```
### What changed
- `Reports::DataSource` factory + `Reports::RawDataSource`
- `TimezoneHelper#timezone_name_from_params` — prefers IANA name, falls
back to offset
- Unified `Timeseries::ReportBuilder` replaces `CountReportBuilder` +
`AverageReportBuilder`
- Summary builders delegate to `DataSource` instead of querying directly
### How to test
This is a pure refactor — all existing report pages (Overview, Agent,
Inbox, Label, Team) should produce identical numbers. No feature flag or
new config needed.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tanmay Deep Sharma <tanmaydeepsharma21@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tanmay Deep Sharma <32020192+tds-1@users.noreply.github.com>
Introduce a `Last Responding Agent` options to assign_agents action in
automations to cover the following use cases.
- Assign conversations to first responding agent : ( automation message
created at , if assignee is nil, assign last responding agent )
- Ensure conversations are not resolved with out an assignee : (
automation conversation resolved at : if assignee is nil, assign last
responding agent )
and potential other cases.
fixes: #1592
This updates macros and automations so agents can explicitly remove
assigned agents or teams, while keeping the existing `Assign -> None`
flow working for backward compatibility.
Fixes: #7551Closes: #7551
## Why
The original macro change exposed unassignment only through `Assign ->
None`, which made macros behave differently from automations and left
the explicit remove actions inconsistent across the product. This keeps
the lower-risk compatibility path and adds the explicit remove actions
requested in review.
## What this change does
- Adds `Remove Assigned Agent` and `Remove Assigned Team` as explicit
actions in macros.
- Adds the same explicit remove actions in automations.
- Keeps `Assign Agent -> None` and `Assign Team -> None` working for
existing behavior and stored payloads.
- Preserves backward compatibility for existing macro and automation
execution payloads.
- Downmerges the latest `develop` and resolves the conflicts while
keeping both the new remove actions and current `develop` behavior.
## Validation
- Verified both remove actions are available and selectable in the macro
editor.
- Verified both remove actions are available and selectable in the
automation builder.
- Applied a disposable macro with `Remove Assigned Agent` and `Remove
Assigned Team` on a real conversation and confirmed both fields were
cleared.
- Applied a disposable macro with `Assign Agent -> None` and `Assign
Team -> None` on a real conversation and confirmed both fields were
still cleared.
## Account branding enrichment during signup
This PR does the following
### Replace Firecrawl with Context.dev
Switches the enterprise brand lookup from Firecrawl to Context.dev for
better data quality, built-in caching, and automatic filtering of
free/disposable email providers. The service interface changes from URL
to email input to match Context.dev's email endpoint. OSS still falls
back to basic HTML scraping with a normalized output shape across both
paths.
The enterprise path intentionally does not fall back to HTML scraping on
failure — speed matters more than completeness. We want the user on the
editable onboarding form fast, and a slow fallback scrape is worse than
letting them fill it in.
Requires `CONTEXT_DEV_API_KEY` in Super Admin → App Config. Without it,
falls back to OSS HTML scraping.
### Add job to enrich account details
After account creation, `Account::BrandingEnrichmentJob` looks up the
signup email and pre-fills the account name, colors, logos, social
links, and industry into `custom_attributes['brand_info']`.
The job signals completion via a short-lived Redis key (30s TTL) + an
ActionCable broadcast (`account.enrichment_completed`). The Redis key
lets the frontend distinguish "still running" from "finished with no
results."
Images and videos sent from Chatwoot to LINE inboxes fail to display on
the LINE mobile app — users see expired markers, broken thumbnails, or
missing images. This happens because LINE mobile lazy-loads images
rather than downloading them immediately, and the ActiveStorage signed
URLs expire after 5 minutes.
Closes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6696/line-messaging-with-image-or-video-may-not-show-when-client-inactive
## How to reproduce
1. Create a LINE inbox and start a chat from the LINE mobile app
2. Close the LINE mobile app
3. Send an image from Chatwoot to that chat
4. Wait 7-8 minutes (past the 5-minute URL expiration)
5. Open the LINE mobile app — the image is broken/expired
## What changed
- **`originalContentUrl`**: switched from `download_url` (signed, 5-min
expiry) to `file_url` (permanent redirect-based URL)
- **`previewImageUrl`**: switched to `thumb_url` (250px resized
thumbnail meeting LINE's 1MB/240x240 recommendation), with fallback to
`file_url` for non-image attachments like video
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Adds `WebsiteBrandingService` (OSS) with an Enterprise override using
Firecrawl v2 to extract branding and business data from a URL for
onboarding auto-fill.
