# Pull Request Template
## Description
Better scheduling and queueing mechanics for document auto-sync
- add jitter plan wise for document sync
- move auto-sync documents to purgeable queue
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
locally tested and with specs
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Fixes urls going past 255 chars, this is because of arabic urls, where
each character balloons to 8-9 characters and goes past the 255 limit
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
specs
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
skip documents that fail with ActiveRecord errors possibly due to
stale/corrupt data and not crash scheduler
How did we find out about this error?
before October 28th, 2025, we did not have url normalisation.
so we had document rows as:
id: 123 `https://example.com` status: `in_progress` --> likely stuck
crawl
id 234: `https://example.com/` status: `available`
When the schedule sync job ran, it ran an `document.update!(sync_status:
:syncing, last_sync_attempted_at: Time.current)` on the 234 one since it
was `available`
now `update!` runs `before_validation :normalize_external_link`
so `https://example.com/` became `https://example.com`
which invalidated:
`validates :external_link, uniqueness: { scope: :assistant_id }`
so the scheduler crashed.
This PR logs the skipped ones with their errors and continues to pick
other documents to scheduler doesn't crash
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
spec
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Captain (v1) makes false promises by saying it will handoff but doesn't.
This happens due to an exact string match comparison and the prompt
gives the model a lot of responsibilities:
- identity
- what to respond
- obey custom instructions
- decide on tool calls
This PR decouples responsibility, the core prompt responds, and an
additional llm call evaluates if handoff was needed or not after that
message.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
Locally
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
- Wires up Controllers to auto-sync job
- adds plan based sync schedule
- a scheduler that runs every hour to check syncable documents
- guards the whole feature behind feature flag by reclaiming
`twilio_content_templates`
- Adds a global and account level cap on how many documents to enqueue
to prevent sudden burst at first run
- some refactor to simplify code
- specs
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
specs and locally
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
- Fetch main content only from Firecrawl, exclude some tags to remove
boilerplate
- Prompt changes for FAQ generation
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
tested locally
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Adds the ability to translate help center articles to other languages using Captain's LLM infrastructure. Translated articles are created as drafts linked to the source article.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6901/translate-article-to-another-language
**How to test**
1. Navigate to Help Center → Articles for a portal with multiple locales
2. Click the three-dot menu on any article → "Translate"
3. Select a target language and category → click Translate
4. Switch to the target locale — the translated article appears as a
draft
5. Try translating the same article again — a warning shows the existing
translation with a link to open it in a new tab
6. Click "Overwrite and translate" to replace the existing translation
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1d2e991b-f0ac-403a-bcc1-2181b5731ea4
HandoffTool changes conversation status but only posts a private note.
ResponseBuilderJob now detects the tool flag and creates the public
handoff message that was previously only shown in V1.
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Captain V2 was silently forwarding conversations to humans without
showing a handoff message to the customer. The conversation appeared to
just stop
responding.
Root cause: In V2, HandoffTool calls bot_handoff! during agent
execution, which changes conversation status from pending to open. By
the time control returns
to ResponseBuilderJob#process_response, the conversation_pending? guard
returns early - skipping create_handoff_message entirely. The V1 flow
didn't have this
problem because AssistantChatService just returns a string token
(conversation_handoff) and lets ResponseBuilderJob handle everything.
What changed:
1. AgentRunnerService now surfaces the handoff_tool_called flag (already
tracked internally for usage metadata) in its response hash.
2. ResponseBuilderJob#handoff_requested? detects handoffs from both V1
(response token) and V2 (tool flag).
3. ResponseBuilderJob#process_response checks handoff_requested? before
the conversation_pending? guard, so V2 handoffs are processed even when
the status has
already changed.
4. ResponseBuilderJob#process_action('handoff') captures
conversation_pending? before calling bot_handoff! and uses that snapshot
to guard both bot_handoff!
and the OOO message - preventing double-execution when V2's HandoffTool
already ran them.
New V2 handoff flow:
AgentRunnerService
→ agent calls HandoffTool (creates private note, calls bot_handoff!)
→ returns response with handoff_tool_called: true
ResponseBuilderJob#process_response
→ handoff_requested? detects the flag
→ process_action('handoff')
→ create_handoff_message (public message for customer)
→ bot_handoff! skipped (conversation_pending? is false)
→ OOO skipped (conversation_pending? is false)
Fixes#13881
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Update existing response_builder_job_spec.rb covering the V2 handoff
path, V2 normal response path, and V1 regression
- Updated existing agent_runner_service_spec.rb expectations for the new
handoff_tool_called key and added a context for when the flag is true
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Aakash Bakhle <48802744+aakashb95@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: aakashb95 <aakashbakhle@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Captain v1 does not have access to contact attributes. Added a toggle to
let user choose if they want contact information available to Captain.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
Specs and locally
<img width="1924" height="740" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-19 at 18 48 19@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/353cfeaa-cd58-40eb-89e7-d660a1dc1185"
/>
![Uploading CleanShot 2026-03-19 at 18.53.26@2x.png…]()
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Add account setting and store_accessor for
`captain_force_legacy_auto_resolve`.
Enterprise job now skips LLM evaluation when this flag is true and falls
back to legacy time-based resolution. Add spec to cover the fallback.
