Commit Graph
1907 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Sivin VargheseandGitHub 7a76cee723 Merge branch 'feature/cw-7495-llm' into feature/cw-7495-api 2026-07-23 15:12:49 +05:30
Sivin VargheseandGitHub 4842f724ea Merge branch 'develop' into feature/cw-7495-llm 2026-07-23 15:12:34 +05:30
aakashb95 b11f2e4a0c fix(captain): revalidate FAQ matches after edits 2026-07-22 23:32:24 +05:30
aakashb95 d5a9747b81 test(captain): cover restricted FAQ suggestion sources 2026-07-22 23:30:35 +05:30
aakashb95 a8ef787878 fix(captain): allow FAQ approval across languages 2026-07-22 23:30:08 +05:30
aakashb95 d85ab03444 fix(captain): retain approved FAQ suggestion sources 2026-07-22 23:29:40 +05:30
aakashb95 b4d2fa5554 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/feature/cw-7495-llm' into cook/pr-14979-review 2026-07-22 23:29:08 +05:30
aakashb95 f1753f08b2 fix(captain): match approved FAQs across languages 2026-07-22 23:28:53 +05:30
aakashb95 1ee939a910 feat(captain): allow agents to review FAQ suggestions 2026-07-22 23:19:49 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub ddb0535a93 perf: reuse resolved count for reopen rate (#15122)
This improves the Captain overview by loading reporting metrics and FAQ
stats from separate endpoints. Range changes now refresh only the
metrics, while reopen-rate calculation reuses the resolved conversation
count to avoid redundant database queries.

## What changed

- Split Captain overview metrics and FAQ stats into separate APIs.
- Fetch FAQ stats independently from range-based metrics.
- Reuse resolved conversation totals when calculating reopen rate.
- Skip the reopen query when there are no resolved conversations.
2026-07-22 22:03:25 +05:30
887897ea98 fix: lock agent quota checks (#15029)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Locks the agent quota check to the account row while creating account
users. This fixes a race where concurrent agent-create requests could
all observe the same remaining seat before any `account_users` row was
inserted.

The API continues to return the existing `402 Account limit exceeded.
Please purchase more licenses` response when the limit is reached. Bulk
create now preflights the requested email count while holding the
account lock, then creates each agent through the same locked builder
path. The Enterprise custom-role hook now no-ops when create did not
produce an agent.

Fixes:
[CW-7039](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7039/race-condition-in-agent-creation-bypasses-plan-agent-seat-limit)

## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

- `POSTGRES_DATABASE=chatwoot_test_c20f_agent_quota REDIS_DB=9 bundle
exec rspec spec/builders/agent_builder_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/builders/agent_builder_spec.rb
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/agents_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/agents_controller_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/controllers/enterprise/api/v1/accounts/agents_controller_spec.rb`
- `bundle exec rubocop app/builders/agent_builder.rb
app/controllers/api/v1/accounts/agents_controller.rb
enterprise/app/controllers/enterprise/api/v1/accounts/agents_controller.rb
spec/builders/agent_builder_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/agents_controller_spec.rb`
- `git diff --check`
- One-off threaded Rails validation with 8 concurrent `AgentBuilder`
calls against an account with one remaining seat: `created: 1`,
`limited: 7`, final `count=2`, `limit=2`.

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-07-22 18:43:00 +05:30
8aee518149 fix(integrations): restrict Linear/Notion/Shopify hook deletion to admins (#15126)
Non-admin agents could delete an account's Linear, Notion, or Shopify
integration through the dedicated integration endpoints, which — unlike
the generic hooks endpoint — never checked the caller's role. This
restores the intended admin-only boundary for removing an integration.

## Closes
- https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7383
- https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7384
- https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7189

## How to reproduce
As a non-admin **agent**, `DELETE
/api/v1/accounts/:id/integrations/{linear,notion,shopify}` returned
`200` and removed the account-wide integration. After this change it
returns `401` and the integration is preserved; administrators can still
remove it.