OSS version uses HTTParty + Nokogiri to extract:
- Business name (og:site_name or title)
- Language (html lang)
- Favicon
- Social links from `<a>` tags
Enterprise version makes a single Firecrawl call to fetch:
- Structured JSON (name, language, industry via LLM)
- Branding (favicon, primary color)
- Page links
Falls back to OSS if Firecrawl is unavailable or fails.
Social handles (WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, Telegram, TikTok, LINE)
are parsed deterministically via a shared `SocialLinkParser`.
> We use links for socials, since the LLM extraction was unreliable,
mostly returned empty, and hallucinated in some rare scenarios
## How to test
```ruby
# OSS (no Firecrawl key needed)
WebsiteBrandingService.new('chatwoot.com').perform
# Enterprise (requires CAPTAIN_FIRECRAWL_API_KEY)
WebsiteBrandingService.new('notion.so').perform
WebsiteBrandingService.new('postman.com').perform
```
Verify the returned hash includes business_name, language,
industry_category, social_handles, and branding with
favicon/primary_color.
<img width="908" height="393" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e3696887-d366-485a-89a0-8e1a9698a788"
/>
When syncing contacts to LeadSquared, the `Lead.CreateOrUpdate` API
defaults to searching by email. If a contact has no email (or a
different email) but a phone number matching an existing lead, the API
fails with `MXDuplicateEntryException` instead of finding and updating
the existing lead. This accounted for ~69% of all LeadSquared
integration errors, and cascaded into "Lead not found" failures when
posting transcript and conversation activities (~14% of errors).
## What changed
- `LeadClient#create_or_update_lead` now catches
`MXDuplicateEntryException` and retries the request once with
`SearchBy=Phone` appended to the body, telling the API to match on phone
number instead
- Once the retry succeeds, the returned lead ID is stored on the contact
(existing behavior), so all future events use the direct `update_lead`
path and never hit the duplicate error again
## How to reproduce
1. Create a lead in LeadSquared with phone number `+91-75076767676` and
email `a@example.com`
2. In Chatwoot, create a contact with the same phone number but a
different email (or no email)
3. Trigger a contact sync (via conversation creation or contact update)
4. Before fix: `MXDuplicateEntryException` error in logs, contact fails
to sync
5. After fix: retry with `SearchBy=Phone` finds and updates the existing
lead, stores the lead ID on the contact
## PR#1: Reporting events rollup — model and write path
Reporting queries currently hit the `reporting_events` table directly.
This works, but the table grows linearly with event volume, and
aggregation queries (counts, averages over date ranges) get
progressively slower as accounts age.
This PR introduces a pre-aggregated `reporting_events_rollups` table
that stores daily per-metric, per-dimension (account/agent/inbox)
totals. The write path is intentionally decoupled from the read path —
rollup rows are written inline from the event listener via upsert, and a
backfill service exists to rebuild historical data from raw events.
Nothing reads from this table yet.
The write path activates when an account has a `reporting_timezone` set
(new account setting). The `reporting_events_rollup` feature flag
controls only the future read path, not writes — so rollup data
accumulates silently once timezone is configured. A `MetricRegistry`
maps raw event names to rollup column semantics in one place, keeping
the write and (future) read paths aligned.
### What changed
- Migration for `reporting_events_rollups` with a unique composite index
for upsert
- `ReportingEventsRollup` model
- `reporting_timezone` account setting with IANA timezone validation
- `MetricRegistry` — single source of truth for event-to-metric mappings
- `RollupService` — real-time upsert from event listener
- `BackfillService` — rebuilds rollups for a given account + date from
raw events
- Rake tasks for interactive backfill and timezone setup
- `reporting_events_rollup` feature flag (disabled by default)
### How to test
1. Set a `reporting_timezone` on an account
(`Account.first.update!(reporting_timezone: 'Asia/Kolkata')`)
2. Resolve a conversation or trigger a first response
3. Check `ReportingEventsRollup.where(account_id: ...)` — rows should
appear
4. Run backfill: `bundle exec rake reporting_events_rollup:backfill` and
verify historical data populates
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Unconfirmed agents (pending email verification) were incorrectly
appearing in the "assign agent" dropdown for macros and automations.
