Commit Graph
85 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Sivin VargheseandGitHub 56275b750e fix: respect companies feature flag for auto-association (#14886)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

This PR stops new contacts from getting an auto-assigned company name
when the Companies feature is disabled.

Since #14496, email-domain company auto-association also updates a
contact's `company_name`. However, the callback isn't gated behind the
Companies feature flag, so accounts without the feature enabled still
auto-create companies and overwrite any `company_name` provided via the
SDK/`setUser`.

This PR gates `should_associate_company?` behind
`account.feature_enabled?('companies')`, so auto-association only runs
when the Companies feature is enabled.

Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7462/setuser-overwrites-contact-company-name-for-accounts-that-dont-use

## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-06-29 17:23:31 -07:00
Sony MathewandGitHub 43e0f8a141 feat: Route Enterprise LLM services (3/6) (#14841)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Routes Enterprise assistant, copilot, FAQ, contact memory,
action-classifier, and false-promise detector LLM paths through
feature-specific model resolution. `Llm::BaseAiService` now accepts
feature/account context and uses `Llm::FeatureRouter` when that context
is present, while retaining the installation-model fallback for
unmigrated callers. This also adds a `document_faq_generation` feature
default for generative FAQ/document content.

Linear: https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7425/test-new-models
Depends on #14840

## Type of change

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update

## How Has This Been Tested?

- `bundle exec rspec spec/lib/llm/models_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/llm/base_ai_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/copilot/chat_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/assistant_chat_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/faq_generator_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/conversation_faq_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/assistant_action_classifier_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/assistant_false_promise_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/jobs/captain/conversation/response_builder_job_spec.rb`
passed with 112 examples, 0 failures.
- `bundle exec rspec spec/models/concerns/captain_featurable_spec.rb
spec/models/account_spec.rb
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/captain/preferences_controller_spec.rb
spec/lib/llm/feature_router_spec.rb` passed with 87 examples, 0
failures.
- `bundle exec rubocop enterprise/app/services/llm/base_ai_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/copilot/chat_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/assistant_chat_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/faq_generator_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/conversation_faq_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/contact_notes_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/contact_attributes_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/assistant_action_classifier_service.rb
enterprise/app/services/captain/llm/assistant_false_promise_service.rb
spec/enterprise/services/llm/base_ai_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/copilot/chat_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/assistant_chat_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/faq_generator_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/conversation_faq_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/assistant_action_classifier_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/captain/llm/assistant_false_promise_service_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/jobs/captain/conversation/response_builder_job_spec.rb`
passed with no offenses.
- `bundle exec ruby -e "require 'yaml'; config =
YAML.load_file('config/llm.yml'); abort('missing
document_faq_generation') unless config.dig('features',
'document_faq_generation'); abort('missing default') unless
config.dig('features', 'document_faq_generation', 'default'); puts
'llm.yml ok'"` passed.
- `git diff --check` passed.

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-06-25 17:03:07 +05:30
2b37fef0e0 fix(companies): sync contact company names (#14759)
Fixes company-contact name drift when a company is renamed or deleted.

Closes: N/A

## Why
Contacts keep a denormalized `additional_attributes.company_name` for
display and filtering. Company rename/delete flows could leave that
copied value stale even though the actual `company_id` relationship
changed.

## What changed
- Enqueues an async company contact-name sync job when a company name
changes.
- Moves company deletion into `Companies::DeleteJob`.
- The delete job unlinks linked contacts, clears only the copied
`company_name`, and then deletes the company.
- Uses bulk JSON updates for the cleanup path so contact records are not
saved, which avoids contact update callbacks, webhook dispatch, and
automation side effects.

## How to test
- Link a contact to a company, rename the company, and confirm the
contact company name updates after the job runs.
- Delete a company with linked contacts and confirm the delete job
removes the company, unassigns linked contacts, and preserves other
contact additional attributes.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-22 06:49:52 -07:00
6a262287d2 feat(captain): allow agents to report Captain messages (#14799)
Adds a cloud-only flow for agents to flag incorrect or problematic
Captain (AI) responses. Right-clicking a Captain message surfaces a
"Report message" option that opens a dialog to pick a problem type and
add a description, persisted to a new captain_message_reports table for
the team to review.


<img width="636" height="542" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-20 at 9 15 56 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/afaa233d-6bd6-455a-8a33-a3796a3e3ef6"
/>
<img width="580" height="502" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-20 at 9 16 03 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2d220d99-98cc-4c5e-a325-778ceb4f7bc9"
/>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-20 14:47:08 -07:00
Vishnu NarayananandGitHub f66b551c7d revert: Sidebar unread counts for filters (CW-7262) (#14769)
## Description

Reverts [#14726](https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/14726)
(\"feat: Add sidebar unread counts for filters (CW-7262)\"), which
shipped in 4.15.0.

After 4.15.0 rolled out to prod the unread-counts-for-filters code path
caused a cascading incident:

- `Counter#ensure_filters_cache!` fires on every `/unread_counts/index`
and `update_last_seen` request.
- On cache miss it calls `Builder#build_filters_for!`, which:
- invokes `store.clear_user_filters!` -> `delete_matching` -> a Redis
`SCAN_each` over a per-user pattern keyspace, and
- runs 4 fresh SQL passes per user (mentions, participating, unattended,
and per-folder `Conversations::FilterService` queries).
- Threads blocked in the SCAN held their DB connections, the connection
pool exhausted, Sidekiq jobs were discarded with
`ActiveJob::DeserializationError: could not obtain a connection from the
pool`, and the enqueued queue blew past 200K.


Related:
[CW-7262](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7262/unread-counts-for-filters-folders)

## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update

## How Has This Been Tested?


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-06-17 14:58:48 +04:00
fe6368b42e feat: Add sidebar unread counts for filters (CW-7262) (#14726)
## Description

Extends the conversation unread-count system so the left sidebar can
show unread badges for Mentions, Participating, Unattended, and saved
conversation folders. Folder badges reuse the existing `custom_filters`
conversation filter semantics, store user-scoped Redis sets lazily, and
skip unsupported folder filters so invalid saved folders continue to
render without a badge. The Unattended badge counts all visible unread
open conversations that match the existing unattended conversation
scope.