## What changed
- Route integration-hook deletion through `HookPolicy` (admin-only) via
a shared `Integrations::BaseController`, matching the generic hooks
controller.

Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com>
2026-07-22 17:53:25 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 837343b12d Merge branch 'feature/cw-7495-llm' into feature/cw-7495-api 2026-07-22 16:06:36 +05:30
166a41c31c fix(whatsapp): prevent invalid automation sends outside reply window (#15113)
WhatsApp automations now fail locally when they attempt to send a
free-form message after the 24-hour customer service window has closed.
This avoids sending an invalid template request to Meta and gives users
a clear, actionable error instead of “Template not found or invalid
template name.”

Template messages continue to be sent whenever template parameters are
present. Free-form messages continue to be sent normally while the
conversation is replyable.

Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-183/prevent-whatsapp-automations-outside-the-24-hour-window-from-producing

### How to reproduce

1. Create a WhatsApp automation that sends a message without template
parameters.
2. Trigger it on a conversation whose 24-hour customer service window is
closed.
3. Observe that the message previously reached the template send path
and failed with a misleading provider error.

### How to test

1. Trigger an automation with template parameters and confirm it sends
as a template message.
2. Trigger an automation without template parameters inside the 24-hour
window and confirm it sends as a free-form message.
3. Trigger an automation without template parameters outside the 24-hour
window and confirm it fails locally with a clear error and makes no
request to Meta.

### Things to know

This changes only the invalid closed-window, no-template path. Existing
template and in-window message behavior remains unchanged.

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-22 12:40:28 +04:00
aakashb95 9f658fbfaa fix(captain): route FAQ matching model 2026-07-22 13:41:21 +05:30
aakashb95 c183b2aa80 fix(captain): allow FAQ answers across agent messages 2026-07-22 13:36:19 +05:30
aakashb95 9a780e8716 fix(captain): serialize FAQ suggestion grouping 2026-07-22 13:14:48 +05:30
aakashb95 e48d612a55 fix(captain): preserve FAQ suggestion assistant 2026-07-22 13:11:44 +05:30
aakashb95 3662224396 fix(captain): retry failed FAQ comparisons 2026-07-22 13:10:20 +05:30
e65e18e9c5 fix: normalize phone numbers during whatsapp channel lookup (#13709)
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-99/whatsapp-messages-dropped-for-brazilargentina-numbers-due-to-phone
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/14492

Meta's WhatsApp Cloud API includes `display_phone_number` in webhook
payloads, but its format can differ from the number stored in Chatwoot's
channel record.
In Brazil, Meta omits the mobile 9 prefix. For example, it sends
55419XXXXXXX (12 digits) instead of 554199XXXXXXX (13 digits). In
Argentina, Meta adds an extra 9 after the country code. For example, it
sends 549XXXXXXXXXX instead of 54XXXXXXXXXX.
The whatsapp event job uses `display_phone_number` for an exact-match
channel lookup. When the formats do not match, the lookup returns nil
and the incoming message is silently dropped, logging:

`Inactive WhatsApp channel: unknown - <phone_number>.`

The fix extends `get_channel_from_wb_payload` to fall back to normalized
phone number matching using the existing PhoneNumberNormalizationService
normalizers (Brazil, Argentina), which were previously only used for
contact-level lookups.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-22 10:33:40 +04:00
aakashb95 961c4a8951 test(captain): cover FAQ suggestion details 2026-07-22 11:45:35 +05:30
aakashb95 439ac80019 test(captain): cover FAQ review through API 2026-07-22 11:42:25 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub e0aa099487 Merge branch 'feature/cw-7495-llm' into feature/cw-7495-api 2026-07-21 18:17:44 +05:30
Sony MathewandGitHub 11143672a6 Merge branch 'develop' into feature/cw-7495-llm 2026-07-21 17:01:38 +05:30
Tanmay Deep SharmaandGitHub 2144de92f2 fix(whatsapp): reopen conversation across a contact's coexistence identities (#15098)
WhatsApp contacts using coexistence are identified by more than one
source ID (a phone `wa_id` and a `BR.`/BSUID identity), so a single
contact ends up owning multiple `contact_inbox` records. The "reopen the
same conversation" feature scoped conversation reuse to a single
`contact_inbox`, so messages arriving under a different identity of the
same contact started a brand-new conversation — even with reopen enabled
— producing duplicate conversations.

