# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR makes the contacts bulk action bar sticky while scrolling.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshots
<img width="1080" height="300" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/21f8f3c6-813e-4ef6-b40a-8dd14e6ffb26"
/>
<img width="1080" height="300" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bb939f1d-9a13-4f9f-953d-b9872c984b74"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
**This PR includes:**
1. Added URL-based filter persistence for the responses pages, including
page and search parameters.
2. Introduced a new empty state variant for pending FAQs — without a
backdrop and with a “Clear Filters” option.
3. Made the actions, filter, and search row remain fixed at the top
while scrolling.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5852/improvements-in-pending-faqs
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/1d9eee68c0684f0ab05e08b4ca1e0ce9
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/12553
Heroku build was failing due to `omniauth` version mismatch. Also, added
`NODE_OPTIONS=--max-old-space-size=4096` to handle OOM during Vite
build.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Tested on heroku
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
**This PR includes,**
- Added new pending FAQs view with approve/edit/delete actions for each
response.
- Implemented banner notification showing pending FAQ count on main
approved responses page.
- Created dedicated route for pending FAQs review at
/captain/responses/pending.
- Added automatic pending count updates when switching assistants or
routes.
- Modified ResponseCard component to show action buttons instead of
dropdown in pending view.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5833/pending-faqs-in-a-different-ux
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/5fe8f79b04cd4681b9360c48710b9373
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
## Summary
- Fix captain response builder not getting triggered for cases where
responses are created as completed.
## Testing Instructions
- Test articles with firecrawl
- Test articles without firecrawl
- Test PDF documents
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
## Description
Fixes timezone offset parameter in V2 reports API that was broken by DST
transitions. The issue occurred when UK DST ended on October 26, 2025,
causing the test to fail starting October 27th.
~~**Initial diagnosis:** The root cause was that
`timezone_name_from_offset` used `zone.now.utc_offset` to match
timezones, which changes based on the current date's DST status rather
than the data being queried.~~
**Actual root cause:** The test was accidentally passing before DST
transition. During BST, `timezone_name_from_offset(0)` matched "Azores"
(UTC-1) instead of "Edinburgh" (UTC+0), and the -1 hour offset
coincidentally split midnight data into [1,5]. After DST ended, it
correctly matched "Edinburgh" (UTC+0), but this grouped all
conversations into one day [6], exposing that the test data was flawed.
The real issue: Test data created all 6 conversations starting at
midnight on a single day, which cannot produce a [1,5] split in true
UTC.
Fixes CW-5846
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
**Test that was failing:**
```bash
bundle exec rspec spec/controllers/api/v2/accounts/reports_controller_spec.rb:25
```
**Changes:**
~~1. Fixed `timezone_name_from_offset` to use January 1st as reference
date instead of current date~~
~~2. Converted timezone string to `ActiveSupport::TimeZone` object for
`group_by_period` compatibility~~
**Revised approach:**
1. Freeze test time to January 2024 using `travel_to`, making timezone
matching deterministic and aligned with test data period
2. Start test conversations at 23:00 instead of midnight to properly
span two days and test timezone boundary grouping
3. Keep `zone.now.utc_offset` (correct behavior for real users during
DST)
**Why this works:**
- Test runs "in January 2024" → `zone.now.utc_offset` returns January
offsets consistently
- Offset `-8` correctly matches Pacific Standard Time (UTC-8 in January)
- Real users in PDT (summer) with offset `-7` → correctly match Pacific
Daylight Time
- No production impact, test is deterministic year-round
**Verification:**
- Test now passes consistently regardless of current DST status
- Timezone matching works correctly for real users during DST periods
- Reports correctly group data by timezone offset across all seasons
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
### Problem
WhatsApp Cloud channels already handle Brazil/Argentina phone number
format mismatches (PRs #12492, #11173), but Twilio WhatsApp channels
were creating duplicate contacts
when:
- Template sent to new format: `whatsapp:+5541988887777` (13 digits)
- User responds from old format: `whatsapp:+554188887777` (12 digits)
### Solution
The solution extends the existing phone number normalization
infrastructure to support both WhatsApp providers while handling their
different payload formats:
### Provider Format Differences
- **WhatsApp Cloud**: `wa_id: "919745786257"` (clean number)
- **Twilio WhatsApp**: `From: "whatsapp:+919745786257"` (prefixed
format)
### Test Coverage
#### Brazil Phone Number Tests
**Case 1: New Format (13 digits with "9")**
- **Test 1**: No existing contact → Creates new contact with original
format
- **Test 2**: Contact exists in same format → Appends to existing
conversation
**Case 2: Old Format (12 digits without "9")**
- **Test 3**: Contact exists in old format → Appends to existing
conversation
- **Test 4** *(Critical)*: Contact exists in new format, message in old
format → Finds existing contact, prevents duplicate
- **Test 5**: No contact exists → Creates new contact with incoming
format
#### Argentina Phone Number Tests
**Case 3: With "9" after country code**
- **Test 6**: No existing contact → Creates new contact
- **Test 7**: Contact exists in normalized format → Uses existing
contact
**Case 4: Without "9" after country code**
- **Test 8**: Contact exists in same format → Appends to existing
- **Test 9**: No contact exists → Creates new contact
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5565/inconsistencies-for-mobile-numbersargentina-brazil-and-mexico-numbers
iamsivin