Closes
-
[CW-7262](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7262/unread-counts-for-filters-folders)

## What changed

- Added user-scoped unread-count Redis keys and cache builders for
mentions, participating conversations, unattended conversations, and
saved folder filters.
- Reused `Conversations::FilterService` through a relation-returning
path so folder counts match the folder conversation list behavior.
- Invalidated user filter caches from mention, participant,
custom-filter, and relevant conversation update events.
- Extended the unread-count endpoint payload and sidebar Vuex/sidebar
rendering for the new badge counts, including the Unattended sidebar
item.
- Added Ruby, Enterprise, request, listener, and frontend store coverage
for the new unread-count dimensions.

## Type of change

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

- Created local validation folders for `john@acme.inc` and confirmed the
unread-count payload includes open, resolved, and high-priority folder
badges while excluding the invalid unsupported folder.
- Added coverage for the Unattended badge rule: all visible unread open
conversations matching `Conversation.unattended`.
- Ran focused unread-count Ruby specs, including service, listener,
request, and Enterprise counter coverage.
- Ran frontend unread-count store specs.
- Ran RuboCop on the touched Ruby files.
- Ran ESLint through the project script; it completed with warnings in
existing unrelated files and no errors.

<img width="369" height="525" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-13 at 10 51 39 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/36b1d2c4-dac1-4f6f-9c0e-7ef5a6cc2975"
/>

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] Documentation changes are not required for this internal
unread-count behavior
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] No dependent downstream changes are required

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-06-16 23:46:49 +05:30
41a3ab6dfa feat(companies): add contact company selector (#14496)
Adds a company selector to the contact details form so agents can
associate a contact with an existing company directly from the contact
page.

Closes

- None

Why

Contacts already expose company information through the CRM fields, but
the form only accepted free-text company names. As we split company CRM
work into smaller PRs, this keeps the contact page aligned with the
structured company model while preserving the existing company-name
behavior used by automations.

What changed

- Shows a company dropdown in the contact details form when the
Companies feature is enabled.
- Keeps legacy free-text company names editable when a contact has no
structured `company_id`.
- Allows Enterprise contact create/update APIs to accept account-scoped
`company_id`.
- Syncs `additional_attributes.company_name` when a contact is
associated with a company, including the existing email-domain
auto-association path.
- Serializes `company_id` in the contact model payload so the form can
show the current association.

How to test

1. Enable Companies for an account and open a contact details page.
2. In Edit contact details, use the Company field to select an existing
company.
3. Save the contact and refresh the page.
4. Confirm the selected company remains visible and the contact is
associated with that company.
5. Confirm contacts with only a legacy free-text company name still show
the text input instead of an empty selector.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-16 15:29:27 +05:30
Tanmay Deep SharmaandGitHub 8d5d02ea97 feat: add per-inbox toggle to disable incoming calls (#14645)
## Description

Adds a per-inbox "Allow incoming calls" toggle for voice-enabled
WhatsApp and Twilio inboxes. When turned off, the setting is persisted
on the channel; actually rejecting inbound calls is handled in a
follow-up PR.

## Type of change

- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## Screenshot
<img width="804" height="384" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-04 at 11 44 07 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/df8bb026-0387-4031-bcba-6d9a56872eb7"
/>


## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-06-11 14:22:44 +05:30
1d2f3e86dd feat(companies): track company last activity (#14435)
Tracks company recency from linked contact activity so the Companies
list and detail page can show/sort by real customer engagement instead
of generic record updates.

## Closes

None.

## Why

Company recency should reflect activity from people associated with the
company. This keeps the signal tied to persisted contact activity,
without treating passive online presence or widget heartbeat pings as
company activity.

## What Changed

- Adds a company helper to record `last_activity_at` from linked contact
activity.
- Rolls up `Contact#last_activity_at` changes to the associated company.
- Initializes company activity when an already-active contact is
associated with a company, including the business-email auto-association
path.
- Throttles company activity rollups to once every 5 minutes per company
to avoid unnecessary writes during active conversations.
- Treats company activity as monotonic: unlinking, moving, or deleting
contacts does not move a company's activity timestamp backwards.
- Leaves historical backfill, online presence tracking, widget visit
tracking, and richer activity attribution out of scope.

## How to Test

1. Open an account with Companies enabled and visit the Companies list.
2. Trigger activity for a contact that belongs to a company, for example
by receiving or sending a message in that contact's conversation.
3. Confirm the linked company shows a recent activity timestamp in the
Companies list/detail page after the contact activity updates.
4. Associate an already-active contact with a company and confirm the
company receives that contact's existing activity timestamp.
5. Confirm repeated contact activity within a short window does not
continuously rewrite the company timestamp.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-18 15:01:05 +05:30
6c67eb9ba0 fix(notifications): Respect conversation access when notifying agents (#14412)
Agents with limited custom roles were receiving notifications (creation,
assignment, mentions, new messages, SLA) for conversations they couldn't
actually open. For example, an agent whose custom role only grants
`conversation_unassigned_manage` was getting notified about
conversations assigned to other agents.

Notifications now go through the same `ConversationPolicy#show?` check
that gates the conversation view itself, so an agent only gets notified
for conversations they're permitted to see. Administrators and agents
without custom roles are unaffected.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-05-12 10:57:29 +04:00
Aakash BakhleandGitHub d00867d636 fix: captain auto sync scheduler config (#14336) 2026-05-04 13:37:25 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 568aae875b feat: wire up auto-sync job backend [AI-150] (#14117)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

- Wires up Controllers to auto-sync job
- adds plan based sync schedule
- a scheduler that runs every hour to check syncable documents
- guards the whole feature behind feature flag by reclaiming
`twilio_content_templates`
- Adds a global and account level cap on how many documents to enqueue
to prevent sudden burst at first run
- some refactor to simplify code
- specs

Fixes # (issue)

## Type of change

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

specs and locally

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-04-29 14:47:14 +05:30
0e122188e9 feat: Add voice calling as a capability on Twilio SMS channel(Enterprise) (#13963)
Voice calling is now a capability on the existing TwilioSms rather than
a separate Voice model. A single Twilio phone number handles both SMS
and voice calls through one inbox.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6683/add-voice-calling-as-a-capability-on-twilio-sms-channel
and https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-120/add-the-support-for-sms