This scopes reuse to the contact across all of its `contact_inbox`
records in the inbox instead of a single `contact_inbox`.

## Closes
- [CW-7651
](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7651/duplicate-conversations)

## How to reproduce
1. On a WhatsApp Cloud inbox with "reopen the same conversation" (lock
to single conversation) enabled.
2. Have a coexistence contact whose webhooks alternate between carrying
the phone `wa_id` and only the BSUID identity.
3. Before: each identity opens its own conversation → duplicates. After:
incoming messages reopen the contact's existing conversation regardless
of which identity the webhook carried.

## What changed
- `Whatsapp::IncomingMessageBaseService#set_conversation` now looks up
reusable conversations via `@contact.conversations.where(inbox_id:
@inbox.id)` instead of `@contact_inbox.conversations`.
- Updated existing specs to wire the conversation's `contact` to the
contact_inbox's contact, mirroring production data.
2026-07-21 16:21:40 +05:30
0e376f4fe2 feat(whatsapp-call): support BSUID callers for inbound voice calls (#14743)
## Linear Ticket
-
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7276/bsuid-support-to-whatsapp-voice-calling

## Description

Keeps WhatsApp voice calls in the same thread as the chat when a caller
has adopted a **WhatsApp username** and hidden their phone number.
This makes the inbound-call path BSUID-aware, reusing the same
identifier the messaging pipeline keys on so calls land on the existing
`ContactInbox`/conversation.

## Type of change

- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

-  Locally via UI

## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-07-21 16:19:53 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 67cab7171d feat: show Captain generation path on conversation messages [CW-7484] (#15078) 2026-07-21 15:15:13 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 7a5385cc32 feat: improve captain overview loading and reuse stats for summary [CW-7610] (#15105) 2026-07-21 15:14:18 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub ae49af354d fix: serialize multimodal Captain session content (#15096)
Captain now saves agent session records when a user message includes an
image. The saved record keeps the image URL and excludes downloaded
image bytes, so image replies no longer report a JSON serialization
error after delivery.

Fixes:
https://chatwoot-p3.sentry.io/issues/7618423184/?alert_rule_id=13673680&alert_type=issue&notification_uuid=d22a7ab9-95d6-4bba-85e0-733a28466775&project=6382945

## Root cause

RubyLLM downloads image attachments and caches the binary bytes inside
`RubyLLM::Content`. `SessionCaptureService` passed the live object to
the `run_context` JSON column. Rails then tried to encode the cached
JPEG bytes as UTF-8 and raised `JSON::GeneratorError`.

The error did not block replies, handoffs, or credit updates because
session capture rescues its own failures. The failed write meant that
Chatwoot lost the agent session record for the response.

## How to reproduce

1. Send an image to a Captain V2 assistant.
2. Let RubyLLM load the image during the model request.
3. Save the resulting conversation history in an agent session.
4. Observe the JSON encoding error when Rails reaches the cached image
bytes.

## What changed

`SessionCaptureService` now converts `RubyLLM::Content` to its JSON safe
hash before saving the current turn. The hash contains the message text
and attachment URL without the cached bytes. Other message content is
unchanged.

