# Pull Request Template
## Description
Fixes:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7167/label-suggestions-bad-ux
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
When a new account finishes onboarding we want to land them on a
dashboard with a working web widget already configured, branded, named,
and assigned to them, instead of an empty inbox list. This PR adds the
services that produce that widget. **No user-visible change yet:** the
services are dormant until the trigger and background job are wired up
in the follow-up PR.
## Context
Milestone 1 added `Account::BrandingEnrichmentJob`, which calls
context.dev during signup and stores brand data on
`account.custom_attributes['brand_info']`, plus the new onboarding form
that captures `domain`, `name`, `industry`, etc. Milestone 2 starts
using that data, and the first thing we want is a web widget
materialized automatically. Splitting the service layer from the
orchestration plumbing (Redis key, `onboarding_step` extension,
controller wiring, ActionCable) keeps this diff focused and lets the
LLM/widget logic merge independently.
## How to test
Run against an existing account that already has `brand_info` populated.
```ruby
account = Account.find(<account_id>)
user = account.administrators.first
inbox = WidgetCreationService.new(account, user).perform
inbox.channel.widget_color # color from brand_info, or '#1f93ff'
inbox.channel.welcome_title # brand_info[:title], or account.name
inbox.channel.welcome_tagline # LLM tagline (Enterprise + system key set),
# else brand_info[:slogan]/[:description]/nil
inbox.inbox_members.pluck(:user_id)
```
Toggle `InstallationConfig['CAPTAIN_OPEN_AI_API_KEY']` to flip between
LLM and brand-text tagline paths. To verify failure isolation, raise
inside `Captain::Llm::WidgetTaglineService#perform` and confirm widget
creation still succeeds with the fallback tagline.
Removes sentry flooding of unnecessary rubyllm logs of wrong API key.
Logs only system api key error since it would be P0.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
captain decides if conversation should be resolved or open
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/AI-91/make-captain-resolution-time-configurable
Update: Added 2 entries in reporting events:
`conversation_captain_handoff` and `conversation_captain_resolved`
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
LLM call decides that conversation is resolved, drops a private note
<img width="1228" height="438" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fb2cf1e9-4b2b-458b-a1e2-45c53d6a0158"
/>
LLM call decides conversation is still open as query was not resolved
<img width="1215" height="573" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2d1d5322-f567-487e-954e-11ab0798d11c"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