This fix filters out unconfirmed agents from these dropdowns and adds
backend validation to prevent assignment of unconfirmed agents.
Fixes#13223
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
**Backend tests:**
```bash
docker compose run --rm rails bundle exec rspec spec/services/action_service_spec.rb
```
- Added tests for confirmed agent assignment (should succeed)
- Added tests for unconfirmed agent assignment (should be skipped)
**Frontend tests:**
```bash
docker compose run --rm rails pnpm test app/javascript/dashboard/composables/spec/useMacros.spec.js
```
- Updated mocks to use `getVerifiedAgents` getter
**Manual testing:**
1. Create an unconfirmed agent via platform
2. Navigate to Settings → Macros → New Macro → Add "Assign Agent" action
3. Verify unconfirmed agent does NOT appear in dropdown
4. Navigate to Settings → Automations → New Automation → Add "Assign
Agent" action
5. Verify unconfirmed agent does NOT appear in dropdown
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
## Description
This PR optimizes message queries by explicitly filtering with
`account_id` so the database can use the existing indexes more
efficiently.
Changes:
- Add `account_id` to message query filters to improve index
utilization.
- Update `last_incoming_message` query to include `account_id`.
- Avoid unnecessary preloading of `contact_inboxes` where it is not
required.
- Update specs to ensure `account_id` is set correctly in
message-related tests.
These changes reduce query cost and improve performance for message
lookups, especially on large accounts.
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
## Summary
This Enterprise-only feature automatically fetches a favicon for
companies created with a domain, and adds a batch task to backfill
missing avatars for existing companies. The flow only targets companies
that do not already have an attached avatar, so existing avatars are
left untouched.
## Demo
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d050334e-769f-4e46-b6e7-f7423727a192
## What changed
- Added `Avatar::AvatarFromFaviconJob` to build a Google favicon URL
from the company domain and fetch it through `Avatar::AvatarFromUrlJob`
- Triggered favicon fetching from `Company` with `after_create_commit`
- Added `Companies::FetchAvatarsJob` to batch existing companies that
are missing avatars
- Added `companies:fetch_missing_avatars` under `enterprise/lib/tasks`
- Kept the company-specific implementation inside the Enterprise
boundary
- Stubbed the new favicon request in unrelated specs that now hit this
callback indirectly
- Updated a couple of CI-sensitive specs that were failing due to
callback side effects / reload-safe exception assertions
## How to verify
1. Create a company in Enterprise with a valid domain and no avatar.
2. Confirm that a favicon-based avatar gets attached shortly after
creation.
3. Create another company with a domain and an avatar already attached.
4. Confirm that the existing avatar is not replaced.
5. Run `companies:fetch_missing_avatars`.
6. Confirm that existing companies without avatars get one, while
companies that already have avatars remain unchanged.
## Notes
- This change does not refresh or overwrite existing company avatars
- Favicon fetching only runs for companies with a present domain
- The branch includes the latest `develop`
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
This PR updates Facebook Messenger outbound tagging in Chatwoot to
support Human Agent messaging when enabled.
Previously, Facebook outbound text and attachment messages were always
sent with:
```
messaging_type: MESSAGE_TAG
tag: ACCOUNT_UPDATE
```
With this change, the tag is selected dynamically:
```
HUMAN_AGENT when ENABLE_MESSENGER_CHANNEL_HUMAN_AGENT is enabled
ACCOUNT_UPDATE as fallback when the flag is disabled
```
## Summary
This PR enables and surfaces **conversation workflow** for social-style
channels that should support either:
- `Create new conversations` after resolve, or
- `Reopen same conversation`
## What is included
- Adds the conversation workflow setting UI as card-based options in
Inbox Settings.
- Expands channel availability in settings to include channels like:
- Telegram
- TikTok
- Instagram
- Line
- WhatsApp
- Facebook
- Updates conversation selection behavior for Line incoming messages to
respect the workflow (reopen vs create-new-after-resolved).