The focused service spec covers a cached JPEG byte payload and passes
with 12 examples. RuboCop reports no offenses in the changed service and
spec.
2026-07-21 13:04:12 +05:30
Sojan JoseandGitHub eae9841eb4 fix: restore token access to account APIs (#15088)
Token-authenticated requests to Agent Bots, Labels, and affected Captain
endpoints return normal responses again. The regression was caused by
duplicate `current_account` callbacks in subclasses moving account
resolution behind the API entitlement check, leaving `Current.account`
unset.

## Closes

- https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7641/5xx-errors-in-agent-bot-apis

## How to reproduce

1. Send `GET /api/v1/accounts/:account_id/agent_bots` with a valid
administrator API access token.
2. Observe a `500` from `validate_token_api_access` because
`Current.account` is `nil`.
3. With this change, account resolution runs in the base-controller
order and the request succeeds.

## What changed

- Removed redundant `current_account` callbacks from account-scoped
controllers that already inherit the callback from
`Api::V1::Accounts::BaseController`.
- Kept the standalone direct-upload controller callback unchanged.
- Added regression coverage for administrator API-token access to Agent
Bots.
2026-07-20 15:28:33 -07:00
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 412319462a Merge branch 'develop' into feature/cw-7495-llm 2026-07-20 22:36:29 +05:30
90861f8809 feat(whatsapp): gate embedded signup inbox creation (#15046)
WhatsApp inbox creation now shows Embedded Signup for Chatwoot Cloud
accounts only when the new `whatsapp_embedded_signup_inbox_creation`
feature flag is enabled. Cloud accounts without the flag go directly to
manual WhatsApp Cloud API setup, while self-hosted installations with a
configured WhatsApp App ID retain their existing Embedded Signup flow.

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-17 14:09:36 +04:00
Sony MathewandGitHub c420edce58 feat: branded email layouts for email inboxes (#14936)
## Description

Adds an API-only branded email layout feature for Email inbox replies.
Administrators can configure an account-level fallback layout and
per-email-inbox overrides with Liquid HTML using `{{ content_for_layout
}}`, and eligible outbound email replies/transcripts render through the
scoped layout when the account feature flag `branded_email_templates` is
enabled.

The feature is disabled by default and is manually controlled through
the normal account feature flag mechanism.

Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7514/branded-html-email-templates-per-inboxbrand

## Type of change

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] This change requires a documentation update

## How to test

1. Start Chatwoot locally and sign in as an administrator.
2. Enable the account feature flag for the account you are testing:

   ```ruby
   account = Account.find(<account_id>)
   account.enable_features!(:branded_email_templates)
   ```

3. Create or pick an Email inbox, then note the `account_id` and
`inbox_id`.
4. Configure an account-level fallback layout through the API using
authenticated admin headers:

   ```http
   PATCH /api/v1/accounts/:account_id/branded_email_layout
   Content-Type: application/json

   {
"branded_email_layout": "<html><body><header>Account Brand</header>{{
content_for_layout }}<footer>Account footer</footer></body></html>"
   }
   ```

5. Confirm `GET /api/v1/accounts/:account_id/branded_email_layout`
returns the saved account layout.
6. Configure an inbox-level override for the Email inbox:

   ```http
   PATCH /api/v1/accounts/:account_id/inboxes/:inbox_id
   Content-Type: application/json

   {
"branded_email_layout": "<html><body><header>Inbox Brand</header>{{
content_for_layout }}<footer>Inbox footer</footer></body></html>"
   }
   ```

7. Confirm `GET /api/v1/accounts/:account_id/inboxes/:inbox_id` returns
the inbox `branded_email_layout`.
8. Send an Email inbox reply and verify the outbound email body is
wrapped with the inbox layout around the generated reply content.
9. Clear the inbox layout by sending a blank value, then send another
reply and verify it falls back to the account layout:

   ```http
   PATCH /api/v1/accounts/:account_id/inboxes/:inbox_id
   Content-Type: application/json

   {
     "branded_email_layout": ""
   }
   ```

10. Clear the account layout with a blank value and verify Email replies
return to the existing no-layout behavior.
11. Verify validation behavior:
- Updating either API with a layout that omits `{{ content_for_layout
}}` returns `422`.
    - Updating either API with invalid Liquid returns `422`.
- Updating a non-Email inbox with `branded_email_layout` returns `422`.
- Disabling `branded_email_templates` and updating a layout returns
`422`.