**What changed**
- Replaced Channel::Voice with voice_enabled flag on Channel::TwilioSms
- Added voice_enabled, twiml_app_sid, api_key_secret columns to
channel_twilio_sms table
  - Dropped channel_voice table (no production data)
- All voice logic lives in Enterprise layer via
prepend_mod_with('Channel::TwilioSms')
- Added Voice settings tab on Twilio SMS inbox settings to
enable/disable voice
  - Validates Twilio number voice capability before provisioning
- Teardown service cleans up TwiML app and credentials when voice is
disabled
- Frontend voice detection uses isVoiceCallEnabled() /
getVoiceCallProvider() helpers — extensible to future providers
  - Gated by channel_voice feature flag

**How to test**

1. Enable feature flag:
Account.find(<id>).enable_features('channel_voice')
2. Create voice inbox: Inboxes → Voice tile → enter Twilio credentials →
verify incoming/outgoing calls and SMS work
3. Enable voice on existing SMS inbox: Inboxes → select Twilio SMS inbox
→ Voice tab → toggle on → provide API key credentials → verify calls
work
4. Disable voice: Voice tab → toggle off → verify TwiML app is deleted,
credentials cleared, SMS still works
5. Re-enable voice: Toggle on again → must provide api_key_secret again
→ new TwiML app provisioned

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-04-29 11:32:19 +04:00
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 2182165201 feat: sync documents job [AI-142] (#14057)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Document auto-sync job pipeline without wiring to controllers or FE

Fixes # (issue)

## Type of change

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
specs and locally

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-04-22 23:36:32 +05:30
5fd3d5e036 feat: allow zero conversation limit capacity policy (#13964)
## Description

Two improvements to Agent Capacity Policy:

**1. Support exclusion via zero conversation limit**
Allow `conversation_limit` to be `0` on inbox capacity limits. Agents
with a zero limit are excluded from auto-assignment for that inbox while
remaining members for manual assignment.

**2. Fix exclusion rules duration input**
- Default changed from `10` to `null` so time-based exclusion isn't
applied unless explicitly set.
- Minimum lowered from 10 to 1 minute.
- `DurationInput` updated to handle `null` values correctly.

## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

- Added model and capacity service specs for zero-limit exclusion
behavior.
- Tested manually via UI flows 

## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-04-06 11:39:14 +05:30
Tanmay Deep SharmaandGitHub 9efd554693 fix: resolve V2 capacity bypass in team assignment (#13904)
## Description

When Assignment V2 is enabled, the V2 capacity policies
(AgentCapacityPolicy / InboxCapacityLimit) are not respected during
team-based assignment paths. The system falls back to the legacy V1
max_assignment_limit, and since V1 is deprecated and typically
unconfigured in V2 setups, agents receive unlimited assignments
regardless of their V2 capacity.

Root cause: Inbox class directly defined
member_ids_with_assignment_capacity, which shadowed the
Enterprise::InboxAgentAvailability module override in Ruby's method
resolution order (MRO). This made the V2 capacity check unreachable
(dead code) for any code path using member_ids_with_assignment_capacity.

## Type of change

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

⏺ Before the fix
1. Enable assignment_v2 + advanced_assignment on account
2. Create AgentCapacityPolicy with InboxCapacityLimit = 1 for an inbox
3. Assign the policy to an agent (e.g., John)
4. Create 1 open conversation assigned to John (now at capacity)
5. Create a new unassigned conversation in the same inbox
6. Assign a team (containing John) to that conversation
7. Result: John gets assigned despite being at capacity
⏺ After the fix
Same steps 1–6.
7. Result: John is NOT assigned — conversation stays unassigned (no
agents with capacity available)


## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-03-27 15:38:17 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 290dd3abf5 feat: allow captain to access contact attributes (#13850)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Captain v1 does not have access to contact attributes. Added a toggle to
let user choose if they want contact information available to Captain.

## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

Specs and locally
<img width="1924" height="740" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-19 at 18 48 19@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/353cfeaa-cd58-40eb-89e7-d660a1dc1185"
/>

![Uploading CleanShot 2026-03-19 at 18.53.26@2x.png…]()


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-03-20 16:15:06 +05:30
dbe35252bc fix: Use handoff_key for scenarios (#13755)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Ensure agent function names stay within OpenAI's 64-char limit
(ai-agents prepends "handoff_to_").

Add HANDOFF_TITLE_SLUG_MAX_LENGTH and
handoff_key generation: persisted records use `scenario_{id}_agent`; new
records use a truncated title slug.
Assistant scenario keys and agent_name now reference the generated
handoff key.

fixes :

`Invalid 'messages[9].tool_calls[0].function.name': string too long.
Expected a string with maximum length 64, but got a string with length
95 instead.`

## Type of change


- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

Tested locally
<img width="1806" height="1044" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/40cd7a3d-3d97-43a8-bd56-d3f5d63abbda"
/>

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
2026-03-11 14:01:25 +05:30
059506b1db feat: Add automatic favicon fetching for companies (#13013)
## Summary

This Enterprise-only feature automatically fetches a favicon for
companies created with a domain, and adds a batch task to backfill
missing avatars for existing companies. The flow only targets companies
that do not already have an attached avatar, so existing avatars are
left untouched.


## Demo 



https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d050334e-769f-4e46-b6e7-f7423727a192



## What changed

- Added `Avatar::AvatarFromFaviconJob` to build a Google favicon URL
from the company domain and fetch it through `Avatar::AvatarFromUrlJob`
- Triggered favicon fetching from `Company` with `after_create_commit`
- Added `Companies::FetchAvatarsJob` to batch existing companies that
are missing avatars
- Added `companies:fetch_missing_avatars` under `enterprise/lib/tasks`
- Kept the company-specific implementation inside the Enterprise
boundary
- Stubbed the new favicon request in unrelated specs that now hit this
callback indirectly
- Updated a couple of CI-sensitive specs that were failing due to
callback side effects / reload-safe exception assertions

## How to verify

1. Create a company in Enterprise with a valid domain and no avatar.
2. Confirm that a favicon-based avatar gets attached shortly after
creation.
3. Create another company with a domain and an avatar already attached.
4. Confirm that the existing avatar is not replaced.
5. Run `companies:fetch_missing_avatars`.
6. Confirm that existing companies without avatars get one, while
companies that already have avatars remain unchanged.