- Updates TikTok conversation selection behavior to respect the workflow
(reopen vs create-new-after-resolved).
- Keeps email behavior unchanged (always starts a new thread).
Fixes: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/8426
## Screenshot
<img width="1400" height="900" alt="pr11079-workflow-sender-clear-tight"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9456821f-8d83-4924-8dcf-7503c811a7b1"
/>
## How To Reproduce
1. Open `Settings -> Inboxes ->
<Telegram/TikTok/Instagram/Line/Facebook/WhatsApp inbox> -> Settings`.
2. Verify **Conversation workflow** is visible with the two card
options.
3. Toggle between both options and save.
4. For Line and TikTok, verify resolved-conversation behavior follows
the selected workflow.
## Testing
- `RAILS_ENV=test bundle exec rspec
spec/builders/messages/instagram/message_builder_spec.rb:213
spec/builders/messages/instagram/message_builder_spec.rb:255
spec/builders/messages/instagram/messenger/message_builder_spec.rb:228
spec/builders/messages/instagram/messenger/message_builder_spec.rb:293
spec/services/tiktok/message_service_spec.rb`
- Result: `16 examples, 0 failures`
## Follow-up
- Migrate Website Live Chat workflow settings into this same
conversation-workflow settings model.
- Add Voice channel support for this workflow setting.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
CSAT templates for WhatsApp are submitted as Utility, but Meta may
reclassify them as Marketing based on content, which can significantly
increase messaging costs.
This PR introduces a Captain-powered CSAT template analyzer for
WhatsApp/Twilio WhatsApp that predicts utility fit, explains likely
risks, and suggests safer rewrites before submission. The flow is manual
(button-triggered), Captain-gated, and applies rewrites only on explicit
user action. It also updates UX copy to clearly set expectations: the
system submits as Utility, Meta makes the final categorization decision.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6424/ai-powered-whatsapp-template-classifier-for-csat-submissionshttps://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8fd1d6db-2f91-447c-9771-3de271b16fd9
When agents or integrations create private notes on a conversation,
every note was sending a notification to the assigned agent and all
conversation participants. The fix ensures that private notes no longer
trigger new message notifications. If someone explicitly mentions a
teammate in a private note, that person will still get notified as
expected.
## Description
AutoAssignment::RateLimiter#within_limit? returned true early for
inboxes without an AssignmentPolicy, bypassing fair distribution
entirely and allowing unlimited conversation assignment.
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Script
- Script to enable users with V2 assignment:
https://www.notion.so/chatwoot/Script-to-migrate-account-to-assignment-V2-30ca5f274c9280f5b8ecfd15e28eeb9c?source=copy_link
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
Some customers using WhatsApp inboxes with account-level webhooks were
reporting receiving duplicate `message_created` webhook deliveries for
every incoming message. Upon inspection, here's what we found
- Both payloads are identical.
- No errors appear in the application logs
- Webhook URL is only configured in one place.
This meant, the system was sending the webhooks twice. For some context,
there's a know related issue... Meta's WhatsApp Business API can deliver
the same webhook notification multiple times for a single message. The
codebase already acknowledges this — there's a comment in
`IncomingMessageBaseService#process_messages` noting that "multiple
webhook events can be received against the same message due to
misconfigurations in the Meta business manager account." A deduplication
guard exists, but it doesn't actually work under concurrency.
### Rationale
The existing dedup was a three-step sequence: check Redis (`GET`), check
the database, then set a Redis flag (`SETEX`). Two Sidekiq workers
processing duplicate Meta webhooks simultaneously would both complete
the `GET` before either executed the `SETEX`, so both would proceed to
create a message. The `source_id` column has a non-unique index, so the
database wouldn't catch the duplicate either. Each message then
independently fires `after_create_commit`, dispatching two
`message_created` webhook events to the customer.
```
Worker A Worker B
│ │
▼ ▼
Redis GET key ──► nil Redis GET key ──► nil
│ │
│ ◄── both pass guard ──► │
│ │
▼ ▼
Redis SETEX key Redis SETEX key
│ │
▼ ▼
BEGIN transaction BEGIN transaction
INSERT message INSERT message
DELETE Redis key ◄─┐ │
COMMIT │ DELETE Redis key
│ COMMIT
│ │
└── key gone before ───┘
B's commit lands
▼ ▼
after_create_commit after_create_commit
dispatch MESSAGE_CREATED dispatch MESSAGE_CREATED
│ │
▼ ▼
WebhookJob ──► n8n WebhookJob ──► n8n
(duplicate!)