## How Has This Been Tested?

Validation:

- `bundle exec rspec spec/models/email_template_spec.rb
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/branded_email_layouts_controller_spec.rb
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/inboxes_controller_spec.rb
spec/lib/email_templates/db_resolver_service_spec.rb
spec/mailers/conversation_reply_mailer_spec.rb`
- `bundle exec rspec
spec/enterprise/services/enterprise/billing/handle_stripe_event_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/internal/reconcile_plan_config_service_spec.rb`
- `bundle exec rubocop` on changed Ruby files, excluding generated
`db/schema.rb`
- `git diff --check` and `git diff --cached --check`
- YAML parsing for changed config/Swagger files
- `bundle exec rails routes -g branded_email_layout`

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-07-17 15:25:55 +05:30
aakashb95 8600e9b170 fix(captain): refine FAQ suggestion generation 2026-07-17 15:24:50 +05:30
Sivin VargheseandGitHub 331875cdaa feat: Add popular content per locale (#14939) 2026-07-17 14:43:42 +05:30
081e08c7c6 fix(whatsapp): skip template sync for suspended accounts (#15047)
Suspended accounts no longer participate in scheduled WhatsApp template
syncs. This avoids unnecessary external API calls while keeping the
existing refresh behavior unchanged for active accounts.

Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-17 11:57:07 +04:00
aakashb95 64d2751c06 fix(captain): scope FAQ suggestions to agent access 2026-07-17 13:11:33 +05:30
aakashb95 f6d97c56b4 fix(captain): harden FAQ suggestion review flow 2026-07-17 12:57:54 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub fc63c7bddf Merge branch 'feature/cw-7495-llm' into feature/cw-7495-api 2026-07-16 21:32:58 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 9749a3dc96 feat: capture captain sessions for v2 assistant responses [CW-7485] (#14971)
Records a `Captain::Session` row for every Captain V2 assistant response
delivered in a conversation, so we can show how a response was generated
and report on credit, FAQ, and document usage. Stacked on #14970 (the
`captain_sessions` model).

## What changed

- `FaqLookupTool` now records the retrieved FAQ ids (and their backing
document ids) into the shared run state, accumulated across tool calls.
- `AgentRunnerService` exposes the raw ai-agents run result via
`last_run_result`; the `generate_response` return shape is unchanged, so
the playground path is unaffected.
- New `Captain::Assistant::SessionCaptureService` builds the session:
scenario resolved from the answering agent name, model from
`assistant.agent_model`, token usage plus the trimmed current-turn
conversation history stored in `run_context`.
- `ResponseBuilderJob` captures after delivery: `credits_consumed`
mirrors the actual charge (1.0 for a billed response, 0.0 for handoffs,
where the session points at the customer-facing handoff message).
Capture runs outside the delivery transaction and swallows its own
failures, so a logging bug can never block or roll back a customer
reply.

V1 responses and copilot are out of scope; copilot capture comes next.

## How to test

On an account with `captain_integration_v2` enabled and an inbox
connected to an assistant with approved FAQs, send a customer message on
a pending conversation. After the assistant replies, a
`Captain::Session` row should exist with the conversation as subject,
the reply message as result, the FAQs/documents used, and the run
context for that turn. Asking for a human agent should produce a
zero-credit session pointing at the handoff message.