## Notes

- This change does not refresh or overwrite existing company avatars
- Favicon fetching only runs for companies with a present domain
- The branch includes the latest `develop`

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2026-03-05 18:51:28 -08:00
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 374d2258c7 fix: captain talking over support agent (#13673) 2026-03-03 16:13:34 +05:30
7c60ad9e28 feat: include contact verified status with each tool call (#13663)
Co-authored-by: aakashb95 <aakashbakhle@gmail.com>
2026-02-26 16:16:33 +05:30
b98c614669 feat: add campaign context to Captain v2 prompts (#13644)
Co-authored-by: Aakash Bakhle <48802744+aakashb95@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-02-25 18:33:37 +05:30
Aakash BakhleandGitHub 6e397c7571 fix: default model for captain assistant (#13496) 2026-02-10 14:53:53 +05:30
04b2901e1f feat: Conversation workflows(EE) (#13040)
We are expanding Chatwoot’s automation capabilities by
introducing **Conversation Workflows**, a dedicated section in settings
where teams can configure rules that govern how conversations are closed
and what information agents must fill before resolving. This feature
helps teams enforce data consistency, collect structured resolution
information, and ensure downstream reporting is accurate.

Instead of having auto‑resolution buried inside Account Settings, we
introduced a new sidebar item:
- Auto‑resolve conversations (existing behaviour)
- Required attributes on resolution (new)

This groups all conversation‑closing logic into a single place.

#### Required Attributes on Resolve

Admins can now pick which custom conversation attributes must be filled
before an agent can resolve a conversation.

**How it works**

- Admin selects one or more attributes from the list of existing
conversation level custom attributes.
- These selected attributes become mandatory during resolution.
- List all the attributes configured via Required Attributes (Text,
Number, Link, Date, List, Checkbox)
- When an agent clicks Resolve Conversation:
If attributes already have values → the conversation resolves normally.
If attributes are missing → a modal appears prompting the agent to fill
them.

<img width="1554" height="1282" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 42
23@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4cd5d6e1-abe8-4999-accd-d4a08913b373"
/>


#### Custom Attributes Integration

On the Custom Attributes page, we will surfaced indicators showing how
each attribute is being used.

Each attribute will show badges such as:

- Resolution → used in the required‑on‑resolve workflow

- Pre‑chat form → already existing

<img width="2390" height="1822" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 43
42@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b92a6eb7-7f6c-40e6-bf23-6a5310f2d9c5"
/>


#### Admin Flow

- Navigate to Settings → Conversation Workflows.
- Under Required attributes on resolve, click Add Required Attribute.
- Pick from the dropdown list of conversation attributes.
- Save changes.

Agents will now be prompted automatically whenever they resolve.

<img width="2434" height="872" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 44 42@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/632fc0e5-767c-4a1c-8cf4-ffe3d058d319"
/>



#### NOTES
- The Required Attributes on Resolve modal should only appear when
values are missing.
- Required attributes must block the resolution action until satisfied.
- Bulk‑resolve actions should follow the same rules — any conversation
missing attributes cannot be bulk‑resolved, rest will be resolved, show
a notification that the resolution cannot be done.
- API resolution does not respect the attributes.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
2026-01-27 11:36:20 +04:00
Shivam MishraandGitHub 566de02385 feat: allow agent bot and captain responses to reset waiting since (#13181)
When AgentBot responds to customer messages, the `waiting_since`
timestamp is not reset, causing inflated reply time metrics when a human
agent eventually responds. This results in inaccurate reporting that
incorrectly includes periods when customers were satisfied with bot
responses.

### Timeline from Production Data

```
Dec 12, 16:20:14 - Customer sends message (ID: 368451924)
                   ↓ waiting_since = Dec 12, 16:20:14

Dec 12, 16:20:17 - AgentBot replies (ID: 368451960)
                   ↓ waiting_since STILL = Dec 12, 16:20:14 
                   ↓ (Bot response doesn't clear it)

14-day gap        - Customer satisfied, no messages
                   ↓ waiting_since STILL = Dec 12, 16:20:14 

Dec 26, 22:25:45 - Customer sends new message (ID: 383522275)
                   ↓ waiting_since STILL = Dec 12, 16:20:14 
                   ↓ (New message doesn't reset it)

Dec 26-27         - More AgentBot interactions
                   ↓ waiting_since STILL = Dec 12, 16:20:14 

Dec 27, 07:36:53 - Human agent finally replies (ID: 383799517)
                   ↓ Reply time calculated: 1,268,404 seconds
                   ↓ = 14.7 DAYS 
```
## Root Cause

The core issues is in `app/models/message.rb`, where **AgentBot messages
does not clear `waiting_since`** - The `human_response?` method only
returns true for `User` senders, so bot replies never trigger the
clearing logic. This means once `waiting_since` is set, it stays set
even when customers send new messages after receiving bot responses.

The solution is to simply reset `waiting_since` **after a bot has
responded**. This ensures reply time metrics reflect actual human agent
response times, not bot-handled periods.

### What triggers the rest

This is an intentional "gotcha", that only `AgentBot` and
`Captain::Assistant` messages trigger the waiting time reset. Automation
and campaign messages maintain current behavior (no reset). This is
because interactive bot assistants provide conversational help that
might satisfy customers. Automation and campaigns are one-way
communications and shouldn't affect waiting time calculations.

## Related Work

Extends PR #11787 which fixed `waiting_since` clearing on conversation
resolution. This PR addresses the bot interaction scenario which was not
covered by that fix.