```
There was a second, subtler problem visible in the diagram: the Redis
key was cleared *inside* the database transaction, before the
transaction committed. This opened a window where neither the Redis
check nor the database check would see the in-flight message.
The fix collapses the check-and-set into a single `SET NX EX` call,
which is atomic in Redis. The key is no longer eagerly cleared — it
expires naturally after 24 hours. The database lookup
(`find_message_by_source_id`) remains as a fallback for messages that
were created before the lock expired.
```
Worker A Worker B
│ │
▼ ▼
Redis SET NX ──► OK Redis SET NX ──► nil
│ │
▼ ▼
proceeds to create returns early
message normally (lock already held)
```
### Implementation Notes
The lock logic is extracted into `Whatsapp::MessageDedupLock`, a small
class that wraps a single `Redis SET NX EX` call. This makes the
concurrency guarantee testable in isolation — the spec uses a
`CyclicBarrier` to race two threads against the same key and asserts
exactly one wins, without needing database writes,
`use_transactional_tests = false`, or monkey-patching.
Because the Redis lock now persists (instead of being cleared
mid-transaction), existing WhatsApp specs needed an `after` hook to
clean up `MESSAGE_SOURCE_KEY::*` keys between examples. Transactional
fixtures only roll back the database, not Redis.
## Description
Fixes a critical bug where conversations assigned to a team could be
auto-assigned to agents outside that team when all team members were at
capacity.
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> **Medium Risk**
> Changes core assignment selection for both legacy and v2 flows;
misconfiguration of `allow_auto_assign` or team membership could cause
conversations to remain unassigned.
>
> **Overview**
> Prevents auto-assignment from crossing team boundaries by filtering
eligible agents to the conversation’s `team` members (and requiring
`team.allow_auto_assign`) in both the legacy `AutoAssignmentHandler`
path and the v2 `AutoAssignment::AssignmentService` (including the
Enterprise override).
>
> Adds test coverage to ensure team-scoped conversations only assign to
team members, and are skipped when team auto-assign is disabled or no
team members are available; also updates the conversations controller
spec setup to include team membership.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
67ed2bda0cd8ffd56c7e0253b86369dead2e6155. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
## Linear Ticket:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6081/review-feedback
## Description
Assignment V2 Service Enhancements
- Enable Assignment V2 on plan upgrade
- Fix UI issue with fair distribution policy display
- Add advanced assignment feature flag and enhance Assignment V2
capabilities
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
This has been tested using the UI.
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> **Medium Risk**
> Changes auto-assignment execution paths, rate limiting defaults, and
feature-flag gating (including premium plan behavior), which could
affect which conversations get assigned and when. UI rewires inbox
settings and policy flows, so regressions are possible around
navigation/linking and feature visibility.
>
> **Overview**
> **Adds a new premium `advanced_assignment` feature flag** and uses it
to gate capacity/balanced assignment features in the UI (sidebar entry,
settings routes, assignment-policy landing cards) and backend
(Enterprise balanced selector + capacity filtering).
`advanced_assignment` is marked premium, included in Business plan
entitlements, and auto-synced in Enterprise accounts when
`assignment_v2` is toggled.
>
> **Improves Assignment V2 policy UX** by adding an inbox-level
“Conversation Assignment” section (behind `assignment_v2`) that can
link/unlink an assignment policy, navigate to create/edit policy flows
with `inboxId` query context, and show an inbox-link prompt after
creating a policy. The policy form now defaults to enabled, disables the
`balanced` option with a premium badge/message when unavailable, and
inbox lists support click-to-navigate.
>
> **Tightens/adjusts auto-assignment behavior**: bulk assignment now
requires `inbox.enable_auto_assignment?`, conversation ordering uses the
attached `assignment_policy` priority, and rate limiting uses
`assignment_policy` config with an infinite default limit while still
tracking assignments. Tests and i18n strings are updated accordingly.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
23bc03bf75ee4376071e4d7fc7cd564c601d33d7. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR fixes account deletion failures by changing how orphaned user
emails are rewritten during `AccountDeletionService`.