<img width="2428" height="1058" alt="CleanShot 2026-07-15 at 17 25
40@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d8e44923-c17b-494f-8c33-c8fa4219438c"
/>
2026-07-16 18:20:44 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 8dd0d08322 refactor: align conversation direct uploads with standard account auth (#15039)
Conversation attachment uploads now go through the same authentication
that every other account-scoped API endpoint uses. Agents continue to
attach files exactly as before, and the upload request is now tied to
the agent's dashboard session instead of a separately serialized access
token.

Because the upload request is now authenticated, the dashboard proves
the agent's session directly instead of passing
`currentUser.access_token`. This keeps uploads working alongside the
profile access-token changes in #14973, including on accounts where that
token is serialized as empty.

## What changed

- `Api::V1::Accounts::Conversations::DirectUploadsController` now runs
the standard account auth stack: API access token when the
`api_access_token` header is present, dashboard session
(devise-token-auth) otherwise, with agent-bot tokens rejected.
Previously it inherited `ActiveStorage::DirectUploadsController`
directly and did not run any authentication.
- `EnsureCurrentAccountHelper#ensure_current_account` now returns `401`
when a request has neither an authenticated user nor a bot resource,
instead of continuing. This closes the same gap for any controller that
relies on the helper.
- The dashboard direct-upload paths (`useFileUpload.js` and the legacy
`fileUploadMixin.js`) now attach the agent's session headers to the
upload request via a new `directUploadsHelper.js`, instead of sending
`currentUser.access_token`.

## How to test

1. As a logged-in agent, open a conversation and attach a file. Upload
should succeed as before, on installs with direct uploads enabled.
2. Confirm attachments still work for an agent on an account whose
profile access token is not serialized (e.g. a Cloud plan without
`api_and_webhooks`).
3. Send a `POST` to
`/api/v1/accounts/:account_id/conversations/:conversation_id/direct_uploads`
with no credentials, an empty `api_access_token`, or an invalid token,
and confirm it returns `401`.
4. Confirm a valid agent of the account (via API token or session) gets
`200`, while an agent of a different account gets `401`.
2026-07-16 18:17:29 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 916b510ecf Merge branch 'develop' into feature/cw-7495-llm 2026-07-16 17:47:12 +05:30
aakashb95 4a73de1581 fix(captain): normalize FAQ suggestion languages 2026-07-16 17:12:45 +05:30
Tanmay Deep SharmaandGitHub 2891a72cb9 feat(whatsapp): enable reconfigure for embedded signup inboxes (#15038) 2026-07-16 16:18:58 +05:30
aakashb95 68f60b0672 refactor(captain): extract FAQ conversation content 2026-07-16 15:34:52 +05:30
aakashb95 e1445e4c2d Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/develop' into feature/cw-7495-llm 2026-07-16 15:32:27 +05:30
522e3c4d3f feat: enforce api_and_webhooks feature for token API and account webhooks (#14973)
This gates API-token access and outgoing account webhooks behind the
`api_and_webhooks` account feature introduced in #14972. On Chatwoot
Cloud, Hacker accounts lose token-authenticated account API access and
account webhook delivery, while paid accounts retain them through the
billing-plan feature reconcile. Community and self-hosted installations
continue to work without any upgrade-time interruption.

## What changed

- Added `Account#api_and_webhooks_enabled?` as the single backend kill
switch. Core returns enabled; the Enterprise override consults the
account flag on Chatwoot Cloud and remains enabled off-Cloud.
- Account-scoped v1 and v2 requests authenticated with a user or
agent-bot API token now return `403 Forbidden` when the feature is
disabled. Invalid tokens still return 401, and dashboard session
requests are unaffected.
- Profile responses return an empty access token when none of the user's
accounts has access. The stored token is preserved, and the profile UI
disables its token controls with paid-plan copy on Cloud.
- Account webhook delivery stops when the feature is disabled. Webhook
CRUD remains available to session-authenticated dashboard requests,
API-inbox webhooks continue to be delivered, and the Cloud dashboard
shows a webhook paywall instead of the webhook list.
- Removed the database backfill migration. Existing paid Cloud accounts
should be enabled with the one-off script below before enforcement is
deployed.