Scripts to clean data:
https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/bd133208e219d0ab52fbfdf03036c48a
2026-01-07 13:57:43 +05:30
Sojan JoseandGitHub d2ba9a2ad3 feat(enterprise): add voice conference API (#13064)
The backend APIs for the voice call channel 
ref: #11602
2025-12-15 15:11:59 -08:00
Shivam MishraandGitHub 0d8e249fe4 feat: include chatwoot metadata with each tool call (#12907) 2025-12-10 15:25:18 +05:30
Vishnu NarayananandGitHub 08b9134486 feat: speed up circleci and github actions (#12849)
# 🚀 Speed up CI/CD test execution with parallelization

## TL;DR

- **Problem**: CI tests took 36-42 minutes per commit, blocking
developer workflow
- **Solution**: Implemented 16-way parallelization + optimized slow
tests + fixed Docker builds
- **Impact**: **1,358 hours/month saved** (7.7 FTE) across GitHub
Actions + CircleCI
  - GitHub Actions tests: 36m → 7m (82% faster)
  - Backend tests: 28m → 4m (87% faster with 16-way parallelization)
  - CircleCI tests: 42m → 7m (83% faster)
  - Docker builds: 34m → 5m (85% faster)
- **Result**: 5-6x faster feedback loops, 100% success rate on recent
runs

---

## Problem
CI test runs were taking **36-42 minutes per commit push** (GitHub
Actions: 36m avg, CircleCI: 42m P95), creating a significant bottleneck
in the development workflow.

## Solution
This PR comprehensively restructures both CI test pipelines to leverage
16-way parallelization and optimize test execution, reducing test
runtime from **36-42 minutes to ~7 minutes** - an **82% improvement**.

---

## 📊 Real Performance Data (Both CI Systems)

### GitHub Actions

#### Before (develop branch - 5 recent runs)
```
Individual runs: 35m 29s | 36m 1s | 40m 0s | 36m 4s | 34m 18s
Average: 36m 22s
```

#### After (feat/speed_up_ci branch - 9 successful runs)
```
Individual runs: 6m 39s | 7m 2s | 6m 53s | 6m 26s | 6m 52s | 6m 42s | 6m 45s | 6m 40s | 6m 37s
Average: 6m 44s
Range: 6m 26s - 7m 2s
```

**Improvement**:  **81.5% faster** (29m 38s saved per run)


#### Backend Tests Specific Impact
With 16-way parallelization, backend tests show dramatic improvement:
- **Before**: 27m 52s (sequential execution)
- **After**: 3m 44s (longest of 16 parallel runners)
  - Average across runners: 2m 30s
  - Range: 1m 52s - 3m 44s
- **Improvement**:  **86.6% faster** (24m 8s saved)
---

### CircleCI

#### Before (develop branch - CircleCI Insights)
```
Duration (P95): 41m 44s
Runs: 70 (last 30 days)
Success Rate: 84%
```

#### After (feat/speed_up_ci branch - Last 2 pipeline runs)
```
Run 1 (1h ago): 7m 7s
  ├─ lint: 4m 12s
  ├─ frontend-tests: 5m 36s
  ├─ backend-tests: 6m 23s
  ├─ coverage: 20s
  └─ build: 1s

Run 2 (2h ago): 7m 21s
  ├─ lint: 3m 47s
  ├─ frontend-tests: 5m 4s
  ├─ backend-tests: 6m 33s
  ├─ coverage: 19s
  └─ build: 1s

Average: 7m 14s
Success Rate: 100% 
```

**Improvement**:  **82.7% faster** (34m 30s saved per run)

---

## 🐳 Related Work: Docker Build Optimization

As part of the broader CI/CD optimization effort, Docker build
performance was improved separately in **PR #12859**.

### Docker Build Fix (Merged Separately)
**Problem**: Multi-architecture Docker builds (amd64/arm64) were taking
~34 minutes due to cache thrashing

**Solution**: Added separate cache scopes per platform in
`.github/workflows/test_docker_build.yml`:
```yaml
cache-from: type=gha,scope=${{ matrix.platform }}
cache-to: type=gha,mode=max,scope=${{ matrix.platform }}
```

**Results** (measured from November 2025 data):
- **Before**: 34.2 minutes/run average (15,547 minutes across 454 runs)
- **After**: 5 minutes/run
- **Improvement**: 85% faster, 29.2 minutes saved per run
- **Frequency**: 25.2 runs/day
- **Monthly savings**: **369 hours** (46 developer-days)

This prevents different architectures from invalidating each other's
caches and contributes 27% of total CI/CD time savings.

---

## 🎯 Key Findings

### Both CI Systems Now Perform Similarly
- **CircleCI**: 7m 14s average
- **GitHub Actions**: 6m 44s average
- **Difference**: Only 30 seconds apart (remarkably consistent!)

### Combined Performance
- **Average improvement across both systems**: **82.1% faster**
- **Time saved per commit**: ~32 minutes
- **Developer feedback loop**: 36-42 minutes → ~7 minutes

### Success Rate Improvement
- **CircleCI**: 84% → 100% (on feat/speed_up_ci branch)
- **GitHub Actions**: 100% (all 9 recent runs successful)
- Fixed all test isolation issues that caused intermittent failures

### Impact at Scale (Based on Real November 2025 Data)
- **CI runs per day**: **30.8 average** for tests, **25.2** for Docker
builds
  - Measured from GitHub Actions Usage Metrics (18 days)
  - Weekdays: 38-54 runs/day
  - Peak: up to 68 runs in a single day
- **This PR (test suite only)**:
  - **Daily time saved**: **15.3 hours** (GitHub Actions + CircleCI)
- **Monthly time saved**: **458 hours** (57 developer-days) on GitHub
Actions
  - Additional **531 hours** (66 developer-days) on CircleCI
- **Combined with Docker optimization** (PR #12859): **1,358
hours/month** (see Summary)
- **Developer experience**: 5-6x faster iteration cycles

---

## Code Changes

### 1. **Backend Test Parallelization (16x)**
Both CI systems now use 16-way parallelization with identical
round-robin test distribution:

```bash
# Distribute tests evenly across 16 runners
SPEC_FILES=($(find spec -name '*_spec.rb' | sort))
for i in "${!SPEC_FILES[@]}"; do
  if [ $(( i % 16 )) -eq $RUNNER_INDEX ]; then
    TESTS="$TESTS ${SPEC_FILES[$i]}"
  fi
done
```

**Why round-robin over timing-based?**
- CircleCI's timing-based splitting grouped similar tests together
- This caused race conditions with OAuth callback tests (Linear,
Shopify, Notion)
- Round-robin ensures even distribution and better test isolation
- Both CI systems now behave identically