Ref:
https://chatwoot-p3.sentry.io/issues/6715254765/events/e228a5d045ad47348d6c32448bc33b7a/
## Changes (develop -> this branch)
- Updated soft-delete email rewrite from:
- `#{original_email}-deleted.com`
- To deterministic value:
- `#{user.id}@chatwoot-deleted.invalid`
- Added reserved non-deliverable domain constant:
- `@chatwoot-deleted.invalid`
- Replaced the "other accounts" check from `count.zero?` to `exists?`
(same behavior, cheaper query).
- Updated service spec expectation to match deterministic email value
and assert it differs from original email.
## Files changed
- `app/services/account_deletion_service.rb`
- `spec/services/account_deletion_service_spec.rb`
## How to verify
- Run: `bundle exec rspec
spec/services/account_deletion_service_spec.rb`
- Run: `bundle exec rubocop app/services/account_deletion_service.rb
spec/services/account_deletion_service_spec.rb`
This change https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/13371 broke the
functionality. When a user replies to a WhatsApp message, the reply
context wasn't being properly stored in Chatwoot due to #13371
WhatsApp sends reply messages with a `context` field containing the
original message ID:
```json
{
"messages": [{
"context": {
"from": "phone_number",
"id": "wamid.ORIGINAL_MESSAGE_ID"
},
"from": "phone_number",
"id": "wamid.REPLY_MESSAGE_ID",
"text": { "body": "This is a reply" }
}]
}
```
However, the in_reply_to_external_id was being overridden when building
the message because content_attributes was explicitly set to either {
external_echo: true } or {}, which discarded the reply-to information.
Upgrade rails to 7.2.2 so that we can proceed with the rails 8 upgrade
afterwards
# Changelog
- `.circleci/config.yml` — align CI DB setup with GitHub Actions
(`db:create` + `db:schema:load`) to avoid trigger-dependent prep steps.
- `.rubocop.yml` — add `rubocop-rspec_rails` and disable new cops that
don't match existing spec style.
- `AGENTS.md` — document that specs should run without `.env` (rename
temporarily when present).
- `Gemfile` — upgrade to Rails 7.2, switch Azure storage gem, pin
`commonmarker`, bump `sidekiq-cron`, add `rubocop-rspec_rails`, and
relax some gem pins.
- `Gemfile.lock` — dependency lockfile updates from the Rails 7.2 and
gem changes.
- `app/controllers/api/v1/accounts/integrations/linear_controller.rb` —
stringify params before passing to the Linear service to keep key types
stable.
- `app/controllers/super_admin/instance_statuses_controller.rb` — use
`MigrationContext` API for migration status in Rails 7.2.
- `app/models/installation_config.rb` — add commentary on YAML
serialization and future JSONB migration (no behavior change).
- `app/models/integrations/hook.rb` — ensure hook type is set on create
only and guard against missing app.
- `app/models/user.rb` — update enum syntax for Rails 7.2 deprecation,
serialize OTP backup codes with JSON, and use Ruby `alias`.
- `app/services/crm/leadsquared/setup_service.rb` — stringify hook
settings keys before merge to keep JSON shape consistent.
- `app/services/macros/execution_service.rb` — remove macro-specific
assignee activity workaround; rely on standard assignment handlers.
- `config/application.rb` — load Rails 7.2 defaults.
- `config/storage.yml` — update Azure Active Storage service name to
`AzureBlob`.
- `db/migrate/20230515051424_update_article_image_keys.rb` — use
credentials `secret_key_base` with fallback to legacy secrets.
- `docker/Dockerfile` — add `yaml-dev` and `pkgconf` packages for native
extensions (Ruby 3.4 / psych).
- `lib/seeders/reports/message_creator.rb` — add parentheses for clarity
in range calculation.
- `package.json` — pin Vite version and bump `vite-plugin-ruby`.
- `pnpm-lock.yaml` — lockfile changes from JS dependency updates.
- `spec/builders/v2/report_builder_spec.rb` — disable transactional
fixtures; truncate tables per example via Rails `truncate_tables` so
after_commit callbacks run with clean isolation; keep builder spec
metadata minimal.