## Type of change
We recently rolled out Captain deciding if a conversation is resolved or
not. While it is an improvement for majority of customers, some still
prefer the old way of auto-resolving based on inactivity. This PR adds a
check.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
legacy_auto_resolve = true
<img width="1282" height="848" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-13 at 19 55 55@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dfdcc5d5-6d21-462b-87a6-a5e1b1290a8b"
/>
legacy_auto_resolve = false
<img width="1268" height="864" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-13 at 20 00 50@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f4719ec6-922a-4c3b-bc45-7b29eaced565"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
captain decides if conversation should be resolved or open
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/AI-91/make-captain-resolution-time-configurable
Update: Added 2 entries in reporting events:
`conversation_captain_handoff` and `conversation_captain_resolved`
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
LLM call decides that conversation is resolved, drops a private note
<img width="1228" height="438" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fb2cf1e9-4b2b-458b-a1e2-45c53d6a0158"
/>
LLM call decides conversation is still open as query was not resolved
<img width="1215" height="573" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2d1d5322-f567-487e-954e-11ab0798d11c"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Add a temporary `captain_disable_auto_resolve` boolean setting on
accounts to prevent Captain from resolving conversations. Guards both
the scheduled resolution job and the assistant's resolve tool.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Summary
- Fix captain response builder not getting triggered for cases where
responses are created as completed.
## Testing Instructions
- Test articles with firecrawl
- Test articles without firecrawl
- Test PDF documents
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
## Context
Sidekiq logs only showed the Sidekiq wrapper class and JID, which wasn’t
helpful when debugging ActiveJobs.
## Changes
- Updated `ChatwootDequeuedLogger` to log the actual `ActiveJob class`
and `job_id` instead of the generic Sidekiq wrapper and JID.
> Example
> ```
> Dequeued ActionMailer::MailDeliveryJob
123e4567-e89b-12d3-a456-426614174000 from default
> ```
- Remove sidekiq worker and unify everything to `ActiveJob`
There were customer reported issues with FAQs which were generated in a
different langauge than what they were expecting. The reason behind this
was that the language of the account was not considered in the prompt
provided. If the language of the content was say Spanish, and the
account locale was english. The output was not predicable. The output
depends on the model and the execution time.
This PR would update the prompt to behave consistently with the account
locale. Even though the content provided is in a different language, it
would generate FAQs in the account locale.
Changes:
- Updated the prompt to include a detailed expectation of the FAQs
quality along with the language
- Added specs for the services where the prompt generator is called.
Tested the prompt using Phoenix playground across GPT 5, GPT 4.1, GPT
4.0. The reasoning setting for GPT 5 needs to be low so that it doesn't
generate random questions like "What was this updated?"
# Pull Request Template
## Linear links:
-
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4479/if-image-is-sent-by-the-customer-send-it-to-openai
## Description
This pull request adds “Captain image support” to Chatwoot. It
introduces multimodal message handling so that when a customer sends an
image, Captain can forward the file to OpenAI’s vision endpoint,
generate a caption/analysis
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
<img width="891" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c7cc98ed-cc44-4865-a53a-83d129e2fe2c"
/>
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
- Enable jobs by default when a copilot thread or a message is created.
- Rename thread_id to copilot_thread_id to keep it consistent with the
model name
- Add a spec for search_linear_issues service
- Fixed Firecrawl webhook payloads to ensure proper data handling and
delivery.
- Removed unused Robin AI code to improve codebase cleanliness and
maintainability.
- Implement authentication for the Firecrawl endpoint to improve
security. A key is generated to secure the webhook URLs from FireCrawl.
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranavrajs@gmail.com>
This pull request introduces several changes to implement and manage
usage limits for the Captain AI service. The key changes include adding
configuration for plan limits, updating error messages, modifying
controllers and models to handle usage limits, and updating tests to
ensure the new functionality works correctly.
## Implementation Checklist
- [x] Ability to configure captain limits per check
- [x] Update response for `usage_limits` to include captain limits
- [x] Methods to increment or reset captain responses limits in the
`limits` column for the `Account` model
- [x] Check documents limit using a count query
- [x] Ensure Captain hand-off if a limit is reached
- [x] Ensure limits are enforced for Copilot Chat
- [x] Ensure limits are reset when stripe webhook comes in
- [x] Increment usage for FAQ generation and Contact notes
- [x] Ensure documents limit is enforced
These changes ensure that the Captain AI service operates within the defined usage limits for different subscription plans, providing appropriate error messages and handling when limits are exceeded.
Currently, it’s unclear whether an FAQ item is generated from a
document, derived from a conversation, or added manually.
This PR resolves the issue by providing visibility into the source of
each FAQ. Users can now see whether an FAQ was generated or manually
added and, if applicable, by whom.
- Move the document_id to a polymorphic relation (documentable).
- Updated the APIs to accommodate the change.
- Update the service to add corresponding references.
- Updated the specs.
<img width="1007" alt="Screenshot 2025-01-15 at 11 27 56 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7d58f798-19c0-4407-b3e2-748a919d14af"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Migration Guide: https://chwt.app/v4/migration
This PR imports all the work related to Captain into the EE codebase. Captain represents the AI-based features in Chatwoot and includes the following key components:
- Assistant: An assistant has a persona, the product it would be trained on. At the moment, the data at which it is trained is from websites. Future integrations on Notion documents, PDF etc. This PR enables connecting an assistant to an inbox. The assistant would run the conversation every time before transferring it to an agent.
- Copilot for Agents: When an agent is supporting a customer, we will be able to offer additional help to lookup some data or fetch information from integrations etc via copilot.
- Conversation FAQ generator: When a conversation is resolved, the Captain integration would identify questions which were not in the knowledge base.
- CRM memory: Learns from the conversations and identifies important information about the contact.
---------
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <vishnu@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