### 2. **Frontend Test Optimization**
Enabled Vitest thread parallelization in `vite.config.ts`:

```typescript
pool: 'threads',
poolOptions: {
  threads: {
    singleThread: false,
  },
},
```

### 3. **CI Architecture Restructuring**
Split monolithic CI jobs into parallel stages:
- **Lint** (backend + frontend) - runs independently for fast feedback
- **Frontend tests** - runs in parallel with backend
- **Backend tests** - 16-way parallelized across runners
- **Coverage** - aggregates results from test jobs
- **Build** (CircleCI only) - final job for GitHub status check
compatibility

### 4. **Critical Test Optimization**
**report_builder_spec.rb**: Changed `before` to `before_all`
- Reduced execution time from **19 minutes to 1.2 minutes** (16x
speedup)
- Setup now runs once instead of 21 times
- Single biggest performance improvement after parallelization

---

## Test Stability Fixes (10 spec files)

Parallelization exposed latent test isolation issues that were fixed:

### Object Identity Comparisons (6 files)
Tests were comparing Ruby object instances instead of IDs:
- `spec/models/integrations/hook_spec.rb` - Use `.pluck(:id)` for
comparisons
- `spec/enterprise/models/captain/scenario_spec.rb` - Compare IDs
instead of objects
- `spec/models/notification_spec.rb` - Compare IDs for sort order
validation
- `spec/models/account_spec.rb` - Compare IDs in scope queries
- `spec/services/widget/token_service_spec.rb` - Compare class names
instead of class objects
- `spec/models/concerns/avatarable_shared.rb` - Use `respond_to` checks
for ActiveStorage

### Database Query Caching
- `spec/jobs/delete_object_job_spec.rb` - Added `.reload` to force fresh
database queries

### Test Expectations Timing
- `spec/jobs/mutex_application_job_spec.rb` - Removed flaky unlock
expectation after error block
  - Related to original PR #8770
- Expectation after error block never executes in parallel environments

### Timezone Handling
- `spec/mailers/account_notification_mailer_spec.rb` - Fixed date
parsing at timezone boundaries
  - Changed test time from 23:59:59Z to 12:00:00Z

### Test Setup
- `spec/builders/v2/report_builder_spec.rb` - Optimized with
`before_all`

---

##  CircleCI GitHub Integration Fix

### Problem
GitHub PR checks were stuck on "Waiting for status" even when all
CircleCI jobs passed. GitHub was expecting a job named `build` but the
workflow only had a workflow named "build".

### Solution
Added an explicit `build` job that runs after all other jobs:

```yaml
build:
  steps:
    - run:
        name: Legacy build aggregator
        command: echo "All main jobs passed"
  requires:
    - lint
    - coverage
```

This ensures GitHub's required status checks work correctly.


---

##  Testing & Validation

-  **GitHub Actions**: 9 successful runs, consistent 6m 26s - 7m 2s
runtime
-  **CircleCI**: 2 successful runs, consistent 7m 7s - 7m 21s runtime
-  Both CI systems produce identical, consistent results
-  GitHub PR status checks complete correctly
-  Success rate improved from 84% to 100% (recent runs)
-  No test regressions introduced
-  All flaky tests fixed (callback controllers, mutex jobs, etc.)

---

## 🎉 Summary

This PR delivers an **82% improvement** in test execution time across
both CI systems:

- **GitHub Actions tests**: 36m → 7m (81.5% faster)
- Backend tests specifically: 28m → 4m (86.6% faster)
- **CircleCI tests**: 42m → 7m (82.7% faster)
- **Developer feedback loop**: 5-6x faster
- **Test stability**: 84% → 100% success rate

### 📊 Total CI/CD Impact (All Optimizations)

Based on real November 2025 data, combining this PR with Docker build
optimization (PR #12859):

**Monthly Time Savings**: **1,358 hours/month** = **170
developer-days/month** = **7.7 FTE**

| System | Runs/Day | Before | After | Savings | Monthly Impact |
|--------|----------|---------|--------|---------|----------------|
| **GitHub Actions Tests** | 30.8 | 36.5m | 6.7m | 29.8m/run | 458 hrs
(34%) |
| **GitHub Actions Docker** | 25.2 | 34.2m | 5.0m | 29.2m/run | 369 hrs
(27%) |
| **CircleCI Tests** | 30.8 | 41.7m | 7.2m | 34.5m/run | 531 hrs (39%) |

*Data source: GitHub Actions Usage Metrics (November 2025, 18 days),
CircleCI Insights (30 days)*

The combined optimizations save the equivalent of **nearly 8 full-time
developers** worth of CI waiting time every month, significantly
improving developer velocity and reducing CI costs. All test isolation
issues exposed by parallelization have been fixed, ensuring reliable and
consistent results across both CI platforms.

woot woot !!!

---------
2025-11-19 15:32:48 +05:30
1fbdd68222 feat: Add company auto-association for contacts (CW-5726 Part 2) (#12711)
## Description

Implements real-time company auto-association for contacts based on
email domains. This is **Part 2** of the company model production
rollout (CW-5726).

**Task:**
- When a contact is created with a business email, automatically create
and associate a company from the email domain
- When a contact is updated with an email for the first time (email was
previously nil), associate with a company
- Preserve existing company associations when email changes to avoid
user confusion
- Skip free email providers and disposable domains

**Dependencies:**
⚠️ Requires PR #12657 (Part 1: Backfill migration) to be merged first

**Linear ticket:**
[CW-5726](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5726/company-model-setting-it-up-on-production)

## Type of change

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

- Service specs: Tests business email detection, company creation,
association logic, edge cases (existing companies, free emails, nil
emails)
- Integration specs: Tests full callback flow for contact create/update
scenarios
- All tests passing: 10 examples, 0 failures
- RuboCop: 0 offenses

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules (PR #12657 pending)

---------

Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2025-11-03 20:36:13 +05:30
38af08534c fix: Captain response builder not getting triggered (#12729)
## Summary
- Fix captain response builder not getting triggered for cases where
responses are created as completed.

## Testing Instructions 
- Test articles with firecrawl
- Test articles without firecrawl
- Test PDF documents

---------

Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
2025-10-28 18:31:08 -07:00
Vinay KeerthiandGitHub 170ea7691f feat: Add company model and API with tests (#12548)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

* add Company model with validations for name, domain, description and
  avatar
* Add database migration fo
* Implement endpoints for company CRUD operations
* Add optional company relationship for contacts
* Add test for models, controllers, factories and policies
* Add authorization policies restricting delete to admins
* support JSON API responses
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.