- `spec/builders/v2/reports/label_summary_builder_spec.rb` — disable
transactional fixtures + truncate tables via Rails `truncate_tables`;
revert to real `resolved!`/`open!`/`resolved!` flow for multiple
resolution events; align date range to `Time.zone` to avoid offset gaps;
keep builder spec metadata minimal.
- `spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/macros_controller_spec.rb` — assert
`assignee_id` instead of activity message to avoid transaction-timing
flakes.
- `spec/services/telegram/incoming_message_service_spec.rb` — reference
the contact tied to the created conversation instead of
`Contact.all.first` to avoid order-dependent failures when other specs
leave data behind.
-
`spec/mailers/administrator_notifications/shared/smtp_config_shared.rb`
— use `with_modified_env` instead of stubbing mailer internals.
- `spec/services/account/sign_up_email_validation_service_spec.rb` —
compare error `class.name` for parallel/reload-safe assertions.
#### Problem
Meta requires the app to be subscribed to the WABA before
`override_callback_uri` can be used. The current implementation tries to
use `override_callback_uri` directly, which fails with:
> Error 100: "Before override the current callback uri, your app must be
subscribed to receive messages for WhatsApp Business Account"
This causes embedded signup to fail silently, the inbox appears
connected but never receives messages.
#### Solution
Split `subscribe_waba_webhook` into two sequential API calls:
```ruby
def subscribe_waba_webhook(waba_id, callback_url, verify_token)
# Step 1: Subscribe app to WABA first (required before override)
subscribe_app_to_waba(waba_id)
# Step 2: Override callback URL for this specific WABA
override_waba_callback(waba_id, callback_url, verify_token)
end
```
#### References
- Subscribe app to WABA's webhooks: https://www.postman.com/meta/whatsapp-business-platform/request/ju40fld/subscribe-app-to-waba-s-webhooks
- Override Callback URL (Embedded Signup): https://www.postman.com/meta/whatsapp-business-platform/request/l6a09ow/override-callback-url
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
When businesses use WhatsApp Business App (co-existence mode) or
Instagram App or TikTok alongside Chatwoot, messages sent from the
native apps were not synced properly back to Chatwoot. This left agents
with an incomplete conversation history and no visibility into responses
sent outside the dashboard. Additionally, if these echo messages did
arrive, they appeared as "Sent by: Bot" in the UI since they had no
sender, making it confusing for agents.
This PR subscribes to WhatsApp `smb_message_echoes` webhook events and
routes them through the existing service with an `outgoing_echo` flag,
mirroring how Instagram already handles echoes. On the Instagram side,
echo messages now also carry the `external_echo` content attribute and
`delivered` status.
On the frontend, messages with `externalEcho` are distinguished from bot
messages showing a "Native app" avatar and an advisory note encouraging
agents to reply from Chatwoot to maintain the service window.
<img width="1518" height="524" alt="CleanShot 2026-01-29 at 13 37 57@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5aa0b552-6382-441f-96aa-9a62ca716e4a"
/>
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4204/display-messages-not-sent-from-chatwoot-in-case-of-outgoing-echo
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-33/incoming-from-me-messages-from-whatsapp-business-app-are-not-falling
### What
Forces `account_id` to be applied consistently in queries and message creation paths.
### Why
Some queries were missing `account_id`, leading to cross-account scans and slow performance in large datasets.
### Changes
* Added `account_id` to the relevant query columns.
* Ensured messages are always created within the correct account scope.
* Updated `created_at` handling where required for consistency.
### Impact
* Prevents cross-account queries.
* Improves query performance.
* Reduces risk of incorrect data access across accounts.
### Notes
No functional behavior change for end users. This is a performance and safety fix.
- Fix ordered lists being sent as unordered lists in WhatsApp
integrations
- The WhatsApp markdown renderer was converting all lists to bullet
points (-), ignoring numbered list formatting
- Added ordered list support by tracking list_type and list_item_number
from CommonMarker AST metadata
Before:
Input: "1. First\n2. Second\n3. Third"
Output: "- First\n- Second\n- Third"
After:
Input: "1. First\n2. Second\n3. Third"
Output: "1. First\n2. Second\n3. Third"
