13 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Shivam MishraandGitHub 67cab7171d feat: show Captain generation path on conversation messages [CW-7484] (#15078) 2026-07-21 15:15:13 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 9749a3dc96 feat: capture captain sessions for v2 assistant responses [CW-7485] (#14971)
Records a `Captain::Session` row for every Captain V2 assistant response
delivered in a conversation, so we can show how a response was generated
and report on credit, FAQ, and document usage. Stacked on #14970 (the
`captain_sessions` model).

## What changed

- `FaqLookupTool` now records the retrieved FAQ ids (and their backing
document ids) into the shared run state, accumulated across tool calls.
- `AgentRunnerService` exposes the raw ai-agents run result via
`last_run_result`; the `generate_response` return shape is unchanged, so
the playground path is unaffected.
- New `Captain::Assistant::SessionCaptureService` builds the session:
scenario resolved from the answering agent name, model from
`assistant.agent_model`, token usage plus the trimmed current-turn
conversation history stored in `run_context`.
- `ResponseBuilderJob` captures after delivery: `credits_consumed`
mirrors the actual charge (1.0 for a billed response, 0.0 for handoffs,
where the session points at the customer-facing handoff message).
Capture runs outside the delivery transaction and swallows its own
failures, so a logging bug can never block or roll back a customer
reply.

V1 responses and copilot are out of scope; copilot capture comes next.

## How to test

On an account with `captain_integration_v2` enabled and an inbox
connected to an assistant with approved FAQs, send a customer message on
a pending conversation. After the assistant replies, a
`Captain::Session` row should exist with the conversation as subject,
the reply message as result, the FAQs/documents used, and the run
context for that turn. Asking for a human agent should produce a
zero-credit session pointing at the handoff message.

<img width="2428" height="1058" alt="CleanShot 2026-07-15 at 17 25
40@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d8e44923-c17b-494f-8c33-c8fa4219438c"
/>
2026-07-16 18:20:44 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 9c68eed676 fix(captain): send custom tool API key headers (#15008)
Captain custom tools configured with API key authentication now send the
configured key in the requested HTTP header. Existing tools begin
working without needing to be recreated or reconfigured, while
credentials remain protected across redirects.

## How to reproduce

1. Create a Captain custom tool using API Key authentication.
2. Configure `X-API-Key` as the header name and save the tool.
3. Invoke the tool and inspect the incoming request.
4. Before this change, the API key header is absent; after this change,
the configured endpoint receives it.

## What changed

The UI persists API key authentication as `name` and `key`, but the
request builder also required an unused `location: header` property. The
request builder now treats API key authentication as header-based,
matching the only mode exposed by the UI.

Custom authentication headers are also registered as sensitive with
`SafeFetch`. They are retained for the configured endpoint and
same-origin redirects, but stripped when a redirect crosses origins to
prevent credential leakage. Factory, request, and redirect specs cover
the real UI payload and both public and private-network fetch paths.
2026-07-15 22:43:30 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub a90ffe6264 feat: Add force legacy auto-resolve flag (#13804)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Add account setting and store_accessor for
`captain_force_legacy_auto_resolve`.
Enterprise job now skips LLM evaluation when this flag is true and falls
back to legacy time-based resolution. Add spec to cover the fallback.


## Type of change

We recently rolled out Captain deciding if a conversation is resolved or
not. While it is an improvement for majority of customers, some still
prefer the old way of auto-resolving based on inactivity. This PR adds a
check.

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

legacy_auto_resolve = true

<img width="1282" height="848" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-13 at 19 55 55@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dfdcc5d5-6d21-462b-87a6-a5e1b1290a8b"
/>


legacy_auto_resolve = false
<img width="1268" height="864" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-13 at 20 00 50@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f4719ec6-922a-4c3b-bc45-7b29eaced565"
/>



## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-03-13 15:04:58 -07:00
d6d38cdd7d feat: captain decides if conversation should be resolved or kept open (#13336)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

captain decides if conversation should be resolved or open

Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/AI-91/make-captain-resolution-time-configurable

Update: Added 2 entries in reporting events:
`conversation_captain_handoff` and `conversation_captain_resolved`

## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] This change requires a documentation update

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

LLM call decides that conversation is resolved, drops a private note
<img width="1228" height="438" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fb2cf1e9-4b2b-458b-a1e2-45c53d6a0158"
/>

LLM call decides conversation is still open as query was not resolved
<img width="1215" height="573" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2d1d5322-f567-487e-954e-11ab0798d11c"
/>


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2026-03-13 10:03:58 +05:30
c08fa631a9 feat: Add temporary account setting to disable Captain auto-resolve (#13680)
Add a temporary `captain_disable_auto_resolve` boolean setting on
accounts to prevent Captain from resolving conversations. Guards both
the scheduled resolution job and the assistant's resolve tool.

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-27 09:37:00 -08:00
7c60ad9e28 feat: include contact verified status with each tool call (#13663)
Co-authored-by: aakashb95 <aakashbakhle@gmail.com>
2026-02-26 16:16:33 +05:30
d8f4bb940e feat: add resolve_conversation tool for Captain V2 scenarios (#13597)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Adds a new built-in tool that allows Captain scenarios to resolve
conversations programmatically. This enables automated workflows like
the misdirected contact deflector to close conversations after handling
them, while still allowing human review via label filtering.


## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

tested by mentioning it to be used in captain v2 scenario

<img width="1180" height="828" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e70baf96-0c70-407e-af2c-328500ac5434"
/>



## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Tanmay Deep Sharma <32020192+tds-1@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-02-20 19:08:36 +05:30
3fce56c98f fix: captain template message conflict (#13048)
Co-authored-by: aakashb95 <aakash@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com>
2025-12-15 15:47:26 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 0d8e249fe4 feat: include chatwoot metadata with each tool call (#12907) 2025-12-10 15:25:18 +05:30
8bbb8ba5a4 feat(ee): Captain custom http tools (#12584)
To test this out, use the following PR:
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/12585

---------

Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranavrajs@gmail.com>
2025-10-06 07:53:15 -07:00
b5f5c5c1bc feat: add more tools (#12116)
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2025-08-08 17:57:30 +05:30
b71a0da10d feat: scenario tools [CW-4597] (#11908)
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2025-07-21 16:42:12 +05:30