Fixes #(cw-5650)

## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update

## How Has This Been Tested?

Tests are implemented using `RSpec`

```
$ bundle exec rails db:migrate
$ bundle exec rspec spec/models/company_spec.rb spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller_spec.rb
```

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2025-10-08 07:53:43 -07:00
9fb0dfa4a7 feat: Add UI for custom tools (#12585)
### Tools list

<img width="2316" height="666" alt="CleanShot 2025-10-03 at 20 42 41@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ccbffd16-804d-4eb8-9c64-2d1cfd407e4e"
/>

### Tools form 

<img width="2294" height="2202" alt="CleanShot 2025-10-03 at 20 43
05@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9f49aa09-75a1-4585-a09d-837ca64139b8"
/>

## Response

<img width="800" height="2144" alt="CleanShot 2025-10-03 at 20 45 56@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b0c3c899-6050-4c51-baed-c8fbec5aae61"
/>

---------

Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranavrajs@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
2025-10-06 09:05:54 -07:00
8bbb8ba5a4 feat(ee): Captain custom http tools (#12584)
To test this out, use the following PR:
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/12585

---------

Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranavrajs@gmail.com>
2025-10-06 07:53:15 -07:00
239c4dcb91 feat: MFA (#12290)
## Linear:
- https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/486

## Description
This PR implements Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) support for user
accounts, enhancing security by requiring a second form of verification
during login. The feature adds TOTP (Time-based One-Time Password)
authentication with QR code generation and backup codes for account
recovery.

## Type of change

- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

- Added comprehensive RSpec tests for MFA controller functionality
- Tested MFA setup flow with QR code generation
- Verified OTP validation and backup code generation
- Tested login flow with MFA enabled/disabled

## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2025-09-18 20:19:24 +05:30
Shivam MishraandGitHub 7a453f50f4 feat: update users on SAML setup and destroy [CW-2958][CW-5612] (#12346) 2025-09-15 21:20:22 +05:30
3ad2c33220 chore: Update translations (#12371)
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranavrajs@gmail.com>
2025-09-12 14:33:40 -07:00
PranavandGitHub 16b98b6017 fix: Add account_id to the query to force using a better index (#12420)
I've added the account_id filter to the
`get_agent_ids_over_assignment_limit` method. This optimization will
help the query leverage the existing composite index
`conv_acid_inbid_stat_asgnid_idx (account_id, inbox_id, status,
assignee_id)` for better performance.

**Before:**
```sql
HashAggregate (cost=224238.12..224256.27 rows=484 width=4)
Group Key: assignee_id
Filter: (count(*) >= 10)
-> Index Scan using index_conversations_on_inbox_id on conversations (cost=0.44..223963.67 rows=54891 width=4)
Index Cond: (inbox_id = ???)
Filter: (status = 0)
```

**After:**
```sql
GroupAggregate (cost=0.44..5688.30 rows=476 width=4)
Group Key: assignee_id
Filter: (count(*) >= 10)
-> Index Only Scan using conv_acid_inbid_stat_asgnid_idx on conversations (cost=0.44..5640.81 rows=5928 width=4)
Index Cond: ((account_id = ??) AND (inbox_id = ??) AND (status = 0))
```
2025-09-11 22:27:38 -07:00
Shivam MishraandGitHub 33058b5f3f feat: add saml model & controller [CW-2958] (#12289)
This PR adds the foundation for account-level SAML SSO configuration in
Chatwoot Enterprise. It introduces a new `AccountSamlSettings` model and
management API that allows accounts to configure their own SAML identity
providers independently, this also includes the certificate generation
flow

The implementation includes a new controller
(`Api::V1::Accounts::SamlSettingsController`) that provides CRUD
operations for SAML configuration

The feature is properly gated behind the 'saml' feature flag and
includes administrator-only authorization via Pundit policies.
2025-09-03 13:30:42 -07:00
e863a52262 chore: Update account deletion email copy (#12317)
Update the email copies for account deletion emails 

## Manual Deletion 

<img width="1378" height="678" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-29 at 2 41 40 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/63d7ad97-ad51-4a8b-9ef3-d427fa467f8a"
/>

## Inactive Deletion

<img width="2946" height="1808" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bb50d08c-8701-4f93-af29-0b1d948a4009"
/>

---------

Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2025-08-31 16:01:41 +02:00
Tanmay Deep SharmaandGitHub 1ba00075ce feat: Add BE changes for captain pdf support for faq generation (#12113) 2025-08-27 20:31:22 +05:30
ad90deb709 feat: Add agent capacity controllers (#12200)
## Linear reference:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4649/re-imagine-assignments

## Description
This PR introduces the foundation for Assignment V2 system by
implementing agent_capacity and their association with inboxes and
users.

## Type of change

- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Test Coverage:
-  Controller specs for assignment policies CRUD operations
-  Enterprise-specific specs for balanced assignment order
-  Model specs for community/enterprise separation

## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
2025-08-26 19:12:58 -07:00
Sojan JoseandGitHub d48503bdcf feat(voice): Improved voice call creation flow [EE] (#12268)
This PR improves the voice call creation flow by simplifying
configuration and automating setup with Twilio APIs.

references: #11602 , #11481 

## Key changes

- Removed the requirement for twiml_app_sid – provisioning is now
automated through APIs.
- Auto-configured webhook URLs for:
  - Voice number callbacks
  - Status callbacks
  -  twiML callbacks
- Disabled business hours, help center, and related options until voice
inbox is fully supported.
- Added a configuration tab in the voice inbox to display the required
Twilio URLs (to make verification easier in Twilio console).