## Existing paid-account rollout

Run this as an ad-hoc Rails runner script on Chatwoot Cloud. It
intentionally targets only the Startups, Business, and Enterprise plans
and does not add `api_and_webhooks` to `manually_managed_features`, so
future billing reconciles remain authoritative.

```rb
paid_plan_names = %w[Startups Business Enterprise]
accounts = Account.where("custom_attributes ->> 'plan_name' IN (?)", paid_plan_names)

total = accounts.count
enabled = 0
skipped = 0

puts "Enabling api_and_webhooks for #{total} paid account(s)..."

accounts.find_each(batch_size: 500).with_index(1) do |account, processed|
  if account.feature_enabled?('api_and_webhooks')
    skipped += 1
  else
    account.enable_features!('api_and_webhooks')
    enabled += 1
  end

  puts "Processed #{processed}/#{total}..." if (processed % 1000).zero?
end

puts "Done! Enabled: #{enabled}, Skipped: #{skipped}, Total: #{total}"
```

For example, save the snippet outside the repository as
`enable_api_and_webhooks.rb`, then run:

```sh
bundle exec rails runner /path/to/enable_api_and_webhooks.rb
```

## How to test

- On Cloud, use a Hacker account and confirm token-authenticated
requests to account-scoped v1 and v2 endpoints return 403, while the
same dashboard actions continue to work through session authentication.
- Confirm profile access-token controls are disabled with paid-plan copy
when all accounts are ineligible, and remain available when at least one
account has the feature.
- Confirm the Webhooks settings page shows the billing paywall for a
Cloud account without the feature; admins get the billing action and
agents get the existing ask-an-admin message.
- Confirm outgoing account webhooks stop for an ineligible Cloud account
while API-inbox webhooks still deliver.
- Confirm community and self-hosted installations retain API and webhook
behavior after upgrading, even when an existing account does not have
the stored feature bit.


### Screenshots

## Cloud

<img width="2590" height="642" alt="CleanShot 2026-07-15 at 15 13 14@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/431a7bd8-1742-4e7a-b312-d3ad92015f9b"
/>

<img width="2152" height="994" alt="CleanShot 2026-07-15 at 15 14 37@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/475dda48-d1c5-4be5-a3c3-7a96b9713724"
/>

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-07-16 13:43:49 +04:00
Sivin VargheseandGitHub 0fccb7dacd feat: stage edits to published articles as drafts (#14842) 2026-07-16 12:44:10 +05:30
354c2cab6b fix(captain): handle resolved conversation context (#14433)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Fixes: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13880

Uses approaches discussed from:
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/13883

Activity messages pertaining to resolve are included along with an
instruction for the LLM to choose whether to consider them or not along

## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

locally and with specs


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
2026-07-15 23:30:17 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 9c68eed676 fix(captain): send custom tool API key headers (#15008)
Captain custom tools configured with API key authentication now send the
configured key in the requested HTTP header. Existing tools begin
working without needing to be recreated or reconfigured, while
credentials remain protected across redirects.

## How to reproduce

1. Create a Captain custom tool using API Key authentication.
2. Configure `X-API-Key` as the header name and save the tool.
3. Invoke the tool and inspect the incoming request.
4. Before this change, the API key header is absent; after this change,
the configured endpoint receives it.

## What changed

The UI persists API key authentication as `name` and `key`, but the
request builder also required an unused `location: header` property. The
request builder now treats API key authentication as header-based,
matching the only mode exposed by the UI.

Custom authentication headers are also registered as sensitive with
`SafeFetch`. They are retained for the configured endpoint and
same-origin redirects, but stripped when a redirect crosses origins to
prevent credential leakage. Factory, request, and redirect specs cover
the real UI payload and both public and private-network fetch paths.
2026-07-15 22:43:30 +05:30