## Test Cases
- Provisioning
- Create a new voice inbox → verify that Twilio app provisioning happens
automatically.
  - Verify twiML callback 
- Webhook configuration
- Check that both voice number callback and status callback URLs are
auto-populated in Twilio.
- Disabled features
- Confirm that business hours and help center options are
hidden/disabled for voice inbox.
- Configuration tab
- Open the voice inbox configuration tab → verify that the displayed
Twilio URLs match what’s set in Twilio.
2025-08-22 13:38:23 +02:00
341487b93e feat: Add assignment policies controllers with jbuilder views (#12199)
## Linear reference:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4649/re-imagine-assignments

## Description
This PR introduces the foundation for Assignment V2 system by
implementing assignment policies and their association with inboxes.
Assignment policies allow configuring how conversations are distributed
among agents, with support for different assignment orders (round_robin
in community, balanced in enterprise) and conversation prioritization
strategies

Fixes # (issue)

## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update

## How Has This Been Tested?

Test Coverage:
-  Controller specs for assignment policies CRUD operations
-  Enterprise-specific specs for balanced assignment order
-  Model specs for community/enterprise separation

Manual Testing:
1. Create assignment policy: POST
/api/v1/accounts/{id}/assignment_policies
2. List policies: GET /api/v1/accounts/{id}/assignment_policies
3. Assign policy to inbox: POST
/api/v1/accounts/{id}/assignment_policies/{id}/inboxes
4. View inbox policy: GET
/api/v1/accounts/{id}/inboxes/{id}/assignment_policy
5. Verify community edition ignores "balanced" assignment order
6. Verify enterprise edition supports both "round_robin" and "balanced"

- testing the flows after enterprise folder deletion

## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranavrajs@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
2025-08-18 19:15:21 -07:00
c6be04cdc1 feat: scenario agents & runner (#11944)
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-08-14 12:39:21 +05:30
420be64c45 chore: Automate SSL with Cloudflare (#12021)
This PR adds support for automatic SSL issuance using Cloudflare when a
custom domain is updated.

- Introduced a cloudflare configuration. If present, the system will
attempt to issue an SSL certificate via Cloudflare whenever a custom
domain is added or changed.
- SSL verification is handled using an HTTP challenge.
- The job will store the HTTP challenge response provided by Cloudflare
and serve it under the /.well-known/cf path automatically.

How to test:

- Create a Cloudflare zone for your domain and copy the Zone ID.
- Generate a Cloudflare API token with the required SSL certificate
permissions.
- Set the Fallback Origin under SSL -> Custom HostName to the Chatwoot
installation.
- Add or update a custom domain and verify that the SSL certificate is
automatically issued.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2025-07-24 13:09:06 +04:00
b71a0da10d feat: scenario tools [CW-4597] (#11908)
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2025-07-21 16:42:12 +05:30
Tanmay Deep SharmaGitHubMuhsin KelothCopilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>iamsivinSivin VargheseSojan Jose
61d10044a0 feat: Whatsapp embedded signup (#11612)
## Description

This PR introduces WhatsApp Embedded Signup functionality, enabling
users to connect their WhatsApp Business accounts through Meta's
streamlined OAuth flow without manual webhook configuration. This
significantly improves the user experience by automating the entire
setup process.

**Key Features:**

- Embedded signup flow using Facebook SDK and Meta's OAuth 2.0
- Automatic webhook registration and phone number configuration
- Enhanced provider selection UI with card-based design
- Real-time progress tracking during signup process
- Comprehensive error handling and user feedback


## Required Configuration

The following environment variables must be configured by administrators
before this feature can be used:
Super Admin Configuration (via
super_admin/app_config?config=whatsapp_embedded)

- `WHATSAPP_APP_ID`: The Facebook App ID for WhatsApp Business API
integration
- `WHATSAPP_CONFIGURATION_ID`: The Configuration ID for WhatsApp
Embedded Signup flow (obtained from Meta Developer Portal)
- `WHATSAPP_APP_SECRET`: The App Secret for WhatsApp Embedded Signup
flow (required for token exchange)
![Screenshot 2025-06-09 at 11 21
08 AM](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1615fb0d-27fc-4d9e-b193-9be7894ea93a)


## How Has This Been Tested?

#### Backend Tests (RSpec):

- Authentication validation for embedded signup endpoints
- Authorization code validation and error handling
- Missing business parameter validation
- Proper response format for configuration endpoint
- Unauthorized access prevention

#### Manual Test Cases:

- Complete embedded signup flow (happy path)
- Provider selection UI navigation
- Facebook authentication popup handling
- Error scenarios (cancelled auth, invalid business data, API failures)
- Configuration presence/absence behavior

## Related Screenshots:

![Screenshot 2025-06-09 at 7 48
18 PM](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/34001425-df11-4d78-9424-334461e3178f)
![Screenshot 2025-06-09 at 7 48
22 PM](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c09f4964-3aba-4c39-9285-d1e8e37d0e33)
![Screenshot 2025-06-09 at 7 48
32 PM](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a34d5382-7a91-4e1c-906e-dc2d570c864a)
![Screenshot 2025-06-09 at 10 43
05 AM](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a15840d8-8223-4513-82e4-b08f23c95927)
![Screenshot 2025-06-09 at 10 42
56 AM](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8c345022-38b5-44c4-aba2-0cda81389c69)


Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-2131/spec-for-whatsapp-cloud-channels-sign-in-with-facebook

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2025-07-14 21:37:06 -07:00
93f18315cc feat: add Captain::Scenario Model and API [CW-4597] (#11907)
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2025-07-14 16:12:38 +05:30
Vishnu NarayananandGitHub 20dc4f169c fix: Do not enforce max_limits if inbox_auto_assignment is disabled (#11849)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

The `auto_assignment` max_limits were being enforced even if the inbox
level `auto_assign` feature was disabled. This was because the
enterprise method was not verifying the feature status before returning
the available agents.

## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)


## How Has This Been Tested?
- Tested locally
- Added Specs

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2025-07-01 15:10:39 -07:00
b7f2c151bf feat: Voice channel creation Flow (#11775)
This PR introduces a new channel type for voice conversations.

ref: #11481 

## Changes

- Add database migration for channel_voice table with phone_number and
provider_config
- Create Channel::Voice model with E.164 phone number validation and
Twilio config validation
- Add voice channel association to Account model
- Extend inbox helpers and types to support voice channels
- Add voice channel setup UI with Twilio configuration form
- Include voice channel in channel factory and list components
- Add API routes and store actions for voice channel creation
- Add comprehensive translations for voice channel management

---------

Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
2025-06-25 14:21:03 -07:00